It’s Time To Get Serious About Cold Weather Climate Change Or Something

Listen, and understand! That Warmists are out there! They can’t be bargained with. They can’t be reasoned with. They don’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear! And they absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead paying taxes!

It’s time to get serious about climate change

When former Vice President Al Gore released his documentary in 2006 entitled An Inconvenient Truth, somehow the public was lectured with the consequences of global warming. Some may have missed it or did not pay attention. But truth of the matter-climate change is real.

That’s when he was blaming pleasant, warm weather on Other People taking fossil fueled flights.

Climate change has showed its severe impact in large scale destruction in mankind and the environment we are living in. The unrolling cold weather that continues to blanket the eastern U.S. can be an example of the biggest changes that we have to expect entering this new year.

Many experts are also blaming this cold season on climate change-at least it is part of the problem.

If Warmists want to get serious, why don’t they practice what they preach? Why do so many of them seem to have higher carbon footprints than non-Warmists?

Notice that the link is from a Chicago outlet. In the same Chicago Tribune, they just tied an 80+ year old for number of days below freezing. Raleigh, and many others, have done the same. On one hand, they’ll say “this is just weather.” In the next “it’s climate change!!!!!!”

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

31 Responses to “It’s Time To Get Serious About Cold Weather Climate Change Or Something”

  1. Jeffery says:

    TEACH typed:

    And they absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead paying taxes!

    You’ve become such a drama queen!!

    The Southern hemisphere is in the middle of a massive heat wave. 117F in Sydney AUS.

    • There was supposed to be a strikethru on dead, which I’ve fixed. Also, why can’t things just be fun? That’s why I do this. I have fun.

      • Jeffery says:

        That’s great! So you don’t really believe climate realists are communists perpetrating a hoax to take over the world and tax conservatives to death? You just type those things for fun. Good deal.

    • McGehee says:

      …where it’s summer.

  2. Jl says:

    A massive heat wave no doubt caused by global cooling.

  3. drowningpuppies says:

    Imagine a heat wave during the summer!

  4. Professor Hale says:

    Wait. I thought our side were the Climate realists. As in, trusting what they can see instead of what models tell them their lying eyes should see.

    • Jeffery says:

      Sorry Professor, your side refuses to recognize the reality of climate change. What one can see is that thermometers tell us the Earth is warming. And there is no reason to believe the warming will stop on its own short some catastrophe such as nuclear winter, volcanic winter or an asteroid strike.

      Your side doesn’t realize that the Earth and its people are already seeing the effects of climate change – and this from just 1C warming. And there is no reason to believe the warming will stop at 1C. If we’re responsible (and a bit lucky) maybe we stop it at 2C.

      Your side believes that mere humans can’t impact the Earth’s climate even as mere humans have increased the level of CO2 in the atmosphere by 40%. And there is no reason to believe that the increase in CO2 will stop until we reduce our emissions of CO2.

      So no, your side is not on the side of climate realism.

      • o0Nighthawk0o says:

        Which effects would those be?
        Droughts? No, because the number and severity of droughts have NOT increased in the last 120 years. In fact, have declined over the last few years.

        Maybe tornadoes? Nope. The number of EF1+ tornadoes has been decreasing for the last 30+ years.

        Hurricanes? Again no. The frequency of these has also been falling over the last 30+ years.

        Wild fires? HA!! Again becoming less frequent.

        Maybe you don’t like the fact that the Earth is now 25% greener. Meaning more plants, more crops and longer growing seasons to produce more food.

        Or maybe you don’t like that humans are better equipped to survive in warmer climates than colder as evidenced by the larger death rates in winter as opposed to summer.

        Again, ‘our side’ doesn’t deny that the climate is changing. We disagree with the cause. There is no proof that human activities are having any significant effect on the climate.

        You speak of realism so here’s some for you. The NOAA in October, using their wonderful climate models, predicted that this winter would be unusually warm and dry for the United States. As we all can see, this is a miserable failure of a prediction. If these wonderful, all knowing scientists and models can’t accurately predict what will happen in just a couple months in the future, how can we trust them to predict what will happen 100 years from now. The only real thing these models show is that we have absolutely no idea how the climate really works and what really drives it.

        But by all means, let’s tax people and wreck economies based on a theory that has yet to be proven and by all observed data, is completely bogus.

  5. Jeff,
    You are a liar. You aren’t sorry at all. You can’t call yourself a realist and just make shit up like that. You don’t even know who “my side” is. You don’t know me. You don’t know what I know. But I know you. You argue like a 5 year old, mindlessly repeating what other people told you because arguing is fun. That’s why I don’t bother comparing facts with you. You don’t care about the facts. You will make up your own. The only real difference between one side and the other:

    1. Your side wants to impoverish hundreds of millions of people with higher fuel prices so that well connected billionaires and foreign aristocrats can get wealthy beyond the dreams of mere mortals.

    2. Your side doesn’t care how many real people freeze to death in real live winter every year because they get priced out of the fuel market, so that large oil companies, shareholders, and Al Gore can make huge profits from the sale of carbon credits.

    This isn’t an academic argument about tenths of degrees Celsius or thousandths of millimeters of ocean rise or potential fictional catastrophes in some distant future. It has nothing to do with pointless climate vs weather monologs. It’s not about science. It’s about real measurable hardship intentionally inflicted on real people last year, this year, and next year so that wealthy politicians and their wealthy friends around the world can get wealthier in perpetuity while managing to produce nothing that anyone will ever be able to see or hold them accountable for. It’s about the real money that is written in bold print in the Kyoto treaty and the Paris accords. Money the USA pays and everyone else collects. Communists have never cared how many millions of people they need to kill to get to the top and stay there and the modern environmentalist movement is no different. Real people, really freezing to death every year.

    That is your “side” Jeff. You and all your super wealthy friends, who BTW, also don’t care if you die in the process. As long as they are still on top. Good job on becoming a corporate stooge and defender of aristocratic wealth.

    • Jeffery says:


      You’re the one who claimed a “side”, typing: I thought our side were the Climate realists.

  6. Dana says:

    When thankfully-never-President Gore released his movie in 2006, he also told us that we had only ten years to do something about global warming climate change, or it would be too late. Well, that ten years has elapsed, so, if we are to believe Mr Gore, it’s too late to do anything to stop global warming climate change, so we’re better off, now, to not waste money on stopping the unstoppable, and instead engineering our economy, lifestyle and infrastructure to deal with whatever effects global warming climate change has on the environment.

    Of course, that doesn’t have lead to the socialism that the warmunists want . . . .

  7. Jl says:

    “Earth and it’s people are seeing the effect of climate change.” The only effect seen so far is beneficial.

  8. Jeffery says:

    Fellow Earthlings,

    It’s a fact that the Earth is warming from the increased levels of CO2 in the atmosphere. It’s a fact that the CO2 comes from us Earthlings burning fossil fuels.

    And of course “greening” is not the only impact of increased CO2, but nice conflation (global warming and increased CO2 are not the same thing, although one is causing the other). Ocean acidification is a real thing, too.

    Tony Wuwt and Pierre Gosselin and Jo Nova may have persuaded you but actual scientists find that global warming is impacting droughts, floods, sea level, growing seasons, sea ice, glaciers and heat waves. The ground is getting drier (the warmed air holds more water vapor). And there is no good reason to believe any of this will stop and the Earth continues to warm.

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Yet little guy still never provides any proof that CO2 causes warming in a convective atmosphere like the one we have on Earth.

      Ever wonder why?

      • Jeffery says:

        Hey little girl, what would constitute proof?

        • drowningpuppies says:

          Read very slowly.

          You, little guy, stated it is a “fact”….

          Facts require proof.

          Please provide your proof, little guy.

          Is that so hard to understand, little guy?

  9. McGehee says:

    I’m still waiting for somebody to take the latest models, feed them data from 30 years ago and before, and have the model accurately predict what’s happening now.

    Climate models are theory. When theory doesn’t predict now, it sure as shootin’ can’t predict the future.

    • Jeffery says:

      And yet, just as predicted, the Earth continues to warm. Go figure.

      • Warmth is not prove of causation, Jeffrey. Just warming. As happened multiple times in the Holocene. And that’s the debate, causation. If your side is so sure it’s mostly/solely anthropogenic, why are so few Warmists giving up their own use of fossil fuels and going carbon neutral?

    • o0Nighthawk0o says:

      They have done this and they all failed miserably.

  10. drowningpuppies says:

    Ocean temperatures have risen only 0.1 degree Celsius over the last five decades, according to a landmark study some scientists argue could change the way researchers measure the ocean’s temperature levels.

    Disappointing, huh, little guy.

  11. Jeffery says:

    Did you read the Nature paper? Didn’t think so.

    Anyway, A 0.1 degree Celsius increase in mean ocean temperature (surface and deep abyss) amounts to a massive amount of retained heat. Massive. It’s why an El Nino can cause 2C spike in mean global surface temperatures. You should look up “specific heat” as it relates to H2O.

    It’s interesting that, as it suits their “arguments”, science deniers prefer proxy measurements, even with only 250 year discrimination, to thermometers. LOL. Their precision (admitted by the scientists) is only 0.2C, so they can’t measure changes less than that.

    Anyway, NOAA had determined long ago that the deep oceans are not warming, that the mass of warming is resulting in the top 2 miles (that’s still a lot of water!).

    So the parts of the ocean that interact with our atmosphere are warming rapidly, just as predicted. When you average the overall ocean temperature (including the deep abyss) you get a smaller number, at least as represented by nobel gases measured in the air. Science! You should try it.

    Also stop bringing that weak Daily Caller sh!t. They lie almost as much as Pierre Gosselin and Tony Wuwt.

    But kudos for wanting at long last to argue the science of global warming, which is happening. And which is happening because of CO2 generated by us mere Earthlings!

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Ever wonder why little guy never provides any empirical evidence that CO2 causes warming in a convective atmosphere like the one we have on Earth then goes on to deny the real science published by the Nature paper?

      • Jeffery says:

        We stand corrected. The fat little dumbass did NOT want to discuss climate science at all. If you had even skimmed the Nature article you would realize I agreed with the paper, it’s the sorry propaganda of the Daily Caller and suckers like you who are at fault.

        Sorry, fat little dumbass, but you’ll have to jerk off alone. Again. Buh-bye.

        • drowningpuppies says:

          Don’t go away mad, little guy, because you were so confused and need to blame others.

          We understand.

          • Jeffery says:

            Last chance, fat little dumbass. Explain to us all why you perceive that a convective atmosphere negates the property of CO2 absorbing infrared radiation, please.

            We have the popcorn. Please, entertain us.

          • david7134 says:

            you can now add body shaming to Jeff’s credentials. He is a very deplorable individual.

          • drowningpuppies says:

            Didn’t type that, little guy.
            Are you still confused?
            Go back and read the comment and get back to us.

Pirate's Cove