If All You See…

…is the world killing fridge all your leftovers are in, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Watts Up With That?, with a post on replacing BBC “journalists” with ChatGPT.

Read: If All You See… »

You Holding On To Your Old Tech Is Hurting The Economy

Oh, yeah, this is definitely your faul

Researchers: Americans Holding on to Old Tech Devices Is Hurting the Economy

Americans are holding onto their smartphones and other devices longer than ever, but researchers claim this trend comes with a hidden cost to the economy.

CNBC reports that in recent years, Americans have been clinging to their aging smartphones, computers, and other electronic devices for extended periods. While this may seem like a financially prudent decision on an individual level, experts warn that the collective impact of this trend could be detrimental to the economy as a whole.

According to a recent survey by Reviews.org, the average American now holds onto their smartphone for 29 months, a significant increase from the 22-month average in 2016. This trend is not limited to individual consumers; businesses are also holding onto outdated technology for even longer periods to delay the expense of device rollouts.

Experts claim that lost productivity and inefficiency are the unintended consequences of people and businesses clinging to aging technology. Cassandra Cummings, CEO of New Jersey-based electronics design company Thomas Instrumentation, explains that older devices were engineered when internet speeds were much slower, and they often struggle to keep up with the faster speeds available today. This can lead to networks throttling back their speeds to accommodate the slowest devices, resulting in entire sections of networks running slower than they would if all devices were up to the newer standards.

Wait, 29 months? An extra 5 months over the typical 2 years people are charged monthly for that new phone? That’s it? Which is just 7 months more than the previous average? Phones are a lot more expensive than they were in 2016, and, really, do they do much more? The processors might be slightly faster and the cameras better, but, the tech is really not all that much of a step up, in the same way computers are not really that much different than 9 years ago.

I have a Samsung Galaxy S20 FE purchased Christmastime 2020. It works fine. The battery is still fine. The processor is more than fast enough for what I do. I couldn’t care less about a better camera. 4K would be nice for the screen, but, very little is 4K. Otherwise, it would actually be a downgrade, since phones still do not have a replaceable battery (one of the main reasons I switched from iPhone to Android long ago), and most Androids no longer take a memory card, especially the higher end ones. I have over 1200 songs on the card, plus, that is where I store photos and certain documents I secure with a passcode. Even a movie. What benefit does a new one have, other than getting a $25 plus charge on my bill monthly?

If it works, why change it? My JVC receiver is from around 1987. Still works perfect, though, can’t hook to TV, since new TVs do not have red/white/yellow out anymore. Washer and dryer from 1994 work fine. Heck, while not tech, a cheap Carlos acoustic guitar from early 80s still plays fine. I have a Chorus foot pedal I rarely use and a tuner pedal which I do from mid-80s that work fine. Knock on wood.

I’ve replaced my laptops every couple of years, because the hard drives started dying. Hopefully the current will last longer with a solid state HD. It really isn’t all that much faster than the desktop I had around 2005. Just slight improvements in things like the number of cores. And less expensive solid state hard drives. I could seriously go down the rabbit hole, but, nah, just remember, this is all your fault.

Read: You Holding On To Your Old Tech Is Hurting The Economy »

Climate Cult Is Dying In Canada As Cabinet Minister Quits Over Oil Expansion

But, can you ever kill it off?

Carney loses Cabinet minister over pipeline push

A prominent member of Mark Carney’s Cabinet quit Thursday in protest of the Liberal government’s decision to roll back Canada’s environmental policies and clear the way for a new oil pipeline.

Steven Guilbeault, a Trudeau-era climate minister, resigned in a statement on social media.

He said while he is leaving Carney’s team of ministers, he will remain a member of Parliament within the Liberal caucus.

On Thursday in Calgary, Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith signed an agreement that paves the way to boost oil production, advance new pipelines and overhaul controversial energy laws that were a hallmark of then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government.

The deal is the clearest signal yet Carney is steering the Liberal government toward a more industry-friendly energy policy — a shift significant enough to trigger the resignation of a key Cabinet minister from Quebec. The prime minister has vowed to make Canada an “energy superpower” to grow the economy and spur investment. Carney said Thursday that President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canadian goods and the uncertainty they’ve created will wipe C$50 billion from the Canadian economy.

Getting rid of fossil fuels in snowy, overcast, rainy Canada for their winters and replacing it with solar and wind doesn’t work. There are many places which are far apart and require fossil fuels to get their. EVs do not work well in cold weather. Let’s also not forget that Trudeau was a bit proponent of the Keystone pipeline which would have moved shale oil from Canada to the U.S.

“Despite this difficult economic context, I remain one of those for whom environmental issues must remain front and center,” Guilbeault said in his statement. He had most recently served as minister of identity. (snip)

“Over the past few months, several elements of the climate action plan I worked on as Minister of the Environment have been, or are about to be, dismantled,” he said in his statement. “In my view, these measures remain essential to our climate action plan.”

His and his fellow Liberals, but, what do the citizens of Canada really want? Do they ever ask? Do they ask why Steven takes long fossil fueled trips, like to Belem, Brazil?

Read: Climate Cult Is Dying In Canada As Cabinet Minister Quits Over Oil Expansion »

Meltdown Coming: Trump Admin To Re-Examine Green Cards From 19 Countries

Caterwaul incoming

U.S. immigration agency launches re-examination of green card holders from 19 countries ‘of concern’

President Donald Trump has directed the federal agency that oversees legal immigration to the U.S. to conduct a sweeping review of green card holders from what the administration calls countries of concern, the head of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said Thursday.

“At the direction of @POTUS, I have directed a full scale, rigorous reexamination of every Green Card for every alien from every country of concern,” USCIS Director Joseph Edlow said Thursday afternoon in a statement on X.

Edlow said that protecting the country “remains paramount” and that “the American people will not bear the cost of the prior administration’s reckless resettlement policies.”

Asked for details on which countries are considered “of concern,” USCIS pointed to a June presidential proclamation listing 19 countries “considered deficient with regards to screening and vetting.” Afghanistan is one of the countries on the list, which also includes Haiti, Iran and Venezuela.

From that proclamation

I have determined to fully restrict and limit the entry of nationals of the following 12 countries:  Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.  These restrictions distinguish between, but apply to both, the entry of immigrants and nonimmigrants.

I have determined to partially restrict and limit the entry of nationals of the following 7 countries:  Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela.  These restrictions distinguish between, but apply to both, the entry of immigrants and nonimmigrants.

A goodly chunk of these people are not compatible with American society, with a 1st World nation. And there really needs to be full restrictions on immigrants from many Islamic nations, as well as limiting visitor visas from those nations. And, now, of course, you will see Democrats defend people from those countries, simply due to TDS. They won’t even consider the policy or think about it.

Read: Meltdown Coming: Trump Admin To Re-Examine Green Cards From 19 Countries »

If All You See…

…is a world killing turkey causing heat waves, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on America hating educators going unhinged on Thanksgiving.

Read: If All You See… »

Happy Thanksgiving!

But, how dare you eat turkey!

Mixing Thanksgiving with climate justice: forget the turkey, pass the foraged plants

Ever thought to eat what is commonly considered an invasive weed?

That’s exactly what this group of nine Bay Area residents did recently, nibbling away at bright green nasturtium leaves under the guidance of Linh Hoang, who hosted “A New Thanksgiving” at the Lake Merritt Pergola in collaboration with Sunrise Movement Bay Area.

Eyes lit up and eyebrows rose as the sharp, radish-like flavor of the leaves burst onto tastebuds.

The event combined a potluck dinner with lessons about edible plants that can be found growing in sidewalk cracks and neighborhood parks around Oakland. For Hoang, it was an opportunity to connect Indigenous practices of foraging to the work of climate justice, and to address deep-seated myths surrounding the holiday.

Go away. Leave the rest of us alone.

A holiday classic

Read: Happy Thanksgiving! »

Does Anyone Really Care About The Carbon Footprint Of Your Thanksgiving Turkey

Well, in cult world they care, hence an idiot article at Axios

Your Thanksgiving turkey has a carbon footprint

climate change joke

You probably won’t ponder your carbon footprint when you sit down to devour that Thanksgiving turkey — but some food and climate activists say you should.

Why it matters: With climate change fading in importance on some U.S. lawmakers’ priority lists, activists say even small steps from the public are needed.

The big picture: The beloved bird is considered more environmentally friendly than beef. But turkey still produces, in production and post-production, the greenhouse gas emissions responsible for global warming — even more than chicken, according to the Environmental Working Group.

No, I never considered pondering it. How about you? Are you a cultist? If you are, here we go with the normal

How to talk to your skeptical parents about climate change at Thanksgiving

Let’s be honest: telling your parents they might be wrong about something has never been easy. Now, throw in politics, Thanksgiving dinner and climate change? That’s a recipe for disaster – and indigestion.

But here’s the thing – if you approach the conversation in the right way, you can actually communicate some pretty challenging information without it spiraling into a shouting match. Here’s how to talk to your parents, or anyone on the other side of the issue, about climate change.

Why is a conversation necessary at all? If you want to be a miserable sod, stay home. Let everyone else be and have a good day.

Polar Vortex Set to Hit US During Thanksgiving Holiday Weekend

A weather phenomenon known as a polar vortex is likely to hit a large swath of North America this week and into next, potentially disrupting travel for millions of people during the Thanksgiving holiday. (big snip through explanations as to the places to be affected)

It’s unclear whether this specific weather event is due to climate change or not — polar vortexes happen regularly every two years or so, and this current one appears to be aided by the La Niña phenomenon as well. But a growing body of research suggests that, as the planet warms due to the effects of the climate crisis, the disruption of Arctic air that is the basis of a polar vortex may become more common and/or more severe.

Sigh.

Read: Does Anyone Really Care About The Carbon Footprint Of Your Thanksgiving Turkey »

Democrats Love Meeting With Violent Illegal Aliens

Seriously, can anyone figure out how this benefits Democrats? Are their base voters that stupid and/or divorced from reality? Are these elected Democrats that nuts and hate Americans this much?

Democrats Meet with Previously Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Kidnapping, Domestic Violence

A group of House Democrats met with a previously deported illegal alien – accused of kidnapping and domestic violence – at a detention facility in San Diego, California.

According to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials, Reps. Juan Vargas (D-CA), Mike Levin (D-CA), Sara Jacobs (D-CA), and Scott Peters (D-CA) visited the agency’s San Diego Field Office on November 24 and requested to speak to Dennis Mauricio Rojas-Molina — a previously deported illegal alien from Honduras.

Rojas-Molina, ICE officials reveal, was arrested by the San Diego Sheriff’s Office in May of this year on kidnapping and battery of a spouse charges.

“Democrats once again chose to stand with a criminal illegal alien over American citizens,” the Department of Homeland Security’s Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement:

This criminal illegal alien these Democrat lawmakers met with has been charged with kidnapping and domestic abuse. It begs the question: have they met with his victim? These sanctuary politicians continue to smear law enforcement and falsely claim ICE is not targeting the worst of the worst. It’s disgusting that these sanctuary politicians continue to do the bidding of criminal illegal aliens.

The illegal in question was previously deported, and then came back across the border, which is a felony against the U.S., but, the Obama released him in 2015 instead of either throwing him in jail or immediately deporting him. Previously deported people cannot claim asylum. And then there was a final deportation order, and he finally deported. And then came back in again. And then committed more felonies.

At one point, Levin referred to Rojas-Molina as a “hardworking plumber“, but, deleted it.

Read: Democrats Love Meeting With Violent Illegal Aliens »

Climate Doom May Possibly Maybe We Think Explain More Wildlife In Your Yard

It’s always something with these wackos

Seeing more wildlife in your yard? Climate change may explain why, UCLA study finds

If you’ve noticed more wildlife visiting your yard in recent years — maybe digging up your vegetable garden or even drinking from your pool — you’re not alone.

A recent study from UCLA found that larger predators like mountain lions and bears are more likely to interact with humans and travel closer to population centers in drier years. To determine this, the researchers analyzed state data collected on reported property damage, nuisances, conflicts and sightings.

“It kind of runs the full gamut of how people interact with wildlife around their neighborhoods and their homes,” said UCLA postdoctoral researcher Kendall Calhoun, the lead author on the study.

As you might expect, different animals might have different reasons for entering populated areas. But in large part, Calhoun said, it comes down to animals’ survival instincts.

The primary motivator for many herbivores is likely to be food. That’s because with less precipitation, there’s also less plant material for them to eat. (Don’t forget: even with all the rain we’ve had recently, much of Southern California is still in a drought.)

“?Deer and elk might be pushed to find those food resources in places that they normally wouldn’t go, like agriculture, crops, things from people’s yards, persimmons from your tree,” Calhoun said.

While wetter and drier times might have something to do with it, the main culprit has always been urban/suburban sprawl, taking away resources and territory. And, these wild animals can get used to being in human dominated areas, looking for livestock (which has happened for thousands of years), digging through trash, eating your garden. There’s less concern for humans doing something and larger numbers as environmental regulations (which I’m in favor of) limit hunting them.

We have a coyote which wanders through the middle of our golfing community. I’ve seen it on multiple occassions. It walks through the backyards of homes and along the 15th. I saw it walk across the road in the middle of the day and into a backyard near the 1st tee. I know they walk along the greenway along the river. I’ve seen tracks for other animals, possibly a large wild cat. Deer will be in my backyard since I moved in in 2009. One scared the beejesus out of me at 630am in the dark while having that 1st smoke while rubbing his antlers on my deck.

There are bears that will get in the middle of the Garden State Parkway in Monmouth County and down, especially in Ocean and down, as more construction happens. Think of the moose videos in Alaska and Maine. Gators in Florida, Alabama, etc. It’s not ‘climate change’, but, the cult has to drag everything in.

Read: Climate Doom May Possibly Maybe We Think Explain More Wildlife In Your Yard »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful wild space being destroyed by carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is GeeeZ…, with a post on no pajamas.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove