Unsurprisingly, you won’t find this information at the NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times, CBS News, NBC News, or ABC News, nor almost any non-Republican outlet
First on Fox: Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to “infiltrate” servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an “inference” and “narrative” to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham says.
Durham filed a motion on Feb. 11 focused on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman, who has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent. Sussman has pleaded not guilty.
The indictment against Sussman says he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016, less than two months before the 2016 presidential election, that he was not doing work “for any client” when he requested and held a meeting in which he presented “purported data and ‘white papers’ that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel” between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.
But Durham’s filing on Feb. 11, in a section titled “Factual Background,” reveals that Sussman “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign.”
It gets really convoluted and detailed after that, how these various people and groups were paid by the Clinton campaign. Here’s how the NY Post puts it, in simplifying the Fox News report
Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign paid an internet company to “infiltrate” servers at Trump Tower and the White House in order to link Donald Trump to Russia, a bombshell new legal filing alleges.
The Friday filing from a Department of Justice prosecutor tasked with investigating the origins of the FBI’s Russian probe served to throw cold water on Democrats’ longstanding allegations of collusion.
Special Counsel John Durham filed a motion related to potential conflicts of interests in connection with the case of Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who is charged with lying to the feds, according to Fox News.
This is rather big news, isn’t it? That the Clinton campaign was paying to manufacture those links between Trump, his campaign, and Russia. I mean, those who live in the real world new this was all campaign dirty tricks, some of the dirtiest of all time, yet, the media simply ran with it, never caring to investigate. Nor do they care now, as the only other outlet interested in this is the UK Daily Mail.
Not really a “bombshell” of any kind. We have all known this since 2017. Seeing hillary clinton stuffed into the back of a squad car would be a bombshell. Even getting CNN to admit that they lied during the entire campaign to help hillary would be a bombshell.
Fact: This goes nowhere. No one joes to jail. No national news media talks about it. It should have been shut down when trump left office. If you cant prove a crime in 5 years, when you already know the facts, you aren’t trying.
Imagine the fact that today, as we speak, the democratic elites are turning to HRC to run again to spare them from Biden. To save the Party from progressives. This will go over like a turd in the punch bowl since before it was running against Trump, This time they are running against their own president.
The same woman who accepted money from women hating countries. Kept top secret information hidden from the government. Had her own server so she did not have to turn over her information to the NATIONAL ARCHIVES. Smashed all her staff phones before giving them to the FBI. Now it’s news that she was in bed with the deep state to destroy Donald J. Trump?
LOL
LOLOL
LOLOLOLOL
Unfortunately, the Professor is correct; this will go nowhere. The ‘Organized Media’ will keep the great unwashed in the dark and any exposure of the turd in the punchbowl will remain hidden.
Yes, this should have been ended during the Trump administration. Truth being, the security agencies chose to remain true to the swamp and protect HRC, BHO, etal at the expense of the country. They had the information.
The word “infiltrate” is not found in the filing, yet Fox News put it in quotes.
Are you still defending the wicked witch of the North?
Seriously? This is the vilest, evilest woman in the history of politics and you defend someone who takes money from countries that hate women.
Do you hate women Zach? Why would you defend her? Her husband screwed women right and left. Do you hate women Zach? Her husband hung out on Epstein’s Island assaulting minors. Do you hate minors Zach? I should think as a leftist you would be supporting the VICTIMS of Clintons Crimes. Women, Minors and our legal process.
I would think you would be glad to be rid of someone like Clinton, considering how hard you go after Trump.
Are you still?: Are you still defending the wicked witch of the North?
The quotation marks indicate the quote is verbatim, while the claim indicates that the source is ‘a filing from Special Counsel John Durham’. It’s a false attribution. Your other comments are irrelevant to the fact of the matter.
Remember, the Z is a child in grade school. He has no idea as to what he is saying, just repeating junk