If All You See…

…is a sea that will dozens of feet by 2050, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Don Surber, with a post on the real reason for the Hunter Biden trial.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

64 Responses to “If All You See…”

  1. drowningpuppies says:

    Looks like Joey’s going to grant amnesty to another million illegals just in time for election day.
    Who da thunk it? The steal begins.


    Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Hot fisherwoman.

    The creepy Don Slurper and the equally creepy Rami Swami are wrong. The Hunter trial is taking place because a conservative, Trump-appointed federal judge torpedoed the original plea deal. Or do Don and Viv believe Judge Noreika was on the Biden payroll? Like most right-wingers, Surber is beside himself following the felony conviction of Trump and lies that the Hunter trial is occurring as a show trial to show the DOJ is unbiased! Tell that to Noreika! Ramaswamy is angling for a position in the Trump administration if it happens.

    • L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

      It’s a good thing you’re a Democrat Elwood because you don’t have a legitimate bone in your body. You can’t even be honest about a whitewash trial that you watched and know damn right well was illegitimate. You are the typical corrupted Democrat. You are what ruined the Democrat party over the years. The only good news is once Trump’s back firmly ensconced in the White House we can get rid of slime like you from all levels of government.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Slime-bag L.G.,

        You far-right MAGAts hate America. You hate the justice system, the woke military, woke education, colleges and college students, the media, big religion, elections, science and medicine, etc.

        Donald Jesus Trump has become your Great White Hope put here at this time and place by God to make it right!!

        You actually believe that the 2020 election as stolen. How can anyone believe anything you say?

        The trial… Did Jesus Trump pay off a porn star he had to keep her quiet? Yes. Nasty work but not illegal.

        Did Jesus Trump pay off a porn star to keep her quiet to help his election? Yes.

        Did Jesus Trump alter the books of his “business” to cover up his paying off a porn star to keep her quiet to help his election? Yes.

        You know that is all true. Your argument must be that he should not have been prosecuted for these acts? Now that is actually a reasonable debate. Many New Yawkers have been prosecuted (and convicted) for falsifying business records to cover up another crime. Ask Michael Cohen who was sentenced to prison.

        Donald Jesus Trump is your hope to make all the smart-alec, over-edumacated, NYTs reading, socialist, faux-caring, CRT-promoting, LGBTQ-loving, America-destroying, liberal pedophiles suffer bigly!!

        • drowningpuppies says:

          Another vile reply from Rimjob.
          It’s almost as if he believes what he posts.
          In reality he reveals his own stupidity.

          Thanks dumbass!

        • Flexo says:

          Did Jesus Trump alter the books of his “business” to cover up his paying off a porn star to keep her quiet to help his election? Yes.

          How did altering his books in 2017 help his election in 2016? Still waiting for evidence that Trump has a TARDIS.

          Many New Yawkers have been prosecuted (and convicted) for falsifying business records to cover up another crime.

          And what was the crime he covered up? You just said earlier: “Nasty work but not illegal.” So therefore by your own admission he couldn’t have falsified business records to cover up another crime because it wasn’t a crime.

          Amazing how you can’t even stay consistent within a single post.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Asked and answered.

            Paying a porn star to stay quiet is NOT a crime!!

            But trying to influence the outcome of an election is illegal!!

            Have you contacted Trump’s lawyers with your legal theory? They could have used it. https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_yahoo.gif

          • Flexo says:

            But trying to influence the outcome of an election is illegal!!

            So… business records in 2017 influenced the 2016 election? Or are you trying to say campaigning is illegal now?

            Thanks for giving us the carte blanche to prosecute Biden and Clinton, Elwood! “He tried to convince people to vote for him? TO JAIL!” https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_good.gif

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            What did Trump’s lawyer, Blanche, say? I know they were busy yesterday with the parole interview, but I can’t believe they didn’t use that as evidence.

            The cover-up of the crime occurred after the original crime.

            Get it now, dumbshit??


        • L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

          Thank you Elwood, that’s gonna be one of the dumbest comments you’ve ever made. Starting the panic? The more you go after Trump the more popular he gets.

          You just proved me right by going right back in and insisting that it wasn’t a sham trial. It was and you know it but you just can’t admit it. I pity you your inability to be honest with yourself. I can see why you lied to everybody else I could even understand why the Democrat Communist Party lies to everybody else. But there’s no excuse for you to lie to yourself and continue to live that lie like a moron.

          All of us here including drowningpuppies, Teach and myself began with good intentions trying to talk to you as a reasonable human being. We have all found that impossible. And the only reason that it’s become impossible is because you are so steep in left wing propaganda and brainwashing that you refuse to see the truth when it’s right in front of your face.

          You actually believe that the 2020 election as stolen. How can anyone believe anything you say?

          I personally do believe that the 2020 election was stolen and the reason I believe that is because of people like you who absolutely refuse to audit and investigate the election in an honest way. Instead of proving to us all 75 million of us that this election was in fact legitimate you decided to ignore us call us names and refuse to even consider the massive regularities of this election. We understand why could you wanna steal this 2024 also. Many times we’ve given you a list of all the irregularities and all the shenanigans that occurred during the 2020 election but you refused to even consider them. And the only reason for that could be that she know they’re true and are terrified that if you admit it you’ll lose the White House.

          This is how the left has established themselves as liars and that includes you. And you don’t need to be a liar you could have reasonable discussions with us here but rather than that you chose to believe the opposite. You live in a world of fraud and deceit and you think you could force others to see it your way but you never ever will. We don’t live in a world of lies that’s why we’re not Democrat communists.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:


            Your evidence that the 2020 election was stolen is that other Americans believe it wasn’t?

            And you claim you’re the reasonable one??

            There were recounts in every close race, and every recount confirmed the original. Mr Trump’s team filed several dozen lawsuits that failed. FOX News agreed to pay Dominion Voting systems nearly $800 MILLION for defamation for knowingly lying on-air.

            Do you have any evidence at all? Was the Biden campaign so clever that no one can find a single fraudulent vote?

            You maintain the election was stolen solely because then-President Trump claimed it was stolen, and still does.

  3. Professor Hale says:

    Hunter trial is a whitewash. Will finish up just in time with no convictions and Biden’s team can say, “we investigated it and Hunter is totally cleared by a court”.

  4. Flexo says:

    You’re right, Elwood, the Hunter case IS proceeding because the judge torpedoed the plea deal.

    The plea deal which was offered by the DOJ.

    The DOJ which you have for the last couple of days been using its prosecution of Hunter as proof against its corruption.

    So…. did you know all along and have been constantly lying the last week or two or did you just now figure all this out?

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      You may not understand but different prosecutors can have different philosophies.

      Anyway, you probably didn’t realize AG Merrick Garland assigned David Weiss as a special prosecutor in charge of the Hunter Biden case. Mr Weiss is a registered Republican appointed by then-president Donald Trump to be United States Attorney for the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.

      We know, we know… far-right fantasists do not believe anything that runs counter to your pre-conceived notions.

      AG Garland, even President Biden could have stopped the proceedings. Are you claiming that conservative Republicans, Judge Noreika and Special Counsel Weiss, are in on the “fix”? Most doofusses (doofi?) like Hunter Biden are not charged for crimes such as this. Prosecutor Weiss thought differently.

      US District Judge Maryellen Noreika has already ruled that defence lawyers cannot argue that the prosecution can only get a guilty verdict by proving Mr Biden was using drugs on the day he bought the weapon.

      Instead, in a pre-trial hearing, the judge agreed with prosecutors’ argument that they need only prove that “unlawful use (had) occurred recently enough to indicate that the individual (was) actively engaged in such conduct”.

      The original plea deal which Judge Noreika “torpedoed”:

      called for Biden to plead guilty to two counts of failing to pay his taxes in return for prosecutors recommending a sentence of probation. A separate gun charge for illegally owning a Colt Cobra .38 Special handgun would have been dropped in two years if Biden honored the terms of what’s known as a diversion agreement.

      Are you arguing that the actual trial on the gun charges is a show trial planned a year ago?

      If I were on a jury judging Donald Trump JR under identical circumstances, as much as I dislike the whiny little prick, I would be likely to acquit because the charges/punishment (25 yrs!) far exceed the import of the “crimes”.

      • drowningpuppies says:

        Jeez, Rimjob, Judge Norieka didn’t “torpedo” Hunter’s sweetheart plea deal.

        Legal experts have spoken out after a plea deal negotiated by Hunter Biden’s lawyers with the Department of Justice collapsed on Wednesday in a Delaware courtroom. Hunter Biden’s attorney declared the agreement “null and void” after learning it wouldn’t offer sweeping immunity for other possible offenses.

        In other words, Hunter would basically have immunity from any crimes he committed and any future prosecution. He thought he was going to get away with everything.
        Fortunately, the judge said fuck that, who are you trying to kid?

        Read and learn something, dipshit.

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          SMD, Pissant!

          As a result, U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika “declined to approve the deal, until the parties could get back together and reach agreement.”

          • drowningpuppies says:

            Hunter Biden’s attorney declared the agreement “null and void” after learning it wouldn’t offer sweeping immunity for other possible offenses.

            Stop omitting relevant facts, dimbass.
            You’re not very smart. https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Lil Pissant (aka Rimjob),


          • drowningpuppies says:

            Another cogent response.
            That’s a job for your wife, Rimjob.

      • Flexo says:

        Let’s see here…

        Hunter Biden, . . . has been charged by the Biden administration.

        Elwood P Dowd

        Biden’s DOJ, besides prosecuting Trump, is also prosecuting Hunter Biden,

        Elwood P Dowd

        Well let’s go to the transcript of the trial shall we?

        Page 45: THE COURT: Now, I want to talk a little bit about this agreement not to prosecute. The agreement not to prosecute includes — is in the gun case, but it also includes crimes related to the tax case. So we looked through a bunch of diversion agreements that we have access to and we couldn’t find anything that had anything similar to that.

        Page 52: THE COURT: And you say that the — in the Diversion Agreement when you say there is not going to be any prosecution, you say that’s not just prosecution on the gun charge which is the subject of the Diversion Agreement, you say also no prosecution with respect to anything in the statement of facts attached to the memorandum of plea, right.

        Page 98: THE COURT: I understand. Look, I knew why you brought it, okay, I could see why you would want that provision in here, but I don’t — you are putting me — the government, the executive branch has the discretion to bring charges. Here, the government does not have discretion to continue to pursue this charge or any other charge unless you include the Court. And that seems like it’s getting outside of my lane in terms of what I am allowed to do. And thus, I have concerns about the constitutionality of this provision. That gives me concerns about the constitutionality of this agreement because there doesn’t seem to be a separate severability, and that gives me concerns about whether the Defendant has the protection from prosecution that he thinks he’s getting if this agreement turns out to be not worth the paper it’s written on.

        WOW It sure looks like the DOJ was trying NOT to prosecute Hunter, and is only doing it now because the Judge rejected the plea deal. So which is it? Were you just ignorant of the facts all along or have you been lying about your points?

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          It was the DOJ (AG Merrick Garland) that assigned a Special Prosecutor, David Weiss, a respected conservative appointed by Donald Trump as a US Attorney.

          President Biden said he would NOT pardon his son if convicted.

          A conservative judge (Noreika) appointed by Donald Trump withdrew the original plea deal.

          Rarely are these cases prosecuted unless linked to another, usually violent, crime.

          Mr Biden still has tax charges to negotiate. That trial is scheduled for September. He has paid his back taxes.

          Prosecutors (Weiss) allege that Hunter Biden engaged in a four-year scheme to not pay at least $1.4 million income taxes for the tax years 2016 through 2019.

          He is charged with six misdemeanor counts of failure to file his tax returns and pay taxes, one felony count of tax evasion and two felony counts of filing a false return.

          Biden could receive a maximum of 17 years in prison.

          • Flexo says:

            It was the DOJ (AG Merrick Garland) that assigned a Special Prosecutor, David Weiss, a respected conservative appointed by Donald Trump as a US Attorney.

            And Weiss who let the statute of limitations lapse on several of the charges and then tried to offer a plea deal that would given Hunter immunity to all other felonies. Sure looks like the DOJ tried to cover for Hunter until the Judge denied them.

            “But where’s the proof” -Elwood the Blind

            Rarely are these cases prosecuted unless linked to another, usually violent, crime.

            Funny how “rareness” was no longer a legitimate argument when it came to Trump’s “crimes” and you posted a whole… 5 examples of other people being prosecuted for something “similar.”

            I’m still curious if you are paid by the word or paid by the post. And what’s the going rate on your principles nowadays?

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:


  5. drowningpuppies says:

    So the bitch wanted a riot.

    The January 6 Committee also never subpoenaed Speaker Pelosi or her daughter for documents about the riot.

    The video substantiates claims by former President Donald Trump that Pelosi was responsible for failing to prepare sufficient security ahead of the protest.


    Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

    • Professor Hale says:

      The only thing that video shows is that Nancy was already wasted by lunch time on Jan 6. Simply stating that it was her responsibility is just what is already known from the publicly available list of duties of the Speaker of the House. It’s certainly not an admission of guilt or exhonoration of Trump. It does show that the “Trump did it” narrative wasn’t concocted until later.

      • drowningpuppies says:

        So don’t you wonder why this is coming out now? Or why Pelosi wasn’t called to testify at the ti e?

        Congressional leaders, including Pelosi, chose not to deploy the National Guard early over concerns of “optics” amid 2020’s Black Lives Matter riots, according to a 2022 GOP report.

        Additionally, then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley’s fear former President Trump would commandeer the military for political reasons allegedly influenced the delay of deploying the National Guard, D.C. National Guard witnesses testified in April.


  6. drowningpuppies says:

    Another Black Woman Abusing Power.
    Bye Shalitha.

    Shelitha Robertson, who said she would never degrade herself ”for a dolla,” used the PPP loans to buy a Rolls Royce, a 10-carat diamond ring, and a motorbike. Robertson submitted a false loan application claiming she needed money for her four businesses. She also transferred funds to family members.


    Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  7. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    While Big Donnie in Las Vegas whining about his teleprompter, he fell into a story about whether it’s better to be electrocuted in a sinking electrical boat or eaten by a shark 10 feet away.

    Either would be OK.

  8. Professor Hale says:

    Hunter actually used the “I couldn’t have been on drugs that day because I was blotto on alcohol” defense.

    Add that to the “I wasn’t an addict on the day I bought the gun, just the day before I bought it and the day after I bought it” defense.

    But the icing on the cake was Dr Jill Corleone sitting in the front row intimidating the jury by letting them know she knows who they are.

    • Professor Hale says:

      But really, the only thing relevant in this trial is the public knowledge that Hunter was willing to plead guilty to these charges only a few months ago, when it was linked to immunity for all other charges, even those not yet charged (like conspiracy to bribe a public official and acting as unregistered foreign agent).

  9. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    The Man to End Abortion!!

    The Danbury Institute opposes abortion in all cases, including rape, incest and when the mother’s life is at risk. The group believed life begins at the moment of fertilization, a belief that is commonly used to support restrictions on some kinds of fertility treatments and contraception.

    Candidate Trump sent a video to their annual meeting in Indy.

    “Now is the time for us to all pull together and stand up for our values and freedom,” Mr. Trump said in a video address to the organization. “I’ll be with you side by side.”

    He promised that the organization would “make a comeback like no other” in a second Trump administration. “These are going to be your years,” he pledged.

    “You just can’t vote Democrat — they’re against religion,” Mr. Trump continued. “They’re against your religion in particular.”

    Would you want a law that says a doctor cannot save the life of your pregnant wife, sister, girlfriend or daughter?

    • CarolAnn says:

      Would you want a law that says a doctor cannot save the life of your pregnant wife, sister, girlfriend or daughter?

      I personally would not but other people are entitled to their own opinions. And since you say you believe in democracy they have a right to vote on it and the majority should rule correct? Ohh that’s right, you only believe in democracy if you’re the majority.

      You do realize Roe V wade was an unconstitutional law don’t you? Therefore you do realize undoing Roe V wade was the correct way to go? And you also recognize that the truly constitutional way to go is through states rights?

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Hi CarolAnn,

        Always good to hear from you.

        Mr Trump supports a group that supports an absolute ban on ALL abortions, even in cases of rape or the health (even possible death) of the expectant woman.

        Would a Republican House and Senate support such a bill? Would a President Trump sign it?

        The Supreme Court decides what is Constitutional. Roe v Wade was decided by the Supreme Court in 1973, so it was Constitutional until 2022 when another Supreme Court decided it was not (Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization). Now, each state can set its own laws.

        In Idaho, if an 11 year old is impregnated by her father, it’s a crime for another person to aid her without the father’s permission. Someone who drives her or gives her a bus ticket to Montana for an abortion could get five years in prison. That said, it’s always possible for the 11 year old to move from Idaho.

        If you watch TV other than FOX, you will hear stories of women with a fetus with no heartbeat (i.e., non-viable) unable to get proper medical care in states like Louisiana or Texas (and doubtless many other “red” states).

        Even before the Dobbs decision:

        States with abortion bans or restrictions experience adverse outcomes including limited maternity care providers, maternity care deserts, higher rates of maternal mortality and infant death, especially among people of color, elevated death rates for birthing individuals of reproductive age, and greater racial disparities in healthcare (41, 42). Maternal death rates in abortion-restriction states were 62% higher than in states with greater abortion access states (28.8 vs. 17.8 per 100,000 births) (43).

        Undoubtedly, things are worse now.

        • drowningpuppies says:

          Once again, Rimjob. You can’t help yourself.

          To everything you post the response should be.

          Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Lil Pissant (aka Rimjob),

            We’ll consider your argument!



          • drowningpuppies says:

            Ask your wife. It is her duty t perform as a White Christian Nationalist .

        • CarolAnn says:

          You know Elwood, only a evil communist like you could make murdering your own children into a red versus blue state political debate. You are really evil to the core and have no soul.

          As you know I’m a nurse and I have never heard of any woman anywhere in any state including red states that have had a dead fetus (that is a fetus without a heartbeat) that was denied medical care. If that happened that should be handled by law enforcement. But it should never be made into a political football. Because the death of that child without a heartbeat this is the death of an innocent being. You have absolutely 0 empathy. You’re a heartless individual. You have no idea how hurt the mother of that dead child is and you don’t care as long as you make your political points that’s all you care about is power, what a pig.

          You really need to look into the mirror and see what your political Communist leanings have created and made you into. It ain’t pretty.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Hi CarolAnn,

            Hoping all is well with you and yours. But why so angry? You’ve won the abortion battle! States’ rights and all. Are the new laws not restrictive enough? Does your state still allow too many?

            I’m not a communist. Perhaps a social democrat or democratic socialist or social capitalist, but I oppose communism. Do you know what communism is?

            The majority of Americans accepted Roe v Wade restrictions on abortion, e.g., unrestricted first trimester, reasonable restrictions in second trimester, restricted in third trimester except for the well-being of the expectant mother.

            It worked for nearly 50 years.

            It’s likely I have no soul, but it’s likely you don’t either. It’s impossible to measure! The idea of a soul is a religious belief.

            Nancy Davis of La had a fetus with acrania determined at 10 weeks. As an obstetric nurse you know what acrania is. Doctors in La refused to perform an abortion because they were afraid it would lead to criminal charges. Davis has made arrangements for an out of state abortion but must carry her nonviable fetus another 6-8 weeks.

            You accuse me of 0 empathy because I support abortion rights. You accuse me of 0 empathy because I have more sympathy for a woman than a dead fetus???

            What empathy do you have for a woman with a non-viable fetus? You would force her to deliver or put her in prison?

            The state bans on abortion will not stop abortions. Women will secure abortions anyway, just not as safely.

            At my age, I try to avoid mirrors, but I’m not ashamed of my stance on supporting abortion rights. You had hinted earlier that you were willing to compromise on abortion, permitting baby murder for some number of weeks. Given your beliefs that seems less moral than my position.

  10. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    In a very unusual move Mr Trump was 1) able to conduct his probation interview over video conference and 2) with his attorney present.

    Mr Trump IS above the law!!

    • L'Roy White says:

      I don’t know where you’re from white boy but where I am conducting your interviews over video conference is not unusual. In the hood in New Jersey convicts often have meetings with judges on zoom or face to face with whatever you call it blue jeans or something. I know of several people just in my block alone who have done testimonies with their probation officers via computer screen.

      So there is nothing very unusual about the move. It’s done every day all over the country.

      • drowningpuppies says:

        Rimjob doesn’t get out much in the real world. He’s too busy hovering 24/7 over a keyboard typing his stupid insults about Trump and the commentors here.
        He’s nothing more than an immature child who has nothing better to do since he and his partners bilked investors out of $50M there at Galera.
        Pretty soon he will learn how to give testimony over Zoom.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        No offense Mr White, but we’ve caught you in “fibs” before (Covid). So excuse us when you claim several people on your block alone who have done testimonies by computer.

        Perhaps you are thinking of some other type of meeting, or are referring to virtual meetings during the Covid pandemic.

        In any event, most Pre-Sentence Investigations (PSIs) are conducted in person. Mr Trump was interviewed virtually because 1) the probation office knows much of his background already* 2) it would be a another security circus in Manhattan, and 3) he’s a candidate, and Trump.

        *Trump’s family, finances, living arrangements, friends/associates who are criminals, past crimes (if any), conduct, statements, etc are well-known and documented.

        • drowningpuppies says:

          So Rimjob (aka SMD) why are you talking down to L’Roy?
          Are you calling him a liar?
          Is it because he’s black?

          Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Hey Pissant (aka Rimjob),

            Mr White identifies as Black online, but he fibbed about a Covid vaccine case earlier.

            I don’t find Blacks lying often, but I’ve learned to never take the word of a conservative, who have no appreciation of the truth. Facts and truth are a commodity to them.

            I even gave Mr White an out for his error – perhaps he was referring to virtual interviews during the Covid pandemic.

            I talk down to all online conservatives. It’s unavoidable. LOL. SMD.

          • drowningpuppies says:

            Rimjob (aka SMD), the lying racist that he is, somehow feels he’s making a cogent point by talking down to those with superior intellect.

          • L'Roy White says:

            Of course it’s because I’m black drowningpuppies. He’s targeted me since day one here since I’m pretty new and since I’m a black conservative. You know a black conservative to a far leftist like Dowd is like holy water splashed on vampire.

            No offense Mr White, but we’ve caught you in “fibs” before (Covid). So excuse us when you claim several people on your block alone who have done testimonies by computer.

            Exactly when did you catch me in fibs before? I don’t make it a habit of lying to people but I’m getting pretty used to leftists lying to me.

            You put several reasons why you think that trump was given some sort of special accommodation with you online interviews. They’re all incorrect. You know nothing about the judicial system. Nothing and I mean absolutely nothing is done for the benefit of anything or anybody accept the court. Unless of course you’re a Democrat and bring your own judge and jury. And obviously that’s not Mr. Trump.

            Now I have been wrong on things many times but I have never deliberately lied to you or anybody else about anything. The very fact that you think I’m white or Mexican or whatever you think shows how biased and racist you are. The very idea of a black being for Trump is perplexing to you.

            Well go on being perplexed.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Mr White,

            I’m sorry you feel specifically targeted, but you are no more abused by me than any of the other conservative numbskulls here, including Mr Teach. All us white boys are racist to some extent.

            You should have heard The Pissant in years past!! Mr Teach had to tell him to knock off his racist comments. One of his favorites was calling black folk and those that defended them “nignorant”, haha, nigger + ignorant! He’ll deny it, of course, but it’s in the record!!

            Do you, like the far-rightists, consider black people to be inherently lazy, stupid and violent. The commenter who goes by david claims to be a physician and said he found black patients to be lazy and stupid. Mssrs Dana and L.G. want us all to recognize that America is a white, Christian nation and was a better nation before blacks and women could vote.

            I appreciate that your presence has made them better behaved.

        • Flexo says:

          So excuse us when you claim several people on your block alone who have done testimonies by computer.

          No, since COVID courts have really embraced the telecomm revolution.

          Didn’t you see the viral clip of the man calling into his hearing while driving?

          Mr. White doesn’t have to claim anything, there was literally just an instance of this happening that went wide on the Internet.

          • david7134 says:

            You made a number of points, all lies and all not in proper context. You are good at confabulating conversation and of course you know exactly how everyone thinks.

          • Flexo says:

            @david7134 – Your comment is positioned as if it is in reply to me, but you say “Jeff,” at the start which isn’t my name so… not sure who you’re trying to respond to.

  11. Flexo says:

    The cover-up of the crime occurred after the original crime.

    Hold on, Elwood, you need to get your story straight.

    Trump was convicted on altering business records. Which you claim is a cover up of a crime. But the only thing the business records “covered up” was an action you admitted yourself is not a crime.

    So what was the crime that was covered up? Because so far it really looks like you’re arguing that altering the business records was the crime that altering the business records was covering up.

    You know for something you keep screaming about that “everybody knows” it’s kind of hilarious how you can’t actually state what this crime is that everybody knows Trump is guilty of.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Did his lawyers not return your calls?

      My recollection is that Mr Trump was found guilty for 34 counts of “falsification of business records” a felony in New York.

      Each of the 34 charges against Trump corresponded to a check, invoice and voucher generated to reimburse Cohen. Prosecutors said Trump knew the payments were to reimburse Cohen for the Daniels payment, not for his legal expenses. The jury believed the prosecutors.

      As you know but continue to ignore, the payment that Cohen made to Stormy Daniels at Mr Trump’s direction, was to keep Ms Daniels from disclosing, BEFORE the election, her and Mr Trump’s assignation in Jul 2006.

      The jury believed the prosecutors.

      And you continue to beat this dead horse.

      Maybe Mr Trump’s crack team of lawyers were use your argument on appeal.

      BTW, from what law school did you graduate? You argue like a lawyer – only interested in winning – but not the truth.

      • L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

        First of all Elwood they made-up the whole nonsense like you leftists are want to do. Secondly you may have heard by the 10,000 people on every channel even the leftist channels that there’s no case here, that the judge is corrupt and was assigned to the case illegally, that the venue should have been changed, and that there were a whole load are you illegal technicalities including a gag order against the defendant. The entire trial is a scam as usual. You guys can never try a person honestly. We’re reading the nonsense that you’re writing here and we’re all laughing because not only are you a liar but they’re all liars and you all know it.

        Finally the entire sham is gonna be overturned on appeal. We realize that you’re just trying to steal another election with this which is why the entire case is BS which mystifies us as to why you keep fighting for something you know is wrong and is only there to steal another election! That’s all you’re trying to do is steal election #3. No I don’t know if you’re planning on coming up with another COVID or something else later on but this was just a hold off before the election and the hopefully kept your fingers crossed that he might be knocked off the ballot. either way you are willfully and through lawfare trying to steal the election. So stop acting like there’s something going on cause we all know there’s not.

        You liars will just keep on lying you’re really ridiculous.

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          Yes, Mr Trump is able to appeal his multiple convictions. It’s the American justice system, the best in the world. A convicted felon is permitted to exhaust every option in defense.

          You seem confused about elections though. Russia and Turmp stole the 2016 election, but Secretary Clinton conceded, even though she won by nearly 3 million votes winning by over 2%. It’s the American electoral system, still the best in the world.

          In 2020 Donald Trump stood the American system on its ear by accusing, with little evidence, his opponent of “stealing” the election. Trump lost bigly, by 7 million votes and 4.5%, yet he insists to this day that he won and the election was stolen. His devoted cult followers slavishly repeat his claims to the detriment of the nation. Still the best in the world, and bigly so.

      • Flexo says:

        BTW, from what law school did you graduate? You argue like a lawyer – only interested in winning – but not the truth.

        I’m a robot. I only care about logic and truth. Two things you seem particularly bad at. For example…

        As you know but continue to ignore, the payment that Cohen made to Stormy Daniels at Mr Trump’s direction, was to keep Ms Daniels from disclosing, BEFORE the election, her and Mr Trump’s assignation in Jul 2006.

        From above on the page, also by Elwood:

        The trial… Did Jesus Trump pay off a porn star he had to keep her quiet? Yes. Nasty work but not illegal.

        So which is it? You keep saying he’s in trouble for the cover-up, but you said what he covered up is not illegal. So what’s the cover-up?

        By your logic, if you were buying stuff at Kroger and wrote in the memo line of your check “supplies” instead of “food” or “groceries”, then I can now charge you with a felony for covering up your…. purchase of foodstuffs.

        So make up your mind, Elwood. Is it illegal or not illegal? You yourself said it was NOT illegal, but then you say the crime is covering-up a crime – that you admitted was not illegal. So how is a crime not illegal? Is this whole trial about covering up a legal crime?

        (No idea what Mr. Trump’s lawyers have to do with anything. Are you feeling alright?)

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          You’re completely right and I am completely wrong.

          You can get on with your life now.

          • Flexo says:

            What am I right about? I just asked which of your statements is wrong as both are mutually exclusive which means they can neither both be wrong or right. If A is true, B is false and vice versa. (See how logic works?) So you’ll have to be more specific about what you’re wrong about.

            Did Trump commit a crime in paying off blackmailers? Do you have the New York law code making that illegal?

            Or are you agreeing that Trump is guilty of no crime then, thus the trial was a sham and should be overturned as a travesty of justice and truth?

    • Professor Hale says:

      Trump is guilty of being literally Hitler. It doesn’t matter what the charges are, he is guilty. Everyone knows he is guilty of something they heard about on MSNBC or the View or Russian collusion, or vandalizing a hotel room in Moscow, or grabbing something. It doesn’t matter what he actually did, he is guilty. The multiple trials against him prove that. He is also guilty of being very popular with actual voters and to save Democracy, we have to make sure this election is not left to the voters. Those dumb voters will just mess it up.

      • Flexo says:

        Exactly right, Prof. Hale. Everybody can see the trial is really about making it illegal to be Republican.

Pirate's Cove