Climaheartache: Trump Quits UN Framework On ‘Climate Change’

Forget pulling out of the Paris (scam) agreement, this is huge

Trump quits pivotal 1992 climate treaty, in massive blow to global warming effort

The announcement to sever ties with the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change came as Trump quit dozens of international organizations that the White House says no longer serve U.S. interests by promoting radical climate policies and other issues. It was outlined in a memo by the White House. Trump has called on other countries to abandon their carbon-cutting measures, and the move appears to be his latest attempt to destabilize global climate cooperation.

The 1992 UNFCCC serves as the international structure for efforts by 198 countries to slow the rate of rising climate pollution. It has universal participation. The U.S. was the first industrialized nation to join the treaty following its ratification under former President George H.W. Bush — and it will be the only nation ever to leave it. The move also marks Trump’s intensifying efforts to topple climate efforts compared to his first term, when he decided against quitting the treaty.

“Many of these bodies promote radical climate policies, global governance, and ideological programs that conflict with U.S. sovereignty and economic strength,” stated a White House fact sheet.

This is awesome. Incredible. What seemed like a good idea in 1992 quickly morphed into a push for soft authoritarianism.

(NRDC) It takes one year after the United States formally submits its paperwork to the United Nations to no longer be a party to the UNFCCC. No country has ever taken this radical step to completely withdraw from all international climate efforts. Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and the UNFCCC solidifies this administration’s stance as a global pariah on climate change.

So, it takes a year? But, to rejoin, it would be immediate. Damned big reason to make sure a Republican wins in 2028.

Read: Climaheartache: Trump Quits UN Framework On ‘Climate Change’ »

NY Times Super Concerned What Europeans Think About Trump After Maduro Capture

These would be the same Europeans who said that Maduro stole the 2024 election and that he was not the legitimate president? Who were just fine with Biden’s $25 million bounty on Maduro (which the Trump admin bumped to $450 million)?

Europe and Rest of World Try to Come to Terms With Trump the Imperialist

It had the makings of one of the most awkward trans-Atlantic meetings in a long time.

European leaders are said to be privately angry and even panicky about President Trump’s new threats to seize Greenland from Denmark, a NATO ally, after his military intervention in Venezuela. But they need the United States to ensure credible security for postwar Ukraine against any further aggression by Russia — a vital strategic interest for Europe

With that backdrop, European leaders met in Paris on Tuesday with senior American negotiators to discuss how to secure a peace settlement in Ukraine. They jointly announced progress on security assurances for a postwar Ukraine, but any cease-fire seems distant, given that Russia is not part of the talks.

Even with those outward displays of European-American unity, underlying everything is Mr. Trump’s sudden return to a more imperialist era. Europeans who consider the American intervention in Venezuela a violation of international law see a U.S. president newly empowered and enthralled by military action, which he compared to watching a television show. He comes across as a largely unpredictable force capable of causing enormous disruption — in NATO, in Ukraine, in Iran, in Gaza — as his eye swings from one imagined prize to another.

Let’s see, which nations has Trump launched a full scale war on? Was it Libya? Syria? How many nations is Trump bombing continuously? Iran was a quick one. So was Venezuela. The idea is that Trump threatens and cajoles. I don’t remember the Times complaining about Obama being an “imperialist”, including when he sent the military into Pakistan without their consent, a nation that was a nominal ally (which, again, I had no problem with). And then there was Biden trying to start WWIII. Anyhow, while the Times and the Europeans are whining

Huh. Too bad they didn’t include Brazil, which has about a half million Venezuelans in refugee status. BTW, I would highly recommend reading this tweet from a Venezuelan.

Read: NY Times Super Concerned What Europeans Think About Trump After Maduro Capture »

If All You See…

…is a village which will soon be wiped out by Bad Weather flooding, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is the First Street Journal, with a post noting you will own nothing and like it.

Sorry, got distracted before work trying to learn Cat Scratch Fever on guitar, forgot I never finished this.

Read: If All You See… »

Say, How Can Cities Adapt To The Climate Crisis (scam)?

Can you guess what’s coming?

How cities can adapt to climate change without starting over

Local governments make infrastructure decisions all the time – rebuilding roads, expanding housing, and updating public services. A new proposal argues those everyday choices could also become some of the most effective climate actions communities have.

Instead of treating climate adaptation and emissions cuts as separate goals, the approach urges cities to link them.

By “urge” they mean force

The pitch starts with a reality check. Many cities aren’t planning for climate change as a distant possibility. They’re already responding to it.

They’re dealing with storms, flooding, heat, and shifting population patterns that force practical decisions about where people live and what infrastructure can handle.

“Local governments are already dealing with the impacts of climate change,” said Christopher Galik, a professor of public administration at NC State.

“There are more extreme weather events, such as hurricanes and flooding, which force municipalities to make decisions about how, where, and – in some cases – whether to rebuild.”

First, there aren’t more. However, because of expansion with poor planning it looks like more. Streets, sewers, etc, that are not set up for the number of buildings and cars. Instead of putting in some single family homes they build massive apartment and townhouse complexes. There is no way for the normal rain to run-off correctly, so, you get flooding. Clearcut properties, all the concrete and paving instead of ground. Tiny young trees replacing old growth. Giant factories, storehouses, and so forth, all jammed in. Limited roads. We have a big problem in the South with this where growth radiates out from the center in a circle, limiting primary and secondary roads. It’s the problem of land use. I’ve seen floods where I never saw them before because of new apartment complexes. Anyhow

The power of forced decisions
Municipal change is rarely easy, even when it’s clearly needed. Updating zoning or construction requirements can trigger fierce debates, and it often costs money up front.

The paper argues that climate disruption, ironically, can create windows where change becomes more realistic because the alternative is rebuilding the same vulnerabilities again.

“Instituting new policies and regulations that govern zoning, construction requirements, and so on, can be expensive and politically challenging,” Sanchez said.

“But if communities are already having to build or rebuild in response to climate change, implementing compound resilience policies may be more feasible.”

In other words, you will comply, Comrades. Like it or not, you will comply. It all sounds so non-authoritative, but, that is what they want: total governmental control.

Read: Say, How Can Cities Adapt To The Climate Crisis (scam)? »

Gas Prices Expected To Dip Below $3

Weirdly, there’s one name not mentioned anywhere in this NBC News article

Average nationwide gas prices will dip below $3 per gallon this year, GasBuddy projects

For the first time since 2020, the annual average price of gas is projected to fall below $3 a gallon in 2026, the price-tracking group GasBuddy said in a new report Tuesday.

At $2.97, GasBuddy’s projected average for the year is 13 cents below the average price per gallon nationwide in 2025, which was $3.10.

“The world has spent years recovering from the economic whiplash of the pandemic and the shock of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, but the situation has been improving quietly since 2022,” Patrick De Haan, GasBuddy’s head of petroleum analysis, said in a statement.

GasBuddy calculated the average by determining a monthly price range, averaging that and then taking the average of all 12 months. Full results were included in the group’s 2026 fuel price outlook report.

The last year that average annual gas prices nationwide were as low as GasBuddy projects for this year was 2020, when the Covid pandemic kept millions of Americans working from home and schools largely virtual.

It was $2.17 in 2020. $3.03 in 2021, $3.98 in 2022, $3.54 in 2023, $3.32 in 2024, $3.13 in 2024. Thanks to COVID and the policies of Biden and his Democrat Comrades it spiked hard and then was slow to come down. Now it’s up to Trump to set the conditions to get more drilling going and get the refineries working.

The events unfolding in Venezuela won’t immediately change anything for consumers at the pump, however.

“A lot of Americans may think there’s going to be some sort of overnight or even weekly or monthly improvement in Venezuela’s oil output, but this is really a clock that’s going to tick much slower,” De Haan told NBC News.

“Gas prices almost always start going up in the spring,” he added. “What’s happening in Venezuela is not going to stop that seasonal trend.”

Well, they sure went up quickly, but, yeah, harder to bring down, just like most goods.

Read: Gas Prices Expected To Dip Below $3 »

Bummer: Capitalists Want You To Stop Worrying About Climate Doom

Hmm, there’s something interesting here

Capitalists Want You to Stop Worrying About Climate Change

Andreas Malm and Wim Carton have an enemy, and it’s not “climate deniers.” These authors acknowledge that the original Big Oil brand of climate denialism — which rejected the scientific fact that through the burning of fossil fuels humans emit carbon dioxide, which in turn warms the planet — is now less prevalent than a newer denialist argument, asserting that “climate change exists but it is not much of a problem.”

Nor is their enemy as broad or systemic as “capitalism,” although the authors have half-jokingly described their book as a sort of “readable IPCC report of a Marxist nature” and advocate goals like the “infliction of serious material costs on fossil capital.”

For these professors at Lund University in Sweden, the authors of the new book The Long Heat: Climate Politics When It’s Too Late, the enemies du jour are the “rationalist-optimists.”

Um, they wrote a book, with the intention of making money via a capitalist system, right? Let’s skip through all the cult propaganda to the end

There is no path to net-zero emissions without discomfort, without the stranding of assets, without people and corporations losing money. While there’s certainly a role for CDR, and perhaps maybe even SRM one day, we must cut emissions above all else. With decarbonization at the fore, we can then — as a report from researchers at American University puts it — focus on how much CDR we can do well.

Doing CDR well means building CDR as a public good, marshaling massive public investment and policy — perhaps via a federal carbon authority — to deliver removals outside some make-believe free market. We need to ensure removals are publicly monitored and verified, set removal targets that complement but don’t replace emissions cuts, and sharply curb the use of CDR for enhanced oil recovery.

Unsurprisingly, tons of government. The article is in Jacobin, which is a seriously far left Socialist (really, far far right, because Modern Socialism is authoritarian) website. Anyhow, pushing ‘climate change’ sure seems like a Modern Socialist thing if it’s not a capitalist thing, eh?

Read: Bummer: Capitalists Want You To Stop Worrying About Climate Doom »

Say, Why Is Trump Supporting A Maduro Loyalist?

It makes a lot of sense, and I bet Marco Rubio is behind this

Trump backs Maduro loyalist over Venezuela opposition leader in post-capture transition

When Nicolás Maduro was removed from power by the United States, many in Washington expected the U.S. to rally behind Venezuela’s most prominent opposition leader.

Instead, the Trump administration moved to engage a longtime Maduro loyalist, signaling a transition strategy driven less by democratic symbolism than by concerns over stability on the ground.

The approach sidelined María Corina Machado, the opposition leader who claims the strongest popular mandate and international profile, while elevating Delcy Rodríguez, Maduro’s vice president and a central figure in the outgoing regime.

Administration officials and outside analysts say the shift reflects a calculated effort to avoid a power vacuum and maintain control during a fragile transition, even as it complicates Washington’s longstanding support for Venezuela’s democratic opposition.

And President Donald Trump is betting Rodríguez now lives in fear of what might happen to her if she defies the U.S.

Trump, describing his phone call with Rodríguez, said she offered: “We’ll do whatever you need.”

“I think she was quite gracious,” he said.

But in a separate interview with The Atlantic he warned: “If she doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro.”

Now, let’s consider: she stays in power during the transition. Trump doesn’t want to run Venezuela. He doesn’t want nation building. He wants a stable Venezuela, and, at that point, elections. Sidelining Machado and the guy everyone says won the 2024 election, Edmundo González, means they won’t be accused of being Trump’s people, or America’s people. If Biden or Harris were president right now it would be best to sideline Machado and Gonzalez, do not want them to appear to be in Los Yankees pockets.

A classified CIA intelligence assessment examined who would be best positioned to lead a temporary government in Caracas, Venezuela, and maintain short-term stability, a source familiar with the intelligence told Fox News Digital. The report, requested by senior policymakers and presented to Trump, aimed to offer the president “comprehensive and objective analysis” on possible scenarios after Maduro’s capture. (snip)

“There was sentiment among senior officials that Machado lacked the necessary support in Venezuela if Maduro was to be removed,” the source familiar told Fox News Digital.

Neither she nor Gonzalez would, at least on paper, be able to get the support of the military or security services, at least not in a time that matters, and right now it is time to stablize Venezuela, get the oil flowing, get goods coming in and out, and shut off the flow of drugs (as much as possible, of course).

Read: Say, Why Is Trump Supporting A Maduro Loyalist? »

Huh: Ancient Clues Inform On Sea Rise Doom

How do they write this with a straight face?

What these ancient clues tell us about future global sea level rise

climate doom yearly

Wait, I don’t have global heating on here?

When the researchers first arrived at their field camp at Prudhoe Dome, atop the Greenland ice sheet, they felt they had been swallowed by a monster.

The mountain of ice in northwest Greenland was more than 50 miles wide and 1,600 feet tall. The temperature at its summit was well below 0 degrees Fahrenheit. The scientists’ experiment there — an unprecedented effort to extract bedrock from deep beneath the ice sheet — was routinely disrupted by howling winds and blizzards so dense they blocked the sun. It was hard to imagine that this formidable, frozen expanse could ever disappear.

But the rocks they uncovered on that 2023 expedition contain chemical signatures showing that Prudhoe Dome completely melted within the past 10,000 years — and it might soon suffer the same fate amid modern climate change.

How do Warmists not notice that this has, in fact, happened before? Oh, of course, they’ll say “oh, this was totally natural before, but, today it’s totally Your Fault. Not natural at all. Trust us.”

The results published Monday in the journal Nature Geoscience hold a warning for a warming planet, lead author Caleb Walcott-George said. The study suggests that large portions of Greenland were ice-free in Earth’s recent past, when global temperatures weren’t much higher than they are now. If the same melting occurred today, it would raise average sea levels anywhere from 7.5 inches to 2.4 feet.

Present-day melting may not precisely emulate what happened in the past, the researchers acknowledged. The cause of modern climate change — pollution primarily from burning fossil fuels — is distinct from the slight wobbles in Earth’s orbit that triggered warming thousands of years ago.

FFS. These people are cultists.

The GreenDrill team had hoped they would find that Prudhoe Dome hadn’t melted since the last interglacial — a geological period more than 100,000 years ago, when global temperatures were slightly warmer than they are today.

But the luminescence measurements suggested that the sediments had been buried for only about 7,100 years. This meant the ice atop Prudhoe Dome disappeared amid conditions similar to the current climate, when the Arctic was about 3 to 5 degrees warmer than it was in the 19th century.

Hoped, found they wrong, but, still hold on to the climate scam, even though it was apparently much warmer.

Read: Huh: Ancient Clues Inform On Sea Rise Doom »

If All You See…

…are world killing dogs, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is No Tricks Zone, with a post on Berlin’s terror blackout entering the 4th day.

Read: If All You See… »

Venezuela Could Collapse Economically From US Oil Embargo Or Something

Suddenly the NY Times is concerned about the economic viability of Venezuela

Venezuela Braces for Economic Collapse From U.S. Blockade

Even before American forces blasted their way into Venezuela’s capital and seized President Nicolás Maduro on Saturday, the nation was already facing dire economic prospects.

The partial blockade imposed by the United States on Venezuela’s energy exports was expected to shutter more than 70 percent of the country’s oil production this year and wipe out its dominant source of public revenue, according to people briefed on Venezuela’s internal projections compiled in December.

The Trump administration’s decision last month to begin targeting tankers carrying Venezuelan crude to Asian markets had paralyzed the state oil company’s exports. To keep the wells pumping, the state oil company, known as PDVSA, had been redirecting crude oil into storage tanks and turning tankers idling in ports into floating storage facilities.

If the blockade held, the Venezuelan government expected national oil production to collapse from about 1.2 million barrels per day late last year to less than 300,000 later this year, said the people briefed — a drop that would significantly reduce the government’s ability to import goods and maintain basic services. The people had access to the projections and discussed them on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

OK, you see where this is going, Orange Man Bad for potentially maybe possibly seeing oil production crash. Even though one would think leftists who are usually climate cultists hate oil. And the money previously made was not going back into helping the people of Venezuela

Venezuela: The Rise and Fall of a Petrostate

Venezuela, home to the world’s largest oil reserves, is a case study in the perils of becoming a petrostate. Since it was discovered in the country in the 1920s, oil has taken Venezuela on an exhilarating but dangerous boom-and-bust ride that offers lessons for other resource-rich states. Decades of poor governance have driven what was once one of Latin America’s most prosperous countries to economic and political ruin.

In recent years, Venezuela has suffered economic collapse, with output shrinking significantly and rampant hyperinflation contributing to a scarcity of basic goods, such as food and medicine. Meanwhile, government mismanagement and U.S. sanctions have led to a drastic decline in oil production and severe underinvestment in the sector. Though Washington eased some sanctions on Venezuela’s oil and gas sector in 2023, signaling a potential détente, Caracas’s failure to meet conditions for a fair election prompted the U.S. government to reimpose sanctions in 2024.

Well, that’s one way to look at it, because it comes down to Venezuela being run into the ground by hardcore leftist dictators. Other petrostates are doing fine. And the above article was before Trump took office the second time.

(Economic Observatory) Living standards in oil-rich Venezuela plummeted by a staggering 74% between 2013 and 2023. This is the fifth largest fall in living standards in modern economic history.

The country’s economy collapsed under a single government during peacetime. But this economic implosion is comparable to those seen in Iraq, Lebanon and Liberia – countries that have been ravaged by war or civil war – or Georgia, Moldova and Tajikistan after the Soviet Union fell and brought down the state and entire economic system.

Venezuela had problems getting food to the point that zoos were being raided. They couldn’t get toilet paper and beer.

Here’s the UK Guardian as they attempt to say arresting Maduro was Bad and causing problems

“Anger,” said Sauriany, a 23-year-old administrative worker from Venezuela’s state-owned electricity company as she queued outside a supermarket on the other side of town with her 24-year-old partner, Leandro.

Leandro voiced shock as the couple waited in a 100-person queue to buy flour, milk and butter alongside a quartet of nuns. “Who could have imagined that his would happen? That right at the start of the year they’d bomb our country while everyone was asleep?” he asked. (snip)

But many locals were quietly rejoicing at the demise of a politician who many loathe for leading their oil-rich country into years of ruin and repression since he took power in 2013 and is widely believed to have stolen the 2024 presidential election.

The nation is already in economic collapse. It’s why about one third of the citizens left and moved to other countries: US, Argentina, Brazil, EU nations. Arresting Maduro didn’t lead to those food lines within a few hours. The Trump admin will use pressure to get reform into Venezuela via their oil production, which could lead to the ability to produce other products, like rice, corn, fish, tropical fruit, coffee, pork and beef in levels that would feed the citizens and allow exports. The nation needs political stability, and to actually rely less on oil revenues. We’ll see what happens, but, the current economic crisis is not because of Trump arresting Maduro, and can only get better.

Read: Venezuela Could Collapse Economically From US Oil Embargo Or Something »

Pirate's Cove