According to the lunatics at Think Progress (via Tom Nelson)
My vision of Jesus and the life he would lead today is quite the opposite of today’s masters of the universe. In fact, Jesus would probably champion low carbon living. Clearly this is not the focus of fundamental Christians today perhaps because it would require such an inconvenient lifestyle. Today’s fundamentalist Christians seem more focused on belief and faith rather than acting to follow in Christ’s footsteps.
This is all in context of
How might appeal to “virtue-based†ethics spur people to action to reduce their carbon footprint?  To attempt an answer this, let’s step back for a moment. When we make appeals to people to change their behavior or lifestyle to forestall global warming, we usually ask two things: change our buying or investment patterns and/or change our daily actions. For example, do we buy a 48†plasma television, or perhaps a more energy efficient option; do we invest in energy efficiency upgrades for our home or live with higher heating bills; do we take public transit to work or drive?
What Warmist Max Wei is positioning is that his fellow Warmists should live the low CO2 lifestyle. Too bad few will. But, hey, Jesus!
I would guess that “(his) vision of Jesus” would be quite at odds with Jesus as he is portrayed in the Bible. What would the liberals at Think Progress think about Jesus’ statement that divorce was tantamount to adultery, or that even looking at a woman with lust was a sin? Jesus stated that he was not on earth to destroy the law or the prophets, the law stating that homosexual activity was forbidden; what would they have thought of that?
[…] at Pirate’s Cove is blogging about Jesus as a Warmist. LOL! Go read […]
I envision Jesus being a laser shooting armoured Martian coming down to Earth on a hover tank to obliterate the evil human sinners. The lasers, would actually come out of his up-modified fingers.
And since none of you peon sinful worthless humans don’t believe as I do, then you all must be wrong, sinful, and … not earth friendly.
Well Dana I also see that seemed to apply only to married women since at that time wives were considered property
Well Dana I also see that seemed to apply only to married women since at that time wives were considered property and. Jewish law did allow divorce