Youts Sue Trump Over Climate (scam) Executive Orders

By William Teach May 31, 2025 – 7:00 am

And, by youts, we all know this means many big monied climate cult groups astroturfing this

Young people sue Donald Trump over climate change

A group of young people — as young as 7 and as old as 25 — are suing the Trump administration to stop its assault on renewable energy and climate action.

Executive orders President Donald Trump signed to promote fossil fuels amount to an “unconstitutional” overreach of power, they allege in a complaint filed Thursday at a US District Court in Montana. The 22 plaintiffs also claim that by increasing pollution and denying climate science, the president’s actions violate their Fifth Amendment rights to life and liberty.

It’s the latest high-profile case brought against governments by youth concerned about how fossil fuel pollution and climate change poses risks to their health and ability to thrive as they grow up.

Two brothers, aged 11 and 7 and named “J.K.” and “N.K.” in the suit, “were born into climate change-induced smoke seasons that did not exist for older generations and which compromise their health,” the complaint says. (big snip)

The plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief to block implementation of those executive orders and to declare them unconstitutional. They also claim that Trump lacks the authority to erode environmental protections passed by Congress under the Clean Air Act. The administration’s efforts to impede scientific research and remove climate information from federal websites amounts to “censorship” and denies plaintiffs access to resources they might otherwise be able to use to minimize risks they face from climate change, the suit alleges.

Will the defense lawyers or any involved judges ask if the kiddies have forgone the use of fossil fuels in their own lives? Also, have the lawyers who put this together actually read the 5th, and know what it means?

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Yeah, that’s all about criminal prosecutions, not a bunch of cultists trying to say a tiny increase in the Earth’s temperature over 175 years from the same fossil fuels the youts won’t stop using themselves violates their 5th amendment rights. It’s all very silly.

It’s also very silly, because these same youts are happy to take Other People’s property, liberty, and I bet are supporters of abortion.

Read: Youts Sue Trump Over Climate (scam) Executive Orders »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

CNN Says “Investigators” Claim Migrant Who Threatened To Kill Trump Was Set Up

By William Teach May 31, 2025 – 6:45 am

See if you see what I see. Or, better, what I’m not seeing

Exclusive: Kristi Noem said a migrant threatened to kill Trump. Investigators think he was set up

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem posted a stunning allegation on Wednesday: A undocumented migrant sent a letter threatening to kill President Donald Trump, promising to “self deport” after the assassination.

“Thanks to our ICE officers, this illegal alien who threatened to assassinate President Trump is behind bars,” Noem wrote in a social media post that included the letter and a picture of the man arrested. DHS also sent out a press release.

The story was picked up by multiple news outlets. The president’s allies used it to highlight what they see as the dangers of undocumented migrants and the work of the administration to boot them out of the country.

The problem: Investigators believe the migrant was a victim of a setup.

Law enforcement believes the man, Ramon Morales Reyes, 54, never wrote the letter, which was sent to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement office and other law enforcement agencies, several sources familiar with the matter told CNN.

Instead, investigators suspect the letter was intended to benefit a separate individual who is currently awaiting trial in a robbery and assault case in which Reyes is a victim. They do not consider the threat to be credible.

Who are these investigators? Which law enforcement?

A high-level law enforcement official who was briefed on the case told CNN that law enforcement determined Reyes did not write the letter when they interviewed him regarding the threat. Federal officials asked for a handwriting sample from Reyes and determined his handwriting and the threatening letter didn’t match.

Further, a source told CNN law enforcement reviewed jail calls made by a person they believe played a role in penning the letters. The source said the person asked about specific addresses, one of which received the letter.

Is there one source that is named? They do not even name the agencies. That’s not to say that the illegal wasn’t set up. Hey, I think it could be true. But, this is the problem with the Credentialed Media: anonymous sources out the wazoo in order to Get Trump.

A spokesperson for the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Wisconsin told CNN they have “no charged matter involving this individual,” and declined to comment further.

“Morales entered the U.S. illegally at least nine times between 1998-2005,” DHS said in its original press release on Reyes’ arrest. “His criminal record includes arrests for felony hit and run, criminal damage to property and disorderly conduct with a domestic abuse modifier.”

So, in order to Get Trump, CNN is trying to prop up this scumbag? Really? And, what if it is a different illegal? Is CNN OK with that?

Read: CNN Says “Investigators” Claim Migrant Who Threatened To Kill Trump Was Set Up »

Posted in Illegal Immigration, Wonky Media | 5 Comments | Trackback URL

Fossil Fuels Companies Sued Over Death Of Person On Hot Day

By William Teach May 30, 2025 – 4:39 pm

I doubt this will go far, but, the cult will keep trying, and I bet they now file more of these nuisance suits

Oil companies face a wrongful death suit tied to climate change

A lawsuit filed in a Washington state court claims oil companies are responsible for the death of a woman in Seattle during a record-breaking heat wave several years ago.

The case marks the first time oil companies have been sued over the death of a person in a “climate disaster,” according to the Center for Climate Integrity, an advocacy group.

Julie Leon, 65, was found unresponsive in her car on June 28, 2021 — the hottest day in Seattle’s history. The temperature in the city that day peaked at 108 degrees Fahrenheit. By the time Leon died of hyperthermia, her internal temperature had risen to 110 degrees Fahrenheit, according to the lawsuit filed Thursday in King County Superior Court.

The suit names six oil companies, including ExxonMobil, BP and Chevron, that have allegedly known for decades that burning fossil fuels alters the Earth’s atmosphere, resulting in more extreme weather and the “foreseeable loss of human life.” But rather than warn the public, the suit says the oil companies deceived consumers about the risks.

“Defendants have known for all of Julie’s life that their affirmative misrepresentations and omissions would claim lives,” the lawsuit says. “Julie is a victim of Defendants’ conduct.”

Why did they wait almost four years to file the suit? If fossil fuels are so bad why was Ms. Leon in her car? Did it not have air conditioning? Why was she out and about?

In a rapid attribution study released days after the event, a team of scientists said the 2021 heatwave in the Pacific Northwest would have been “virtually impossible without human-caused climate change.”

In other words, they made some mule-fritters up, but, do they know what the actual temperatures were during the Medieval Warm Period? How about the Roman Warm Period? And others over the last 8,000 year? That would be necessary for comparison.

A lawyer for Chevron, Theodore Boutrous, criticized the lawsuit. “Exploiting a personal tragedy to promote politicized climate tort litigation is contrary to law, science, and common sense,” Boutrous said in a statement to NPR. “The court should add this far-fetched claim to the growing list of meritless climate lawsuits that state and federal courts have already dismissed.”

If it is not thrown out, and makes it through trial and the plaintiffs win, it will eventually die on appeal once it makes it out of the far-left Washington area. Right now, other than reimbursement for certain costs, such as medical and funeral, they have left damages open-ended, hoping the jury will reward them big time. But, more importantly, that the jury (a jury trial is demanded) find the companies liable in order to create more lawsuits, because you know there must be cult groups behind the suit.

Read: Fossil Fuels Companies Sued Over Death Of Person On Hot Day »

Posted in Global Warming | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach May 30, 2025 – 1:00 pm

…is an Evil fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Theo Spark, with a post on Gazans looting an aid station.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 13 Comments | Trackback URL

SCOTUS Rules Trump Admin Can Revoke Protected Status Migrants

By William Teach May 30, 2025 – 11:47 am

Apparently, it is a slapping wacko judges down day. I just mentioned on this morning for ruling the Trump admin cannot end the protections. Will this stop the wacko liberal federal judges?

Supreme Court lets Trump revoke safe-haven program for Cubans, Haitians, Venezuelans and Nicaraguans

The Supreme Court on May 30 said the Trump administration can revoke for now the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans living in the United States.

Two of the court’s three liberal justices – Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor – dissented.

Jackson wrote that the court “plainly botched” its assessment of whether the government or the 532,000 migrants would suffer the greater harm if their legal status ends while the administration’s mass termination of that status is being litigated.

The administration wants to cut short a humanitarian program that provided a two-year haven for migrants because of economic, security, political and health crises in their home countries.

Lawyers for the migrants said half a million people lawfully in the country will become subject to deportation, in what it called the “largest mass illegalization event in modern American history.”

As opposed to the largest mass importation in modern American history?

At the end of the day, the Trump admin could have just waited out the clock for when the 18 month TPC on each group ends, but, then a loopy lefty judge would rule that they cannot be repatriated. Will this SCOTUS ruling stop the lawfare? Doubtful.

Read: SCOTUS Rules Trump Admin Can Revoke Protected Status Migrants »

Posted in Illegal Immigration | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Democrat Tap Obese “Content Creator” To Woo Young Men Back

By William Teach May 30, 2025 – 10:30 am

The numbers weren’t that bad for the Democrats during the 2024 election when it comes to Gen Z males: 54% voted Kamala. But, that is not enough for Democrats. Also, Democrats are worried over whether this is a blip or a trend where the men vote more and more for Republicans. And there is a concern with Millennial and Gen X men. So, what to do?

(Outkick) It was a blowout across the board, and one of the issues is that Democrats simply don’t appeal to regular dudes.

It’s a problem they don’t seem to know how to fix.

Trashing men, calling all of the rapists and sexual abusers, denigrating, saying women do not need men, saying masculine things are stupid. Yeah, that worked.

You’d think Democrats would move back to the center, and just realize that regular dudes are simply that.

Regular people who mostly want to live life and be left alone.

A smart person would think that, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. Instead, Democrats continue to go full cringe. That includes popular Democrat activist Olivia Julianna talking about how much she loves “young men” and how they actually all agree with Democrat policies.

“I spend a lot of time on college campuses…I love young men. I love frat guys, and in that I realize, even the ones who identify as conservative are almost always pro-choice. Almost always pro-gay marriage. You’d be surprised at the number of them who supported Black Lives Matter. I feel like people kind of just lump them into this box when the truth is, again, a lot of them are with us on the issues. They’re just not part of our coalition because they feel like they’re not welcome,” Julianna said during an interview with Micah Erfan.

So, instead of using hot female celebrities, they go with the obese lady?

Well, good luck!

It’s pretty simple to figure out how to appeal to men. They love America, football, WWII history, drinking beer with their friends, adventure and a sense of purpose.

Well, they fail with that too, with their silly cooking burgers things and such.

Read: Democrat Tap Obese “Content Creator” To Woo Young Men Back »

Posted in Barking Moonbats, Democrats | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

SCOTUS Curbs Rogue Judges From Blocking Infrastructure Projects

By William Teach May 30, 2025 – 7:00 am

Too many of these enviro-weenie/climate cult judges were ruling based on their beliefs, not law

Supreme Court limits judges’ authority to block infrastructure projects over environmental concerns

The Supreme Court on Thursday limited the authority of judges to block infrastructure projects due to environmental concerns.

The justices handed down the lone decision Thursday morning, slightly curbing judicial authority at a time when President Donald Trump’s administration is loudly complaining about alleged judicial overreach. The case, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, relates to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the requirement for environmental impact statements (EIS) in infrastructure projects supported by the federal government.

“NEPA does not allow courts, ‘under the guise of judicial review’ of agency compliance with NEPA, to delay or block agency projects based on the environmental effects of other projects separate from the project at hand,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in the opinion of the court.

“Courts should afford substantial deference and should not micromanage those agency choices so long as they fall within a broad zone of reasonableness,” the opinion continued.

Kavanaugh went on to state that agencies should not be expected to consider the environmental impact of any project aside from the one they are currently working on, “even if” the environmental impacts “might extend outside the geographical territory of the project or materialize later in time.”

“The fact that the project might foreseeably lead to the construction or increased use of a separate project does not mean the agency must consider that separate project’s environmental effects,” the court ruled.

There’s that “guise of judicial review” thing again, where judges are simply involving themselves outside the bounds of the scope of their duties and authority. The ruling was 8-0, with Gorsuch sitting out. More details on the case itself at the link.

Read: SCOTUS Curbs Rogue Judges From Blocking Infrastructure Projects »

Posted in Energy, Global Warming | 9 Comments | Trackback URL

Loony Judge Says Trump Can’t End Biden Era Fake Asylum Seeker Protections

By William Teach May 30, 2025 – 6:45 am

Biden created them, and Trump is not allowed to end them? Just wait till you find out the judge’s reasoning (it’s weird because it’s an Axios piece)

Federal judge blocks Trump admin from pulling Biden-era migrant protections

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration on Wednesday from suspending Biden-era temporary migrant protections and ordered officials to resume applications.

Why it matters: The ruling that comes as the Trump administration is moving to escalate its hardline immigration crackdown affects thousands of people who came to the country legally via temporary programs from Afghanistan, Latin America and Ukraine.

Driving the news: President Trump in January ordered the Homeland Security Department to terminate Biden-era “parole” programs that allowed people from certain countries to temporarily live and work in the U.S. on humanitarian or public interest grounds.

State of play: U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani in her order acknowledged that the Trump administration has broad discretion on immigration policy, but said it was not wholly shielded from judicial review.

“This court emphasizes, as it did in its prior order, that it is not in the public interest to manufacture a circumstance in which hundreds of thousands of individuals will, over the course of several months, become unlawfully present in the country,” Talwani said Wednesday.

So, wait, the Trump administration has the authority to end the policy  (a goodly chunk of the Biden era programs, which last 18 months under law and Biden had renewed, will end soon or have already ended), but, the judge has decided that she will now determine how the Executive Branch is to run things? Because that is what she is saying. That she runs US immigration.

The other side: “The Biden Administration abused the parole authority to allow millions of illegal aliens into the U.S. which further fueled the worst border crisis in U.S. history,” DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in an emailed statement Thursday.

“Under federal law, Secretary [Kristi] Noem — in support of the President — has full authority to cancel or modify these policies. Doing so is a promise kept to the American people to secure our borders and protect our national security. We have the law, the facts, and common sense on our side,” McLaughlin added.

Yes, under law passed by the duly elected Congress and signed into law by a duly elected President. Which may give a federal court authority to determine if the law is un-Constitutional, followed by the Supreme Court, but, doesn’t give the court the authority to determine how they want the law to run. The Trump admin has every legal right to cancel these programs. Barring that, repatriating all those who had the parole once it runs out. These judges are out of control.

Read: Loony Judge Says Trump Can’t End Biden Era Fake Asylum Seeker Protections »

Posted in Illegal Immigration, Unhinged Tools | Comments Off on Loony Judge Says Trump Can’t End Biden Era Fake Asylum Seeker Protections | Trackback URL

Allentown Yout Groups Get Lots Of Climate (scam) Cash

By William Teach May 29, 2025 – 4:53 pm

Will the youts be giving up their own travel in fossil fueled vehicles? Stop using so much energy?

Youth-led groups land grants to fight climate change in Allentown

More than a dozen youth-led groups are set to get started on projects to fight the effects of climate change in Allentown after winning microgrants from the city.

Allentown is set to distribute more than $65,000 to 14 projects, which represent the second round of the Youth Climate Action Fund.

Eleven groups each will get $5,000 — the largest grants available through the fund — while three others will split a little under $11,000.

Top-prize-winning projects include plans for an outdoor classroom at Trexler Middle School, several garden spaces and an “upcycling” initiative, as well as gardening workshops and a free community bike tune-up day.

And two projects at Muhlenberg College each got $5,000 grants.

Bikes? Tuning them up? Really? This is linked to ‘climate change’? Making some garden spaces is nice, a good beautification project, but, global boiling? Must everything be linked?

Allentown School District plans to use its $3,318 grant to bolster tree-equity education, while the Boys and Girls Club of Allentown’s teen-led climate campaign received $3,150 in funding.

So, not really doing anything, just yapping. I’d be more impressed if they were actually planting trees.

And Easton-based Nurture Nature Center got $4,300 from Allentown’s Youth Climate Action Fund to implement AI-powered hydroponic systems.

OK, that’s a good one. If they actually do it. Not sure why they really need it, though, since there are already plenty of AI systems on the market as it is.

Bloomberg Philanthropies offered $50,000 grants to 100 cities — including Allentown — whose mayors attended COP28, the 28th United Nations Climate Change Conference in Dubai, in late 2023.

Well, at least it’s not coming from the taxpayers.

Read: Allentown Yout Groups Get Lots Of Climate (scam) Cash »

Posted in Climate Cult, Global Warming | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach May 29, 2025 – 1:00 pm

…is a fast rising ocean that will soon swamp the land, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is GeeeZ…., with a post on the reason why J6 will never go away.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 14 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove