If All You See…

…is an evil road that supports fossil fueled vehicles, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day Moonbattery, with a post on vegan ISIS.

Read: If All You See… »

Irony: Al Gore’s Book Outsold By Book Debunking Gore’s Book

Hey, maybe it’s because Warmists do not want to invest the carbon pollution producing energy required to purchase the book?

(Daily Caller) Former Vice President Al Gore’s new book is lagging in sales, and, in fact, is being outsold on Amazon Kindle by an e-book debunking many of the claims made in “An Inconvenient Sequel.”

Climatologist Roy Spencer authored an e-book, “An Inconvenient Deception,” to critique the “bad science, bad policy and some outright falsehoods” in Gore’s latest movie and book, which were released in August. Now, it’s ranked higher in Amazon’s Kindle store.

“There are three big weaknesses in Gore’s new movie: science, economics and energy policy,” Spencer, a noted skeptic of catastrophic global warming, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

The e-book published to accompany Gore’s film is ranked #51,031 for purchases in the Kindle Store, according to Amazon.com. Spencer’s book is ranked #1,201 for Kindle Store purchases.

At the time of writing of this post, 8:45am, Gore’s book is now 40,015 in paid Kindle books. Roy Spencer’s is #278.

I have Spencer’s book on my Kindle, haven’t gotten around to reading it yet, have a couple of things up first.

Read: Irony: Al Gore’s Book Outsold By Book Debunking Gore’s Book »

Tom Cotton: Sure, We Can Support Dreamers, But, We Have To Shut Down The Illegal Alien Pipeline

Today is the day that President Trump is slated to announce his decision on Obama’s lawless and un-Constitutional DACA. What will he announce? We’ll see. Tom Cotton has some ideas

(Washington Examiner) Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton, who after the departure of Jeff Sessions has emerged as the Senate’s leading immigration hawk, says he would support the legalization of all current DACA recipients — nearly 800,000 of them — if Congress would at the same time pass measures to protect Americans workers from the effects of that legalization.

“We ought to take care of them,” Cotton said in a telephone conversation Sunday, noting that DACA recipients arrived in this country illegally “through no fault of their own.”

Again, this brings up the notion of what to do with the parent(s) who brought them. Do we reward the parent(s) for breaking federal law while bringing their children who are now “entitled” to some sort of legal status through “no fault of their own?”

“In any legislative fix, I would like to see them receive a green card,” Cotton said. At the same time, he continued, “We ought to recognize that giving them legal status has two problems. First, it creates a whole new class of people who will then be eligible for a green card and citizenship — namely, the extended family members of those who will receive legal status who can, through chain migration, get legal status themselves.”

“Second,” Cotton said, “it will encourage more illegal immigration.”

And that is the rub. If you reward lawless behavior, you will get more lawless behavior.

The first problem can be fixed by passing the RAISE Act, Cotton said — the bill Cotton has sponsored with fellow GOP Sen. David Perdue that would strictly limit chain migration as well as re-balance current immigration policy in favor of skilled immigrants.

The second problem could be addressed by extending E-verify across the country, which Cotton called “the best way to reduce more illegal immigration.”

They’re partial ideas, but neither full deals with the concept of illegal immigration. The RAISE Act is more about those coming in legally. E-verify can only deal with those who are caught, and only if law enforcement does something. I offered some recommendations at the end of this post yesterday regarding DACA. We can be sympathetic while also being tough. There are ways to deal with the needed workers with temporary work permits while also being tough on illegals. To start with, if you are caught illegally in the U.S., you see a judge who asks if you are in the U.S. illegally. That’s it. No asking “why.” When the answer is yes, you are deported immediately. If you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime.

Oh, and Trump just tweeted this

Read: Tom Cotton: Sure, We Can Support Dreamers, But, We Have To Shut Down The Illegal Alien Pipeline »

Washington Post: Since Impeachment Is A Long Shot, There’s Something Else Unhinged That Can Be Done

The unhinged fantasies of Democratic Party voters, and, yes, some Republicans, that Trump will be impeached are not good for their mental well being. This constant bleating that something will show up, that he’s committed some sort of crime, that they can invoked the 25th Amendment, and, further, somehow get impeach VP Mike Pence at the same time and end up with a Hillary Clinton (a candidate who was so bad that even though the entire media was pulling for her, she lost the only election that mattered by blowing off needed states. And passing out in public view). Now, we have the Washington Post’s Robert Kagan dragging out yet another fantasy

Impeaching Trump is a long shot.  There’s another way to protect the country.

With the impeachment and removal of President Trump a long shot at best, there is another way to provide the country some protection from our unfit president: congressional government. The idea may seem far-fetched in this era of the “imperial presidency,” but there have been times in the nation’s history, especially in the decades after the Civil War but also to a lesser extent during the 1920s, when Congress ran the show on many critical matters and the president dared take no action without the approval of powerful committee chairmen.

The clearest example of this, and the one most relevant to the current situation, was in 1865, when a Republican Congress seized control of federal administration of the defeated South from then-President Andrew Johnson. A Tennessean who saw himself as the defender of Southern white supremacy, Johnson refused to pursue the agenda of the Radical Republicans who wanted to break the power of the white ruling class in order to ensure the rights and the physical safety of newly freed blacks. When Johnson refused to compromise, Congress took charge. For some months, Congress wielded control not only over national policy but also over its implementation by the military.

Months. In fact, Kagan is leaving a lot of details unmentioned. A LOT. The situation was vastly different. Look it up. There’s no comparison with Trump, who Democrats and some Republicans loathe simply because.

There’s no reason Congress could not do the same now. On some issues, it already has. On two important policies — sanctions on Russia and health care — a working majority of Democrats and Republicans in the Senate has already thwarted Trump. Another bipartisan majority appears to have formed against Trump’s threat to shut down the government unless he gets significant funding for a wall along the Southern border. In fact, on any number of issues, there are enough anti-Trump Republicans in the Senate not only to block the president but also to push their own policies contrary to the president’s — as was the case with Russia sanctions.

But, that isn’t even close to Congress “running the show.” It’s simply the normal state of affairs, where the duly elected Legislative Branch disagrees with the duly elected Chief Executive. That happens. Is the Supreme Court “running the show” when it disagrees with legislation?

The rest of the typical Barking Moonbat opinion is just a continuation of this silliness, this fantasy of people who just can’t move on. It’s surely a good time to be a psychologist. Gonna be a lot of fancy cars and boats purchased by them.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Washington Post: Since Impeachment Is A Long Shot, There’s Something Else Unhinged That Can Be Done »

Good Grief: Cancelling DACA Would Be “Evil”

Well, leave it up to the Washington Post’s resident wackadoodle “Republican” Jennifer Rubin to go wonkers

Ending DACA would be Trump’s most evil act

Following the law as written is now evil, you guys.

Some in the media take seriously the notion that he is “conflicted” or “wrestling” with the decision, as though Trump were engaged in a great moral debate. That would be a first for Trump, who counts only winners and losers, never bothering with moral principles or democratic norms.

How about the Rule Of Law? Doesn’t that come first?

First, let’s not think Trump — who invites cops to abuse suspects, who thinks ex-sheriff Joe Arpaio was “doing his job” when denying others their constitutional rights and who issued the Muslim ban — cares about the Constitution

Doing away with DACA would, get this, be following the Constitution.

However this turns out, the GOP under Trump has defined itself as the white grievance party — bluntly, a party fueled by concocted white resentment aimed at minorities. Of all the actions Trump has taken, none has been as cruel, thoughtless or divisive as deporting hundreds of thousands of young people who’ve done nothing but go to school, work hard and present themselves to the government.

So, enforcing The Law is sorts of bad things? Good grief.

And, let me throw this out there: why are Whites not allowed to have grievances? Blacks are allowed to air theirs, as are Latinos, Hispanics, Mexicans, Liberals, etc. Not whites, though? Last time I checked, we still had Constitutional rights.

Regardless, with friends like Jen Rubin (and Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney, etc), who needs enemies? And, as Scott Greer notes, all the arguments for DACA put Americans last.

Read: Good Grief: Cancelling DACA Would Be “Evil” »

If All You See…

…is an evil animal contributing greenhouse gases that will destroy the Earth, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Pacific Pundit, with a post on EPA related fake news from the AP.

Read: If All You See… »

More On SSL Changes

I’ve reverted back to the non https address, with a script that forces all domain calls to go to www, because, for whatever reason, a straight http://thepiratescove.us call still only shows from last Friday.

Using the https address was killing several scripts, mainly traffic counter and live traffic.

However, the RSS feeds are still broken. Not sure why. Everything necessary is stripped.

More: Whelp, I didn’t do anything, but, the feeds started working again, at least from what I see in Feedly. Every post is showing as 6 hours ago, and the post from my testing site is likewise showing. I’m not going to touch anything here for awhile, I’ll continue to do things with the test site.

Read: More On SSL Changes »

Extreme Weather Events Are Linked To Climatic Changes Or Something

Seriously, who would have thought that the climate could ever change?

NOAA: Extreme weather events occur more often when the climate changes

Supporters of theories that man created climate change or global warming is contributing to major storms like Hurricane Harvey are making their case.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, officially lists extreme weather events as one of several phenomena occurring more frequently because of climate change. But attributing specific storms or disasters to climate change, according to NOAA is “much harder.”

This branch of science is known as “extreme event attribution” and is still in its infancy.

Got all that? It’s totally linked, except they don’t really have a frickin’ clue.

But, hey, get this: the climate is always changing, and causes climatic changes. Weird concept, eh?

Read: Extreme Weather Events Are Linked To Climatic Changes Or Something »

Surprise: Trump Resistance Groups Are Taking North Korea’s Side

As you’re certainly aware, North Korea has become rather bellicose as of late, because that’s what they do. They just reportedly set off a hydrogen bomb, and they are reported to be readying another missile launch. Just the other day we saw this

(Breitbart) This week in an interview with the Los Angeles Times editorial board, Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA), who filed articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, said “Trump derangement syndrome” was so strong with his Californian constituents, he would be forced to oppose Mother’s Day if Trump endorsed it.

Sherman said, “Then we have a Trump derangement syndrome where — thank God he didn’t put out a message on Mother’s Day because there would have been pressure on me to come out against Mother’s Day.”

He added, “If Trump takes a position, then you must take an equally extreme and opposite position. He’s for Mother’s Day — you must be against Mother’s Day. He’s for a wall — you have to be for unlimited immigration from all places.”

Then we have this

(Daily Caller) Two of the nation’s most active anti-Trump “resistance” organizations are taking decidedly pro-North Korea stances in the United States’ developing nuclear standoff with the communist country, whose leader, Kim Jong Un, has repeatedly threatened to launch a nuclear strike against America.

One group is Refuse Fascism, a well-funded “resistance” group created for the express purpose of opposing President Trump’s administration. Internal presentations from a Refuse Fascism conference last month said the group intends to make America’s leaders lose “international legitimacy” as a way of ultimately bringing down the Trump presidency, as TheDC first reported.

The other group is Workers World Party, a Marxist organization that has played a leading role in anti-Trump demonstrations across the country.

Both groups have consistently echoed North Korean talking points that demonize America while excusing Un’s genocidal regime, and both groups have instructed their followers to distrust American media reporting that reflects negatively on North Korean leaders’ oppression of their own people.

There’s quite a bit more at the article, much more detail. Suffice to say, yes, they are just two Leftist organizations. But, you can bet there are quite a few #resist-ers who feel the same. Searching “north korea #resist” at Twitter we see things like

https://twitter.com/brienthess/status/904417362429878272

That’s mild in the attacks on Trump.  We’re living in a Trump Derangement Syndrome world. Much like Democrats wanted to take the side of anyone no matter how bad they were during the Bush years (Iran, Al Qaeda, Islamist groups, North Korea, and so forth), they’re doing the same now for Trump.

Read: Surprise: Trump Resistance Groups Are Taking North Korea’s Side »

Report: Trump To End DACA, With 6 Month Grace Period

Of course, read with a grain of salt, as this is using the typical anonymous sources

(Politico) President Donald Trump has decided to end the Obama-era program that grants work permits to undocumented immigrants who arrived in the country as children, according to two sources familiar with his thinking. Senior White House aides huddled Sunday afternoon to discuss the rollout of a decision likely to ignite a political firestorm — and fulfill one of the president’s core campaign promises.

The administration’s deliberations on the issue have been fluid and fast moving, and the president has faced strong warnings from members of his own party not to scrap the program.

Trump has wrestled for months with whether to do away with the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, known as DACA. But conversations with Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who argued that Congress — rather than the executive branch — is responsible for writing immigration law, helped persuade the president to terminate the program and kick the issue to Congress, the two sources said.

In a nod to reservations held by many lawmakers, the White House plans to delay the enforcement of the president’s decision for six months, giving Congress a window to act, according to one White House official. But a senior White House aide said that chief of staff John Kelly, who has been running the West Wing policy process on the issue, “thinks Congress should’ve gotten its act together a lot longer ago.”

All in all, this makes sense. DACA is most likely un-Constitutional to start with, as the President has no statutory authority to make/change immigration law. Giving two year exemptions in perpetuity is changing immigration law without the consent of the duly elected Legislative branch.

White House aides caution that — as with everything in the Trump White House — nothing is set in stone until an official announcement has been made.

Change that to “Politico writers caution that”. Same with writers at other news outlets. Regardless, some are calling it Republican suicide, if the GOP controlled Congress passes some sort of amnesty, and there are certainly enough idiot Republicans who would be willing to do something like that. It wouldn’t be common sense and measured, it would most likely end up with them giving blanket amnesty and citizenship to not only the so-called Dreamers, but their parents, cousins, that kid who was brought illegally and they knew in the 5th grade through a friend’s friend.

Meanwhile, Mr. Whiny, who is seeing so much of his agenda go down the toilet, may speak out

Former President Barack Obama plans to speak out if President Donald Trump declares his intention to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, according to a person close to Obama.

Obama’s current plan is to post a statement on Facebook and link to it on Twitter, where the former president has more than 94 million followers. In his final presidential press availability, he suggested that he would speak out if Trump went after the Dreamers — and that it was one of the few issues where he would feel morally compelled to do so. He said he would not remain silent in the face of “efforts to round up kids who have grown up here and for all practical purposes are American kids, and send them someplace else, when they love this country.”

Here’s a recommendation: Congress puts DACA into law, but allows 4 year renewals, rather than 2 years, in order to decrease burden on federal agencies. Just like with people who are applying for citizenship, any serious crimes can be cause to cancel an illegals legal status and deport them. And, yes, even DUIs may be considered cause, just like with those applying for citizenship. After 12 years, they can go through the same process as those applying for citizenship in order to attempt to earn full citizenship.

BUT, if we aren’t going to lay the “sins” of the parent(s) on the children, we are going to lay them on the parent(s). In order to obtain DACA status, the parent(s) must self deport, and provide proof at an immigration checkpoint as they leave. They are not allowed back in the United States for 2 years, and then only for a short visit. If they are caught residing in the U.S., or attempting to enter the country illegally, the children will have their DACA status ended and will be deported. After 12 years, they would be allowed to apply for temporary resident status, conditioned on speaking English and having good moral character. This seems fair. The parents broke our laws.

If you don’t agree with punishing the parents, then you’re simply using DACA to create a backdoor amnesty for all.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Report: Trump To End DACA, With 6 Month Grace Period »

Pirate's Cove