Trump Can Stop States From Doing Something About Climate Doom Or Something

Who says he wants to? Doing Something about climate doom is not a duty of the Legislative Branch, who make the laws. Hence, reserved for the states and the people

Why Trump can’t stop states from fighting climate change

The United States has never really cared much about tackling climate change, at least at the federal level. Up until the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act, or IRA — which handed out billions of dollars for people to electrify their homes and pumped billions more into the clean energy economy — neither Congress nor the executive branch advanced truly meaningful climate policy, given the scale of the crisis.

Lots of people care, right up till they have to pay for it. The Elites care, and expect Other People to pay for it

Yet carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S. have fallen from 6 billion tons annually in 2000 to less than 5 billion today. For that, the country can largely thank its states and cities, which have embarked on ambitious campaigns to, among other things, electrify transportation, set automobile pollution standards, and incentivize the deployment of renewable energy. At the same time, wind and solar are now cheaper to build than new fossil fuel infrastructure, and there’s little President Trump can do to stop those market forces from driving down emissions further.

Let them do it. Also, let them pay for it themselves.

Accordingly, Trump has set his sights on states during the first 100 days of his administration. He has tried to kill New York City’s congestion pricing, though last week the Department of Justice accidentally filed a document outlining the legal flaws with the administration’s plan. On April 8, he signed an executive order directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to identify and halt any state climate laws that she deems illegal, including California’s pioneering cap-and-trade program. That directive, though, is probably illegal itself, because the Constitution guarantees states broad authority to enact their own laws, legal experts told Grist. “This is the world the Trump administration wants your kids to live in,” California Governor Gavin Newsom said in a statement. “California’s efforts to cut harmful pollution won’t be derailed by a glorified press release masquerading as an executive order.”

Some things are the power of Los Federales, because of inter-state commerce.

“States have been saying since the election that they retain the authority and the ability and the ambition to drive down pollution and keep America on track to meet its goals,” said Casey Katims, executive director of the U.S. Climate Alliance, a coalition of 24 governors (just one of them a Republican) focused on climate action. “This order is an indication that the president and this administration know that all of that is true.”

Have at it. Every experiment needs an experimental group. Just leave those of us in other states out of it. It is hilarious that they discovered States’ Rights.

Ultimately, climate action is increasingly popular among voters. A spokesperson for Governor JB Pritzker of Illinois pointed to polling that shows 65 percent of people in the state are worried about climate change and 70 percent support fully transitioning to clean energy by 2050. “Voters are smart,” the spokesperson said, “and the more the Trump administration tries to kill clean energy policies that are giving us cleaner air, good-paying jobs, and lower energy bills, the more pushback you’re going to see, because those policies are popular for a reason.”

Again, popular until they have to pay for it and their own lives are negatively affected.

Read: Trump Can Stop States From Doing Something About Climate Doom Or Something »

If All You See…

…are Bad Weather clouds from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Independent Sentinel, with a post on stupid Prince Harry.

Read: If All You See… »

Politico Upset Republicans Are Close To Shredding Tons Of Regulations

There isn’t a regulation that Democrats do not like. Well, except for regulations on the abortion on demand industry. Have you ever watched Futurama? This one (the specific part starts about 1:30)

Well, that’s what the US federal government is meant to do: have a light touch. Like a safe-cracker. Democrats want Progressivism (nice Fascism): “we’re doing this for your own good, even if you do not like it, even if it causes you problems).

Conservatives have long dreamed of passing a bill to shred tons of regulations. They may be closer than ever.

Conservative Republicans have spent more than a decade working toward a wholesale rollback of federal regulations — and now they think they have the legislative battle plan to make it happen.

Advocates of the rule-shredding proposal are seeking to give their legislation a coveted spot in the GOP’s party-line energy, tax and border security megabill, a maneuver that would defuse the filibuster threat that has repeatedly thwarted their dreams. They say they have spent the better part of the past year crafting ways to ensure their latest iteration can pass muster in the Senate.

The proposal would turn Congress into a gatekeeper for certain major rules and allow lawmakers to roll back countless regulations for the remainder of President Donald Trump’s term, drastically transforming the way the federal government oversees everything from businesses and banks to health care and energy development. The House Judiciary Committee advanced it last week as part of the Republicans’ broader budget reconciliation package — a potentially major step toward finally catapulting the deregulatory proposal to Trump’s desk.

“For those who say it would make a radical change, a radical departure from the status quo of rulemaking, I’d say, ‘Thank heaven above for that,’” said Senate Energy and Natural Resources Chair Mike Lee (R-Utah).

The language moving forward is based on the “REINS Act” — short for “Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny” — which has become a rallying cry for the Republican base.

Well, look, Republicans have themselves to blame, too. It’s not just Democrats. They write legislation that is not specific and targeted, giving their power to the Executive Branch. This one was not on Republicans, but, consider, where did the Contraception Mandate in Obamacare come from? You won’t find it in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (sic). So, how did HHS come up with? We don’t know. The legislation gave the Exec tons of authority to make rules, such as with the fines and time without health insurance. Democrats and Republicans fail to do their job: legislation should be what makes rules. Oh, they do not have the experts? Perhaps they should partner with experts before passing legislation!

The legislation would also allow Congress to repeal numerous recently finalized regulations through the use of a single resolution rather than repealing them one by one, as is current practice.

“It would be a war on regulations,” said Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the minority whip. “To take that authority away from the executive branch would be a serious mistake.”

Does Dick understand the job of the Legislative Branch? And I’m doubting most Americans are thrilled by all these regulations created by unaccountable bureaucrats. Are they thrilled with regulations putting gender confused men in women’s showers, locker rooms, and bathrooms, as well as their sports teams?

Read: Politico Upset Republicans Are Close To Shredding Tons Of Regulations »

Huh: 35 Democrats Voted With GOP To Kill California EV Mandate

Remember, the EV mandate was enacted by the California Air Resource Board, a group of unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats, and it has the force of law in California

35 Democrats vote with GOP to block Biden rule allowing Newsom’s gas car ban

Thirty-five House Democrats are rebuking the Biden administration’s 11th-hour waiver that cleared a path for California to enact a full ban on gas cars by 2035.

A Republican resolution aimed at repealing the Biden-era Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) move passed by a 246 to 164 vote on Thursday morning.

Notably, two California House Democrats were among the 35 who voted to rescind their own state’s clean energy waiver — Reps. Lou Correa and George Whitesides.

It was a stunning repudiation of their own former party leader’s policies targeting one of Democrats’ largest strongholds.

Republican leaders, meanwhile, cheered the resolution’s passage.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said of the California waiver, “This radical measure bans the sale of gas-powered vehicles, forcing electric vehicles on the American people and taking away consumer choice.”

Too bad the resolution didn’t include anything about the members of the CARB, Gavin Newsom, the members of his admin, and the general assembly not driving EVs themselves

A resolution of disapproval, under the Congressional Review Act, allows lawmakers a mechanism to oppose unilateral rules made by federal agencies.

With 35 Democrats voting for the resolution, will the media whine about the Republicans using CRA again?

Read: Huh: 35 Democrats Voted With GOP To Kill California EV Mandate »

Trump Directs DOJ To Reopen Alcatraz

Oh, yeah, this is creating Category 5 Moonbattery

(San Francisco Standard) President Donald Trump says he wants to turn Alcatraz Island — a museum and tourist destination for decades — back into a federal prison.

“When we were a more serious Nation, in times past, we did not hesitate to lock up the most dangerous criminals, and keep them far away from anyone they could harm,” he wrote on Truth Social. “No longer will we tolerate these Serial Offenders who spread filth, bloodshed, and mayhem on our streets.”

Created in 1934, the Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary held some of America’s most famous criminals, such as Al Capone and George “Machine Gun” Kelly, until it shut down in 1963 due to high operating costs and structural damage.

Given its remote location and the cold waters around it, escape from the prison was nearly impossible — and Alcatraz gained the reputation of being the highest security lockup in the country.

Right now it is a visitors center via the Nation Parks Service.

(The Hill) The Bureau of Prisons notes on its website that “USP [United States Penitentiary] Alcatraz closed after 29 years of operation” due to soaring costs.

“An estimated $3-5 million was needed just for restoration and maintenance work to keep the prison open. That figure did not include daily operating costs — Alcatraz was nearly three times more expensive to operate than any other Federal prison,” the bureau says.

It would cost a hell of a lot more now. And, knowing the government, it would take 15 years to get it back open. It’s rusted, the walls are falling apart, it’s decrepit. You would have to really tear it all down. Getting everything out and bringing stuff in would be difficult and expensive. Getting water and power in would be incredibly difficult. A lot of people actually escaped. Probably be better starting fresh using an island off the coast of Alaska.

But, I suspect this is more about winding up Democrats.

Read: Trump Directs DOJ To Reopen Alcatraz »

St. Greta Almost (not really) Killed On Ship Heading To Help Hamas

Just gonna leave this here

Um, she wasn’t even on the ship yet. This also happened at Malta, which is halfway across the Mediterranean from Israel. It is below Sicily.

Read: St. Greta Almost (not really) Killed On Ship Heading To Help Hamas »

If All You See…

…is a horrible plastic bottle destroying the world, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Right Scoop, with a post on Trump warning Iran.

It’s orange week!

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another great day in Returned America. Getting a little well needed rain, the Dodgers are kicking butt, and my ankle is almost back to normal. This pinup is by Bill Medcalf, with a wee bit of help, and, no, per an email, I’m not trying to make the addition perfect. That’s always the point. The wonderful pinups take precedence.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Not A Lot Of People Know That: Parliament EV Chargers To Be Removed For Safety Reasons
  2. No Tricks Zone: Brink Of Extinction – More And More Companies Rejecting Costly Hydrogen Technology
  3. Watts Up With That?: Another refinery closure in California increases the States’ dependency on China.
  4. American Greatness: Virginia’s Car Tax is the Highest in the Nation and Democrats Want to Keep it That Way.
  5. Bearing Arms: California Now Looking to Ban Most Popular Handgun Model on Planet
  6. Cold Fury: What Do We Have Here?
  7. Geller Report: China EXEMPTS A Quarter of US Imports From Tariffs
  8. IOTW Report: ICE Nabs Rapists, Child Predators, Gang Members In Deportation Blitz
  9. Jihad Watch: UK: Pro-Hamas candidate who backed segregated spaces for Muslims wins local election seat
  10. Legal Insurrection: China Poised to Address Fentanyl Crisis in Gambit to Start Trade Talks with Trump
  11. Moonbattery: Why the Oppressed Don’t Escape to Africa
  12. neo-neocon: The left’s “undocumented” martyrs
  13. Never Yet Melted: Firing Is Not Enough
  14. Pacific Pundit: Trans daycare worker gets plea deal, avoids prison time after sexually abusing infant in Kentucky
  15. And last, but, not least, The Gateway Pundit has New CEO of California High-Speed Rail Project Hopes it Might be Finished by… 2045

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014, so, most are hosted internally). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your Pinups for Vets calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me. I’ve also mostly alphabetized them, makes it easier scrolling the feedreader

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. And do you have a favorite blog you can recommend be added to the feedreader?

Two great sites for getting news links are Liberty Daily and Whatafinger.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Bummer: Democrats Upset Republicans Are Using An Obscure Law To Roll Back Over-Regulation

I have to wonder: would the NY Times be in favor of rolling back regulations if they were directly on the NY Times? Would the Fish Wrap be fine with Democrats using the law to roll back Trump regulations?

Republicans in Congress Use Obscure Law to Roll Back Biden-Era Regulations

As President Trump moves unilaterally to slash the federal bureaucracy and upend longstanding policies, Republicans in Congress have embarked on a spree of deregulation, using an obscure law to quietly but steadily chip away at Biden-era rules they say are hurting businesses and consumers.

In recent weeks, the G.O.P. has pushed through a flurry of legislation to cancel regulations on matters large and small, from oversight of firms that emit toxic pollutants to energy efficiency requirements for walk-in freezers and water heaters.

To do so, they are employing a little-known 1996 law, the Congressional Review Act, that allows lawmakers to reverse recently adopted federal regulations with a simple majority vote in both chambers. It is a strategy they used in 2017 during Mr. Trump’s first term and are leaning on again as they work to find ways to steer around Democratic opposition and make the most of their governing trifecta of the House, the Senate and the White House.

I can’t find anywhere in the NY Times where they complained about Democrats using the CRA during the Biden years. The LA Times cheered the use of the CRA by Democrats, as did NBC News.

But this time, Republicans are testing the limits of the law in a way that could vastly expand its use and undermine the filibuster, the Senate rule that effectively requires 60 votes to move forward with any major legislation.

Because resolutions of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act need only a majority vote, they are some of the only legislation that can avoid a filibuster in the Senate. This allows them to circumvent the partisan gridlock that stands in the way of most significant bills.

See, it was OK when Democrats did it during the Biden years, but, not OK for Republicans.

Now Republicans are trying to go much further with the law, including using it to effectively attack state regulations blessed by the federal government. The House this week passed three disapproval resolutions that would eliminate California’s strict air pollution standards for trucks and cars by rejecting waivers from the Environmental Protection Agency that allowed them to take effect.

Those state rules have national implications and involve interstate commerce.

Either way, experts warned that Republicans may come to regret reading the statute so broadly. Michael Thorning, the director of the Structural Democracy Project at the Bipartisan Policy Center, a nonprofit think tank, said doing so could hand Democrats a powerful tool to undo regulations that they dislike when they one day return to power.

They already did this during the Biden years. Funny these same people weren’t worried about the lawfare against Trump and his people but are now bothered when Republicans do the same.

Read: Bummer: Democrats Upset Republicans Are Using An Obscure Law To Roll Back Over-Regulation »

Energy Secretary Says Not Moving Forward With New “Green” Loans

I’m unclear why they are called loans, when the money is rarely repaid. These are handouts, for which Biden was giving them to friendly companies, with little expectation of results, and virtually no oversight

Energy Chief Says US Won’t Move Forward With With Billions in Biden-Era Loans

Energy Secretary Chris Wright said his agency doesn’t plan to move forward with billions of dollars worth of Biden-era loans as the Trump administration reviews the department’s $400 billion-strong green bank.

Wright, speaking during a Bloomberg Television interview Friday, criticized former President Joe Biden’s administration for issuing billions of dollars in loans and grants between the time President Donald Trump was elected and inauguration day.

“We’ve got a lot of reasons to be worried and suspicious about that,” Wright said in response to a question about the department’s loan program. “Some of these loans will go forward, some of it, it’s too late to change course. A lot of them won’t go forward, but that’s a very careful review process that we’ve just put in place and just got a team to execute on.”

The department recently started a review of its Loan Programs Office, which has financed nearly $70 billion in energy projects and made more than $41.2 billion in conditional commitments that haven’t been finalized. The latter include $1.46 billion to biofuel maker Gevo Inc. and $4.4 billion for a high-voltage transmission line project spanning Kansas to Missouri.

In my mind, one of the major things they should be doing is auditing the “loans” and grants. Let’s see how the money was spent. What were the results? Were the projects completed or on their way to completion? How much money went to the projects and how much into people’s pockets? Are the projects sustainable, or, just simply being done on a whim, and will soon collapse generally putting money in people’s pockets)? Does anyone remember Solyndra, and all the other failed projects from Obama’s green slush fund? How about

Interesting

(AIE) “It” was the Ivanpah solar power project in the California Mojave Desert, and it was none of those things. Beginning operations in early 2014 to thunderous applause from all of the usual suspects—left-wing environmentalists, ideologues opposed to fossil fuels and modern economies, crony capitalists, federal bureaucrats, journalists credulous and lazy, and politicians eager to cut ribbons—it was a monstrosity combining huge costs, huge subsidies, huge environmental damage, and justifications hugely spurious. It never achieved its advertised electricity production goals even remotely, even as the excuses flowed like wine, as did the taxpayer bailouts.

And now, despite all the subventions, it is shutting down about 15 years early as a monument to green fantasies financed with Other People’s Money, inflicted upon electricity ratepayers in California denied options to escape the madness engendered by “climate” hysteria supported by no actual evidence.

The performance was so bad that PG&E, not exactly known as a carefully operating entity (lots of wildfires started due to negligence), terminated the contract. So, it’s closing 15 years early. And will soon be rusting in the desert.

Anyhow, now we wait for Democrat friendly judge to demand the Trump DOE spend the money willy nilly.

Read: Energy Secretary Says Not Moving Forward With New “Green” Loans »

Pirate's Cove