Nanny Bloomberg Tries To Explain Why Having Armed Protection Is OK For Him, But Not You

Really, you can apply this argument to most of the leading gun grabbers, who so often either have their own firearm or armed security

WATCH: Bloomberg Tries to Defend Using Armed Guards While Pushing Gun Control

An attendee at the March 2, 2020, Fox News town hall asked Mike Bloomberg why he pushes gun control for the common man but surrounds himself with armed security.

The attendee said, “You have an armed security detail that is likely equipped with the same firearms and magazines you seek to ban the common citizen from owning. Does your life matter more than mine or my family’s?”

Bloomberg responded by admitting to having an armed detail, and suggesting he needs armed protection because he gets more threats than the common man.

On February 3, 2020, Breitbart News reported that Bloomberg enjoyed armed security even as he campaigned on a platform of gun control for the common man.

The New York Post reported on Bloomberg referring to the NYPD as his “own army,” while Mayor of New York City. And on January 25, 2019, NRA-ILA reported that after his tenure as mayor ended, “Bloomberg hired some of the same  [NYPD] officers from his security detail to work for him privately.” Yet he continued to push gun control for average Americans.

Bloomberg is the man behind Mom’s Demand and Everytown, groups that want way more than just expanded background checks. They want to turn the whole country into NJ and California and NYC, to have “universal background checks” which require firearms registration, to tax the hell out of firearms and ammunition, the current 4th Amendment violating Red Flag laws, and then to keep going, right up to what New Zealand has just done, which is ban most firearms from private ownership.

Of course, the Big Wigs like Mike would still have armed security, along with those gun grabbers like Alyssa Milano, who would be allowed to keep their own sem-auto pistols. Politicians and such would have the benefit of government armed security, typically carrying weapons that are already banned from private ownership right now.

Of course, Nanny Mike’s chances of being the Democrat nominee are about the same as you getting that $50,000 payoff from that lottery scratchoff. But, he pretty much wants the same as all the others. Sleepy Joe has long pushed this stuff, yet has had his own Secret Service armed protection for a long, long time. His plan is pretty extreme, including registration or buy back, bans, licensing, and so much more. Comrade Bernie’s plan is almost the same. The rest of the Dems still in, but with no shot, have plans that all look almost the same, because they are all coming from the same place, and like Obamacare is a step towards a government run health system, these plans are steps towards the New Zealand solution for guns.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

5 Responses to “Nanny Bloomberg Tries To Explain Why Having Armed Protection Is OK For Him, But Not You”

  1. I find it funny that the media is telling us that Biden is the moderate compared to Bernie, but in reality, there is no difference in their public policy. The only real difference is that Joe is a lot more corrupt than Sanders. Even in Corruption, Sanders just doesn’t have the work ethic that Biden does. Typical communist. Wants everything handed to him after others work for it.

    • formwiz says:

      Notice Bolshevik Bunny isn’t talking about last night.

      Didn’t turn out quite the way it was supposed to.

      The Demos even cheat their own people.

  2. John says:

    Do you open carry. 24/7 ?
    Do you allow employees to open carry in your phone stores?
    Can you post any pics of them doing so ?

    • formwiz says:

      Planning an ambush?

    • gitarcarver says:

      Do you open carry. 24/7 ?

      Wouldn’t that be his choice?

      Apparently you don’t understand the difference between exercising a right and the government trying to take that right away.

      Do you allow employees to open carry in your phone stores?

      Do you allow people to carry in your mother’s basement? If not, that would mean that is a decision that your mother makes on her property. Once again, a personnel choice is not the same as the government trying to take people’s rights away.

      We get it John. In your hatred, you want to restrict people’s rights. You want to restrict their freedom of speech. You want to take every gun so people cannot defend themselves against the likes of you.

      If you choose not to own a weapon, that’s fine.

      Stop hating freedom john.

      All the left has is hate.

Pirate's Cove