EU Looks To Block The Sun Or Something

What could possibly go wrong, and how much will it cost, and then how much will it cost to fix what they tried to fix?

European Union to look into blocking sun’s rays to combat climate change: Report

The European Union is set to look into blocking rays from the sun as a possible option to combat climate change, according to a report.

According to Bloomberg News, the European Union on Wednesday will announce a framework for assessing possible security implications of climate change, which includes a study regarding the possible dangers of re-engineering the atmosphere itself.

“These technologies introduce new risks to people and ecosystems, while they could also increase power imbalances between nations, spark conflicts and raises a myriad of ethical, legal, governance and political issues,” a document obtained by Bloomberg states.

The technology, described as solar radiation modification, will be studied by the EU.

“The EU will support international efforts to assess comprehensively the risks and uncertainties of climate interventions, including solar radiation modification,” the document states.

Look, I’m a big reader of science fiction, over half of what I read, maybe closer to 75% (the rest being horror, mostly zombies, some mystery, and some adventure), and this is the stuff of far in the future science fiction….wait, what’s that? It’s a scam, you say? The EU will give lots and lots of taxpayer money to groups to study this, come up with “plans”, and lots of donors and people engaged in climate cult Rightthink will make a bundle, and not a damned thing will happen? Huh.

Among the options to combat climate change that will be looked at are stratospheric aerosol injection, which would increase the atmospheric concentration of particles in order to reduce the overall sunlight which will reach the Earth’s surface.

That’s the beginning of a bad scifi movie, where they do this and Bad Things happen.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

14 Responses to “EU Looks To Block The Sun Or Something”

  1. MrLiberty says:

    Chemtrails have filled our skies for at least 15 years. Every criminal agency is now talking about them to provide cover for what they ALREADY DO. Just look up the day before it’s expected to rain. That is generally when they do the spraying.

  2. James Lewis says:

    Back in the day it was proposed that we cover the ice caps with coal ash to induce melting and increase the atmosphere’s temperature thus saving us from the much ballyhooed “Ice Age.”

    Now the same people who backed that silly plan wants to mess with the atmosphere.

    These idiots want power and are stupid and have no shame.

    An often deadly combination.

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Experts are not big supporters of these approaches. Studying is one thing, doing is another.

    If (when?) in 100 years it’s a crisis, our descendants may have to try extraordinary means.

    • James Lewis says:

      Dear Elwood:

      Just how many “experts” do you know????

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Here’s a recent lay review on geoengineering for global warming.

        CLIMATEWIRE | A controversial idea for cooling the earth’s climate through artificial means would likely require a much longer global commitment than policymakers and the public understand, according to a recent study that raises new questions about the potential for using solar geoengineering.

        If world leaders decide to use solar geoengineering to meet international climate goals, they could be locked into it for a century or more, the study suggests. The potentially long timeframe further complicates the debate about geoengineering and its viability.

        Solar geoengineering refers to a kind of climate geoengineering aimed at manipulating the amount of solar radiation that hits the planet. The most commonly discussed strategy involves spraying special reflective aerosols into the atmosphere to beam sunlight away from the earth, lowering global temperatures.

        It’s just an idea for now. And it’s highly contentious. Solar geoengineering risks and side effects range from possible damage to the earth’s ozone layer to inadvertent changes in global precipitation patterns.

        Once started, it would be dangerous to stop unless enough carbon had been sucked out of the atmosphere to lower the earth’s temperatures below a safe threshold. Otherwise, a sudden halt to geoengineering could cause temperatures to skyrocket…

        • James Lewis says:

          Dear Elwood:

          These are the same people and magazines that touted global cooling.

          They are experts only in following the crowd.

  4. Professor Hale says:

    It’ll be fine. If the Earth starts getting too cold, we can just turn up the thermostat by releasing more CO2. Human science can control the temperature of the planet. Just don’t let the old ladies know where the dial is.

  5. James Lewis says:

    Dear Elwood:

    Just how many “experts” do you know????

  6. H says:

    Of course we shouldn’t have science “looking into” anything we might not like

    • Jl says:

      Yes, we should have science at least try to give some evidence of why they may need “to block the sun or something”. Wait…was that from the Babylon Bee? It wasn’t?….

  7. tdothen says:

    How will this affect their ability to generate electricity from solar power?

  8. Professor Hale says:

    Speaking of changing the entire climate on a whim…\

    The Whole northern Virginia area has been experiencing a second day of air quality index of red due to forest fires in Canada. I suspect that a few climate activists in Canada have single handedly released more carbon into the air than all the SUVs ever produced in North America. I wonder if other climate activists will suggest holding them accountable in the same way they try to hold oil companies accountable for their “collective social damage”. Of course not. Climate change activism is all about the money, not making the climate better.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      This is another example of a positive feedback loop. Global warming contributes to more widespread forest fires which releases more CO2 (and smoke!) which contributes to global warming.

      If southern Canada is going to become the new breadbasket of the world the forests will need to be cleared anyway.

  9. Est1950 says:

    Some fun facts to Remember: The 3 branches of government must approve of anything before it is a reality.

    Big Pharma
    Raytheon
    Silicon Valley

    Without their approval and marching orders? Nothing gets accomplished. Just look at how easy it was to cancel the ‘Woke’ Bud Light or Target and how Starbucks is running for cover. ‘Woke’ Disney movies this past year have crashed and burned dramatically and even leftists are speaking against Transgenderism since Trans is a huge thorn in the LGBQ’s agenda.

    Even today people are now claiming they are ‘Not Woke’ because it is getting them canceled every bit as easily as the ‘Woke’ mob used this process to get their way. This is actually becoming a thing on Podcasts and YouTube.

    Yet despite all this activity, we are still funding Ukraine which has been decimated to the point that they have lost 20 percent of their country(The most productive and resource-rich part) and they are not winning by any stretch of the imagination. The Wagner group’s antics were nothing more than Putin rallying the people of Russia to his side as polling shows it upped his ratings to 80 percent.

    If anyone follows history they know that today’s Ukraine looks eerily similar to the beginning of world war one for the USA and the left in the West continue to double down until there will be no choice but admit defeat or put boots on the ground as latest estimates show that Ukraine has lost some 300,000 troops and nearly all their highly trained troops are now dead or injured.

    Incidently the leader of Ukraine just said no elections until the war is won. I seem to remember the USA having elections in the middle of WW2, but yet the powers that be. Ie. Raytheon, Big Pharma, and Silicon Valley deem it acceptable that Democracy can die in Ukraine as long as they keep making trillions at the expense of anyone but themselves suffering or dying.

    We live in a perfect storm of insanity, driven by an internet where our children all want to be YouTubers or Tik Tokers and stand around all day taking selfies of themselves while being taught they are worthless.

    As Bill Maher Pointed out. In 1943…1 percent said they were gay. Then 2 percent. Then Millenials were 10 percent, and Gen Z says 20 percent. At this rate in 2054, we will all be gay or trans. Does that mean we are all in the wrong body?

    Yes. Says big Pharma. After all, they cash in no matter which operation you chose to have and if that’s not enough the West is protecting bio-labs in Eastern Europe so they can unleash another pandemic on us when the latest one wears off.

Pirate's Cove