…is extreme rain from too much carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Fire Andrea Mitchell, with a post where Liberals wished Carly Fiorina was hurt by the curtain collapse.
Read: If All You See… »
…is extreme rain from too much carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Fire Andrea Mitchell, with a post where Liberals wished Carly Fiorina was hurt by the curtain collapse.
Read: If All You See… »
So says The Nation
On Climate Change, Listen to Pope Francis, Not Jeb Bush
….
But he will have a hard time topping his argument against accepting Pope Francis’ counsel on the need to fight climate change. After the pontiff urged members of Congress to engage with the rest of the world in “courageous actions and strategies†to combat global warming, Bush declared that the pope’s call should be disregarded.
Why? Because, Bush announced, “He’s not a scientist, he’s a religious leader.â€
Bush, who is Catholic and who has attended mass with Pope Francis, needs to study up on the pontiff’s background in science. And on the rigorous research that underpins the pope’s advocacy on climate-change issues.
Before he chose to pursue the priesthood, the future pope trained as a chemical technician. Writers for the National Catholic Reporter reference “his training as a scientist†and point out that the young Jorge Mario Bergoglio “worked as a chemist prior to entering the seminary.â€
It is a valid point, regarding the Pope’s background in chemical engineering. However, what about something else?
On Climate Change, Listen to Pope Francis, Not Jeb Bush – The Nation. http://t.co/qxgXFS93Oe #climate #change
— Climate Change News (@NewsClimate) September 27, 2015
https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/648189705956233216
The Pope is the #1 authority figure alive in the Catholic church on these matters (well, obviously Jesus and the Bible are the ultimate authority): should we listen to him on those matters if we’re supposed to listen to him on Hotcoldwetdry? Strangely, Climate Change News hasn’t responded, nor has the Nation writer John Nichols.
Read: Cult Of Climastrology: We Should Listen To The Pope On “Climate Change” »
On one hand, this is like investigating the life of a woman who has made a credible accusation that she was raped (something Hillary did all the time to those Bill raped/sexually assaulted). On the other hand, this could be a good idea
(The Blaze) Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said during an interview Sunday that doesn’t believe the undercover videos that purport to show the sale of fetal tissue by Planned Parenthood officials are real, and they should be investigated.
Appearing on CNN’s “State of the Union†Sunday morning, the Minority Leader said the videos led her to want an investigation. But while social conservatives have been been calling for an investigation as well, Pelosi wants to investigate the anti-abortion group that has been behind the videos, the Center for Medical Progress — not Planned Parenthood.
“And I think they should be investigated as to how they obtained those and doctored those and then had them be accepted as something that was an indictment against Planned Parenthood because that’s not true,†Pelosi told CNN’s Jake Tapper.
While it could be argued that Pelosi wants an investigation that violates CMP’s constitutional rights, including freedom of speech, let’s consider that this investigation could, and most likely would, show the exact way CMP took the videos, and, here’s the important part, would officially determine whether any unacceptable doctoring of the videos occurred. Of course, one can actually see and watch the entire video collection themselves, along with the shortened ones (hey, does the media ever take video and shorten them?). Has Nancy Pelosi watched any of them?
What will Nancy and other Democrats do when it is determined by The Government, be it one or more Congressional panels or the Department of Justice (gee, an investigation by the DOJ might violate a few Constitutional Amendments, eh?), that the videos say exactly what we all know they say?
https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/648455973938589696
Put your money where your mouth is, Nancy!
Read: Pelosi: We Should Totally Investigate Whether Those Planned Parenthood Videos Are Fake »
It’s all about spreading awareness, ya know
Paris has car-free Sunday ahead of Cop21 climate change conference
For the first time ever the centre of Paris was car-free all day long on Sunday, in a bid to promote cleaner forms of transport in a festive atmosphere. The future goal is to become like Brussels where a car-free day takes place every year in 19 districts of the city.
Private cars were not allowed to drive through the centre of Paris between 11.00am and 6.00pm on Sunday.
Outside this zone, cars were allowed to drive at 20km/hour maximum, while taxis, buses and residents could use “green zones”.
So, no private cars in this small area for a whopping 7 hours. Plenty of government vehicles, of course. And, on a Sunday, where the traffic is much lighter. Which made Warmists mad
“The fact that a Sunday was chosen doesn’t help,” wrote Olivier Razemon. “At the end of the 1990s every year on 22Â September on World Car-free Day, Paris and other cities really made an effort to limit traffic. As the date was fixed, the restrictions could fall on a Friday or a Tuesday. It is not without significance that this forced drivers to adapt and, once a year, try new ways of getting around.”
Do these Warmists know they can give up their own fossil fueled travel for every day? Oh, wait, they just want to force Other People to comply.
…is horrible climate change induced extreme rain, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is This ain’t Hell…, with more tales from the terminally stoopid.
It’s rain week!
Read: If All You See… »

Happy Sunday! Another great day in America. Are we ready for super moon with eclipse? This pinup is by Ren Wicks, with a wee bit of help.
What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets†calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me
Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.
Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »
If I didn’t tell you up front that the speaker was Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, might you think this was Obama or some other leading Warmist? He gave a speech to the UN Summit for Sustainable Development Goals, first offering prayers for those killed during the Hajj, before diving into Hotcoldwetdry and terrorism
Environmental problems have taught us humans living on planet earth that we are all in the same boat. What others do also impacts our destiny. We cannot be assured of our own peace and security, whilst ignoring how others are living. Without extensive cooperation at the national, regional and international levels, achieving the ‘Sustainable Development Goals’ will be very difficult. Such cooperation should be mindful of our common destiny and joint commitment towards important human responsibilities.
A common destiny requires a common goal. But this doesn’t mean that the responsibilities of all are the same. It would be impossible to achieve the post-2015 sustainable development goals without considering the responsibilities of states and their share in creating the current environmental status quo and would result in fruitless argument.
Rouhani’s vision of an authoritarian destiny is surely different from other Warmists. He would prefer one based on a world-wide Caliphate, led by Iran (hence a major reason Iran stands against ISIS), while Western Warmists would prefer a secular destiny, dominated by Progressivism (nice fascism).
As I said in the summit meeting of climate change, the West Asia region is not only facing hotter climate conditions and challenges of continued extensive drought. But, it is also grappling with the scourge of terrorism and extremist violence. In other words, violence against man and nature are the dual calamities befallen the West Asia region.
Interesting, as Iran is the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism. Oh, and of course they have drought: a goodly chunk is and has been desert.
Two years ago when I spoke of WAVE (World Against Violence and Extremism), I had both of these disasters and their mutual impact in mind. Terrorists tend to grow and thrive in lands that are deprived and damaged by environmental disasters and easily pour across borders like haze. Terrorist groups crush the sustainable development goals. And the continuation of this situation results in further poverty and environmental destruction. Not only have terrorism and violence damaged the environment, but also they have taken sustainable development out of the agenda of countries, forcing them to expend their national resources on fighting against insecurity.
If “terrorists crush the sustainable development goals”, why is Iran funding so many of them? One of the things he’s saying here is that fighting terrorism is taking attention, and money, away from fighting “climate change”.
The process of the past two years and the ensuing nuclear deal between Iran and the P5+1 has created suitable conditions for regional and international cooperation including in the field of environmental preservation. We are eager to cooperate with our neighbors to promote regional sustainable development through active environmental diplomacy, constructive relations with other countries, transfer of technology and knowhow, and participation in joint scientific activities, in order to fulfill our share in building a more sustainable world immune from environmental threats.
Oh, OK, so the whole nuclear deal is all about stopping “climate change” It’s so simple!
Warmists must be thrilled that this hardcore Islamist has the exact views they do. Actually, they probably sympathize more with Rouhani than fellow countrymen who have different views on climate change. And let’s not forget that Iran is super-enthused by the nuclear deal, which will see Iran vastly increase their pumping of fossil fuels.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Read: Iran’s Rouhani Totally Concerned With Climate Change, Says Terrorism Gets In Way Of Solving It »
So says climahypocrite Al Gore’s Climate Reality
No, climate change is NOT a ‘natural cycle.’ 10 ways we can tell humans are affecting it: http://t.co/O61lD9LdB1 pic.twitter.com/sroAE0hZp9
— Climate Reality (@ClimateReality) September 25, 2015
I’m doing this post on my smartphone, so, no long discourse on the idiocy of the article, except to note that it utterly fails to prove that any of those ten reasons are man-caused over natural causation. The closest it gets is in almost alluding to UHI/land use. The unhinged screed does what most Warmists do: take data and simply imply, heck, demand that mankind is at fault, yet, for all that, they refuse to act like it’s a crisis in their own lives.
More: added “change” to headline, was supposed to be there in the first place. Doesn’t really change the substance being discussed, eh?
Read: Climate Change Is Totally Not A Natural Cycle Now Or Something »
…is a world flooded by too much carbon pollution from Other People, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Jawa Report, with a post on university snowflakes scared of string in a tree.
Read: If All You See… »