Hillary Supporters Give Marching Orders To Media On What Language Is “Sexist”

You can bet the majority of the media will listen

(Daily Caller)  Do you work in the media and have the gall to think that the entire Webster’s dictionary is at your disposal? Think again, you sexist.

When it comes to reporting on Hillary Clinton, George Carlin’s “Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television” have turned into “Twelve Words You Can Never Say About a Powerful Politician.”

“We will be watching, reading, listening and protesting coded sexism,” the pro-Hillary group HRC Super Volunteers warned The New York Times’ Amy Chozick Wednesday.

The words/phrase are:

https://twitter.com/amychozick/status/580822978331561985

https://twitter.com/amychozick/status/580823323677978624

Secretive is cute, considering her email scandal.

Her next tweet is

https://twitter.com/amychozick/status/580823990090014720

The liberal left, Progressives, who Jonah Goldberg referred to as “nice fascists”, have two main weapons in their arsenal: fear and shame. They start with shame, and they make sure that shame is public. And the shaming will continue to escalate. They balance this with risk/reward. The risk is that they will continue to come after you, will attempt to destroy your personal and work life, which creates fear. The reward is that you might get a pat on the head for staying with Approved Progressive Doctrine, but the fear is always hiding around the corner. Because it doesn’t matter if your were right: there are no apologies in Liberal World, and you are always on notice. Shame is a powerful motivator, especially when backed by Fear.

In this case, they are attempting to shame Ms. Chozick, who they know will share the information (and I’d bet quite a few other reporters and media outlets received the same email), into compliance, using fear as their backstop. There’s a saying that “he who controls the language controls the debate”. There’s another that goes “he who controls the language controls the masses.” That’s Saul Alinsky. Language is controlled to elicit shame and fear, whether it be racism, Islamophia, you name it. In this case, dog whistle language for “sexism.” Because Hillary Must Not Be Questioned.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

7 Responses to “Hillary Supporters Give Marching Orders To Media On What Language Is “Sexist””

  1. Hank_M says:

    So any word that can accurately be used to describe Hillary Clinton, and you’ll note that none are positive, are to be considered sexist?

    Well, when you put that together with her “accomplishments” you’re going to end up with a lot of blank pages.

  2. Jeffery says:

    For sure, the odious Repubicums never try to manage the message, except for Democrat Party, Death Panels, Death Taxes, lazy, climastrology, obamacare, moochelle etc etc etc.

    Firing a shot across the bow of the mainstream press that hates the Clintons is not a bad idea.

    Soon enough they’ll be calling her Madam President.

  3. Jeffery says:

    Is it hypocritical or ironic that the Daily Caller seems concerned about language. It seems like just yesterday that they said this of a female aide of Mayor DeBlasio:

    Great response. Whiny little self-righteous bitch. “Appalling?”
    And with such an ironic name, too… Spitalnick? Ironic because you just know she has extreme dick-fright; no chance has this girl ever had a pearl necklace. Spoogeneck? I don’t think so. More like LabiaFace.

    Oh, it was just yesterday. The odious dickhead *ucker Carlson must be so proud.

    In case you get the wrong idea about “pearl necklace”, here’s what the disgusting person meant: a sexual act in which a man ejaculates semen on or near the neck, chest, or breast of another person.

    What a horrible, horrible family. But typical repubicum trash. What a trashy website.

  4. Hank_M says:

    I’ll agree with that, that Buckley Carlson is despicable and that the email was a disgrace.

    Hadn’t heard about this til you brought it up.

    Another good reason for not reading the Daily Caller.

  5. jl says:

    Are you ok today, J? Those words you mentioned above (death panels , death taxes, Obamacare, ect)are words that many citizens use. The post was about what words not to use (according to Hillary’s PC police.)The two aren’t even remotely linked. The story told is one that’s told many times before- the left’s back door infringement on free speech by making more and more words “offensive”, or not politically correct, thus having the effect of limiting debate. The unaware victim spends all his time defending himself from some made-up “ism” that the left paints those they disagree with. In other words, yes, the right tries to “manage its own message”, as does the left. This post was about some on the left trying to manage or restrain someone else’s message, which is a totally different thing.

  6. GOODSTUFF says:

    Madame Voldemort: She Who Must Not be Described

  7. JGlanton says:

    Hillary and her HRC committee sure are Bossy!

Pirate's Cove