…is a road built for Evil fossil fueled vehicles causing Bad Weather, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is LMAO, with a post on “You Can’t Spell “Racist” Without “Cis””
Read: If All You See… »
…is a road built for Evil fossil fueled vehicles causing Bad Weather, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is LMAO, with a post on “You Can’t Spell “Racist” Without “Cis””
Read: If All You See… »
By evolving, US News and World Report mostly means “dumping them”
Corporate Climate Change Pledges Are Shifting and Evolving
Reporting this week that Starbucks has quietly but aggressively rolled back many of its sustainability targets has turned a spotlight on corporate climate pledges and how they have evolved in recent years.
The Financial Times reported Tuesday that Starbucks has revised or abandoned pledges to cut waste and water use in half, even as it reconsiders a goal to reduce carbon emissions by a similar amount.
The newspaper also reported that Starbucks executives focused on sustainability have been particularly hard hit by job cuts at the company over the last two years.
The news was particularly striking because the Seattle-based coffee giant has cultivated an eco-friendly image for years, making green commitments a central element of its corporate identity.
That Starbucks is doing this shows that even the most extreme companies are realizing that it’s a scam, it costs too much money, and the purpose of the business it to make money. Oh, and that people really care about this stuff less and less in the real world, and consumers do not want to pay for the cult activism of companies
The environmental consultancy firm Trellis recently reported that while Walmart cut its overall carbon emissions in 2025, it has also revised overall green commitments, in some cases postponing the target dates for specific goals.
In July, a New York Times analysis cited Pepsi, Coca-Cola and Kraft Heinz along with steel manufacturer ArcelorMittal among corporate giants that “moved the goal posts” when initial climate pledges proved difficult or impossible to honor.
Companies are moving away from placating the climate nuts, because, let’s be honest, while a lot of people care in theory about ‘climate change’, they don’t care that much and companies having pledges means jack squat to them.
Read: Corporate Climate (scam) Pledges Are Evolving Or Something »
The US has all these people in the nation who are not citizens, just hanging around as “permanent residents”, who seem to hate the US and support terrorism. Would liberals support deporting someone who is a full on supporter of Putin?
US immigration judge allows cold war-era law to deport Wisconsin mosque’s president
An immigration judge has ruled that the president of Wisconsin’s largest mosque can be deported under a controversial, cold-war era law the Trump administration has sought to wield against foreign nationals who have been outspoken about Palestinian rights.
Salah Sarsour, a US permanent resident for nearly three decades, was detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement in March. He was released after a federal judge found he had probably been detained in retaliation of his advocacy for Palestinian rights, which the federal judge said would render his detention unlawful.
Despite that ruling, the administration pressed forward and fast-tracked Sarsour’s immigration case – a separate legal track – and on Tuesday night an immigration judge ruled he is “removable”.
Judge Jayme Salinardi, who was brought in from out of state to oversee the case, announced he would be retiring shortly after issuing the decision.
Obviously, his lawyers and the other Islamic terrorism supporters will appeal
The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but claimed before that Sarsour was “suspected of funding terror organizations and lying on immigration forms”. He has denied both claims.
In a statement issued shortly after his arrest, the DHS cited Sarsour’s decades-old military court convictions in Israel for, it said, “throwing a Molotov cocktail at the homes of Israeli armed forces and illegally attempting to possess weapons and ammunition”.
Double obviously, the UK Guardian takes his side against Israel, claiming the conviction was coerced and such. He never should have been allowed in the US, and, really, post 9/11, people like Sarsour should have been booted.
Read: Excellent: Judge Rules Islamist Mosque President Can Be Deported »
They get it: when will others?
Florida OKs terror designations for CAIR, antifa, Muslim Brotherhood
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), antifa and the Muslim Brotherhood will be labeled domestic terrorist organizations under a new state law, after Florida leaders OK’d the designations at their Sept. 29 meeting.
These designations were in a 427-page packet submitted by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement for approval by Gov. Ron DeSantis and Florida Cabinet members: Attorney General James Uthmeier, Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson and state Chief Financial Officer Blaise Ingoglia.
The packet also named numerous other groups labeled by the federal government as foreign terrorist organizations. (snip)
The law not only allows the state to issue these designations, but also mandates universities to expel students who “promote” these groups. It also restricts schools affiliated with domestic terror groups from participating in the state’s school voucher program, which grants taxpayer-funded scholarships for parents to enroll their child in a school of their choice.
Now, the organizations have seven days after receiving the notice to object to the designation. The group can also petition FDLE to remove the designation, or it can appeal the designation in the 2nd Judicial Circuit.
Is Amtifa a terrorist group? They use violence for political means, which does make them terrorists, rather than simply a criminal gang. CAIR is backed by the Muslim Brotherhood, which is certainly a terrorist group, one which is against everything America stands for. Hell, there’s a reason they are banned in Egypt.
Of course, the Usual Useful Idiots are proclaiming this is Fascism!!!!!, never seeming to understand that the Islamists are using them to push the Islamist agenda.
Read: Awesome: Florida Designates Antifa, CAIR, Muslim Brotherhood As Terrorist Orgs »
…is an Evil fossil fueled vehicle causing sudden Bad Weather, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Irons In The Fire, with a post on “I repeat, British cops stopped being peace officers a long time ago, now”
Read: If All You See… »
I really had no desire to see the movie, because I really had zero idea what it was about from the promos, and nothing in them enticed me to go see it. The AP has some interesting things to say
Movie Review: In ‘Digger,’ a ‘Dr. Strangelove’ for the climate change era
Just as the fate of the world hangs in the balance in “Digger,” Alejandro G. Iñárritu’s over-the-top, climate-disaster satire teeters on the brink.
It’s an audacious plate-spinning act, juggling exaggerated farce, sober anxieties and an oil-mad Tom Cruise. Iñárritu, an art-house showman, has always delighted in a grandiosity of vision: the long-take backstage circus of “Birdman,” the rugged vistas of “The Revenant,” the metaphysical musings of “Bardo.” You come to an Iñárritu movie for swagger, not subtlety.
And “Digger,” — a “Dr. Strangelove” for the climate change era — isn’t trying to mince words. Its desire to make a statement and shake up its audience may be unlikely to find broad critical favor. But there are times to go big. Can you dig it?
But “Digger” is sharper on the other side of tragicomedy. An impassioned provocation aimed at both politicians and audience members, “Digger” is by any measure an uncommon major studio release — as urgent as “An Inconvenient Truth” but a whole lot more operatic. For better or worse, this is an of-the-moment big swing that’s unlikely to come along again anytime soon. (snip)
Meanwhile, Digger begins fielding calls from a massive oil drilling platform in Greenland. A glacier crack and methane leak from the seabed are worrying scientists, but Digger charismatically cajoles them with baseball metaphors. He asks instead for some “hustle” in increasing the daily barrels pumped.
The article seems to be giving the impression that Digger is a climate cult siding movie in the same way that Dr. Strangelove was an anti-nukes/nuclear war movie, highlighting the dangers of global boiling. But, it’s apparently not funny or sarcastic in the way Peter Sellers was. Maybe that’s why the ads didn’t really show what the movie was about. Even climate cultists mostly do not want to see climate scam movies.
Read: Apparently The Movie Digger Is About ‘Climate Change’ »
This is deja vu all over again, after the Court ruled in 2025 that it was OK to send them to 3rd party countries
Supreme Court lets Trump resume deporting migrants to countries not their own
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday let President Donald Trump’s administration resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own without offering them the chance to show the harms they may face, bolstering a tool his administration has used for rapid expulsions as part of his immigration crackdown.
The court granted ?the Justice Department’s emergency request to put on hold Boston-based US District Judge Brian Murphy’s ruling that the Department of Homeland Security’s policy to remove migrants to so-called third ?countries is unlawful. The court also agreed to hear arguments in the dispute in December, with a formal ruling on the policy to follow.
The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal justices dissented from the decision to let ?the deportations immediately resume pending the final outcome of the litigation.
Murphy’s ruling came in a class-action lawsuit filed by immigrant rights groups on behalf of migrants seeking to prevent the US government from sending them to third countries without notice and a chance to assert the harms they could face.
I’m surprised the Majority didn’t write “don’t try to block this again, moron liberal judges”, because you know some dipshit will put a ruling out, right?
The case has been hotly contested since it began, and included findings by Murphy that the administration “repeatedly ?violated, or attempted to violate” his orders. Murphy in 2025 found that the administration had violated another order he issued requiring additional steps before attempting to send ?a group of migrants to South Sudan.
Maybe Murphy should have listened to the Supreme Court to start with.
Read: Supreme Court Once Again Allows Deporting Illegals To 3rd Party Countries »
…is heatsnow because Other People eat meat, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jihad Watch, with a post on “Sharia UK: Essex supermarket has sex-segregated checkout lines”
Read: If All You See… »