What If We’re Looking At The Wrong Polling Question On Trump?

Does Donald Trump really have a chance to win because other metric should be considered?

Democrats, don’t celebrate Trump’s nomination. Fear it.

I know the polls say Donald Trump cannot win. But what if we are looking at the wrong poll question?

What if Trump’s overwhelming negatives don’t matter? Or, to put it another way, what if the country’s negatives matter more?

Right now, about 6 in 10 Americans have an unfavorable view of Trump, and only 36 percent view him positively.

But the country is faring even worse. In the most recent average of polls calculated by RealClearPolitics, 26.9 percent of Americans think the nation is headed in the right direction and 64.9 percent think we are heading down the wrong track.

There are lots of polls that track similarly, things like consumer confidence, good jobs, earnings, and others, that are poor news that would have people saying that the country is on the wrong track. A brand spanking new poll by Rasmussen says that 60% want to put America first, which helps Trump.

So what if even voters who respect Hillary Clinton’s competence reject her as the embodiment of business as usual? And what if even voters who do not like Trump’s bigotry or bluster care more that he will, in their view, shake things up?

Sure, these voters might tell themselves, he may be crude, or inconsistent, or ill-informed. He may insult women and Hispanics and other groups. But it’s part of a shtick. He probably doesn’t mean half of it. He’s just an entertainer. The desire to send a message of disgust or disapproval, in other words, could lead voters to overlook, discount, wish away or excuse many Trump sins.

Hillary is status quo, and she’s not as talented as Bill. She has quite a few negatives and problems, one of which is Bill’s misogyny and attacks on women. Do not for a moment think that Trump will not beat that horse on a constant basis.

Still, when I hear smart people explaining why Trump cannot win, all I can think is: Aren’t you the ones who told us that he couldn’t top 30 percent, and then 40 percent, and then 50 percent in the Republican primaries? Weren’t you confident that he was finished after he called Mexicans rapists, and insulted prisoners of war, and dished out a menstruation insult?

Here’s the thing: whether you like, dislike, love, or loath Donald Trump, don’t discount him. I hear pundits on TV wondering when he’s going to pivot to a kinder, gentler version for the general election. Who says he will? This schtick has worked so far. It’s a pretty safe bet that a guy like Trump has a massive action plan, written prior to jumping into the race, just like business people do for running businesses. It surely included things like finding nicknames for opponents, like calling Ted Cruz “lyin’ Ted” and Jeb Bush “low energy”. And “Crooked Hillary”. The bluster, the attacks, the whipping people up. I remember a football coach saying he would keep running the same plays that work until the other team could stop him. If it works, keep doing it.

And it is working. The question is, will enough people buy into the schitck for the general to get Donald to the requisite number of electoral college votes? Will he woo enough people? Are there enough folks who see the country heading in the wrong direction and want to change? Think what you will, but don’t think Trump doesn’t have a plan, one which takes advantage of things like almost 75% of the nation thinking we’re heading in the wrong direction. And he will beat Hillary around the shoulders as part of the problem.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

2 Responses to “What If We’re Looking At The Wrong Polling Question On Trump?”

  1. Jeffery says:

    It’s always the risk of having a Republican nominee. There’s always a chance they’ll win. Look what happened in 2000 when we elected an unqualified man; and the dead in Iraq cry out from their graves. He was horrible and an embarrassment, but not as bad as many had feared, in that America survived. Every 20 years we elect a person capable of destroying the nation, 1980, 2000… let’s wait until 2020 to elect another affable destroyer of worlds (Paul Ryan).

    Stumpy McTrump, the short-fingered vulgarian, COULD win! It’s unlikely, but he could. Even as Jon Stewart, mocked by Stumpy for being Jewish, revealed Stumpy’s birth name, Fuckface von Clownstick, he COULD win! Stewart described Stumpy as a man-baby-American, with a man’s countenance, but a baby’s hands and behavior.

    Stumpy is even less qualified than Sarah Palin. Stumpy exemplifies what Newton G. said years ago when he started the Republicans along the path to destruction: truth is a commodity. McTrump can say anything at anytime and not suffer. He opposed the Iraq invasion! He watched thousands of Muslims in NJ celebrate the 9/11 attack! He favors/opposes raising the minimum wage! He favors/opposes raising taxes on the wealthy!

    Stumpy started out as a rich guy who stayed rich, and has lived a life of ease. A shameless self promoter, he got bored and ran for president. He is the “Chauncey Gardiner” of his angry, vulgar followers – regardless of what he says, it’s profound. That said, there’s 30-40% of Americans so upset with being screwed by the elites that McTrump gives them hope.

  2. John says:

    Teach all of the poll numbers about direction of the country good jobs etc have changed little since the last election which Obama won easily
    And it isn’t only polls that show Trump as a long shot, it is also the predictive markets such as Iowa Electtonic Matkets where people risk real money
    Last election they were accurate on 50 of the 51 electoral votes
    And bathroom wars will not help the GOP

Pirate's Cove