Apparently, Forcing Women To Not Bare Their Breasts In Public Is Like Sharia

I’ll replace this later with proper Twitter embed code, which I can’t get on Droid, but, suffice to say, this is silly. It’s also mostly a waste of time the General Assembly is engaged in, too, but, I don’t think they’re engaged in requiring women to wear full body covering clothes. And public nudity is illegal in lots and lots of places around the country, including California, NY, NJ, amd other liberal meccas, except for certain specific areas. Which are usually privately owned and out of public viewing.

Oh, and there is no such thing a “Republicans for Obama”. If you support the majority of his agenda and voted for him you longer represent anything the GOP stands for.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

2 Responses to “Apparently, Forcing Women To Not Bare Their Breasts In Public Is Like Sharia”

  1. john says:

    Republicans want to ban boobs. They are the anti sex party. And actually sharia law does not mandate full covering, only modest. Less than 5% of muslim women are fully covered, and then mostly in the countries of our “friends” like Saudi Arabia Afghanistan and Yemen and Somalia. And Teach in this country you get to decide for yourself what political party to join, no one else.

  2. So you’re comfortable with women walking around with their breasts exposed in front of children?

    And why am I not surprised that you are defending Islamists?

Bad Behavior has blocked 8380 access attempts in the last 7 days.