If All You See…

June 29, 2022 – 2:52 pm

…is an area flooded by carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Diogenes’ Middle Finger, with a post on the Saudis giving Biden the finger.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

This entry was written by William Teach and posted on at 2:52 pm and filed under If All You See. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

4 Responses to “If All You See…”

  1. Hoss says:
    June 29, 2022 at 4:24 pm

    Somebody’s been doing her squats! Exceptional.

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:
    June 29, 2022 at 11:23 pm

    There’s law stating that returning service members must be offered their old government job. Texas refused and a returning soldier sued. The Supreme Court sided with the service member.

    It was a 5-4 decision with Thomas, Gorsuch, Alito and Barrett dissenting. Said Justice Thomas:

    In upholding suits by vets against the state, “the court brushes aside a 23-year-old, pathbreaking precedent,” he said, and instead allows Congress “to deny states the dignity owed to them in our system of dual federalism. Our sovereign states deserved better,” he concluded.

    Justice Thomas penned the dissent, apparently without a hint of irony.

    The conservative caucus of the Catholic court is claiming state’s rights take precedent over federal law.

  3. CarolAnn says:
    June 30, 2022 at 8:38 am

    Exactly what is the irony of upholding states rights? And yes, states rights take precedent over federal law if that law is unconstitutional. You have a hard time understanding the very idea of a federal system, don’t you?

    There is no conservative caucus nor is there a Catholic court. You are a prejudiced, bigoted anti Christian and should be treated as such. You are the most hateful person I’ve ever read when it comes to Christians. Shove your hatred and bigotry where it belongs and take your insults with it. The people on the court are just like you and me. Some are conservative and some are not. You know, like America. People who are Christian or conservative have rights too you bigot. You commies really need to get a grip or get out.

    You are one evil SOB.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:
      June 30, 2022 at 9:14 am

      CarolAnn,

      The irony is that Justice Thomas overturned nearly 50 years of precedent but complained about 23 years of precedent.

      CA: states rights take precedent over federal law if that law is unconstitutional

      If what law is unconstitutional? Each state CANNOT decide which federal law they consider unconstitutional.

      State laws can be declared unconstitutional by our Supreme Court. If Mississippi wanted to reinstate slavery, even this current reactionary court would likely object.

      We hope you don’t find this insulting, but you have a hard time understanding the very idea of a federal system, don’t you?

      Less than 20% of Americans admit to belonging to the Catholic religion. Seven of nine (77%) justices are Catholic. The Catholic Church condemns abortion, going so far as condemn its own followers who do not criticize abortion strongly enough! Please excuse Americans for suspecting that the current court may have been influenced by religious feelings/beliefs.

      We understand that you are irate. Religious people often become hysterical when objective flaws in their religious organization are pointed out. Religious people can believe whatever they wish!! But in a free and open society, religious people are not entitled to force other Americans to subscribe to others’ religious feelings/beliefs, regardless of how strongly those feelings are. America is NOT a theocracy. The founding fathers were clear on that.

      Even when Roe and Casey were the “law” of the land, you were not forced to have an abortion, were you. No one was. But a woman could make the choice to end a pregnancy for whatever reason she deemed appropriate through the first trimester with state level restrictions for later abortions.

      Perhaps every prospective SC jurist should be asked if they consider a fertilized ovum to be a “person”, with the rights of born American.

Pirate's Cove