AP Fact Checks Obama’s SOTU, Finds It Wanting

No, I did not watch Obama’s State Of The Union speech. I haven’t bothered with most of his SOTU campaign speeches, nor do I bother watching any of his speeches. They are a raft of campaign speeches, replete with lies, half truths, and insults aimed at those who disagree with him. He typically calls for bipartisanship, for working together, then goes on to taunt and denigrate Republicans. He did that again last night. The Weekly Standard refers to the speech as “defiant“. And four Associated Press writers had to sit through his speech and fact check it

(WRAL) The U.S. may not have “risen from recession” quite as rousingly as President Barack Obama suggested in his State of the Union speech Tuesday night. Seven years after that severe downturn began, household income hasn’t recovered and healthy job growth is complicated by the poor quality, and pay, of many of those jobs.

It’s always problematic when a president takes credit for an improving economy, just as it is when he’s blamed for things going bad. A leader can only do so much, for better or worse, and there are two sides to every economy. But after an election in which Obama largely held off on chest-beating, he claimed credit in bold terms for what is going right.

Obama has never had a problem with taking credit for anything that goes right, and blaming others for things that go bad. Vox notes that the most important sentence was “Tonight, we turn the page”. Yeah, it only took him six years. And people still do not think that the economy has recovered, rightly or wrongly. People at the bottom and middle are not feeling the stock market.

OBAMA: “At this moment – with a growing economy, shrinking deficits, bustling industry and booming energy production – we have risen from recession freer to write our own future than any other nation on Earth.”

THE FACTS: By many measures, the economy is still recovering from the deep scars left by the Great Recession.

Job growth has been healthy, but fueled in part by lower-paying jobs in areas such as retail and restaurants, which have replaced many higher-paying positions in manufacturing and construction. Part-time jobs also remain elevated: There are still 1.7 million fewer workers with full-time jobs than when the recession began in December 2007.

Sadly, wages are barely growing. Furthermore, the energy growth mostly has to do with the public sector, in spite of Obama administration policies, rules, and regulation. The majority of the jobs are part time and in retail and restaurants, jobs that were called “bad jobs” by Democrats when Bush was in office. There are also a historic number of Americans who have dropped out of the jobs market, and long term joblessness is also at historic numbers.

OBAMA: “I am sending this Congress a bold new plan to lower the cost of community college — to zero.”

THE FACTS: Zero for qualifying students; an estimated $60 billion over 10 years to the treasury.

Of course, his tax plan harms those who use 529 savings plans. And, really, what he means by “sending…a bold new plan” is “I’m saying I want this done.” He won’t actually send over any legislation proposals. At best, he’ll send over a piece of paper with a short rough outline, the same as can be read at Whitehouse.gov.

OBAMA: “Thanks to a growing economy, the recovery is touching more and more lives. Wages are finally starting to rise again. We know that more small-business owners plan to raise their employees’ pay than at any time since 2007.”

THE FACTS: A survey of small businesses by the National Federation of Independent Business does show that a rising proportion plans to raise wages. But plans to raise pay aren’t the same as actually raising them.

Probably the snarkiest thing in the article. No reason to add commentary.

There are a few other fact checks, such as working to degrade ISIS, and yammering about “not getting dragged into another ground war.” If you think about it, this is in part whining about fighting Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan, a nation state that al Qaeda operated out of, and sent terrorists to hijack 4 airplanes and fly them in a terrorist attack on 9/11. And, rather than engage in ground war, the U.S. is attacking Islamic jihadis in more countries than President Bush did, mostly using drone strikes and, surely, special operations groups (note: this is one of the few things Obama is doing that I heartily approve of).

Of course, this is the same president who flouts the law by having an illegal alien sit in the box with Michelle Obama.

Anyhow, Guardians of the Galaxy was a much better option than listening to this buffoon do his normal schtick. That was a really, really fun movie. As for Obama, now he gets back to being a part time president, more vacations, golf, learning about important things on TV, and generally just avoiding the hard work.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: AP Fact Checks Obama’s SOTU, Finds It Wanting »

Say, “Could humour cut through the malaise that has smothered the public discourse” On Climate Change?

In a word, “no”

Why it’s good to laugh at climate change

Did you hear the one about the climate policy analyst? Or the polar bear who walked into a bar?

Climate change is not generally considered a source of amusement: in terms of comedic material, the forecast is an ongoing cultural drought. But perhaps campaigners have missed a trick in overlooking the powerful role that satire and subversion can play in social change. Could humour cut through the malaise that has smothered the public discourse, activating our cultural antennae in a way that graphs, infographics and images of melting ice could never do?

The problem is, when it comes to any politics and stuff, Lefties are not humorous. Or, in British, humourous. Their default mode is to sneer, condescend, insult, and abuse.

But while online ridicule directed towards climate ‘deniers’ (generally portrayed as either too stupid to understand the science, or as conspiracy theorists) may appeal to the usual crowd, its hard to see how this kind of approach will breach the political divide. After all, the feeling of being laughed at by a sneering, left-leaning elite is not appealing. One notorious attempt by the 10:10 campaign and director Richard Curtis at ‘humorously’ marginalising opposition towards environmentalism backfired completely. It turns out that most people don’t find graphic depictions of children’s heads exploding all that hilarious after all…

The hell you say! It says quite a bit about Warmists, a subsection of the Progressive movement, would think that the video had any humor, er, humour, in it at all. They thought so much of their “humor/humour” that they immediately worked to make sure copies of the video uploaded to Youtube and other outlets were wacked. Fortunately, there are still some out there

That’s what Warmists think is “humour”. These are people who think stabbing a “denier” with an icicle is funny.

Many “reasonable” Warmists have highly recommended that Warmists take a chill on the insanity, and are always ignored.

Read: Say, “Could humour cut through the malaise that has smothered the public discourse” On Climate Change? »

If All You See…

…is a flooded world turning humans into mermaids merpeople, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on crazy, but also evil.

Read: If All You See… »

Surprise: Obama Chief Of Staff Takes Blame For Paris Absence

Previously, we learned that no one told Obama, who holds the position of President Of The United States, the most powerful position in the world, that the Paris march was going to be so big. Politico’s money line was

White House aides were so caught off guard by the march’s massive size and attention that they hadn’t even asked President Barack Obama if he wanted to go.

Someone had to throw themselves on the proverbial sword, ya know

(The Hill) White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough said Tuesday it was his fault the White House didn’t send the president or another senior member of the administration to a unity rally in Paris earlier this month following the terror attack on a satirical newspaper.

“We’ve said we regret we didn’t send someone more senior than our ambassador,” McDonough said in an interview with NBC’s “The Today Show. “That rests on me, that’s my job.”

Uh huh.

Read: Surprise: Obama Chief Of Staff Takes Blame For Paris Absence »

“Civility And The Civilized Man”

Yesterday I wrote about civility, which was very much a post about provoking thought. Proof Positive has an excellent post regarding the same, entitled Civility And The Civilized Man.

Read: “Civility And The Civilized Man” »

On MLK, Jr. Day Obama Celebrates Obama

I chose, unintentionally, not to mention Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, the same way I choose not to mention many federal holidays. Obama went a different route (via Daily Caller)

Which leads to many Tweets such as

https://twitter.com/YodaCon/status/557243639932280833

The DC also notes

The rest of the tweet linked to a video of Obama urging Americans to tune into the White House live stream Tuesday to watch the president give his State of the Union address.

That’s right. The Youtube video has nothing to do with MLK, Jr. It’s funny, The Hill is running a story about “Obama tries to steal GOP thunder“. Heck, Obama does this to everyone else most of the time, constantly including himself in pictures of other famous people to make it all about himself.

Read: On MLK, Jr. Day Obama Celebrates Obama »

Many In Leftist Hollywood Are Questioning Whether We Should Be Celebrating The Life Of A “Killer”

It’s time for another

Here we go

‘American Sniper’ Complaints Grow in Hollywood: Should Clint Eastwood Be Celebrating a ‘Killer’? (Exclusive)

Even as “American Sniper” breaks January box-office records and revels in six Oscar nominations, criticism over the subject of the film, sharpshooter Chris Kyle, is rising and reaching into the Academy of Motion Picture of Arts and Sciences, which votes on the Academy Awards.

Over the weekend, multiple Academy members told TheWrap that they had been passing around a recent article by Dennis Jett in The New Republic that attacks the film for making a hero out of Kyle, who said: “The enemy are savages and despicably evil,” and his “only regret is that I didn’t kill more.” Kyle made the statements in his best-selling book, “American Sniper,” on which the film is based. (snip)

But Academy members seem to be paying attention to the criticism that Eastwood and star/producer Bradley Cooper shouldn’t be celebrating a man who wrote that killing hundreds of Iraqis was “fun.”

“He seems like he may be a sociopath,” one Academy member told TheWrap, adding he had not yet seen the film but had read the article, which is being passed around.

There’s lots and lots more criticism, well, really, Barking Moonbat Syndrome, of the movie, Clint Eastwood, and Chris Kyle, which goes on and on and on.

Gateway Pundit notes leftists spray painted “Murder” on a billboard for the movie. Q&O wonders if the Academy member who throws around the word “sociopath” thinks the same of all military members. Patterico notes the leftism and bigotry of the Academy. Powerline finds liberals to be pretty dumb on the subject.

I’m not going to even bother attempting to make an argument in an attempt to change the minds of liberals. That’s a waste of time. As the saying goes, “don’t try and teach a pig to dance. You’ll waste your time and annoy the pig.” Was Kyle a killer? You betcha. We have those in war, you know. Audie Murphy was a stone cold killer, too, and it earned him the Medal Of Honor. How about the guys in Easy Company (Band Of Brothers), who liberated Kaufering IV, a subsidiary concentration camp of Dachau, among others? Yes, killers. War, unfortunately, requires killers. How about JFK? He certainly killed during WWII. Does anyone think most service members had a good opinion of Germans, Italians, Japanese, North Koreans, Chinese, British, and, heck, the other side during the Civil War?

What I will wonder is, if Hollywood is so concerned with “sociopathic” killers, then why have they made multiple movies about Che Guevara? Obviously, Hollywood loves movies about killers, hence the numerous Friday The 13th and Nightmare on Elm Street films, including reboots, but they really loves them some Che. Wait, didn’t Hollywood just make a “humor” movie about assassinating Kim Jong Un? Hollywood made a TV movie about Margaret Sanger. How many human deaths is she responsible for?

There are quite a few movies upcoming that celebrate people (and aliens, such as the movie Chappie) who kill. I don’t hear the complaints from Leftist Hollywood, do you?

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Many In Leftist Hollywood Are Questioning Whether We Should Be Celebrating The Life Of A “Killer” »

Say, Should Tackling Hotcoldwetdry Trump Real Environmental Concerns?

That’s what Miles King at the UK Guardian wants to know, though he puts it without snark

Should tackling climate change trump protecting nature?

Does the need to mitigate the effects of man-made climate change override the need to protect nature?

Climate change is with us, and is one of nine reasons why scientists are now concerned that the rate of environmental degradation is a threat to the future of human life on Earth. The loss of biodiversity, dubbed the Sixth Green Extinction by some, is another threat to humanity, with nearly half of the world’s amphibians and a fifth of its plants at risk of extinction.

We do not have the luxury of choosing which of these nine challenges to tackle; they are all critical to our survival.

Strange, since Warmists tend to pick their fake issue over real environmental concerns

Yet last week, here in West Dorset, the council unanimously approved the development of a 25MW solar farm on a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). Rampisham Down was designated as a SSSI because it is nationally important for wildlife. There are 70ha of heathland and nature-rich grassland, known as lowland acid grassland at Rampisham. (snip)

The West Dorset planning committee met last weeky to decide whether to give the Solar Farm planning permission. They listened to the evidence against it from Natural England and Dorset Wildlife Trust, and for it, from the developers, their witnesses and local councillors. They discounted the nature value of the Down, viewed it as brownfield land which would benefit from being developed, and decided that the production of renewable energy and the small number of jobs the development would bring were of greater benefit to society than protecting the wildlife.

So, to hell with nature, let’s slap up tons of solar panels all over the countryside, despoiling nature, which will produce roughly 4 to 5 megawatts. Warmists don’t actually care about nature. They care about their politics.

Read: Say, Should Tackling Hotcoldwetdry Trump Real Environmental Concerns? »

If All You See…

…is a horrible vacation spot which requires fossil fueled travel for other people causing the seas to rise, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is American Power, with a post on #BlackLivesMatter looking to hijack legacy of MLK, Jr.

Read: If All You See… »

42% Of French Say Cartoons That Upset Muslims Shouldn’t Be Published

I actually have a bunch of “climate change” articles saved to Pocket, but this article, via Hot Air headlines, intrigued me

(UK Guardian) Four out of ten French people want the press to avoid publishing further cartoons that will upset the Muslim community, according to a poll published on Sunday.

While supporting the idea of freedom of expression, 42% of those quizzed in the Ifop poll for Le Journal du Dimanche said cartoons that made Muslims feel injured or threatened should be avoided.

However, a majority – 57% of those asked – said magazines and papers should be free to continue publishing cartoons whatever the reaction.

Traditional media was treated slightly more favourably than new media by those asked: 50% said there should be limits put on the freedom of expression on the internet, while 49% said there should be no restrictions.

Here’s the thing: should media and other outlets avoid publishing material that upsets others? Not just Muslims, but the targeted group? We’re not talking about forced censorship, but personal censorship. Civility. Respect. Responsibility. In Starship Troopers, Robert Heinlein wrote

“A dying culture invariably exhibits personal rudeness. Bad manners. Lack of consideration for others in minor matters. A loss of politeness, of gentle manners, is more significant than is a riot.”

Regardless of it being a science fiction book, that always made quite a bit of sense to me. Too often people are willing to forgo civility. With free speech comes responsibility. Much of the world has forgotten this as an attitude that makes everything not just about “me me me”, but infused with an attitude that everyone else is simply an ant. What does that mean? Do you think about all the ants and bugs you step on? No. You almost never notice them. You’re just doing your own thing without regard to the bugs. This is the way so many people think today. When they’re driving along and cut people off, it’s more than just selfishness, it’s a complete lack of regard for what can happen to other people. The fender bender behind them is of no regard as they drive off without knowing they are responsible for causing that accident.

Just because we can, doesn’t mean we should. Was it appropriate when cartoonists were penning cartoons portraying Condi Rice in a horribly racist manner, many which were published in major American newspapers, such as the Washington Post and NY Times. When we do, we should be responsible for doing, be it speech, actions, the pen. We may not be to blame, we we can bear responsibility.

Read: 42% Of French Say Cartoons That Upset Muslims Shouldn’t Be Published »

Pirate's Cove