Guess Who’s Most Responsible For Hotcoldwetdry?

By William Teach April 13, 2017 – 10:37 am

Well, of course, it can’t possibly be anything related to nature

Who’s to blame for climate change and how it impacts the rest of the world

Climate change and the future of the world’s environment is a topic heavily discussed in today’s media. With the EPA facing the possibility of funding cuts, the future is not looking so bright for the planet. As this topic becomes increasingly important, the question araises, “How did we get here?”

The spike in climate change came after the Industrial Revolution, a period in history when most greenhouse gases were released into the atmosphere as a result of multiple nations developing at the same time. While other nations rose and started to develop, others stayed stagnant, falling behind in the development period.

“I think this is completely true, and we actually covered this topic in one of my environment classes last semester,” Temple University environmental studies major, Rachel O’Brien said. “One way this occurs is through spatial fix, when more developed countries outsource their pollutant heavy jobs, like factory jobs, to under developed countries. They do this to make a greater profit and avoid environmental regulations, and end up displacing the pollution onto these countries in turn.”

According to Center for Global Development, the European Union hold 40 percent responsibility for the CO2 emissions from 1850-2011, and the United States was second with 22 percent.  Developing nations have a combined percentage of 21.

Oh, noes, they’re outsourcing carbon dioxide, a trace gas necessary for life on earth! Perhaps we need to ban the European Union?

Read: Guess Who’s Most Responsible For Hotcoldwetdry? »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Climate Skeptics Want More Action From Trump

By William Teach April 13, 2017 – 8:43 am

Well, yes, yes we do. Promises were made. Promises that are not hard to keep

Climate Change Deniers Have President Trump’s Ear. But Now They Want Results

The past eight years have not been kind to people who dispute that the climate is changing. Leading scientists strengthened the case that the earth is warming and humans are at fault, while the Obama administration prioritized fighting its effects. As with so much else, the election of President Trump has ushered in a new day.

Over the past eight years, we saw the long continuation of the Great Pause, which caused Warmists to trot out well over 70 excuses to wish it away. They were caught numerous times manipulating data to accord with their Beliefs. Polls continued to show that ‘climate change’ was a low ranking issue with people in the U.S., Canada, Britain, and most 1st World nations. The passage of climate change policies in Australia caused the party that passed them to get obliterated in elections, especially those in Queensland. More and more studies have shown that the current warm period is mostly/solely caused by Not-Man.

Since taking office, Trump has moved to gut Obama’s signature climate change regulations, signed executive orders to aid the fossil fuel industry and installed a critic of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as its head. And yet to some of the strongest opponents of Obama’s environmental policy, particularly those who deny the existence of global warming, Trump is not going far enough. Despite having called climate change a “hoax” before his election, these critics think Trump has been ducking bigger fights like withdrawing from the international Paris Agreement on climate change and undoing the scientific underpinning for the EPA’s climate change rules.

The schism reflects the larger divide inside the Trump administration between the disruptive nationalists, the establishment figures and the more centrist voices. In the case of Trump’s environmental agenda, those urging him to move even faster see the president’s daughter, Ivanka, her husband, Jared Kushner, and other advisors with New York ties, like Gary Cohn, the director of the National Economic Council, as their chief opponents.

“At some point it needs to be pointed out to President Trump and his administration that the people who elected Donald J. Trump are not wealthy Manhattanites,” said Myron Ebell, who was Trump’s EPA transition chief, “including his children.”

There’s plenty of criticism for Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who appears to rather moderate on the issue, but, then, he hasn’t been doing much of anything. EPA Head Scott Pruitt has been accused of moving too slowly in scuttling ‘climate change’ regulations.

Trump has taken a number of steps to advance his environmental agenda, which includes some of the priorities Ebell laid out in the transition. Trump’s proposed budget defunds a wide range of EPA programs and calls for widespread layoffs. On March 28, he signed a sweeping executive order that calls for the EPA to review the Clean Power Plan with an eye toward eliminating it, kills a metric for assessing the economic effects of carbon dioxide emissions known as the social cost of carbon and rethinks how policymakers consider climate change.

Trump has done some good things. He needs to follow through and continue this push, along with pulling the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Accord. Simply ignoring it is a poor option, as it would be left in place for future presidents.

Still, those who deny the science behind climate change are in a position to influence U.S. policy for years to come. Trump does not have a science advisor and his administration has turned to skeptics for guidance on energy and environmental policy issues. Lehr, who says the greenhouse effect plays a negligible role in the climate, delivered a presentation to administration officials designed to help Trump defend his claim that climate change is hoax.

Can you guess what really denies the science behind anthropogenic climate change? Science! The models are failures, the data is manipulated, peer reviewed papers are political and junk science. Their whole hypothesis is “it got warmer and man puts out some CO2, therefore, man is at fault, and I’m going to take lots of fossil fueled travel to tell everyone.”

Read: Climate Skeptics Want More Action From Trump »

Posted in Donald Trump, Global Warming | 14 Comments | Trackback URL

Suspected Killer Of Border Agent Brian Terry Caught

By William Teach April 13, 2017 – 8:19 am

This is excellent new. Well, not for Eric Holder and Barack Obama, who initiated the program, Fast and Furious, which ran the guns, one of which ended being used to kill Mr. Terry. His murder led to the exposure of the program, which most news media outlets worked hard to ignore, because it would make Holder and Obama look bad

(Fox News) The cartel member suspected of shooting and killing Border Patrol agent Brian Terry in 2010 with a gun supplied by the U.S. government was arrested in Mexico Wednesday, senior law enforcement, Border Patrol, and congressional sources told Fox News.

The suspect, Heraclio Osorio-Arellanes, was apprehended by a joint U.S.-Mexico law enforcement task force that included the Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S. Marshals and the Border Patrol Tactical Unit (BORTAC).

A $250,000 reward had been sought for information leading to the arrest of Osorio-Arellanes, who was captured at a ranch on the border of the Mexican states of Sinaloa and Chihuahua. U.S. authorities have said they will seek his extradition.

Terry was killed on Dec. 14, 2010 in a gunfight between Border Patrol agents and members of a five-man cartel “rip crew,” which regularly patrolled the desert along the U.S.-Mexico border looking for drug dealers to rob.

The agent’s death exposed Operation Fast and Furious, a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) operation in which the federal government allowed criminals to buy guns in Phoenix-area shops with the intention of tracking them once they made their way into Mexico. But the agency lost track of more than 1,400 of the 2,000 guns they allowed smugglers to buy. Two of those guns were found at the scene of Terry’s killing.

Three of the four members of that “rip crew” has so far been caught and put in jail, which is great, but Heraclio Osorio-Arellanes is the one who allegedly pulled the trigger on the gun that Team Obama ran to Mexico in a straw purchase via Fast and Furious, and then lost.

There can finally be some justice for the family and friends and colleagues of Brian Terry. Sadly, that justice doesn’t include any real problems for Eric Holder, who allowed the gun running program as Attorney General.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Suspected Killer Of Border Agent Brian Terry Caught »

Posted in Current Affairs | Comments Off on Suspected Killer Of Border Agent Brian Terry Caught | Trackback URL

Let’s Take It Down A Notch, Shall We?

By William Teach April 12, 2017 – 6:46 pm

Folks, politics is a rough and tumble game. It has always been civil on top with wallowing with the pigs underneath. I remember using my lifetime tickets to check out what was going on in the House when I was wandering around D.C. about 10 years ago, and one Republican referred to Charlie Rangle as “my esteemed colleague from New York.” The way he said it, though, meant “the asshole from NY.”

Now, I like rough and tumble politics. Always have. I’ve mentioned previously, when I’ve written a similar post here, that I started out playing on the NJ.com Hardball Politics forum, which was known as the Toilet Forum. It was pretty nasty. The moderators didn’t even like moderating it. However, every once in a while they had to crack down.

Now, I’ll take the blame for the comments here getting more and more nasty. It’s my site. I pay the bills. I write the posts. What I would like is for everyone to take a step back and think what they’re writing. Is it getting too personal? Should you really be involving family? Are you going too far? Are you going beyond normal pig-mud politics?

Let’s all dial it back a bit, shall we? I don’t want to pinpoint anyone at this time. I want robust debate. Heck, I miss John (I’m actually a bit concerned for him). Take a look at The Code on the sidebar.

Maybe I need to post more cute things?

Favorite Iron Maiden song

Read: Let’s Take It Down A Notch, Shall We? »

Posted in Pirates Cove | 11 Comments | Trackback URL

Warmists Have A New Tool To Scare People At The Local Level

By William Teach April 12, 2017 – 3:16 pm

Obviously, this is all prognostication

(Business Insider) The climate is changing. Most people know that it’s changing, and a sizeable majority even say they worry about those changes.

But at the same time, just 40% of Americans think it’s going to harm them personally. And just 33% of Americans say they talk about climate change “even occasionally.”

In other words, most people do not care despite decades of spreading awareness and fear-mongering. And most do not think it’s a problem. They aren’t really concerned if the average global temperature rises a few tenths of a degree, regardless of causation.

Well, obviously, it’s time for more scary fables. And, since you people aren’t concerned about it a global level

But climate change is going to impact every corner of the Earth in some way or another.

That’s why the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s slick new online Climate Explorer is so fascinating.

The updated system lets you zip across the 48 contiguous states (and Washington DC), and see for yourself how the local climate in any given neighborhood is likely to change between 2010 and 2100. The Climate Explorer also includes data on how the climate has behaved between 1950 and 2010; scroll forward in time, and you’re seeing data pulled from international climate models.

It allows you to see your future doom based on if things continue as it is (which is Interesting, considering 95%of the models have failed), as well as if you get taxed and fee’d up the ying yang while also giving up lots of freedom and liberty to Centralized Government.

Read: Warmists Have A New Tool To Scare People At The Local Level »

Posted in AGW Scaremongering, Global Warming | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach April 12, 2017 – 1:00 pm

…is a fish that will soon swim in the Arctic Circle due to carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on scary chicken sandwiches.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Bummer: Immigration Crackdown Leads To Illegals With Minor Crimes And No Criminal History Being Arrested

By William Teach April 12, 2017 – 10:30 am

Are they unlawfully present in the United States? Then they are criminals

NEW TRUMP IMMIGRATION ORDER HAS LED TO THE ARREST OF HUNDREDS OF UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS FOR MINOR CRIMES

U.S. immigration officers arrested 367 undocumented immigrants in a country-wide blitz spanning several weeks in March and April. While many of those detained have criminal backgrounds, many are also not the “bad hombres” President Donald Trump said he was going to prioritize getting out of the country, raising concerns among civil rights groups who argue immigrants are being forced to live in fear.

A series of press releases issued in the first week of April show the large-scale coordinated efforts by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to round up immigration offenders in Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, New York and Washington, D.C. Yet of the 75 people arrested during a three-day raid  in North Texas and Oklahoma in the first week of April, 23 did not have criminal pasts. Of the 31 arrested in New York the same week, the most dangerous offense committed by 12 of them was driving under the influence. And 16 of the 153 people arrested during a two-week operation in southern Texas had no criminal history.

Those who had committed offenses faced charges on everything from aggravated assault, burglary, drug trafficking, child abuse, human trafficking and sexual assault. But many others had been charged with fraud, driving under the influence or marijuana possession, in other words, not exactly the dangerous criminals Trump said he would go after.

Perhaps they aren’t the ones that Trump said he would go after, but, he’s not sitting their approving each and every illegal who ICE goes to detain. Furthermore, ICE typically picks up the low and no crime illegals because they have outstanding deportation orders already on the books. Double furthermore, this same thing happened under Obama. Because Obama was only going to micro-manage ICE operations so much.

Just because Trump said he would “prioritize” does not mean ICE won’t pick up those with other crimes or no crimes. And, really, is DUI not a serious crime? When you drive under the influence, usually alcohol, you are drastically increasing the danger to other people. Fraud usually involves stealing legal citizen’s information, which can ruin their lives. Oh, and none should be here in the first place.

But under the Trump administration, the priority has become all undocumented immigrants, no matter their criminal past. The Department of Homeland Security will no longer “exempt classes or categories of removable aliens from potential enforcement,” explained Secretary of Homeland Security John Kelly in a February 20 memo. Immigrants who had overstayed a visa were also a priority, he said.

What part of “unlawfully present” is not understood?

Following the raids in Washington, D.C., La ColectiVA, a local rights group, protested Monday in front of ICE headquarters in Virginia. “We are here to say that we are watching, we are vigilant and we will not let our community members live in fear of deportation and of being abducted and separated from their communities,” the group wrote in a Facebook post. They said families in the surrounding area were being “forced to live in fear” of being deported.

And the more they fear, the more they voluntarily self-deport. The more they live in fear, and the more the media tells us they are living in fear, the more refuse to come illegally, as well as overstay visas. The media and all these illegal alien supporting groups don’t even realize they are helping to stoke the fear, and, in doing so, helping Team Trump reduce illegal immigration.

Read: Bummer: Immigration Crackdown Leads To Illegals With Minor Crimes And No Criminal History Being Arrested »

Posted in Illegal Immigration | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Team Trump Blows Off G7, Won’t Sign Statement Endorsing Paris Climate Agreement

By William Teach April 12, 2017 – 7:19 am

This has made many a Warmist very upset

(Daily Caller) The U.S. refused to sign onto a statement with other G7 countries to commit to the implementation of the Paris climate agreement, which President Donald Trump promised to withdraw from on the campaign trail.

Secretary of Energy Rick Perry said the U.S. “is in the process of reviewing many of its policies and reserves its position on this issue, which will be communicated at a future date,” Italy’s industry and energy minister Carlo Calenda said in a statement.

Calenda said other G7 members “reaffirmed their commitment towards the implementation of the Paris Agreement to effectively limit the increase in global temperature well below 2°C above pre-industrial level.”

The Trump administration would not sign onto a statement mentioning Paris, since the president is still deciding whether or not to keep his campaign pledge. Perry also wanted the G7 to include support for coal and natural gas in its statement.

Italy, which was hosting the G7, had pushed for nations to sign a policy statement which included support for the Paris Climate Agreement (which won’t actually do anything but limit warming by hundredths of a degree Celsius, per Warmists). Since Rick Perry said “nope”, no nation signed.

It’s the 4th paragraph above that causes concern, and leads to this

The White house is split on whether or not to keep Trump’s campaign pledge. On one side, Ivanka Trump, White House aide Jared Kushner and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson support remaining in Paris.

White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt oppose the Paris agreement.

Will he or won’t he? If he hasn’t done so by, say, July, you can surely put that promise in the “broken” category. Of course, Trump could also just let it ride and ignore the requirements, since, for one thing, they have no force of law.

Read: Team Trump Blows Off G7, Won’t Sign Statement Endorsing Paris Climate Agreement »

Posted in Donald Trump, Global Warming | Comments Off on Team Trump Blows Off G7, Won’t Sign Statement Endorsing Paris Climate Agreement | Trackback URL

Syria Strike Fails To Follow Progressive Playbook, Leading To Unhinged Op-Eds

By William Teach April 12, 2017 – 6:36 am

While the attached headline for this Washington Post opinion piece by uber-leftist Katrina Vanden Huevel is technically linked to the piece, it might have been better to call it “Trump Did Something Good, And That’s Not Something Progressives Should Agree With!!!!!”

Syria strike follows Washington’s failed foreign-policy playbook

“There’s a playbook in Washington that presidents are supposed to follow,” then-President Obama said last year, defending his decision not to unilaterally strike Syria in 2013. “It’s a playbook that comes out of the foreign-policy establishment. And the playbook prescribes responses to different events, and these responses tend to be militarized responses. Where America is directly threatened, the playbook works. But the playbook can also be a trap that can lead to bad decisions.”

Obviously, Katrina cannot place blame at Obama’s feet for 6 years of inaction, dithering, leading from behind, and general fecklessness. Nope. Trump

Last week, by impulsively ordering a military strike against a Syrian air base, President Trump both followed the playbook and fell into the trap. To be clear, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s apparent use of chemical weapons against civilians in the town of Khan Sheikhoun is a heinous crime. Almost six years of civil war in Syria have led to nearly half a million dead and millions more displaced, a humanitarian crisis worsened by the Trump administration’s cruel and senseless attempts to ban Syrian refugees. The human suffering has been horrific to watch. Yet despite the fervor of the bipartisan foreign policy establishment, which fetishizes the purported “credibility” that accompanies the use of force, it remains folly to think that Trump’s military action will help end the carnage.

A heinous crime, but, since Trump responded, and because he said something and attempted to do something to limit the people coming from a war torn area replete with ISIS members and Islamic extremists, it’s all his fault. Seriously, who was president the past 6 years? That’s what worsened the humanitarian crisis.

It is a testament to the absurdity of the presidential “playbook” that perhaps the most irresponsible act of Trump’s madhouse presidency has also been one of the most widely applauded. Suddenly, much of the same media and political establishment that has routinely portrayed Trump as an unstable and inept authoritarian are ecstatic that he decided to drop bombs in the Middle East. Airing footage of the assault, MSNBC anchor Brian Williams admired the “beautiful pictures of fearsome armaments.” Five major newspapers collectively published 18 pieces that endorsed the strikes or argued they were insufficient, according to media watchdog Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting.

Irresponsible. Obviously, it would have been better had Trump stated that Assad not cross the next red line, or used a strongly worded letter or a hashtag with a sad face.

But there is little evidence that the strike accomplished anything beyond a temporary popularity boost for a flailing president. If Trump’s goal was to punish Assad for using chemical weapons, the punishment was effectively nothing more than a timeout, as Syrian warplanes resumed use of the targeted air base less than 24 hours after it was hit. And if Trump has a coherent strategy for what happens next, he has failed to communicate it to the American people or the international community.

Maybe it’s better to not broadcast war-plans to dictators and wackjobs at the United Nations. Because Obama’s method of telling everyone his plans, then backing off those plans, hasn’t worked out so well. But, hey, Trump!

Katrina whines some more, using the same talking points as other Leftists who just can’t acknowledge that Trump do something good, ending with

Despite the clamoring of the bipartisan foreign policy establishment, the unfortunate reality is that their “playbook” does not contain a path to victory in Syria. Rather than agitating for more U.S. military intervention in a war that cannot be won, we should be calling on our government to lead a diplomatic effort to end the war once and for all. And for those who recognize that Trump cannot bomb his way to peace, it is time to revive and mobilize an antiwar movement to keep the United States from getting entangled in another Middle East war with no clear strategy and no end in sight.

Perhaps Katrina could illuminate us on how to go about ending the war diplomatically? What could the parties be offered? How to get to that peace? What are her plans? Bueller? You have the Assad regime, the regular folks of Syria, the rebels, and then the Islamic extremists, particularly ISIS. What does peace look like between the four?

And why didn’t Katrina’s god, Barack H. Obama, lead a diplomatic effort to end the war once and for all? He was the guy In Charge for the last 6 years, was he not?

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Syria Strike Fails To Follow Progressive Playbook, Leading To Unhinged Op-Eds »

Posted in Donald Trump, Unhinged Tools | Comments Off on Syria Strike Fails To Follow Progressive Playbook, Leading To Unhinged Op-Eds | Trackback URL

NC Democrats Have Typical Meltdowns Over Proposed Sanctuary City Crackdown Legislation

By William Teach April 11, 2017 – 3:01 pm

Apparently, Democrats are not big fans of The Law. Let’s start out with a quote from deep in the article

(WRAL) “We’re sitting here debating whether to obey the law or not. That just amazes me. In a judiciary committee of this state, does that make any sense that we would be debating that?” asked a clearly frustrated Sen. Harry Brown, R-Onslow.

One would think, but, Democrats do not care about the law, at least when it impedes acquiring new voters who are dependent on the Government.

A proposal to crack down on local governments over immigration led to raised tempers and voices Tuesday in the Senate Judiciary Committee before being approved on a party-line vote.

Senate Bill 145 would withhold state funding from cities or counties that adopt a so-called “sanctuary” policy or ordinance regarding undocumented immigrants in any respect. It would open up an anonymous complaint process for any citizen with a “good faith” belief that a local government is not following immigration laws. The Attorney General’s Office would then be required to follow up and investigate within 45 days.17

Any local government with a sanctuary policy could be sued by anyone who was injured by the actions of an undocumented immigrant.

Obviously, this would make sanctuary cities, which are 100% run by Democrats, a bit antsy. The bill further restricts any University Of North Carolina school from limiting any federal immigration enforcement, and would disallow law enforcement from recognizing banned forms of identification. This is all about government, but, of course, Democrats are throwing monkey wrenches in the works by bringing up private entities, like churches (where was their concern when Charlotte was trying to force private entities, like churches, allow the gender confused in bathrooms, showers, and locker rooms of the opposite biological sex?)

Sen. Paul Lowe, D-Forsyth, said his church provides food and other humanitarian assistance to the community.

“The folks that need help and that are coming for help, we know they’re illegal,” Lowe said. “We know they’re here because they have nowhere else to go and they’re just trying to get some basic help. You don’t advertise it, but you just know.”

So, if you know they’re illegal, then you are breaking The Law. Intentionally. However, the law wouldn’t apply to private entities, hence, the quote from the beginning of the post, which was in response to this Democrat idiocy. Some Dems were worried about cities losing funding that they need.

Easy solution? Don’t be sanctuary cities. Do not harbor illegal aliens. Follow the law.

Read: NC Democrats Have Typical Meltdowns Over Proposed Sanctuary City Crackdown Legislation »

Posted in Illegal Immigration, NC News | 56 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove