If All You See…

…is horrible heat snow caused by Someone Else taking a long fossil fueled trip, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Lid, with a post on a bill allowing illegal aliens to work in Congress being passed in committee.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

44 Responses to “If All You See…”

  1. JGlanton says:

    I can’t see anything behind that humongous derriere.

    Fact: 9/10 images of Julia Schwab show her large rear end. Here’s one that does not:
    https://iv1.lisimg.com/image/16718095/612full.jpg

  2. ST says:

    Cheap or Selfish? – 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidates tax returns show they don’t like giving to charity

    https://commoncts.blogspot.com/2019/05/cheap-and-selfish-alert-2020.html

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    NuCons (American Taliban) are passing laws forcing 12 year girls to deliver babies sired by rapists or Uncle Billy! Is this a popular policy?

    Meanwhile… The trump administration is making preparations for the invasion of Iran.

  4. Kye says:

    The DemComs are complaining because after five decades of murdering 60 million American children the laws are starting to be rolled back because SCIENCE has caught up to their devious deeds. A beating heart with it’s own DNA is a person not “a blob of cells” as they lied about before. Now the Nazi death camps called Planned Parenthood (which have nothing to do with parenthood at all) run and supported by the DemCons and their unholy group of ghouls are feeling the squeeze. Maybe next year they won’t be able to murder as many minority babies as this year and it frightens them.

    Plans for invading Iran have been around for 14 years along with plans to invade several other countries. It’s what a good defense policy does.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Kye,

      Do you believe a raped 12 year old girl should be forced to bear the child of her rapist?

      Of her uncle or her brother?

      • Kye says:

        No I do not Elwood, but you have a history of hyperbole and exaggeration and emotionalism which makes me skeptical about anything you say on the matter.

        Do you believe that a million women a year were 12 year old girls who were raped by their uncle or brother?

        Now you’ve given your “worst case scenario” so other than rapes and incest do you believe a woman has the right to kill her baby for birth control? I do believe there sad instances where abortion may be necessary but birth control is not one of them.

        • formwiz says:

          Worse than that, a lot of babies are aborted for sex selection. The weird part is it’s girls that are mostly aborted.

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          Kye,

          Why wouldn’t the lawmakers make exceptions for rape and incest, as well as health of the mother? In some states they’re defining a 6 wk embryo as a US citizen with full rights. What about a pregnant illegal immigrant – would her embryo be a citizen too?

          Each method of birth control has a failure rate. You may genuinely feel that an embryo is a person and that even 1st trimester abortions are capital murder deserving of severe punishments for those involved. You may feel that contraception that interferes with the implantation of the proembryo is murder.

          Millions of embryos are lost in the US each year because of lack of implantation, some scientific estimates as high as 80% of fertilized eggs DO NOT implant and end up unknowingly being flushed down toilets. Do you support research into methods for saving these “babies”? If not, why not?

          Some (me) make the argument that many on the anti-abortion side are mostly concerned, not with children or babies, but controlling women.

          • gitarcarver says:

            Why wouldn’t the lawmakers make exceptions for rape and incest, as well as health of the mother?

            In past conversations, when asked if you would not support abortion if those exceptions were made, you said you wouldn’t.

            You are trying to make a point that you yourself would not support.

            Furthermore, it is always interesting to see that people on the left think that the value of a life is dependent upon the circumstances during which it was created. They, and they alone, have the right to murder another human being who has done nothing to harm them or society.

            All the left has is hate.

          • formwiz says:

            Why wouldn’t the lawmakers make exceptions for rape and incest, as well as health of the mother?

            Because they represent less than 1% of the abortions in the country. Also, Lefties have used it as a loophole.

            Some (me) make the argument that many on the anti-abortion side are mostly concerned, not with children or babies, but controlling women.

            No, that’s more projection.

            The feminuts, and the Left generally, want women to be thralls just like blacks. It does work on many black women and black America is exterminating itself.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Trolling abortion always catches gitarcarver…

            gc typed: “In past conversations, when asked if you would not support abortion if those exception”s were made, you said you wouldn’t.”

            I said I wouldn’t not support abortion etc? Can you rephrase to make sense?

            You define abortion as murder. My questions above were to sort out at what point, one cell, two cell, zygote, conceptus, proembryo, embryo, fetus does the uterine contents become a person? Surely you’ve thought through these tough questions?

            Is every fertilized egg a precious soul? When does the soul enter? Is a heartbeat the criteria, even if the brain is hardly forming. Is heaven filled with 100s of millions of brainless souls of fertilized eggs that were unknowingly lost during menses?

          • gitarcarver says:

            I apologize Elwood.

            You have said in the past that if those exceptions were included in any law, you would still not support a law against abortion.

            You knew that was what I was trying to say, but that’s okay. I know that you want to distract from your own statements as much as you can.

            Abortion is murder because it is the wanton and deliberate taking of a life – a life that has not done any harm to anyone or society.

            I will never understand your hatred for children.

            Maybe it is because all the left has is hate?

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            gc,

            You give me too much credit. I wasn’t sure what you were trying to say. I’m a simple man.

            Would I support a ban of abortions IF the ban included a carve-out for rape and incest and health of the mother. No. Would I support a partial ban with restrictions on third trimester, yes. Which is what we have now.

            I do not expect you to understand what a young woman is going through with an unwanted pregnancy. I’m not sure I can understand. A college student having the failure of birth control? A young wife whose husband just walked out? A fetus with projected severe disabilities? A cancer diagnosis after conceiving?

            Many cons say if a woman can’t adjust her life to an unwanted pregnancy she should never have sex. But realize women never get pregnant alone (OK, except by artificial insemination) – do you agree that we track down the father and dun him for $500,000 for support for the child?

            Most abortions are performed during the first two trimesters. The women are mostly young (75% under 30 yrs old), poor (75%), undereducated, over 1/2 were Christians.

            2/3rds occur before 8 weeks, 90% by 12 weeks.

            The abortion rate in the US has been declining since 1980.

            Would you support the widespread use of morning after pills for women every time they have sex not intended for pregnancy? They would use other birth control, and then take a pill after intercourse. Both methods combined would really cut the abortion rate, which is your goal.

          • gitarcarver says:

            Would I support a ban of abortions IF the ban included a carve-out for rape and incest and health of the mother. No.

            So the point you tried to make that the bill did not include such provisions was, as I said, a distraction.

      • formwiz says:

        Standard Lefty dodge.

        Such a case is less than 1% of all rapes.

        Second, the baby could be given up for adoption.

        Third, the bunny suit is still shilling for the self-extermination of his own race.\

        Finally, why does the bunny suit hate people?

  5. Kye says:

    Ya know Elwood you keep trying to pin us down to the very most minute point at which we would agree to an abortion. Like that 1% that are incestuous 12 year olds.

    Now I want to know is there any point where you REFUSE to allow a woman to abort? A pregnancy not the result of a gang rape by the entire male family of a 12 year old, that is say at 6 months, perfectly healthy with no defects whatsoever but the mother wakes up one morning and says “fuk this damn kid I want it dead”. What then oh great and virtuous leftist, should she be able to kill her baby? Just for shits and giggles, after all it’s “her” body.

  6. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    I would be perfectly willing to restrict the “right” to abort after 6 months.

    • gitarcarver says:

      I would be perfectly willing to restrict the “right” to abort after 6 months.

      So you’re happy with murder before that point?

      Why do you hate innocent children so much?

      Maybe it is because all the left has is hate.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Abortion is not murder, since murder is illegal in the US. Our willingness to permit restrictions is a political compromise. We are not obligated to support laws that accord with your religious beliefs. We abide with the rulings of our Supreme Court.

        How will you enforce your draconian law? How will you differentiate the millions of miscarriages (“spontaneous” of “god” abortions) each year from the few hundred thousand medical abortions?

        It’s difficult to understand the passivity of anti-abortionists when viewed against their insistence that legal abortion is “murdering babies”. If a group was murdering newborns or toddlers to reduce the population wouldn’t you join me in storming the facility even at the risk of being jailed or killed? Yet, in the face of mass “baby murder” anti-abortionists support Republicans in crafting laws that will take years to work their way through the courts in hopes that a 45 yr old Supreme Court ruling will be overturned? Frankly, anti-abortionists realize they are lying when they call abortion the murder of babies.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        All you have are bumper stickers.

      • gitarcarver says:

        Abortion is not murder, since murder is illegal in the US.

        Slavery was not slavery since it was at one point not illegal?

        Funny how the parallels are there. Some people didn’t think blacks were people. You don’t think children inside the womb are people. Some people felt blacks were commerce and good to be discarded and sold. That’s what you think about the unborn as well.

        We abide with the rulings of our Supreme Court.

        Then why the fear that the Supreme Court will overturn Roe? Why do pro-death people like you say that if Roe is overturned, they won’t abide by the decision?

        Fact of the matter is that you wouldn’t abide by a decision that overturns Roe.

        So please, stop the lying.

        Stop trying to justify the hate you have in your heart for kids to the point where you want them dead.

        All you are doing is proving time and time again is that all the left has is hate.

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          Still, abortion is not murder, so why do you continue to lie?

          Is your hatred of women so great that you’ll stop at nothing?

          There is no such thing as children inside the womb. Embryos, fetuses but not children.

          We must assume since you consider an embryo a child, that you WOULD force a 13 year old to deliver her rapist’s spawn. And the same would apply to any raped woman.

          Are you a father? Have grandchildren? Great-grandchildren? Ever taught school? Or do you spend all your tell whining?

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          And you don’t even believe your own BS – Abortion is the murder of children!!

          No, it’s not. Anti-womanistas such as you don’t love children, you love controlling women.

          • formwiz says:

            Of course, it’s murder.

            Try watching Silent Scream.

            PS A couple of chemical peels and Himmler would have loved you.

  7. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    In practical terms how will our new police state enforce the laws? Will we have a specialized “miscarriage force” to investigate each miscarriage to make certain villainous women didn’t take abortion drugs (medical abortion)? Blood tests to make certain they didn’t? 40% or more of abortions in the US are medical abortions, and sure to increase.

    Must every woman who discovers she’s pregnant register with the state? And her pregnancy progress monitored by the state? And of course investigate if she miscarries.

    • formwiz says:

      Must every woman who discovers she’s pregnant register with the state? And her pregnancy progress monitored by the state?

      Funny you say that because that wonderful universal health care would demand just that.

      PS That kind of secret police thing is your bag. Witness Mule Ears, Comey, Brennan, Nadless, and Schiff For Brains.

  8. Kye says:

    We were making some progress Elwood don’t retreat back to your closed minded emotionalism. 40% of of abortions in the us ARE NOT medical abortions. You’re telling me upwards of 400,000 babies are killed each year for medical reasons? Only if the left once again moved the goal posts and redefined what constitutes a medical abortion. At most 2-3% of abortions are medical and I don’t believe they were EVER illegal. And right now damn near every woman who discovers she’s pregnant registers with the state if she sees a doctor who is part of the VA, Obamacare, Medicare or Medicaid. They are all state run or state partnered and all state regulated.

    According to the Guttmacher Inst. on abortion, <0.5% are victims of rape, 3% are from fetal health problems, 4% from physical health problems and ALL THE REST are because they would interfere with the lifestyle. Oh, women on Medicaid have 3x more abortions than those not on the program.

    It’s worse in some states. In Florida in 2018 there wer 70,083 abortions. the reasons were:
    .0001% from incest
    .001% woman raped
    .003% mother’s life in danger
    .01% woman’s physical health threatened
    .02% woman’s psychological health threatened
    20.02% for social or economic reasons
    75.40% NO REASON!!!!

    There are reasons for abortion Elwood, “NO REASON” not being one of them!

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Kye:

      The term “Medical Abortion” refers to those using an oral anti-progestogen and an oral prostaglandin to induce a miscarriage/abortion, as opposed to “Surgical Abortion.” How will the “abortion police” monitor these?

      It’s your opinion that a woman’s reason for obtaining a legal abortion is irrelevant and should be replaced by your feelings, but the Supreme Court and most Americans disagree with you – certainly through the first 12 weeks of pregnancy – accounting for 90% of abortions.

      It’s true that poor women, young women, women with less education have more abortions than other women. Doesn’t it make sense that supporting young, poor women, improving access to medical care, improving access to education might reduce abortions without punishing them or making them criminals?

      • formwiz says:

        How will the “abortion police” monitor these?

        Controlled substance?

        It’s your opinion that a woman’s reason for obtaining a legal abortion is irrelevant and should be replaced by your feelings, but the Supreme Court and most Americans disagree with you

        No, most Americans don’t like abortion, especially late term. They know it’s as risky to mom and the kid. And we don’t have the Warren Court. It’s fast becoming the Trump Court (anybody see Notorious lately?).

        It’s true that poor women, young women, women with less education have more abortions than other women. Doesn’t it make sense that supporting young, poor women, improving access to medical care, improving access to education might reduce abortions without punishing them or making them criminals?

        How about stopping abortion from being fashionable and telling them they’re exterminating their own people?

  9. Kye says:

    Not being a physician the definitions of “anti-progestogen” and “oral prostaglandin” made no sense to me. It was gobbledygook. I will assume you’re talking about “the day after pill” but using their medical terms in order to show your intellectual superiority and vanity rather than just say “day after pill”. With that in mind #1. there is no such thing as “abortion police” and your attempt (once more) to be over the top hyperbolic to the point of ridiculous is noted. Second, since the day after represents almost zero I see no reason to worry about that now. That’s like your fear about incest (.0001%) we can come back to that.

    Once again you presume to tell me what I think about a woman’s reason for obtaining an abortion. The reason is NOT irrelevant. Quite the contrary. The reason a person is justified in ending the life of another is always relevant. Just like there’s a difference in accidental and first degree homicide there is a big difference between ending your own baby’s life because you have to and because you WANT to. You are just justifying murder for no good human reason and so did the Supreme Court. BTW, most Americans do agree with me they are just afraid of being beat up by the bullies on the left. Even you must realize with today’s science abortion is the killing of a human being. Or are you a science denier?

    Yes, it does make sense that “supporting young, poor women, improving access to medical care, improving access to education might reduce abortions without punishing them or making them criminals?”. Who here either right or left has ever said it isn’t? Is this another of your straw dogs?

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      It’s not the day after pill. It’s a “Medical” abortion. I explained what it was – sorry you didn’t understand. More information is better than less, don’t you think? Progesterone (a progestogen) is a hormone that supports the uterine lining. An anti-progestogen blocks the action of progesterone on the uterus. The prostaglandin causes contractions of the uterus.

      The morning after pill works by different mechanisms, and either stops a fertilized egg from implanting of prevents fertilization. Do you object to methods that prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus, killing a fertilized egg?

      According to you, science dictates that abortion is murder – a what point in fertilization/implantation/pregnancy process is abortion murder? Is the destruction of any fertilized egg murder? Is it the expulsion of any implanted embryo?

      Self-defense, stand your ground, capital punishment, war, police actions are all reasons we use to justify killing human beings. Abortion and miscarriage kill an embryo or fetus.

      • formwiz says:

        Wrong again.

        Or, more accurately, lying again.

        The morning after pill induces an abortion. And the correct medical term is therapeutic abortion, one where the mother’s life is forfeit if the pregnancy is not terminated.

        The morning after pill works by different mechanisms, and either stops a fertilized egg from implanting of prevents fertilization.

        When you figure out what you were trying to say, let us know.

        According to you, science dictates that abortion is murder – a what point in fertilization/implantation/pregnancy process is abortion murder? Is the destruction of any fertilized egg murder? Is it the expulsion of any implanted embryo?

        Death.

        Self-defense, stand your ground, capital punishment, war, police actions are all reasons we use to justify killing human beings. Abortion and miscarriage kill an embryo or fetus.

        No, it terminates the life of a human being as well, but Dr Goebbels would love your attempt at doublespeak.

        Why do you hate your own race?

Bad Behavior has blocked 5724 access attempts in the last 7 days.