…is an evil fossil fueled vehicle created heat snow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is 1389 Blog, with a post wondering about all those peaceful Muslims.
Read: If All You See… »
…is an evil fossil fueled vehicle created heat snow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is 1389 Blog, with a post wondering about all those peaceful Muslims.
Read: If All You See… »

Happy Sunday! A rather white day on the east coast, which has folks in the mid-west laughing at the freakout over what they consider to be a tiny bit of snow. This pinup is by Bill Randall, with a wee bit of help.
What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets†calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me
Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.
Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »
I always get a kick out of Democrats attempting to explain the “free market”, particularly as it applies to ‘climate change’. Their version of the free market is always interesting. Here’s the Editorial Board of the Frederick News-Post, a Maryland paper, who killed lots of trees to publish their paper and use vast amounts of fossil fuels to distribute them
Since when did the Republican Party forget the power of the free market?
Climate-change deniers can close their eyes and turn the page — we’re going to talk today about how and why we need to harness the power of the free market to avert global catastrophe. Let’s start with the basics:
Fact 1: Climate change is real and urgent. Enough already.
Fact 2: Emitting climate-changing gas is a classic economic externality, much like polluting a river. One company or person benefits from spewing cheap carbon, while everyone bears the cost.
Fact 3: Prices change behavior. Just look at what happened to sales of SUVs when gas prices topped $4 a gallon, and look at sales today.
Given these core facts, the Republican rejection of a market-based response to climate change is mystifying.
It’s rejected because climate change caused mostly/solely by Mankind is a fiction. Why would anyone implement anything to solve a non-problem, unless it is for power and/or money? So, what does the Editorial Board propose?
Back in the day when Republicans stood for free markets, they understood that the least onerous way to deal with market externalities such as pollution is to put a fair price on the activity that causes them. That gives polluters a choice — keep polluting and pay those who suffer from their actions, or change their practices. The other alternative is strict regulation and enforcement. Given that choice, many Republicans in 1990 supported successful, market-based solutions to deal with acid rain.
So why not embrace a market-based mechanism such as a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade regime to deal with climate change? It’s hardly radical — even Exxon Mobil has backed the idea.
Except, when it is Government setting the policy via legislation and regulation, then setting the price for the “commodity”, it is no longer a free market exchange, where the price would be established by the parties engaged in commerce. The market Warmists are explaining is a Socialist market, whereby the government is heavily invested in control.
Warmists keep trotting out this trope that a carbon tax and/or cap and trade are somehow part of the free market, yet, how free is it when the government is forcing individuals and private entities to participate?
Perhaps we should put a carbon tax on news organizations, starting at $45 per metric ton, to offset the carbon footprint of operating and distributing the news. All that energy, all that fossil fuel. Newspapers would be fine with this, right? It’s just all part of their “free market”, right? Especially when the government requires compliance and payment.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
There have been many dire predictions made about the end of snow. But, with the last 7 years seeing many winters in the eastern and western hemispheres in both the North and South, well, Warmists have to find some way to cover this, as we’ve seen over the past few years. Here we go again
The Future of Epic Blizzards in a Warming World
What does global warming mean for extreme snowfall?….
Part of the reason this Snowzilla storm is expected to dump so much snow is because it is pulling abundant moisture. As the planet warms because of excess heat trapped by human-emitted greenhouse gases, the atmosphere can hold more moisture. Scientists already expect heavy downpours to increase because of that. But there’s been little research into what that means for “epic blizzardsâ€Â like this one.
It might seem that more moisture in the atmosphere along with warming temperatures should mean more rain than snow, and that’s true. But, it turns out, that’s only part of the story.
Yeah, the rest is Excusemaking, trying to fit more snow into their Narrative.
Read: Remember When Snow Was Going To Be A Thing Of The Past? »
…is a horrible fossil fueled vehicle contributing to planetary doom, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Neo-neocon, with a post on Donald Trump and free speech.
Read: If All You See… »
In Norway and Denmark, the government is holding classes for the “refugees” on how Not To Rape And Sexually Assault. Sadly, the classes are completely optional, unlike at most institutions of higher learning. Germany has decided to take a different route
(Fox News) Rocked by a wave of sexual assaults committed by migrant men, Germany is fighting back with cartoons, in a PC campaign critics say would be comical if it didn’t address such a serious issue.
In a national effort already blasted by critics as demonstrating the government’s ineptitude in dealing with unruly refugees from the Middle East and North Africa, authorities have distributed anti-sexual harassment cartoon leaflets at public swimming pools and other public facilities. One depicts a hand reaching for a shapely, bikini-clad woman’s backside, and bears a universal-language slash demonstrating such behavior is forbidden.
“No verbal and bodily sexual harassment toward women in any kind of clothing,†reads the caption below. (snip)
“These signs are a good step, but they can only be a first initiative of more security measures to come,†Saba Farzan, executive director of Foreign Policy Circle, a Berlin strategy think tank, told FoxNews.com. “Protecting our women from vicious assaults means to teach refugees as well as migrants about gender equality.â€
Which is hilarious, in a bad way, because these people have been raised in societies in which there is no gender equality, that women are, at best, 2nd class citizens. Does one think the zebra is going to remove its stripes simply because it is hanging with horses? From what we’ve seen with this “refugees”, the answer is no. Nor is this isolated, because these Muslims streaming from the Middle East, Africa, and other Muslim nations have shown a lack of respect for women and the laws of the host countries for quite some time.
“If our criminal and asylum laws can’t discourage perpetrators of sexual harassment and the activity of other offenses, what effect can signs in swimming facilities have?â€Â Cologne-based lawyer Stefanie Galla told FoxNews.com.
Yeah, but they’re great signs! Zero Hedge highlighted many designed by the EU that Switzerland had already planned to use when they came out a few days ago, and shows more of the German ones now. One of them reminds these refugees that being homosexual is not punishable by death in Germany. This is the one mentioned in the Fox article

We also learn there is a guidebook, which includes (my list is slightly different from Zero Hedges
There are many, many more, but that last one is amusing, since the government was attempting to hide all the sexual assault, rape, and other bad behavior by these refugees.
Zero Hedge says to check back in 6 months to see if these things are working. Meanwhile, there are more reports of bad behavior by refugees, including women and children this time, at public pools and saunas, which include masturbation, harassment, and voiding bowels, leading yet another town to ban refugees at the public pools.
Read: Good News: Germany Battles Sexual Assault By “Refugees” With Cartoons And Signs »
This is the reason I so often refer to ‘climate change’, as in, the belief that all changes in the climate are caused mostly/solely by Mankind’s output of greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide, as Hotocoldwetdry. They Cult of Climastrology has created a tautology, whereby everything can either be directly blamed on ‘climate change’ or linked to it in a negative fashion. Witness
Explaining #snowmaggedon2016 to climate deniers, part 1:
Historically high sea surface temps in the Atlantic are fueling the storm
— Senate Democrats (@SenateDems) January 22, 2016
Doesn’t prove anthropogenic causation, just warming.
Explaining #snowmaggedon2016 to climate deniers, part 2:
Extreme snowfall is more likely in warmer atmosphere, which holds and dumps more
— Senate Democrats (@SenateDems) January 22, 2016
Got that? Heat causes more snow. Must have been super hot during the last glacial age.
Explaining #snowmaggedon2016 to climate deniers, part 3:
Heaviest snow events have been more frequent in DC since 1960
— Senate Democrats (@SenateDems) January 22, 2016
First, since records only go back so far, we do not know that. Second, it’s rather disturbing that elected officials use a derogatory term intended to equate non-belief with AGW to Holocaust denial, in effect slurring fellow American citizens they are supposed to represent for Wrongthink.
Explaining #snowmaggedon2016 to climate deniers, part 4:
NOAA scientists have found that extreme regional snowstorms in US are increasing
— Senate Democrats (@SenateDems) January 22, 2016
Hotcoldwetdry. Heat causes more snow. These people really are nuts.
How #snowmageddon relates to climate change: https://t.co/NT4daREmop
— Senate Democrats (@SenateDems) January 22, 2016
That linked article does nothing to prove anthropogenic climate change. Belief is not causation. Nor are talking points along with unhinged pronouncements. Causation is the argument, one for which Warmists cannot provide rock solid scientific evidence. But, they do not feel the need to provide that evidence, because this is about Belief, and creating more government dominance.
Read: Senate Democrats Decide To Explain Snowmaggedon To Deniers »
When I first saw the headline to this Time piece by Joe Klein (The Democrats Stumble Toward 50 Shades of Socialism), I figured I was going to be leading with “au, contraire, Joe, they are moving towards Progressivism, also known as “nice fascism”, but, he somewhat mentions this
A specter is haunting the Democratic Party–the specter of socialism. A question is being asked, mostly by Republicans, but also by MSNBC’s Chris Matthews: What is the difference between a Democrat and a Socialist? Debbie Wasserman Schultz got it last July and, ever the robotic partisan, answered by saying the more important difference was between Democrats and Republicans. Senator Chuck Schumer said it depended on how you define the two, and then refused to define the two. And, most significantly, Hillary Clinton said, “Well, I can tell you what I am … I’m a progressive Democrat.â€
Now this is not a difficult question to answer. Webster’s says socialism is “a social system or theory in which the government owns and controls the means of production.†Democrats tend to believe in free enterprise. They think government should regulate the means of production, not own it. They have taken great pains to separate themselves from socialism, which has always been a poison word in American politics. And yet, according to a recent Des Moines Register poll, 43% of Iowa Democrats describe themselves as socialists. What gives?
What gives is that, first, it’s interesting that Joe refers to “free enterprise”, rather than Capitalism. Because, more and more, Democrats are looking for more and more governmental control of the economic system, along with quiet calls for replacing the capitalist system. Second, the means of production thing covers just one of the 3 cores of Democratic political theory, which determines whether it is a Socialist, Liberal, or Conservative type system. American conservatives are more akin to Classic Liberalism, not true conservatism. For socialism, the moral core has the government staying the heck out of our private lives even more than Classic Liberalism. Does anyone see that happening? Democrats want government involved in all facets of our lives. Then there’s the political core, where virtually everything is up for a vote and almost no one is excluded. They do like this, except when they lose.
Klein goes on to note that they are not really Socialists, but more “European-style social democrats, who believe in a robust redistribution of wealth and government control of some of the means of production–like the health care system.” He goes on to describe what Hillary and Sanders are pushing, finally noting that
But each of those ideas is more “progressive†than “socialist.â€
In that, he’s correct. Democrats really shouldn’t be put on the political scale to the Left: they are actually way to the Right, close to Fascism. It is an Authoritarian political system, which also deals with Absolutism, meaning the government, particularly the central government, is in charge of everything. Everything is dominated by the central government. It believes in the use of force and coercion to keep the citizenry in line. It requires Belief in the primacy of Government, replacing religion as the measure of faith and worship. It’s descended from Fascism, but, doesn’t share all traits. Basically, modern Progressives mix and match their beliefs, all for the good of the Government. While they yammer about being against “oppression”, they like to oppress those who do not hold the correct thoughts, and they want Government to force compliance, for instance.
Indeed, the Democrats should worry about their attachment to big government, which, in America, has come to mean more unaccountable bureaucracy, like the Department of Veterans Affairs; more inefficiency, like the weird tangle of federal job-training programs, each more irrelevant than the last; and more perverse incentives, like welfare programs that ask for nothing–no personal responsibility–in return from their recipients.
But, that is exactly what the Progressives want, at least in terms of a very strong central government. They don’t seem to notice, or, at times, even care, about the problems that come with Big Government, nor that this same BG can reach out and make their lives miserable.
If it was just the political theory of Socialism that we were facing, that could be beaten back, because at least it would include unfettered access to the ballot box and government staying out of our lives. Progressives refuse to accept when they lose at the ballot box, and, again, want heavy control of our lives by Government. Their control of so many facets of American life, particularly the education system, ensures that more and more believe in the primacy of government.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Read: Joe Klein: Democrats Are Stumbling Towards Socialism »
The hell you say!
New BJS study finds high rates of campus sexual assault
The Bureau of Justice Statistics released a new study Wednesday that offers some insight on the prevalence of sexual assaults on college campuses.
During the 2014 to 2015 school year alone, the study found that 10.3 percent of female undergraduates had been the victim of a sexual assault, which they defined as rape or sexual violence. The BJS surveyed 23,000 students from nine different universities for the comprehensive report — 15,000 female and 8,000 male.
The findings also showed that across the nine schools, rates of sexual assault were “significantly higher among nonheterosexual than heterosexual female students.â€
In a statement provided to Yahoo News, Scott Berkowitz, president and founder of the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network or RAINN, called the findings “alarming,†and pointed out the “huge variation in rates of sexual violence†between schools.
Interesting (not in a good way). Here you have institutions of higher learning which are administered mostly by people who lean politically to the left, staffed by the same, and have the same type of teachers. The students themselves tend to be left leaners, and learn to be even further to the left from the teachers, administrators, and staff.
Berkowitz also said the study’s results “show the importance of Congress passing the Campus Accountability and Safety Act, which will ensure that every campus implements a consistent annual survey.â€
Here’s a better idea: people who lean politically to the left should stop all their sexual assault and rape.
Read: Huh: Study Finds Lots Of Sexual Assault On Liberal College Campuses »
…is an evil fossil fuels gas pump filling up an evil fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Lid, with a post on National Review dedicating an entire issue to exposing Trump as a liberal.
Read: If All You See… »