Pa. Supreme Court Says No To Counting Undated/Misdated Mail-in Votes

This is a big win for Republicans, and a crying moment for Democrats, making it harder for them to cheat

Pennsylvania court says undated ballots won’t be counted as RNC claims ‘massive’ legal victory

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court banned the counting of undated or misdated absentee ballots in the upcoming midterm election.

In an order issued Tuesday, the court told the Pennsylvania county boards of elections “to refrain from counting any absentee and mail-in ballots received for the November 8, 2022 general election that are contained in undated or incorrectly dated outer envelopes.”

The court said it was “evenly divided” on the issue of whether failing to count the undated ballots is a constitutional violation, and so ordered that all the misdated or undated ballots be segregated and preserved by the county boards of elections.

Ronna McDaniel, chairwoman for the RNC, reacted to the court order in a Tuesday evening tweet, claiming a “massive” legal victory. “The PA Supreme Court agrees with us that incorrectly or undated mail ballots can not be counted in next week’s elections,” McDaniel tweeted. “Republicans went to court. Now Democrats have to follow the law.”

Well, we can still guarantee that Democrats will still try and count them, and pull other shenanigans, starting with the Pa. Democratic acting secretary of state, Leigh Chapman, who ignored the Supreme Court and the duly elected Pa. General Assembly in telling counties to count the improper mail-in ballots.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

27 Responses to “Pa. Supreme Court Says No To Counting Undated/Misdated Mail-in Votes”

  1. Down on the Corner says:

    Yes but it does not even matter. They have been counted already and the chain of custody is already gone. The ballots separated from their envelope.

    that are contained in undated or incorrectly dated outer envelopes.”

    Herein lies the rub and it is how the democrats perpetually cheat in elections. They simply ignore the rules and laws, have been counting the ballots and then they separate the ballots from the envelopes and unless you want to redo the entire state election you have no recourse.

    PA has been counting these for weeks. Even after the Supreme court said no earlier and are being sued by several GOP groups for breaking the supreme law of PA.

    But of course, their is no cheating in our elections. We all know this don’t we.

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    The last thing a nuCon wants is to have all votes count.

    • alanstorm says:

      Wrong yet again, child. We ant every VALID vote to count. That’s the only way you get accurate data from the electorate. It’s the horribly-misnamed “liberals” who want and encourage bad data by counting every vote, whether it’s valid or not.

      Probably too much nuance for you to process.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Wrong again, shitshow. You want only GOPher votes to count.

        Each state decides, which is what MAGAts depend on. Which is also why they are pushing so many Election-Denying Sec’s of State in 2022!

        Stalin: “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”

        That’s why MAGAts want to count the votes.

        Remember: “I need you to find me just 11,780 votes.”

        The GA Sec of State said “No”, and the then-pres got angry and ran an Election Denier against the Sec of State in the primary. The Denier lost.

        • alanstorm says:

          You have your head so far up your posterior that you can only see out between your teeth.

          Stalin: “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”

          That’s why Democrats want too be the ones counting the votes.

          I’m sorry you are so deluded. Then again, it’s not my fault you have mental issues, so maybe “sorry” is the wrong word.

        • Jl says:

          Hilarious-“each state decides, which MAGAs depend on”. Yes, because that’s what the Constitution says, Mr Genius.

    • Down on the Corner says:

      No DOWD. The last thing NUCON ULTRA MAGATS want is to count ILLEGAL VOTES.

      VOTE. Everyone vote. Just do it LEGALLY!!

      • Professor Hale says:

        Manufactured ballots are not “votes”.

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          PH and DotC,

          Why is it so difficult to find these millions of illegal votes? And are they only Democratic votes?

          The CyberNinjas couldn’t find them.

          • Professor Hale says:

            Fraudulent votes, once allowed into the count stream, are indistinguishable from valid votes. They only seem to be Democrat votes because Republicans are in favor of following laws where Democrats are openly in favor of “by any means necessary”. Why are you so in favor of fraudulent elections?

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Since Clinton led the polls going into the 2016 election, it’s pretty clear that PedoDon, the GOPhers and the Russians stole 2016 (just as Putin wanted) using fraudulent votes.

            Stop the Steal, 2016!!

            Almost all demonstrated vote fraud in 2020 was at the hands of Republicans!

  3. H says:

    Sometimes elderly are unaware of the current date
    I was unaware that was a voting requirement in the Constitution of any state
    Conservatives of both parties have always wanted to restrict the ability of American citizens to vote that should be acknowledged as part of American history and is continuing today

    • Professor Hale says:

      Every state has voting requirements. Every single one. Elderly who don’t know what day it is is not the problem. Are you really defending manufacturing fake votes just because it benefits your democratic party outcomes?

      • L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

        Sorry H, the only people who should be able to vote are people who can vote. Knowing the date means you can vote. Being aware of the fact it’s election day should be part of voting. Being so dumb you don’t know what day it is may qualify you as a brain dead, leftist democommie but in no way enables you to cast an intelligent vote.

        And yes, Professor, as an anti American commie it is H’s job to promote any and every imaginable way to cheat for the democommies in each election. How do you think they win? This guy actually believes a senile old man who was rejected for president 3 previous times, spent his entire campaign in his basement, couldn’t get a crowd larger than 200 people at his rallies and lost all the debates beat an incumbent with the highest vote count of any incumbent in history and he did it by getting 81 million votes.

        Tell me H isn’t detached from reality.

        Mega MAGA

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          Mega MAGAt,

          Perhaps acknowledging that elections are legitimate, win or lose, should be a requirement to vote.

          “I acknowledge, that absent any credible evidence to the contrary, that I approve the results of this election under penalty of losing the right to vote.”_____________ (sign here)

          If you are going to stage a violent insurrection any time you lose, why even have elections?

          • drowningpuppies says:

            Take out your pink pussy cap, Rimjob.
            You may be needing it.

            Bwaha ! Lolgf

          • Professor Hale says:

            You should ask someone who has staged a violent insurrection why they did it. I’m sure they have their reasons. Being employed by the FBI seems to be the biggest reason so far.

          • Professor Hale says:

            Why would any sane person acknowledge events that haven’t happened yet? I suspect very few people are able to see into the future. How about they instead just show their ID to prove they are an eligible voter and attest that their own vote is valid? And when it comes to denying votes, let’s expand that list to include everyone who the courts have decided are “unsuitable” to participate into the public square. Like, for instance, anyone previously convicted of a felony.

            And as long as we are just making shit up, let’s change the laws so that anyone who participates in a party primary automatically grants their general election vote to whoever wins that primary. And further, track each individual by name when they cast their vote to prevent unscrupulous (republicans) from casting a second vote for that person. With current technology, tracking the voter status of under 200 million people should be trivial. Then early or late voting would be just as valid and each voter could check to see if their vote has been counted and only in their home jusrisdiction.

          • L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

            Commie FAGGOt,

            Perhaps acknowledging that elections can be and have been stolen, win or lose, should be a requirement to vote.

            “I acknowledge, that absent any credible evidence to the contrary, that I approve the results of this election under penalty of losing the right to vote.”_____________ (sign here)

            And we guess YOU get to decide what is credible evidence, right?

            If you are going to stage a violent insurrection any time you lose, why even have elections? Are you still going to refuse to Audit and investigate thousands of videos and complaints showing cheating? Are you still gonna seed protests with your FBI gestapo?

            Once again you dumb commie dick a protest by UNARMED citizens is NOT an insurrection. Especially when the only people killed were unarmed civilians. You snowflakes are so a-scared of everything. You still have Qanons and White supremacists hiding under your bed?

            Mega MAGA.

            We see joe pedo LIED again and now we have American troops in Ukraine. So now that daughter rapist has us in a WAR!!! But you didn’t steal the election . BS

    • alanstorm says:

      Sometimes elderly are unaware of the current date

      Yes, Joey-boy frequently demonstrates this.

      What’s your point?

      • CarolAnn says:

        A person non compos mentis is unaware of the date and therefore unfit to vote or serve like Uncle Festerman and that crazy joe shit pants.

  4. Dana says:

    So, what happens if Mehmet Oz and Doug Mastriano win the senatorial and gubernatorial races with all legitimate votes counted, but there are enough fraudulent improper ballots to overturn those election results? The left would have those races overturned; sensible people would say, well that’s too bad; they didn’t follow the rules so their votes don’t count.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      If “if” were a skiff we could all sail away!

      Why do you assume that all the “improper” ballots are for Fetterman and Shapiro?

      What “if” the opposite happens? Would the MAGAts say, “Well, that’s too bad. Mastriano and Oz, better luck next time”? LOL.

      In 2016, maybe it wasn’t that the polling was flawed, maybe the GOP cheated!

      • drowningpuppies says:

        Another comment from… “a cesspool of ignorance, opinion, and BS.”

        Bwah! Lolgf

      • Professor Hale says:

        IF someone from the GOP cheated, that person should be found and prosecuted and suffer the full penalty of the law. Elections need to represent the actual votes cast by real eligible voters, or they are pointless. Creating fake ballots and counting them as if they are real is an attack on democracy itself. Voting rules and restrictions exist to ensure the ballots that are presented are more likely to be valid. Anyone from either party should be in favor of strict voter qualification efforts. I am sure Jeff isn’t actually defending voter fraud just because it seems to always benefit just one political party.

  5. Jl says:

    You mean like the Jan. 21st riots of 2017 in DC at Trump’s inauguration?
    And still waiting for “insurrection” proof.

Pirate's Cove