Stop the ACLU wackjobs!

By William Teach June 30, 2005 – 8:14 am

They Just Don’t Get It.

That’s right, the ACLU just doesn’t get it. In scanning the ACLU’s news page, they illustrate that Karl Rove’s words were dead on.

"Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 in the attacks and prepared for war; liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers," Mr. Rove said at the annual dinner of the New York State Conservative Party.

The ACLU fits that liberal label to a T. They have their knickers all in a twist over the plan to place parts of the FBI under the control of Director of National Intelligence.

The following can be attributed to Timothy H. Edgar, ACLU Policy Counsel for National Security: "Spies and cops have different roles and operate under different rules for a very important reason: to ensure that our law enforcement agencies stay within the Constitution. This proposal could erode the FBI’s law enforcement ethic and put parts of the FBI under the effective control of a spymaster who reports to the president – not the attorney general."

Perhaps they have forgotten one of the causes that led to 9/11, namely a lack of sharing between the FBI and the CIA. Putting the international pieces together with the national pieces. In no way does this errode the Constitution, nor does it turn FBI agents into spies. It gives them another route to get their information out and in the stream of Intelligence gathering, so as to potentially avoid another terrorist attack. The ACLU would prefer to live in a 9/10 world, rather then facing the facts that our world changed the following day, and that we need to change with it.

STOP THE ACLU!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Read: Stop the ACLU wackjobs! »

Posted in Bad ACLU | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Damn, I hate to do this

By William Teach June 29, 2005 – 4:37 pm

But, to be fair, I have to give Kosbat the credit for finding this source, called Newseum, which allows people to scan the front pages of over 435 papers from 45 countries. Pretty cool, plus lots more stuff on their home page.

Hey, if I am going to take shots at him, gotta be fair when he done good.

OK, back to the burying treasure. What? Yeah, I’m playing golf today, what’s your point?

Read: Damn, I hate to do this »

Posted in Web/Tech | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

WTW: Move On.org

By Jebediah Murphy June 29, 2005 – 9:06 am

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Ya know, in all my time, I have never visited that there Moveon.org website. ‘Specially since I thought that Soro’s feller was going to join a monastary if Bush won. Another lying liberal.

Image hosting by Photobucket But, ya know, if Move On is the guiding force behind the moonbattery (“Now it’s our party: we bought it, we own it, and we’re going to take it back.”), then we know where they really stand. If you have to write a book to tell your disciples how to Love America (I assume it is about America. Could be about France, for all we know), then you have lost. America isn’t brocolli: you don’t learn to love it. Either you do, or you don’t. Reading a book Is just an excuse to pretend. I give it one finger up

Image hosting by Photobucket

Read: WTW: Move On.org »

Posted in Beyond Moonbat, White Trash Wednesday | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

The Prez’s Speech

By Jebediah Murphy June 29, 2005 – 8:46 am

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Hey, y’all, Jebediah here. Now, that Bush feller sure ain’t white trash, but, I figger’d I needed to yap about his speech last night. I understand them leftazoids played some game where yu drink every time Pres Bush messed up a word. How sad. ‘Course, what it comes down to is that GWB is still the Prez, and Kerry ain’t. How about them apples?

But, I digress. There were some great lines from the speech, but I would like to highlight this section:

Read More »

Read: The Prez’s Speech »

Posted in Politics, White Trash Wednesday | Comments Off on The Prez’s Speech | Trackback URL

Rumor are Serious?

By William Teach June 28, 2005 – 8:18 pm

Serious allegations and proof of widespread fraud, money laundering, sexual abuse (including of children), drugs, obstruction of justice, kickbacks and payoffs, etc, are apparently not good enough for the UN. But, HEY!, some rumors are "sufficiently serious to merit an official inquiry." (via the Drudge Report)

The UN has learned of "very, very serious" allegations that the United States is secretly detaining terrorism suspects in various locations around the world, notably aboard prison ships, the UN’s special rapporteur on terrorism said.

While the accusations were rumours, rapporteur Manfred Nowak said the situation was sufficiently serious to merit an official inquiry.

"There are very, very serious accusations that the United States is maintaining secret camps, notably on ships," the Austrian UN official told AFP, adding that the vessels were believed to be in the Indian Ocean region.

"They are only rumours, but they appear sufficiently well-based to merit an official inquiry," he added.

Apparently, that is all that it takes to condemn the United States, especially with GWB and the GOP in charge. I’m wondering, does the UN, and the Left, actually have real proof of anything? All I ever see is innuendo, rumors, and faulty logic.

Read: Rumor are Serious? »

Posted in UN, War On Terrorism | 5 Comments | Trackback URL

Quran Desecration?

By William Teach June 28, 2005 – 2:06 pm

Will the DU’ers and other lefty kool aide drinkers even make it through the first sentence?

MOSCOW – A Muslim cleric formerly held at Guantanamo Bay prison said Tuesday that U.S. guards there regularly desecrated the Quran by putting it into a toilet, although he added he never witnessed it himself.

Hmmm. Where’s the story then? More innuendo against GWB, you say? Damn, I forgot about that angle.

"A Palestinian named Mahir, who was in a neighboring cell, had seen it and told me about that," Vakhitov told the AP. "Many other people in Guantanamo also told me about that."

Nope, nothing there.

Vakhitov said that when he was held by U.S. forces at Kandahar, Afghanistan, he personally saw Qurans desecrated there.

"In Kandahar, they tore up copies of the Quran and even put it in a bucket of feces," he said.

OK, he says he saw it there. Why’d it take so long for him to say anything? Maybe he and other Muslims shouldn’t desecrate our Flag and the Bible. Respect works both ways, Airat.

Read: Quran Desecration? »

Posted in Religious Desecration? | Comments Off on Quran Desecration? | Trackback URL

Inside the Mind of a Terrorist(?)

By William Teach June 28, 2005 – 7:31 am

Time Magazine does something newsworthy for a change, and gives us an inside look at the mind of an Iraqi terrorist:

One day soon, this somber young man plans to offer up a final prayer and then blow himself up along with as many U.S. or Iraqi soldiers as he can reach. Marwan Abu Ubeida says he has been training for months to carry out a suicide mission. He doesn’t know when or where he will be ordered to climb into a bomb-laden vehicle or strap on an explosives-filled vest but says he is eager for the moment to come. While he waits, he spends much of his time rehearsing that last prayer. "First I will ask Allah to bless my mission with a high rate of casualties among the Americans," he says, speaking softly in a matter-of-fact monotone, as if dictating a shopping list. "Then I will ask him to purify my soul so I am fit to see him, and I will ask to see my mujahedin brothers who are already with him." He pauses to run the list through his mind again, then resumes: "The most important thing is that he should let me kill many Americans."

Interesting. I have a few questions for Time, though. First, why are they interviewing terrorists? Second, why do they refer to them as insurgents when they are in fact talking about terrorists? And why do they seem to be taking the terrorists side, using what seem to be Democratic talking points?

As to the first, we sort of get an answer:

The interview was the result of weeks of reporting on such insurgents in the hope of learning more about the identities and motivations of those behind the scourge of terrorism in Iraq. A jihadist group passed word that it would send one of its recruits to meet with us. Marwan was unaccompanied; we were not provided with any information about where he lives, works or trains. And out of concern for the safety of TIME’s staff, no attempt was made to track his whereabouts after he left.

So Time spent weeks searching to talk to terrorists. The enemy. Might they perhaps have looked for US and Coalition troops to talk to? Or do they care more for the terrorists providing them with propaganda?

As for the other questions, Time is just another tool of the Left wing media, who seem to want to see the US fail in Iraq.

Read: Inside the Mind of a Terrorist(?) »

Posted in War On Terrorism, Wonky Media | Comments Off on Inside the Mind of a Terrorist(?) | Trackback URL

Too lit to write

By William Teach June 27, 2005 – 9:16 pm

So, how about a bonus Pinup?

Image hosting by Photobucket Click for larger view.

Read: Too lit to write »

Posted in Pirates Cove | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Rumsfeld says no

By William Teach June 27, 2005 – 8:12 am

In regards to Congressional smearings on the Gauntanamo detention center, Donald Rumsfeld used a word that the Democrats should understand: No. It is the Dems favorite word.

A new independent investigation of abuse allegations at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, "doesn’t make sense," Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Sunday.

"I think that to go back into all of the things that’s already been reviewed by everybody else doesn’t make sense," Rumsfeld said on NBC’s "Meet the Press" on NBC.

"But that’s not a decision for me. That’s a decision for the president," he said.

Of course, that’s not good enough for Nancy Pelosi (what is?)

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has said an independent commission could explore the atmosphere that permitted abuses, how troops were trained, and the length of detentions.

So a commission to smear our troops, eh Nancy? Didn’t you learn anything in your trip to G’itmo? What’s that you say, you have never been to G’itmo? I’m shocked. shocked, I tell you. Sounds like she wants to give the terrorists in G’itmo a spank on the bottom and send them out to rejoin their buddies in their business of killing Americans.

Speaking of NO, have you seen the GOP’s video of this? It’s a hoot.

Read: Rumsfeld says no »

Posted in War On Terrorism | Comments Off on Rumsfeld says no | Trackback URL

Moonbat Alert!

By William Teach June 26, 2005 – 8:39 pm

Ted Rall must feel bad, the pajamasphere, even the left of the left side, has been ignoring him for quite some time. I think Club G’itmo and similar stuff has struck a nerve with this moonbat, who also proves he hates the military. Poor moonbat.

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Read: Moonbat Alert! »

Posted in Beyond Moonbat | 1 Comment | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove