Biden Takes Massive Fossil Fueled Trip To Say ‘Climate Change’ More Dangerous Than Nuclear War

I’m not going to bother describing the vast amounts of fossil fuels Biden used to travel to NYC. You know all the planes and SUVs and limos and such. I will mention that Biden and his Comrades are working to get the world into WWIII with their support of Ukraine, which could lead to nuclear war

Biden calls global warming bigger threat to humanity than nuclear war during NYC speech

President Biden gave Manhattan donors an update on his thoughts about nuclear war Tuesday, saying that he currently views global warming as a greater threat — less than four months after he casually told a different set of New York City donors that the world was close to nuclear “Armageddon.”

“[Global warming] is the single most existential threat to humanity we have ever faced, including nuclear weapons,” Biden told a small group of supporters on the Upper East Side after headlining a rail infrastructure event nearby.

It’s unclear if the 80-year-old commander-in-chief elaborated on his reasoning. Reporters were only allowed to see part of Biden’s remarks, and video of the private event was not immediately available. (snip)

Despite warning of dire threats from global warming, Biden regularly takes fuel-guzzling helicopters to spend the weekend at his Delaware homes, where he’s passed nearly a quarter of his presidency. Some of his predecessors, such as former President Barack Obama, would stay at the White House on weekends, sparing the expense — and emissions — of multiple motorcades and flights.

Yes he does. A lot. And virtually no reporter will ask him why he’s fearmongering in this manner while use enormous amounts of fossil fuels.

Just like none will ask why Biden is pimping EVs and trying to force the peasants into them while traveling in a low MPG fossil fueled limo with around 18 fossil fueled SUVs in his motorcades. And that Hummer is around $110K, Every middle class person can afford that, right?

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

15 Responses to “Biden Takes Massive Fossil Fueled Trip To Say ‘Climate Change’ More Dangerous Than Nuclear War”

  1. H says:

    Teach are you really suggesting that Biden has any choice in his travel plans? That is up to the Secret Service.
    But remember his fav way to travel used to be by the electrified Amtrak.
    And speaking of costs, you used to be all over the flight costs of Air Force One when Obama was POTUS.
    Then suddenly when the black president was gone and the orange guy was POTUS , those costs no longer were important news.
    Care to explain ?

  2. H says:

    Nuclear war? You think that our country should base it’s foreign policy on the threats of Putin? Is that really who you think we should be? You don’t think that that the USA should stand strong when confronted by nuclear threats?
    Why the fuck just not say we should do whatever Putin wants because he might hurt you? And he frightens and triggers you when he says bad words
    You think Putin will stop if we give him Ukraine???
    And North Korea, should be obey them also?

    • Dana says:

      The outlandish Mr H wrote:

      Nuclear war? You think that our country should base it’s foreign policy on the threats of Putin? Is that really who you think we should be? You don’t think that that the USA should stand strong when confronted by nuclear threats?

      We see that Mr H is really a macho man!

      The US has been basing its foreign policy on Soviet, and later Russian, nuclear capabilities since 1949. It isn’t everything, but it’s always a concern among intelligent planners.

      The US has based its foreign policy on whether Iraq and Iran were trying to build nuclear weapons. Israel took out Saddam Hussein’s nuclear facilities in 1983, to the public condemnation, and private congratulations, of most nations. The younger President Bush invaded Iraq because American intelligence concluded that President Hussein was building ‘weapons of mass destruction.’ Israel is keeping a close eye on the mad mullahs of Iran and their nuclear program, while Barack Hussein Obama signed a treaty with Iran that supposedly, but not really, keeps Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

  3. Dana says:

    If the most outlandish claims of the warmunists came true, global warming climate change could kill a couple billion people in a hundred years; if an all-out nuclear war occurred, most if not all of the entire world’s population could be killed within a few weeks.

  4. Professor Hale says:

    At this point, since climate change and nuclear war are both just theoretical, having a purely hypothetical argument about which is worse is pretty pointless. But that is what politicians specialize in. Preparing to battle hypothetical enemies is always easier than going after real ones. And modern politicians are cowards at heart and prefer battles that have no consequences for them personally.

    Which is worse? A large asteroid hitting Earth destroying all lie as we know it, or an asteroid nearly missing the Earth, but with global government bureaucrats in charge of our collective response to it?

  5. Jl says:

    We know nuclear war could kill hundreds of millions, we don’t know what “climate change” could do, contrary to the always wrong predictions of the alarmists. Seems like Grandpa has lost whatever cognitive ability he had left..

  6. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    President Biden, an avid cyclist, could have biked to NYC in some 20-24 hrs. Trains from DC to NYC take only 4 hr. It’s about the same by EV! Global aviation adds less than 2% of total CO2 emissions – the contributions of Air Force One and related are minor. Mr Teach wants US Presidents to “virtue signal”, like President Carter wearing a sweater in the White House.

    Conservatives such as Mr Teach appreciate that personalizing issues is an effective tactic. “The President of the United States has his own airliner and you don’t! Such a hypocrite!” US Presidents also live in a huuuuge 50,000 sq ft house maintained by taxpayers, while a majority of Americans live in apartments or 2000 sq ft (avg) homes! The energy requirements of the WH are probably greater than for your residence. Yet, HE wants YOU to conserve! If the President doesn’t take global warming seriously, why should you???

    If Ukraine still had their nukes, Putin would not have invaded. That fact is not lost on other nations.

  7. drowningpuppies says:

    Brandon, like Rimjob and johnnie boy, tends to exaggerate and cannot be taken seriously.

    Bwaha! Lolgf

  8. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    How would Russia respond to a direct attack by NATO/US advancing on Russian soil? I suspect they might fire nukes to save their nation.

    Will Russia fire nukes if their unprovoked invasion of Ukraine goes belly up? Doubtful as that outcome is not a threat to Russia itself.

    What if Kim invades South Korea? Should the world stand by since Kim likely has a nuke or few?

    Russian ally, Iran, is on the verge of developing nukes. The fundamentalist (i.e., crazy) faction in charge will no doubt threaten nuclear war unless the West makes concessions. Should we?

  9. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    The MAGAts prime directive, Own the Libs (OTL), has edged the world to this potential brink.

    The Grand MAGAt gave Putin every sign that whatever he wanted he should have. No wonder Putin wanted the MAGAt King elected!

    King MAGAt gave Iran carte blanche to renew nuclear weapon development.

    And he fell in love with Kim.

    While no doubt enjoyable, OTL has not proven to be good policy.

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Rimjob, like Brandon and johnnie boy, tends to exaggerate and cannot be taken seriously.

      Bwaha! Lolgf

    • L'Roy White says:

      The senile daughter molester has brought us to the brink. HE is the fake president. HE alone can bring this to a negotiated end or to war. You live in a world of denial.

      You and your radical leftists cabal are killing the earth.

      • Professor Hale says:

        Biden cannot bring this to a negotiated settlement. Only a great statesman or at least someone with a reputation for honest dealing can do it. Biden is senile. No one can trust any deal they make with him as a party. He represents the USA that is an active belligerent against Russia. That is not a position for negotiation. Maybe India has another Ghandi who is interested in taking that on. Or Brazil. Or even Mongolia. Everyone else on the planet has already picked sides.

        Trump could do it. For some reason, the democratic party wants a war with Russia and has ever since the fall of the USSR.

        • L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

          I noticed that too, Professor and I may even had mentioned it before. As soo as Russia was no longer communist the democrats suddenly hated Russia, Putin, vodka and all things Russian. The good news is the leftists here still love them some N.Korean, Venezuelan, Cuban, Chinese, Laos and Vietnam communists and of course the half of the US and Canada that have now morphed into reds.

          But the reason they want war with Russia is because 1.) they are no longer commies so they’re now bad 2.) Trump and Putin are not adversarial enough therefore they are secret lovers according to leftists and 3.) They have to keep the lines of criminal money laundering open through Ukraine so big joe and the kid can was their graft along with the rest of the democommies and RINO’s in congress.

          Plus, leftists always need an enemy to concentrate their hate. In the US it’s White people, in the world at large Western Civ and Christianity and right now in Europe it’s Russia, Russia, Russia.

Pirate's Cove