Surprise: Scientists Declaring Climate Emergency Want Population Reduction, Wholesale Change Of Systems

Yesterday I wrote about these Cult of Climastrology scientists saying a tiny increase in CO2 would cause untold suffering. And now we learn more about what they’re pushing

(HuffPost) In order to avoid a “hothouse Earth” where runaway temperature increases beget further warming, the scientists call for immediate action to overhaul the way we live ― from agriculture to education.

“Rather than piecemeal solutions, we need transformative change in the way society functions and interacts with nature,” William Ripple, a professor at Oregon State University’s College of Forestry, told HuffPost in an email. Ripple, one of the study’s authors, called for a holistic solution that also addresses social justice issues and honors “the diversity of humans around the world.” (big snip)

“I think we are entering into a social tipping point in our fight against climate change,” said Ripple, who is hopeful that the world will take the necessary action to tackle this issue. “The urgency of the conversation seems to be ramping up for governments, businesses, and individuals.” (snip)

Simply focusing on rising temperatures fails to “capture the breadth of human activities and the real dangers stemming from a warming planet,” the study states.

After analyzing more than 40 years worth of public data on everything from energy consumption, emissions, and the Earth’s surface temperature to land use, fertility rates, and GDP, the researchers laid out six areas where “humanity should take immediate steps” in order to slow down the impacts of a warming world: energy, short-lived pollutants, nature, food, the economy and population.

So, basically, they are partisan political hacks, calling to get rid of capitalism and Democracy, replacing them with Modern Socialism and a domineering central government. Funny how most of the mainstream articles about this avoided discussing this material, as well as

Finally, global population must be stabilized and “ideally gradually reduced,” the study says, noting that this must be done “within a framework that ensures social integrity.” This will require initiatives that make family planning available to all, achieving “full gender equity,” and making primary and secondary education a “global norm.”

That’s the politically correct way of saying they want to reduce the population, and, of course, it will surely start with those icky black and brown people in Africa and Asia, where they should be supplied with lots and lots of contraceptives, sterilizations, and abortions. Climate Cultists have been dipping into this well for quite some time. Most know better than to really express this overtly, though.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

16 Responses to “Surprise: Scientists Declaring Climate Emergency Want Population Reduction, Wholesale Change Of Systems”

  1. Doom and Gloom says:

    We need is a NEW WORLD ORDER. THE INTERNET. World Wide Anarchy is afoot all across the globe. The Globalists need worldwide chaos to ultimately step in and take control promising the people order out of the chaos they created.

    They need a disaster of unmitigated proportions in order to fulfill their goal and now I know why those who so vehemently believe in this stuff cannot be dissuaded even to the point of surrendering everything they are or want to become to the NEW WORLD ORDER. As a friend of mine who believes this crap said. I’m terrified. Truly terrified by all of the climate changes. I just listen. I know he cannot be talked out of his delusion and if I were to try he would be willing to beat me with a stick for daing to challenge his beliefs. He clings to it. So do the Saint Greta’s of the world.

    Frightening stuff.

  2. kye says:

    I had a similar conversation(?) with a close friend’s daughter to whit I asked her to list any detrimental “man made climate changes” and their negative effects on humanity. She could do neither so I told her to go home and make a list and call me. No call came.

    She dropped by my home on Labor Day to swim and BBQ and I asked her again. This time she became hostile and said she “didn’t have to prove climate change”. I explained I did not expect her to “prove” it only to identify specific climate changes that have harmed mankind which can be attributed to human action. She declined to play.

    Later my buddy told me his daughter now considers me a white supremacist. Because of my climate views. Is there no topic which is not racial to leftists?

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:


      Your views on global warming don’t make you a white supremacist, your white supremacy makes you a white supremacist! You want a Caucasian Conservative Christian ethno-state, free of “mud-people”, Muslims, brown immigrants, liberals and agnostics/atheists.

      And your tale seems suspiciously fabricated.

      • formwiz says:

        Actually, it sounds like the mindset I’ve seen from Leftists for the last 50 years.

        You want a Caucasian Conservative Christian ethno-state, free of “mud-people”, Muslims, brown immigrants, liberals and agnostics/atheists.

        Actually, it’s you dreaming of your Brown Wave. Too bad Donald Trump put an end to it.

      • Kye says:

        It seems that you are still unsure of the definition of a white supremacist. One more time just for you intellectually challenged; I cannot be a white supremacist because I am married to a non white and that is not allowed for white supremacists. Are you stupid or just hopelessly ignorant? You keep throwing out the same lie about me, I correct you, then you do it again.

        Where have I said I want a “Caucasian Conservative Christian ethno-state, free of “mud-people”, Muslims, brown immigrants, liberals and agnostics/atheists”? I have never uttered that thought, you did.

        You do realize America is a white Christian nation, don’t you? Or do you think the Founding Fathers were brown Mohammedan atheist mud-people as well as the majority of us living here today? Almost everything you enjoy that makes your life better, better and longer was created or discovered by the white Christian males you hate so very much. Even the computer you type your foolish drivel on.

        Relax Fredo, until some left wing commie atheist is president it’s still okay to be white! Whether you like it or not.

        For a prolific liar, believer in lies and propagator of lies to call my “tale” suspiciously fabricated is a laugh. You believe in 72 sexes and 114 races but MY “tale” is suspicious. I get it. If you can’t fight it just call it “suspicious”. You should concentrate more on the actual bull shit you chose to believe. You might learn something.

      • Doom and Gloom says:

        LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL…..Elwood, you are a true national treasure. You epitomize what a college education does to someone who has retired and become bored with life. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

        On a more positive note, I was at a military Banquet last night and it was heartwarming to find young men still willing to stand for the star-spangled banner and were excited to be a member of a caring community whose mission is to defend their country from all enemies both domestic and foreign.

        Long live the USA.

  3. formwiz says:

    Dachau-on-the-Brazos, here we come.

    This is why you don’t vote Democrat.

    But it will be Bolshevik Bunny’s chance to rid the world of white people.

  4. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    From the article:

    Surface temperature –> +0.183 C/decade
    Glacier thickness –> -4.8 meter/decade
    Arctic sea ice –> -12%/decade
    Greenland ice –> -2610 gigaton/decade
    Antarctic ice –> -1230 gigaton/decade
    Sea level –> +31.3mm/decade
    Ocean heat content –> +6 x 10e22 joules/decade
    Ocean acidity –> +4%/decade
    Extreme weather/hydro events –> +44%/decade
    Burning lands (US) –> +44%/decade
    Losses (weather/hydro) –> +84%/decade

    Still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year, or more than 200,000 per day, the world population must be stabilized — and, ideally, gradually reduced — within a framework that ensures social integrity. There are proven and effective policies that strengthen human rights while lowering fertility rates and lessening the impacts of population growth on GHG emissions and biodiversity loss. These policies make family-planning services available to all people, remove barriers to their access and achieve full gender equity, including primary and secondary education as a global norm for all, especially girls and young women (Bongaarts and O’Neill 2018).

    To decrease population, the fertility rate must fall below the natural mortality rate. But face it, screwing is more fun than dying, so it’s a heavy lift.

    Cons seem to have a problem with contraception and education for women.

    And here’s what they said regarding the economy:

    Excessive extraction of materials and overexploitation of ecosystems, driven by economic growth, must be quickly curtailed to maintain long-term sustainability of the biosphere. We need a carbon-free economy that explicitly addresses human dependence on the biosphere and policies that guide economic decisions accordingly. Our goals need to shift from GDP growth and the pursuit of affluence toward sustaining ecosystems and improving human well-being by prioritizing basic needs and reducing inequality.

    Certainly you can’t favor inequality or oppose improving human well-being or sustaining ecosystem, can you?

    • Jl says:

      Too funny-“we need a carbon free economy..”. First of all, we’re not taking about carbon, but CO2. Second, there’s absolutely no proof we need a “carbon free economy”.

    • formwiz says:

      Token provided is not valid. Please go back to the article page and click the PDF link again.

      So much for the “article”.

      To decrease population, the fertility rate must fall below the natural mortality rate. But face it, screwing is more fun than dying, so it’s a heavy lift.

      As I said, Dachau-on-the-Brazos, here we come.

      Cons seem to have a problem with contraception and education for women.

      When, O when, have Conservatives opposed birth control for women?

      Of course, Red China got around the problem with forcible abortions. Just the sort of thing Bolshevik Bunny likes.

    • Jl says:

      But one has to love the erroneous figures based on unsubstantiated computer model projections. For instance, extreme weather events are not increasing, “burning lands” are down compared to the 30s, losses from weather events may be up, but there’s no more weather events than there were before. Dollar loss goes up simply because things cost more now and there’s more people and structures in the way of whatever hits. As far as ice, there’s more ice now with higher CO2 than over the last 10,000 yrs when there was much lower CO2. Simply another scare story with no proof. Shocking…

    • Doom and Gloom says:

      Okay now wait Elwood. On the one hand, the warming of the planet is opening up all kinds of new fertile growing zones to grow more food. 73 percent of the planet is water. The warmer it gets the more humidity goes into the air the more it rains ending droughts.

      Be thankful We have the foresight to oppose your lunacy.

      Besides, remind me again why you need US? Us Naysayers? The rest of the world is all in, both feet first on AGW. Remind me why it’s so important that the 3 percent of us who haven’t a clue even matter to the AGW crowd????

  5. david7134 says:

    Now explain how destruction of our economy, world communism and huge tax increases prevents the horrible climate change, which is a hoax.

Bad Behavior has blocked 9622 access attempts in the last 7 days.