Cult Of Climastrology Has A New Term: Birthstrikers

This is actually something that all Warmists should be encouraged to become involved in: it would mean fewer of these nutters raising the next generation of nutters


Climate activists calling themselves “Birthstrikers” are refusing to have children due to their fear of climate change, according to a Monday interview with Bloomberg News.

“Our planet is in a kind of collapse. The natural world is collapsing around us, and that’s actually happening right now,” climate activist Victoria Derbyshire told Bloomberg.

“And I’m so disappointed by the response by authorities to this crisis, and so freaked out by everything I’ve read that I’ve — I’ve basically last year I came to the decision that I couldn’t bring a child into that.” Derbyshire continued. “And I was asking around people I know, put it up a little bit on Facebook and realize actually quite a lot of other people are making this decision. Yeah, and so, we realized it was really — really important to tell the public that there are people out there are so scared about this that they feel that they can’t actually have a family.”

Don’t make fun of them, we want them all to do this.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

13 Responses to “Cult Of Climastrology Has A New Term: Birthstrikers”

  1. Liljeffyatemypuppy says:

    Culling the herd.

    • formwiz says:

      That usually requires a third party.

      This is self-culling. Well, it took 50 years, but Paul Ehrlich may get his wish, after all.

      Mine, too.

  2. Liljeffyatemypuppy says:

    Birthstriker aka…

  3. Rob says:

    A pity this wretched creature’s mother did not make this decision.

  4. StillAlive says:

    AWESOME NEWS! All people who believe in AGW should become CHILDLESS by their OWN CHOICE for at least the next 50 or so years. I’m all for that.

    Yes! Go for it I say go for it with all the gusto you possess. Less insane batshit crazies running around. The democrats will start having to send out planetary distress signals to all REALLY TRUE ILLEGAL ALIENS so they can keep their voter block in tact.

  5. ruralcounsel says:

    Evolution thinning out those with poor survival genetics, e.g., too stupid to recognize realty versus the media-embellished crock of environmental doomsday that they’ve been spoonfeeding the public ever since they realized it sold papers or got clicks.

    Hey they want to voluntarily head for the figurative delousing showers, who’s to say we should stop them. Too bad they won’t go quietly, but have to whine and preach the whole way.

    Any male who wants to devote their life to a woman who believes this way is throwing his own life away. I suspect these women will have trouble finding long-term partners, so their old age will be even MORE sterile and empty than most childless women.

  6. formwiz says:

    Speaking of…

  7. Professor Hale says:

    Of course, this is nothing new. People have been refusing to breed since the 50’s because they couldn’t bear to bring children into this messed up world. But really, that’s just the excuse they use. The truth is, they just enjoy the single life. Kids are messy and expensive and break your toys. Warming is just the latest excuse to convince people that their choice to be selfish is a “virtue”.

    But remember the rule of socialism: If it’s good enough to do, it’s good enough to make mandatory.

  8. Dana says:

    Leftists were already having fewer children than normal people, so this is nothing new; it’s just another excuse.

    Of course, there’s a real reason why: conservatives are just plain better in bed than liberals, so naturally conservative women have more opportunities to get pregnant. Conservative men being, on average, physically stronger than liberal males, it stands to reason that women are more attracted to them.

    It all follows: liberal males are more likely to want help because they are less capable to taking care of themselves, and women are more likely to find men who can take care of themselves attractive when compared to males — not men — who are weak and pussified.

  9. John says:

    Teach are you secretly birthstrikkng ?
    White people are not having enough kids to keep America white
    Will you pledge to do your part in increasing the white race ?

  10. yuleeyahoo says:

    If only they could be prevented from working in the education system to prevent them from infecting other peoples children with this rot.

Pirate's Cove