If All You See…

…is an evil diet soda, which not only releases carbon pollution, but can make you eat more, which is bad for climate change, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jammie Wearing Fools, with a post on Allahu Akbar in Moscow.

Read: If All You See… »

The Fate Of The Planet Is At Stake In 2016 Or Something

The NY Times’ Paul Krugman, with his big McMansion and fossil fueled travel, is vexed by the 2016 election, and is worried that the planet is doomed if the wrong president is picked. Seriously, the fate of the planet is on the line

Planet On The Ballot

We now have a pretty good idea who will be on the ballot in November: Hillary Clinton, almost surely (after the South Carolina blowout,prediction markets give her a 96 percent probability of securing her party’s nomination), and Donald Trump, with high likelihood (currently 80 percent probability on the markets). But even if there’s a stunning upset in what’s left of the primaries, we already know very well what will be at stake — namely, the fate of the planet.

Why do I say this?

Obviously, the partisan divide on environmental policy has been growing ever wider. Just eight years ago the G.O.P. nominated John McCain, whose platform included a call for a “cap and trade” system — that is, a system that restricts emissions, but allows pollution permits to be bought and sold — to limit greenhouse gases. Since then, however, denial of climate science and opposition to anything that might avert catastrophe have become essential pillars of Republican identity. So the choice in 2016 is starker than ever before.

But, if we elect the correct fascist president, everything will be OK!

But here’s the thing: the next president won’t need to pass comprehensive legislation, or indeed any legislation, to take a big step toward saving the planet. Dramatic progress in energy technology has put us in a position where executive action — action that relies on existing law — can achieve great things. All we need is an executive willing to take that action, and a Supreme Court that won’t stand in its way.

He repeats himself later in his screed

And as I said, no new legislation would be needed, just a president willing to act and a Supreme Court that won’t stand in that president’s way, sacrificing the planet in the name of conservative ideology. What’s more, the Paris agreement from last year means that if the U.S. moves forward on climate action, much of the world will follow our lead.

Why does it always seem as if ‘climate change’ is an excuse to institute bigger and bigger Centralized government in an authoritative manner? You can bet that Krugman will have a conniption fit if a President Trump started signing lots and lots of Executive Orders, right? Of course he will. But, he will be very happy if a President Hillary Clinton does the same, instituting lots and lots of taxes and controls on citizens and private entities, none of which will really negatively affect someone like Krugman.

Read: The Fate Of The Planet Is At Stake In 2016 Or Something »

Liberals Protest Their Own Culture of Racism And Sexual Assault At Oscars

Is Hollywood overwhelmingly left leaning? Of course it is. And people have been complaining for weeks about #OscarsSoWhite. Some decided to boycott. Of course, most who were boycotting weren’t up for an award in the first place. People wondered if Chris Rock would take on the “racism” as the host. Yes, he did

(Breitbart) Comedian Chris Rock opened the 88th Academy Awards on Sunday by commenting on the #OscarsSoWhite controversy.

“Man, I counted at least 15 black people in that montage!” he said in reference to this year’s lack of diversity among acting nominees. “You realize if they nominated hosts, I wouldn’t even get this job!” (snip)

Rock also joked the Academy should create “black categories,” noting: “You already do it with men and women, think about it. There’s no real reason to have a men and a women category in acting. It’s not track and field, you don’t have to separate them.”

Well, maybe we should consider that Blacks already have numerous awards (that’s a short list) that are open ONLY to Black people. Of course, somehow, these Black actors and actresses are “heroes“.

Rock later introduced the evening’s first presenters, saying, “You want diversity? We got diversity. Please welcome Emily Blunt and somebody whiter, Charlize Theron.”

Now, consider, if Rock was white and the presenters where Black, and he said “somebody blacker”, would that have been racist? You know that the line would have created a firestorm. So would many of his other lines if they went the other way. But, hey, these lefties at the Oscars were laughing about being called racists. Are they racists? Good question. But, it is amusing that they are basically accusing themselves of being racists. But, Rock is being slammed by Black activists for one line

The joke: “Why are we protesting this Oscars? It’s the 88th Academy Awards, which means this ‘no black nominees’ thing happened at least 71 other times. You got to figure that it happened in the 50s, in the 60s. One of those years, Sidney [Poitier] didn’t put out a movie. I’m sure there were no black nominees some of those years, say ‘62’ or ‘63. Black people did not protest. Why? Because we had real things to protest at the time. We were too busy being raped and lynched to care about who won best cinematographer. When your grandmother’s swinging from a tree, it’s really hard to care about best documentary foregin short.”

It’s the line about “real things to protest” that has gotten people Offended.

Then we had Sheriff Joe Biden, who created massive traffic problems when he showed up at the Oscars

(Breitbart) Vice President Joe Biden gave a brief speech in support of victims of sexual violence while introducing Lady Gaga at the Academy Awards on Sunday night.

“Too many women and men… are still victims of sexual abuse,” Joe Biden said, after receiving a raucous standing ovation.

Biden urged the Oscars audience and viewers watching at home to “take the pledge, a pledge that says, ‘I will intervene in situations where consent cannot or has not been given.’”

Let’s see: racism in Hollywood. Sexual assault in Hollywood and college campuses. Why are liberals so racist and sexual assaulty?

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Liberals Protest Their Own Culture of Racism And Sexual Assault At Oscars »

Hotcoldwetdry Is Totally Wreaking Havoc On Our Mental Health Or Something

Well, it’s wreaking havoc on the health of members of the Cult of Climastrology

Climate change is wreaking havoc on our mental health, experts

Climate change is causing chaos in the environment and beyond; experts are warning we’re “not even close to being prepared” for the damage it does to our mental health.
As a provincial coroner and past palliative care physician, Dr. David Ouchterlony has seen suffering and death up close, experiences that have occasionally led to brief moments of sadness. But Ouchterlony describes such emotions as “trivial” compared to the dread he feels when thoughts about climate change linger, as they often do. He worries almost obsessively about a future he won’t see. How will younger generations be affected? Why are we failing to act on the threat?

“I was completely blind to it, and then five years ago it just hit me,” Ouchterlony, 74, said. “I went through this stage of losing sleep, thinking about my grandchild, wondering what I could do.”

He described the feeling as an “absence of hope” characterized by despair and, at times, exhausting guilt. Some researchers have called it a “pre-traumatic” stress disorder that, in some, is feeding anxiety and depressive thoughts.

Sounds like a self inflicted wound, like people who get seriously emotionally distressed by characters on an afternoon soap opera, who make themselves clinically depressed over their favorite show. Of course, Ouchterlony isn’t lonely in his Ouch (sorry, couldn’t resist)

It predicted that cases of mental and social disorders will rise steeply as the signs of climate change become clearer and more frequent, and as more people are directly affected by heat waves, drought and other extreme events that put pressure on clean water resources, food prices and public infrastructure.

“These will include depressive and anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorders, substance abuse, suicides and widespread outbreaks of violence,” predicted the report. It singled out children, the poor, the elderly and those with existing mental health problems as those likely to be hardest hit.

So, pretty much things that have happened throughout Mankind’s history. Just, this time the Warmists will blame Other People for driving fossil fueled vehicles.

Life comes with all sorts of stresses, “but this one really broke the camel’s back for me,” said Ferrara, who as a therapeutic exercise started the blog Confessions of a Climate Worrier in 2011. “I’m convinced hordes of people are filing their mental malaise under divorce, the economy, or whatever, when it’s actually the slow drip of climate reality.”

Read: Hotcoldwetdry Is Totally Wreaking Havoc On Our Mental Health Or Something »

If All You See…

…is a sea that is eating all the warming, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is No Tricks Zone, with a post on the anti-humanity roots of the modern green movement.

It’s British week!

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Patriotic Pinup Enoch Bolles

Happy Sunday! A gorgeous last Sunday of February. This pinup is by Enoch Bolles, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Zilla wonders if Twitter banded Naked Islam’s URL
  2. Independent Sentinel is laughing at Melissa Harris Perry’s meltdown
  3. Vlad Tepes features “drinking camel pee for Allah”
  4. The People’s Cube modernized the Gettysburg Address
  5. The Other McCain is not impressed by Fox News
  6. The Lonely Conservative has an interesting flashback on Donald Trump and the Tea Party
  7. The Last Tradition exhorts Republicans to support Trump
  8. The First Street Journal endorses Patrick Frey for President
  9. The Daley Gator has your Leftist Utopia update
  10. Rhymes With Right discusses #NeverTrump
  11. Raised On Hoecakes covers the meaning of crony capitalism
  12. Powerline shows us how Iran is spending their new cash
  13. Pamela Geller covers more fake hate
  14. Neo-neocon has proof that Trump’s a tyrant
  15. And last, but not least, Moonbattery discusses where social justice leads

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Good News: GOP Candidates Entrenched Against Gun Controls

The NY Times Editorial Board is apoplectic over the gun control positions of the Republican candidates, and is more than happy to let us know about it

Republican Candidates Deeply Entrenched Against Gun Controls

…..

President Obama has labored and even shed tears in pleading for just a bit of compromise to widen background checks on gun buyers and do more about the mental health problems underlying many of the mass shootings. He has also done what he can through executive actions. But the winner of the Republican nomination is almost guaranteed to be an ironclad defender of the gun lobby, pandering to voters by portraying the government as intent on trampling gun owners’ rights and confiscating their firearms.

That sounds like an excellent position to me.

“No more gun-free zones!” vows Donald Trump of local governments’ efforts to limit the killings. “Gun laws fail everywhere they’re tried,” insists Senator Marco Rubio, contradicting studies showing that states with strong gun safety laws suffer fewer shooting deaths. “We define gun control real simple — that’s hitting what you aim at,” Senator Ted Cruz says with a grin as the industry’s concealed-carry campaign to arm more and more Americans advances from barrooms to college campuses.

I’d like to use the thumbs up animated emoticon right here, but, it won’t work for the cross-post at Right Wing News.

Of course, the NYTEB is thrilled that Hillary is a staunch advocate of gun control (without mentioning that she’s a staunch advocate of killing the unborn), and that Bernie Sanders is slowly getting on board. Interestingly, they never mention how many Black people kill and shoot each other with guns, usually illegally obtained and possessed, only mass shootings. It’s like Democrats do not care that Black people are offing each other at a very high rate.

Gun safety should be a bipartisan issue, but the Republican candidates seem too afraid of the gun lobby to let that happen. All the more reason for the Democrats to drive the point home all the way to November.

It’s cute how they end the screed by changing it to “safety”, when the rest of the piece is about “control”. It’s right there in the headline. You want gun safety? Stay out of most big cities, which are run by the Democratic Party and have high rates of shootings.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Good News: GOP Candidates Entrenched Against Gun Controls »

If All You See…

…is a rising sea that will kill us all, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Creeping Sharia, with a post on conversion homework.

Read: If All You See… »

Clinton Crowd Boos Military Vet For Questions On Benghazi

Clinton supporters could care less about Hillary’s incompetence as Secretary of State, nor leaving our citizens to die, much like they don’t care that Bill is a serial sexual predator

(Daily Caller) Former President Bill Clinton became angry when he was heckled by protesters during a campaign event in Bluffton, South Carolina on Friday.

The protesters demanded to know if his wife Hillary Clinton lied about the four American deaths that occurred during the attack in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012.

The man responded that he’s seen Gold Star families “who have mourned.”

“We had four lives in Benghazi killed and your wife tried to cover it up.”

The crowd began to moan and boo in unison.

Then Bill had a hissy fit

“I heard your speech. I heard your speech. Will you let me answer? I’m not your commander in chief anymore but if I were, I’d tell you to be more polite and sit down,” Clinton said, growing angrier as the man began screaming at him.

Of course, the crowd was having none of it, and security escorted the man and others who wanted answers out.

Read: Clinton Crowd Boos Military Vet For Questions On Benghazi »

Good News: ‘Climate Change’ To Cause Catastrophic Weather

The latest scaremongering from the Cult of Climastrology

Climate Change Effects on Weather Are “Potentially Catastrophic,” Scientist Says

The long-term effects of climate change are still unclear, but, as one scientist explained on Thursday, there is already “pretty scary” evidence that the planet is in for a series of dramatic, and dangerous, changes.

“The evidence is very clear that rapid and unprecedented changes are happening in the Arctic,” Dr Peter Gleick, president of the Pacific Institute in California, told the The Independent in an email. “And while there remains uncertainty about the ultimate consequences, there is a good and growing body of research that is pretty scary, and pretty much no evidence that the possible impacts will be good.”

Among the likely effects of a warming Arctic on the rest of the planet are more and more unpredictable weather patterns, according to Gleick.

“Massive storms, sometimes called ‘bomb cyclones,’ are created when warm air from the Atlantic and cold air from the Arctic combine,” Gleick told the The Independent. “There may be connections between out-of-season strong tornados in the central US and these new storm patterns.”

Got that? Uncertainty, but, they just feel that the consequences will be all doomy. If we do not implement lots of tax schemes, and surrender a goodly chunk of our personal freedom to the Central Government, as well as control of private entities and the economy, we are utterly doomed. It matters little that the Warmists all agree that the plans will have virtually no effect on the climate, you just need to shut up and comply.

Oh, and this comes from Peter Gleick, of Fakegate notoriety.

Read: Good News: ‘Climate Change’ To Cause Catastrophic Weather »

Pirate's Cove