Activists Livid That Tulsi Gabbard Is Supporting Bill Protecting Women In Sports From “Trans Women”

At what point do actual, real, biological women start to realize that the Democratic Party mostly puts a tiny number of people with mental health issues over real, biological women? That the Democrats do not have the best interests of real, biological women at heart? That Democrats have relegated real, biological women’s interests to well below that of the tiny number of gender confused men who want to compete as women, often because they cannot compete against men?

For Her Final Act, Tulsi Gabbard Is Promoting A Bill That Threatens Trans Women In Sports

While she might be ending her final term in Congress in just several short weeks, former presidential candidate and Representative Tulsi Gabbard partnered up with Representative Markwayne Mullin to introduce a new bill before she says goodbye — and it has a deeply transphobic twist. H.R. 8932, entitled the Protect Women’s Sports Act, seeks to limit women’s collegiate sports programs to only people assigned female at birth. “Title IX was designed to give women and girls an equal chance to succeed, including in sports. Allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports diminishes that equality and takes away from the original intent of Title IX,” Gabbard said in a statement.

But this is only the latest attempt to prevent transgender athletes from competing in sports according to their true gender as opposed to their gender assigned at birth — or what Gabbard has referred to as “biological sex.” In September, Republican Senator Kelly Loeffler paired up with Tom Cotton and several other senators to propose another transphobic bill, the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. That bill similarly aimed to make it a violation of Title IX protections for any educational institution that receives federal funds to allow transgender women to participate in women’s sports.

Good for Tulsi. Why should actual, real women have to compete against biological men in their sports, so often losing to the “trans women”, which has a real world implication of losing scholarships and wins which they would have earned? They shouldn’t have to

Additionally, a law that bans trans athletes from participating in school sports also passed in Idaho. However, a preliminary injunction was granted to stop the bill from doing irreversible harm. In June, the Supreme Court also decided that under the Civil Rights Act, discrimination on the basis of gender identity is classified alongside sex discrimination.

Akin to Loeffler’s bill, Gabbard’s new bill introduced would also make it a violation for schools that receive federal funding to “permit a person whose biological sex at birth is male to participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated for women or girls.” If it were to become law, it would make it impossible for trans women to play women’s sports. So far, advocates have come out in droves to denounce the harm that the Protect Women’s Sports Act could do. “Dare I say that women’s sports may benefit from actual protection like resources, equal pay, training, support. Stop weaponizing your fear of transness to hurt all women,” said Chase Strangio, an ACLU lawyer and trans advocate.

Gotta love how the activists say that protecting “trans women” so they can beat real women in competitions is somehow protecting real women.

What is perhaps just as alarming is the fact that Gabbard may be the only (technical) Democrat to promote anti-trans legislation like this.

I bet most people beyond the “activists” think of this as promoting protection of real women.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

11 Responses to “Activists Livid That Tulsi Gabbard Is Supporting Bill Protecting Women In Sports From “Trans Women””

  1. david7134 says:

    I passed one of my oak trees and it had a pine cone on it. Is is trying to trans?

  2. Dana says:

    The left see a subject related to sex, and they must, absolutely must, take the furthest left position they can, or they will be complicit with the evil reich-wing conspiracy. J K Rowling, the very liberal author of the Harry Potter books, had the unmitigated gall to suggest that ‘people who menstruate’ meant ‘women,’ which is apparently transphobic because some ‘trans men’ menstruate, and she’s being attacked by the left. Miss Rowling decided to tell us, long after the books were published, that Professor Dumbledore was homosexual, because she supports homosexual rights, but no, that ain’t good enough, ’cause she isn’t wholly accepting of the mentally ill ‘transgendered.’

    Just how f(ornicating) stupid do you have to be to think that Bruce Jenner is a chick?

    The credentialed media are, of course, going right along with this stupidity, referring to Pennsylvania’s Secretary of Health Richard Levine as ‘Rachel,’ and uncritically using the feminine pronouns to refer to him. The Philadelphia Inquirer no longer even mentions that he is ‘transgender,’ but simply goes along with Dr Levine’s delusions like they are perfectly normal.

    Every bird, every reptile, and ever mammal has the ability to recognize the sexes of its own species; only human liberals have become so stupid that they have lost this ability.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      My problem with Dr. Levine is her support for the cheating New England Patriots.

      Otherwise, why would anyone care?

      Little Lord Dauntleroy Trump pretends to be a man. LOL. Trump got pissed when he suggested he could “take” 72 yr old champion wrestler Dan Gable, and Gable responded, “You would have no chance”.

      • Dana says:

        The confused Mr Dowd wrote:

        My problem with Dr. Levine is her (sic) support for the cheating New England Patriots.

        I am not a Patriots fan, but I don’t particularly dislike them. My team was the Oakland, Oakland! not Las Vegas, Raiders. But I certainly rooted for the Patriots against every NFC team they faced in the nine Super Bowls in which they’ve played this century.

        The problem with Richard Levine isn’t his mental illness; that’s his problem. The problem is that the left are trying to normalize his delusions, something in which you engaged by using the inaccurate pronoun to refer to him. If someone wants to try to change his sex, as far as I am concerned, that’s his business . . . as long as he pays for it himself. I will very much object to trying to force the government, meaning my tax dollars, to pay for that wholly elective procedure, and I very much object to the government trying to compel other people to accept the delusions of the ‘transgendered.’ New York City actually has regulations in place, complete with huge fines, on businesses if their employees ‘misgender’ or ‘dead name’ a ‘transgender’ person. The city is essentially telling businesses that they must lieor be fined.

        Only Mr Dowd would think that this is a chick!

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          Ms. Dana seems to like to harass others. Not sure why she does that, maybe it’s just a conservathing.

          Dr. Levine seems to be a competent physician and government official, so what’s Ms Dana’s beef?

          What difference does it make to you how she views herself? How does this impact you in any way?

          Perhaps conservative busybodies should mind their own business.

          By all means call others anything you wish, fags, niggers, spics, whores, kikes etc. I was brought up to refer to people how they preferred.

          • Dana says:

            https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_yahoo.gif The apparently irked Mr Dowd wrote:

            Ms. Dana seems to like to harass others. Not sure why she does that, maybe it’s just a conservathing.

            In a comment in which I criticized New York City for having a regulation which would fine businesses up to $250,000 if their employees ‘misgender’ someone, Mr Dowd chose to ‘misgender’ me, I shall assume because he thought it would somehow anger me. A clue for him: a boy growing up with a name more commonly associated with girls quickly grows a thick skin where such things are concerned.

            But there is a difference: in referring to the Secretary of Health for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as male, I wrote the truth, while Mr Dowd deliberately lied. But, what can I say: leftists do that.

            What difference does it make to you how she (sic) views herself? How does this impact you in any way?

            I already answered that:

            The problem with Richard Levine isn’t his mental illness; that’s his problem. The problem is that the left are trying to normalize his delusions, something in which you engaged by using the inaccurate pronoun to refer to him. If someone wants to try to change his sex, as far as I am concerned, that’s his business . . . as long as he pays for it himself. I will very much object to trying to force the government, meaning my tax dollars, to pay for that wholly elective procedure, and I very much object to the government trying to compel other people to accept the delusions of the ‘transgendered.’

            Of course, Dr Levine isn’t just being a private individual, but a public official trying to impose Governor Wolf’s and his unconstitutional dictates on the people of the Keystone State.

            By all means call others anything you wish, fags, niggers, spics, whores, kikes etc. I was brought up to refer to people how they preferred.

            Please, feel free to point out any articles I have written or any comments I have left in which I used any of those terms. My site has a search function; feel free to use it.

            But, you see, there is a difference between being “brought up to refer to people how they preferred,” and deliberately lying, and referring to people by anything other than their natural, biological sex is lying. When I refer to Dr Levine as being male, I am telling the truth; when you refer to him as female, you are telling a lie.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_yahoo.gif Ms Dana seems irked. Do you not like being referred to as Ms? How do we know you weren’t born a Ms? Where’s your long-form birth certificate for examination by experts, no less?

            Since you claim to be married, do you prefer Mrs?

            Anyway, Dr Levine has made her wishes known. How are Gov Wolf’s policies unconstitutional? And what does that have to do with Dr Levine’s gender preference? Maybe you can hire Big Sid Powell to take your case against Dr Levine all the way to the Supreme Court!!

            Speaking of truth, the truth is you don’t approve of transexuals, so you ridicule them. But keep lying to yourself.

            I used to think Donald Trump might not be male, but both Stormy Daniels and E. Jean Carrol swear he has a penis.

    • Sabre22 says:

      The solution is so simple it is literally staring everybody in the face. Question when girls wanted to start competing in sports what did the powers that be do? They created girls/women’s sports. Instead of competing against boys/men they competed against other girls/women. So if trans want to compete they MUST compete against other trans not biological females . Problem solved. Do that and watch the number of Male to female trans competing in sports rapidly decline. If you have 2 X chromosomes you are a FEMALE if you have an X and a Y chromosome you are a MALE. Neither adding or cutting off body parts changes that.

  3. Professor hale says:

    I find it amusing anyone making a legal claim that being denied sports opportunities “harms them”. Fat, slow, clumsy, weak and short kids will be fascintated to learn this. The only fair outcome is to allow every kid a chance to play on whatever team he/she wants and to all get sports scholarships regardless of ability. Why do only the exreme ends of the spectrum merit advocates?

    • The Left Are Traitors says:

      Which is why I tried to explain to Elwood why “equality” is impossible. Nature has no equality. Only we do in law if we respect it.

      He put his fingers in his ears and went na-na-na-na as usual. The truth to a commie is like sunlight to a vampire.

      • Trump Supporters Are Traitors says:

        Kye misunderstands what equality of opportunity means. Kye thinks having a 50 yd headstart in the 100 yd dash is fair, as long as he gets the headstart.

        Regarding m to f transgendered in open sports, in general I’m against it, but I recognize it’s an issue of civil rights vs fairness that will have to be resolved. Conservatives find the transgendered disgusting, just as they find most LGBT people disgusting.

        It’s estimated that 0.58% of the US adult population, or some 1.5 million Americans, are transgendered. We know, we know, Kye doesn’t know any transgendered Americans so they don’t exist.

Bad Behavior has blocked 11073 access attempts in the last 7 days.