Bummer: Climate Cult Scientists Are Ready To Go On Strike Because No One Is Listening

The thing is, the big shots in the climate cult do listen, and try and shove climate cult policies down the throats of the little people, who are also listening. They just don’t like the policies in practice, knowing how it will hurt their own lives. And, most are tired of the doomy prognostications from people who do not seem to practice what they preach

These Climate Scientists Are Fed Up and Ready to Go on Strike

Sometimes, Bruce C. Glavovic feels so proud to be an environmental scientist, studying coastal planning and teaching future researchers, that it moves him to tears.

Other times, he wonders whether any of it has been enough. Scientists have proved beyond doubt that climate change is transforming the planet for the worse. Yet their work has mostly failed to spur governments to address the issue. When all the signs are telling scientists that their research is not being heard, it is tragic, Dr. Glavovic said, that they just keep producing more of it.

“We’ve had 26 Conference of the Parties meetings, for heaven’s sake,” he said, referring to the United Nations global warming summits. More scientific reports, another set of charts. “I mean, seriously, what difference is that going to make?”

Twenty six, eh? When they all take fossil fueled flights to great vacation spots to push politicians to implement controls on citizens.

It was this frustration that led Dr. Glavovic, 61, a professor at Massey University in New Zealand, and two colleagues to send a jolt recently through the normally cautious, rarefied world of environmental research. In an academic journal, they called on climate scientists to stage a mass walkout, to stop their research until nations take action on global warming.

Who will miss them? People who love doom-mongering? If they stop doing research government won’t give them money, and that’s where the majority of funding is coming from.

Predictably, many researchers balked, calling the idea wrongheaded or worse — “a supernova of stupid,” as one put it on Twitter. But the article gets at questions that plenty of climate scientists have asked themselves lately: Is what we’re doing with our lives really making a difference? How can we get elected officials to act on the threats that we’ve so clearly identified? Do we become activists? Would we sacrifice our credibility as academics, our cool composure, by doing so?

What credibility? They’re simply doom-mongers. What are they doing with their lives? Pushing hyperbolic, over-wrought missives of Coming Doom in an attempt to get governments to take more money from citizens and force citizens to live their lives in a certain way. Authoritarianism. Do they even consider what they’re trying to create?

Dr. Glavovic says he believes a pause on research would give his fellow researchers a chance to think, really think, about how best to use their skills in the slender window humans have left for altering the planet’s trajectory. “The clock is ticking,” he said.

Let’s see all of you stop using fossil fuels and make your own lives “carbon neutral.”

If you have to use the backdrop of war to push your climate beliefs, you’re a cult, an activist, not a scientist.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

4 Responses to “Bummer: Climate Cult Scientists Are Ready To Go On Strike Because No One Is Listening”

  1. drowningpuppies says:

    “I mean, seriously, what difference is that going to make?”

    Where have we heard that before?

    Who will miss them L(and their phony baloney jobs)?

    Rimjob and Johnnie most likely.

    #LetsGoBrandon
    #FuckJoeBiden
    Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  2. Emma Hale says:

    in 2022 the best way to make money is online. from this job you can easily makes more than $600 every day just by doing work online. in last month by doing this job for 2 hrs a day i made $18532 and i only gave this 2 hrs a day. simple and easy to do work and regular earning from this are awesome. so easy to do even a child who knows to run FB he can do this job and makes money online. every person can now get this job and start earning extra dollars by follow details on this web.

    ________________________ WorkStore01.blogspot.com

  3. Jl says:

    So there is some sanity out there…but make sure there’s no sharp objects around John when he reads this….https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/03/01/german-green-party-embraces-coal-lng-and-nuclear/

  4. Dana says:

    The New York Times said:

    Yet their work has mostly failed to spur governments to address the issue. When all the signs are telling scientists that their research is not being heard, it is tragic, Dr. Glavovic said, that they just keep producing more of it.

    There’s a whole lot of arrogance in that statement. It supposes that the “research is not being heard,” when the truth is that we’ve all heard it, but are not all persuaded that their policy prescriptions are acceptable.

    Our good friend Mr Dowd has told us that he lives in a small, energy efficient house, that he drives a small, efficient car, and he lives in a metropolitan area leading to shorter drives. But when we look at John Kerry, the President’s ‘climate tsar,’ we see a man who lives in big houses, houses plural, owns yachts and private jets. Mr Kerry has certainly heard the scientists’ evidence, yet has personally chosen to continue the wealthy lifestyle marring a rich widow has brought him.

    Most of us, of course, do not enjoy Mr Kerry’s wife’s wealth, but Americans have been, for the most part, been choosing larger homes when they can, and have gone for personal trucks and SUVs to the extent that Ford and General Motors have mostly ceased building smaller sedans. When given choices, Americans are choosing larger.

    The ‘scientists’ are wanting the government to adopt policies to restrict the choices of the public to what the ‘scientists’ want, but governments are, in the end, responsible to the wishes of the public.

    The ‘scientists’ need to look to their own failure, their failure to persuade the public that the situation is so dire that the public will accept their recommendations without compulsion.

Pirate's Cove