Beer Monday: Democrats Approved Of Waterboarding In 2002?

Good Monday! The start of a new work week. Time to get busy, shift a few paradigms, revolutionize outside the box, send some kudos faxblasts. How ’bout a beer?

Seems as if all those Democrats ponitificating about waterboarding, well, you know, knew about it. And approved of it

In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA program designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in U.S. custody. For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was given a virtual tour of the CIA’s overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk.

Among the techniques described, said two officials present, was waterboarding, a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill. But on that day, no objections were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder, two U.S. officials said.

“The briefer was specifically asked if the methods were tough enough,” said a U.S. official who witnessed the exchange.

Congressional leaders from both parties would later seize on waterboarding as a symbol of the worst excesses of the Bush administration’s counterterrorism effort. The CIA last week admitted that videotape of an interrogation of one of the waterboarded detainees was destroyed in 2005 against the advice of Justice Department and White House officials, provoking allegations that its actions were illegal and the destruction was a coverup.

I would dearly like to know who asked if the methods were tough enough, perhaps we will get some confirmation this week on that point.

With one known exception, no formal objections were raised by the lawmakers briefed about the harsh methods during the two years in which waterboarding was employed, from 2002 to 2003, said Democrats and Republicans with direct knowledge of the matter. The lawmakers who held oversight roles during the period included Pelosi and Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) and Sens. Bob Graham (D-Fla.) and John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), as well as Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.) and Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan).

And, then, Democrats seized upon waterboarding, after it had already been abandoned, as a means of assaulting the Bush administration. If only they would go after the Islamic extremists with the same vigor. Of course, the two seem to be on the same side.

Over at Instapundit: Reader Joseph Beaulieu has a difficult question for Pelosi, et al., on waterboarding: “If it was an acceptable practice five years ago, when the world was a more dangerous place, then what has happened in the past five years to make the world a less dangerous place where such harsh methods are no longer necessary?”

Captain Ed: That doesn’t settle the question as to whether waterboarding constitutes torture, but it certainly calls into question the notion that politics has nothing to do with the debate.

Bryan at Hot Air: Notice what else Pelosi knew about: The CIA’s so-called black sites where terrorists were being held overseas. And she did not object.

A cruise through the left-o-sphere, via Memeorandum, finds that most of the left are upset with Democrats for approving waterboarding of people directly associated with the group that, you know, killed 3,000 of our friends and neighbors. But, here are a few that have gone stark raving loony

AMERICAblog, whose post is entitled “Did Bush approve CIA leak to embarrass Pelosi?” It’s pretty clear that either one of the Republican members of Congress at the meeting, or the CIA, decided to leak what happened at a super-classified post-9/11 briefing in order to embarrass Pelosi and the Democrats. And I don’t doubt for a minute that Bush approved the leak, as he always does.

The conspiracy theory lives at Crooks and Liars, though, sadly, no mention of Karl Rove: When I first read this report, I admit that I got angry.  Then I got smart.  Look carefully at the names named in this report.  Isn’t it interesting that the WaPo reporters made sure to point out the Democrats in attendance when Congress was still operating under a Republican majority?  Hmmm….who do you suppose could have leaked this story to the press to perhaps deflect from their own negative stories?  

Open Left thinks we went nuts after the minor issue of 9.11: Nevertheless, our collective failures, and Nancy Pelosi’s specific moral albatross, is to address this country’s use of torture.  We keep 2 million people in prison, in violent conditions where many of them are tortured, and we do it because it makes a certain fear-based lifestyle easier to manage.  Atoning for our moment of overt lunacy in 2002 means acknowledging where it came from, and working to build a different society.

Maybe I should have made this post part of the Prozac Diaries series instead of Beer Monday?

Image hosting by Photobucket Linkfest Haven, the Blogger's Oasis

Send a trackback to this post, but don’t forget to link it.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

32 Responses to “Beer Monday: Democrats Approved Of Waterboarding In 2002?”

  1. The Knuckleheads of the Day award…

    Today’s winners are The Dubliner magazine, and its publisher Trevor White….

  2. […] Weekend!, Adeline and Hazel, , third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, DragonLady’s World, Pirate’s Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, CommonSenseAmerica, Church and State, Blog @, The […]

  3. Silke says:

    Teach, you are right to call the Democrats (those who knew that waterboarding was occurring) on this. I saw this on Andrew Sullivan’s blog but he had a great quote from Glenn Greenwald:

    Rockefeller is not just any Democrat. He is the individual whom the Democratic Senate caucus thereafter elected — and still chooses — to lead them on all matters relating to intelligence. Just consider how compromised he is and they are when it comes to investigating abuses by the intelligence community over the last six years. Rockefeller was complicit in all of those abuses, and the Democrats voted for him — and still support him — as their Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. How can Rockefeller possibly preside over meaningful investigations into conduct and policies — including the destruction of the videotapes and the conduct which those videotapes would reveal — of which he approved? And how can Senate Democrats pretend to be outraged at such policies when the leader they chose supports them?

    I’m sure a lot more will come out as the investigations begin but the good news is that most people now see waterboarding as torture and therefore unacceptable.

  4. Presidential Candidates on Border Security…

    Roy Beck of Numbers USA has posted a grid of the 2008 Presidential candidates based on Here is what you have to know about the GRID: My rating of a candidate’s past performance in political office is at the bottom…

  5. From the Silly news desk…

    Some news from Oregon. Size matters, even to burglars.

    COOS BAY, Ore. – A burglar who tunneled under a wall to access a Coquille tire shop did not have a good exit plan. The burglar was unable to remove anything because the tires were too large to…..

  6. Half burnt…

    Some news from Oregon. Size matters, even to burglars.
    COOS BAY, Ore. – A burglar who tunneled under a wall to access a Coquille tire shop did not have a good exit plan. The burglar was unable to remove anything because the tires were too large to f…..

  7. […] Hazel, MacBros’ Reviews, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, DragonLady’s World, Pirate’s Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, CommonSenseAmerica, Right Voices, Church and State, Blog @ […]

  8. John Rysn says:

    I think that it was very possible that when waterboarding was first mentioned most people did not realize EXACTLY what that term meant.
    In any case regardless of whether one democrat or all democrats “approved” it was/is illegal to torture people. Even the President can not break the law without being held accountable. If Democrats “approve” an illegal act it does not mean that the perpetrator should not be prosecuted.

  9. Right Truth says:

    Terror Symposium…

    This will be one of the most important events you have ever attended, thanks to the United American Committee: Exposing the Threat of Islamist Terrorism A National Symposium Series Saturday February 2, 2008 Ranch of the Lonesome Dove in Southlake,…

  10. bernie says:

    Just FYI, I trackbacked to you from my post Black Crime and White Justice

  11. Black Crime and White Justice…

    right after we stopped our War on Alcohol murder rates dropped in half and doubled again when we started the War on Drugs…

  12. Pearl Harbor Remembered…

    The 7 December 1941 Japanese raid on Pearl Harbor was one of the great defining moments in history. VIDEO…

  13. Butt Implants Gone Wrong?…

    Butt implants are not an operation that many plastic surgeons offer. The potential for problems is larger than many surgeons (myself included) are willing to accept. I do butt lifts, tummy tucks, liposuction and body lifts in that area, but I am not …..

  14. 123beta says:

    Good Stuff Monday…

    …What I’ve been reading while waiting for the Falcons/Saints game to come on. Honestly, the only reason I’m watching this game is Quarter-back Chris Redmon ……

  15. Silke, in case you haven’t noticed, we waterboarded a grand total of 3 al Qaeda terrorists-you remember them, right? They killed 2,996 of our friends and neighbors in just a few hours-and it has been forbidden by the CIA since 2003. Personally, if I knew an al Qaeda member had info that would save American lives, I’d waterboard them in a heartbeat, if it came to it.

    John, all countries have to do some things which are distasteful at times in order to protect their sovreignity. I would love if there was some drug which we could give the captured terrorists to make them talk and tell the truth. If only. But, if it is us or them, I will choose us.

  16. Right Truth says:

    Home for the Troops (original video for Right Truth)…

    Remembering the troops this holiday season, hubby created the following video. Music by Leslie Uggams titled, “Home”, with thanks to our friend Barry for the Mp3. God Bless Them Every One! ___________________________________________________________ S…

  17. […] third world county, DragonLady’s World, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate’s Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, Republican National Convention Blog, High Desert Wanderer, […]

  18. Christmas Hotties…

    Last year I gave my readers a Christmas treat with my Christmas Babes photo gallery. Just to show I am not merely objectifying women and for balance, here is my photo of male Christmas Hotties:…

  19. It’s Monday Nite and I still hate abc TV…

    Monday Nite Football is no longer on abc TV. It is on ESPN. That is all good and well if you are one of those people who wastes your money on cable TV! Yes, I consider it a waste, but that is not the reason I hate abc. Is the Super Bowl supposed ……..

  20. Silke says:

    Teach said: Personally, if I knew an al Qaeda member had info that would save American lives, I’d waterboard them in a heartbeat, if it came to it.

    Then you would have to torture all of them because you could make the argument that getting any information from any al Qaeda member will save lives. Very quickly the exception becomes the rule.

    Teach, I know exactly who these people are. But this isn’t about who they are. This is about who WE are. Torture is illegal and immoral. Whether you do it one time or one hundred times, it is against the law. We are in a long-term ideological struggle with radical Islamic extremism. We cannot abandon our principles. Every military leader who has spoken out about this agrees. Why not listen to the people who have actually put their lives on the line for this country?

  21. The Knucklehead of the Day award…

    Today’s winner is Congressman Robert Wexler….

  22. Am I not entitled to my opinion anymore in Liberal America, Silke?

    So, if you have an al Qaeda member who you know has information that will save thousands of American lives, and you need that info immediately, you would not waterboard that person? You would put your petty principles, of which al Qaeda has none, above the lives of fellow Americans?

  23. Florida the rules are different here Chapter CLXIV…

    A fire breaks out at a Florida art museum destroying $100,000 of art to be destroyed. The cause? An advertising balloon. The Miami Herald informs us the balloon survived the inferno. Don’t you just love the Sunshine state?…

  24. The natives are restless…

    A small(or not so small) blog brouhaha has broken out in the South Florida blogosphere….

  25. Silke says:

    Teach, of course you are entitled to your opinion. I have never said otherwise. And you certainly have a right to express those opinions. I am simply disagreeing with you.

    As for your scenario, we already know that we have used lesser criteria to waterbaord al Qaeda members. We were justifiably worried another large-scale attack was coming (though we had no information about a specific threat) so we tortured them for any information they could provide. We know that al Qaeda cells are very compartmentalized. Even if we had a high-value detainee in custody it’s very unlikely they would have the time sensitive information you are talking about. Yes, their information could lead to the capture of other al Qaeda members but you could make the case that even if they weren’t currently planning a big-scale attack, we still saved lives because they probably would carry one out eventually. Again, your exception becomes the rule.

  26. Stacy says:

    It seems to have been forgotten that al Qaeda is sub-human and does not deserve our love and kindness. Geezuzkrist, these people are animals and they wouldn’t take too kindly to a woman opining. Especially if she’s not wearing at minimum, the hijab.

  27. Stacy says:

    There is a blog I frequent that is written by a young woman living in the UAE. She was born and raised there, college educated in Canada, returned to the UAE. I haven’t quite figured out what the situation is with her parents. Her mother often lives in Bulgaria and her dad I believe jumps back and forth between Canada and the UAE. And she has a stepmother. Anyway . . . recently she went to the pharmacy to purchase wart remover for a wart on her hand. Because she was an unmarried woman, the male clerk refused to sell her the remover stating that it would leave a scar and no man would marry a woman with a blemish on her hand like that. He told her to go to the hospital and have them remove it. Ironically, the opposite is true. The acid remover will not leave a scar, whereas it being cut out will. This is the UAE, they are not immersed in that archaic version of Islam. She left that pharmacy empty handed. Plus she got in trouble for being alone. I have no sympathy for men who think so little of women.

  28. Silke says:

    I agree al Qaeda members are evil and I have no doubt that some women in the Middle-East are living in terrible conditions but my repudiation of torture is not a defense of terrorists or a culture that degrades and abuses women. On the contrary, I am proud that our country represents everything these terrorists hate and everything these women hope for.

  29. Stacy says:

    It’s stories like this that make me feel like we will never make any headway with the Muslims. This is a family living in Canada, so they live in a progressive society, and it changes nothing.

  30. Silke, waterboarding should be the exeption, and, notice, it was only used on 3 high level AQ members. It is a method of last resort. If you can offer up another method that works, please, feel free.

    I have almost given up on the so called “moderate” Muslims. There may be lots, but they sure do not come out very often. I too find it detestible the way they treat women, and I find it almost as bad how the liberal womens groups ignore the plight of Muslim women, much of it simply because of their BDS.

  31. Stacy says:

    liberal womens groups ignore the plight of Muslim women, much of it simply because of their BDS

    That my friend pisses me off beyond words. If you truly believe in your cause you would ignore insignificant differences like party affiliation. After Afghanistan and Iraq were liberated (up for debate still, no arguing please) I sat on the edge of my chair awaiting the reaction from liberal womens’ groups. Nothing. Absolutely nothing. It is amazing how closed lip they are about the abhorrent actions towards women in the Muslim world.

    And not to say that these things only happen in Islam, there are other religions that have had some bizarre things happen. But unfortunately this mindset appears to be the norm, not the exception.

  32. […] Linked to: Dragon Lady’s World / Pirate’s Cove / High Desert Wanderer / Bullwinkle Blog / Celebrity Smack Share […]

Pirate's Cove