ISIS Publishes Kill List Of 100 U.S. Military Members

When it comes to ISIS, this should very much be taken as a clear and present threat

(UK Daily Mail) A division of ISIS published a ‘kill list’ containing the names, photos and addresses of 100 US military members online and called upon its ‘brothers residing in America’ to kill them.

The list was posted online by the ‘Islamic State Hacking Division’.

The group claimed it hacked several military servers, databases and emails to obtain the information.

The ISHD said it wants ‘lone wolf’ attackers to go after the military members and ‘kill them wherever you find them’.

The list did appear to match up with information which was available online, TheBlaze reported.

The posting read: ‘With the huge amount of data we have from various different servers and databases, we have decided to leak 100 addresses so that our brothers in America can deal with you.

‘And now we have made it easy for you by giving you addresses, all you need to do is take the final step, so what are you waiting for?

‘Kill them in their own lands, behead them in their own homes, stab them to death as they walk their streets thinking that they are safe.’

Interestingly, very few US national media outlets are featuring this story. The NY Times buried it on page A14 of today’s (Sunday) edition. There seems to be no article at the Washington Post. CBS News? Nope. ABC News has a small blurb. NBC News? Negative. CNN? Uh uh. One would think that when it comes to ISIS directly threatening American citizens, much less military members, this would be taken seriously. But, I guess, when it comes to ISIS and the spread of radical Islam, this might show the failure of President Selfie

That is referring to Obama sitting around watching basketball while U.S. forces evacuated from Yemen after al Qaeda seized another town.

That’s right, folks, yet another leisurely round of golf. And it’s surely a given that no bothers will be give with more March Madness today.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

18 Responses to “ISIS Publishes Kill List Of 100 U.S. Military Members”

  1. Jeffery says:

    No wonder conservatives live their lives in abject, bed-wetting fear!

    Obama is your President, not your daddy.

    Fearful conservatives always need comforting that “daddy” gov’t will keep the bad “other” guys from harming them, preferably by sending brave Americans “over there” so that fearful conservatives won’t be confronted with them “over here”.

    There will always be fundamentalist religious fanatics committing violent terrorist acts in the US – anti-abortion terrorists, anti-US Federal gov’t terrorists, Muslim-terrorists.

    Your President, Barack Obama, didn’t start it and it won’t end with him, either. Only the end of fundamentalist religious terrorists will end it.

  2. Jeffery says:

    And not surprisingly, the terrified RWNJs display no concern for those actually threatened but use it as an opportunity to bash the media and your President.

    Conservatives believe in two things: fear and blame.

  3. John says:

    Teach 10-15000 Americans are killed each year by other Americans why are you so worried about Isis?
    And Teach the USA. Military are all supporting all those warmist shennanigans you know part of that giant conspiracy that is trying to take over the world
    I think that Isis will in the future make a statement that says they don’t believe in AGW. That Allah gave oil to Muslims and that carbon pollution. Doesn’t control climate
    Allah controls the climate

  4. Notice how neither Jeff nor John profess any concern for the threat from ISIS towards our military members.

    Obama is your President, not your daddy.

    Obama’s not my president. He’s as much as professed that. He is there to only serve his narrow base (and his personal interests), and couldn’t give a crap less about anyone else.

  5. gitarcarver says:

    Notice how neither Jeff nor John profess any concern for the threat from ISIS towards our military members.

    That’s because john and Jeffery hate the men and women in the military. That is the only conclusion one can come to. But once again, notice the hypocrisy from the left. In 2001, Bush was given a PDB that said there was some background noise on terrorists learning to fly plans with an unspecified plan to fly them into buildings. Bush was excoriated by those on the left for not doing anything even though the threat was non-specific and completely vague. Here we have a credible threat with a known source against known targets and the left says “nothing to see here…… move along.”

    Obama is your President, not your daddy.

    You mean he is going to repeal all those directives and presidential orders he issued because he was “looking out for us?” He is going to repeal all the freedom robbing orders his part of the government issued because we the people aren’t smart enough to do what we feel is right for our lives?

    Yeah. I didn’t think so.

    The problem is that Obama thinks he is everyone’s “daddy,” because he doesn’t have the ability to lead or be a president.

  6. Jeffery says:

    Obama’s not my president.

    Finally admitting that you’re not a citizen. It’s a good first step.

    Perhaps you and dave help the formation of the New Confederacy of Red States of America.

  7. Jeffery says:

    neither Jeff nor John profess any concern for the threat from ISIS towards our military members.

    Speaking for myself only, I thought I made it clear there is little threat, and that this is another example of right-wing paranoia. And I have full confidence that the men and women of our military can protect themselves from some nitwit with a knife. I save my concern and sympathy for actual threats, such as RWNJs shooting police and gov’t officials with military-grade weapons.

    If you’re genuinely concerned for the military why didn’t you express concern for the military? Have you ever heard of leading by example?

    Head Fluffer (HF) – Can you support your claim that I hate the military? I rarely support sending them into harm’s way to satisfy the needs of politicians, weapons contractors or conservatives that . To me, it sounds like you love the idea of the military but are indifferent to the actual soldiers who protect your trembling behind. Typical of frightened conservatives.

  8. Jl says:

    “Conservatives believe in two things-fear and blame.” Says the person who worships the religion of fear and blame-global warming.

  9. gitarcarver says:

    Head Fluffer (HF) – Can you support your claim that I hate the military?

    Who are you addressing Jeffery?


  10. Jeffery says:

    I was addressing The Head Fluffer, aka Fluffer-1.

    Fluffer-2 fluffs Fluffer-1.

  11. gitarcarver says:

    I was addressing The Head Fluffer, aka Fluffer-1.


    I guess you didn’t realize that what you thought were internal thoughts to yourself were actually typed for the rest of us to see.

    Isn’t it interesting that it seems that your “insults” (even those aimed at yourself) have some sort of homo-eroticism to them?

    Why is it that you hate homosexuals, Jeffery?

  12. Jeffery says:

    Simple. Because you and your ilk find it so offensive.

  13. Hank_M says:

    “Because you and your ilk find it so offensive.”

    Wrong again.

    It’s amusing and at the same time, just plain weird.

  14. gitarcarver says:

    Simple. Because you and your ilk find it so offensive.


    I do find your hatred of gays offensive.

    But that is liberals for you. They make childish insults that expose their own hatred and prejudices but are too stupid to see it.

  15. Jeffery says:

    It’s always projection.

  16. gitarcarver says:

    It’s always projection.

    Says the guy who thinks that homoerotocism comments reflect on other people.

  17. Jeffery says:

    Fluffing is not homoeroticism. You may be a woman for all I know (although I’ve never met a woman as full of scheise as you, so you may be a “man”, of some sort). Perhaps you’re transgender. You’re clearly filled with passive-aggressive rage and a very poor sense of honor.

    I favor granting homosexual men and women full rights, meaning legal marriage. Do you?

  18. gitarcarver says:

    Fluffing is not homoeroticism.

    In the context of the conversation, it is and you know it is.

    So why do you make homosexuals and their acts a slur?

    Why do you hate women? And why do you hate homosexuals?

Pirate's Cove