British House Of Lords Tells Young Climate Cultists Should Pay For Their Beliefs

It’s super easy for young Warmists, indoctrinated by adults, to recommend that Something Be Done about the climate crisis (scam). It’s something else when the young Warmists actually have to practice what they preach

Young People Should Pay the Costs of Green Agenda, Says House of Lords

The economic burden of Boris Johnson’s ‘Build Back Better’ green push towards a net-zero economy should be borne by younger generations as older Britons will not benefit from the schemes, a House of Lords committee has suggested.

report from the Industry and Regulators Committee in the upper house of the British parliament claimed that it will cost the government some £321 billion to reach the goal of transitioning the British economy to net-zero carbon emissions by the year 2050. This figure is hotly contested, however, with a recent report from the House of Commons stating that the government itself has “no reliable” estimate of the costs for government and indeed consumers of the green agenda. (snip)

In order to pay for the massive overhaul of the economy the chairman of the committee, Lord Hollick, said: “The amount that can realistically be raised via surcharges on energy bills is not enough.

“Bills are regressive as the poor pay more of their income on energy costs. It is also unfair to the current generation, as we are asking current billpayers to cover the huge costs of something that is designed to mainly benefit future generations.”

The House of Lords peer suggested, therefore, that the government should look to incur more debt through public borrowing to pay for the “long-term infrastructure costs” and pass on the costs to future generations.

While the over 70 crowd has the money to be able to afford all the taxes and such, they are also the least likely to believe in ‘climate change’. The young want this so bad, why do they not move from believing it in theory and putting it into practice?

The ones who believe in the climate scam should be dared, triple dog dared into practicing what they preach. No fossil fueled vehicles, flights, or boats. Move into tiny homes. No ice makers. Hand wash clothes. All the rest. I’ve never understood why the big shots with big perches never go after the Warmists like that.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

16 Responses to “British House Of Lords Tells Young Climate Cultists Should Pay For Their Beliefs”

  1. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Since old men who shit on your lawn don’t have to live with it, it’s up to you to clean it up? Good plan.

    So much for the Party of Responsibility. LOL. The US and Europe are controlled by 70+ yr old white guys, no wonder they want to wipe their asses of any and all responsibility.

    In that case, the old conservatives should just hurry up and die and let the young take care of the world the old shits ruined. Otherwise, the old shits are obligated to help cleaning up the mess they made.

  2. L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

    Lindsay Graham has openly called for the assassination of Mr Putin. And the pigs in New York City have thrown Anna Netrebko out of the Metropolitan Opera simply b/c she’s Russian, although the NY Post says it’s b/c she has “ties to Putin.” Which probably means he has heard her sing.

    She’s also lovely to look at. Here she sings O mio babbino caro by Puccini (O dear Papa!):

    That lovely girl is just thrown away by the pigs in NYC. And have no doubt, they are pigs.

    GOD! I HATE these filthy leftist dogs! No fate is bad enough for them.

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Teach relies on Alinsky Rule 4. It’s his final argument. He earlier denied it was warming. Then, yes, we’ve always recognized warming but the whole CO2 thing is a commie scam about CONTROL!! Then, CO2 may play a miniscule role in warming but neither martians nor cave men had SUVs, so there. Then, so it’s warming, so what – the proposed solution is much worse than the purported warming, so there!! Today, so it’s warming, so what – I’ll believe it’s serious when those who claim it’s serious get serious about what they call a serious issue, so there. Seriously?

    RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.

    In Teach’s juvenile view, if you don’t give up every vestige of modern life, then you can’t expect him to give up anything. It’s not enough to drive a hybrid, you MUST drive an EV. And if you drive an EV, where do you get your E? Coal plants? Gas plants?

    You heat your small, energy efficient home? Sorry, Charlie, unless you use wood. You use wood? “Burning wood releases CO2, you warmist hypocrite!!”

    It’s a tactic, nothing more.

    Here’s another example of Rule 4. Conservatives want less government. They want much less government spending. Yet, red states are largely supported by federal funds. Conservatives oppose Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, but not enough to eschew it. Conservatives oppose clean air and clean water regulations but not enough to stop breathing and drinking!! Hypocrites all!!

    Anyway, rather than being led by the nose by conservative elites, perhaps Teach could discuss global warming. Nah, it’s easier to call it a scam and attack those who take it seriously.

    The Earth is warming rapidly, threatening human societies. You can deny it, but you’ll still drown, even with your head in the sand. Why is it warming? It’s the exaggerated greenhouse effect from we humans adding CO2 to the atmosphere, which is coming from our burning of fossil fuels where the carbon had been locked away for 100s of millions of years!! At the current rate of CO2 increase it will have doubled by 2060. Yikes! Models put the long-term warming “baked-in” (apt!!) at 4-8F which would be catastrophic for human societies. Does Teach support government research into massive scale carbon capture and storage? Rather than ‘force’ conservatives into EVs, efficient appliances and solar panels what if we could remove the CO2 we’re pumping into the atmosphere? Of course, since cons consider global warming to be a scam/hoax and that CO2 cannot possibly in-a-million years cause warming why would we bother?? Just another gubmint, kleptocratic sop to the elites!!

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Rimjob telling others to give up their um… juvenile views then proceeds to spout his warmist drivel again and again.

      That’s rich.

      Bwaha! Lolgf

    • Jl says:

      “Earth is warming rapidly..” No, it warmed much faster earlier in the Holocene.
      “It’s the exaggerated greenhouse effect from we humans….”. Again, no-it’s still an unsupported hypothesis. There are several other theories with supporting peer-reviewed papers. Still a hypothesis because there’s still no simple experiment showing that adding more CO2 will make an object warmer from its own emissions, added to the fact that the MWP was as warm, or warmer.

    • Jl says:

      “Models put warming at 4-8F..” And that’s why they’re models-they don’t count as evidence. As said in this article, the IPCC sensed they needed to ramp up the scare stories, so this one was “More heavily weighted toward implausible scenarios than any other IPCC report..”

    • david7134 says:

      All Jeff does is vomit up the same old talking points. No proof, no answer other than taxes which will do nothing, just stupid statements .

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        The davebot9000 ejaculates Porter’s same old talking points. No proof, no answers… just stupid statements.

  4. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Marl0n: GOD! I HATE these filthy leftist dogs! No fate is bad enough for them

    Maybe Marl0n can use his government position to track down Mr Gelb and kill him.

    Why does your god even permit these filthy leftist dogs to exist??? Come on, they’re fascist pigs for determining who sings at the Met!!

    Vladimir Putin is this generation’s Adolf or Mao or Stalin.

    Ms Netrebko is a talented singer with a storied and long career at The Met. She has been ‘cancelled’ around the world, not just in NYC, for her support of Putin.

    • L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

      dOwd: “She has been ‘cancelled’ around the world, not just in NYC, for her support of Putin.”

      I don’t care what “the world” does we are better than a rabid mob. We believe in the individual. At least we did until Nazi lovers like you stole their way to power. The Ukrainians are fascists just like the Russians. The only difference is you guys used to love you some Ruskies when they were commies. Now? Not so much. You switched sides and now support the guys who sided with Hitler in WWII. Why is that? what is it about fascism that has the American left so enamored? The uniforms? The shiny boots? The oppression of those with whom you disagree even to the point of mob rule?

      As Brandon prepares to buy oil from the narcoterrorist state of Venezuela, he still won’t open energy in USA. But dOwd thinks he’s a big man agreeing to tell a woman she can’t sing Puccini. You are one tough fag, dOwd. So are your fellow mob in NYC. Communists can sing but not some chick who supports HER PRESIDENT because you don’t like him. She should get up and tell them all “FUCK YOU NAZI PIGS”.

      Tell us dOwd, what are the odds that John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden and Mitt Romney would all have kids whose chosen career was a job with a Ukrainian Gas Company? What makes fascist Zelenskyy (2 y’s but only one l) better for American than fascist Putin? We need to know what you see in this leader of Nazi sympathizers.

      Let’s go dOwd, more hate, higher prices, more dead. Just like your bosses planned.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Marl0n deserves an Oscar!!

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Marl0n continues to spread right-wing lies that he gets from NewsMax or FOX.

        Marl0n Brand0n: John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden and Mitt Romney would all have kids whose chosen career was a job with a Ukrainian Gas Company?

        Hunter Biden formerly sat on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma. The sons/stepsons of Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry and Mitt Romney are not, and have not been, board members of energy companies doing business in Ukraine.

        Nor had any of them worked for Burisma. The kids of the rich and powerful have an easier life than working class kids. We all know that. In general, the son of a bank president has it easier than the son of a fire fighter, a waitress or a school teacher.

        Back in 2014 after a change of regime in Ukraine, Hunter Biden joined the board of a scandal-plagued Ukrainian natural gas company named Burisma. Hunter had no apparent qualifications for the job except that his father was the vice president and involved in the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy.

        He got paid up to $50,000 per month for the job and the situation constituted the kind of conflict of interest that was normally considered inappropriate in Washington until the Trump era. These days, of course, the president of the United States regularly accepts payments from foreign sources to his company while in office, and so do the Trump children. The Obama administration probably should have done something about this at the time.

        Much of what far-right reactionaries believe is actually false.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        So Brand0 doesn’t feel a private organization should hire whomever they wish?

        Would fewer patrons attend or donate knowing that a Putin supporter and apologist was on stage?

        The entertainment conglomerate known as the NFL blacklisted a QB for taking a knee during the National Anthem. Did you protest that by calling the NFL NAZI PIGS?

  5. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    So you want proof that doubling atmospheric CO2 will cause a 4-8F increase in the future? Got it.

    Political ‘scientist’, Mr Pielke Jr, is entitled to his opinion, but doesn’t address the issue of increasing temp from increasing CO2.

    • Jl says:

      Yes, there should be some kind of proof, not computer generated scenarios. And it’s not his opinion, as the IPCC focused on the upper implausible end of their projections.
      “Address the issue of increasing temps from CO2.” Sorry, that’s the alarmist’s job to prove that there’s an “issue” to begin with, which hasn’t been done. And if increasing temps are bad, it doesn’t matter if it’s from CO2, the sun, clouds or whatever.

Pirate's Cove