…is a horrible resource sucking dog, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on an interesting SOTU fact.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a horrible resource sucking dog, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on an interesting SOTU fact.
Read: If All You See… »
Thank goodness Happy singer Pharrell Williams decided to stay home and make his presentation via the Internet…oh, wait
Pharrell Williams wants everyone to pay attention to climate change
Global warming, with its slow pace of destruction, arcane scientific explanations, and complex policymaking, isn’t the sexiest subject for pop culture to take on. Pharrell Williams, who brought us the catchiest, and possibly most overplayed song of this generation—Happy—wants to change that.
Speaking from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Williams, along with former vice-president-turned-environmental-activist Al Gore, unveiled plans to stage Live Earth, a huge, global event to raise awareness about the devastating effects of climate change. The concert, which the duo hope will be the biggest of its kind in history, will be held on six continents on June 18 and feature 100 artists. They say it will reach an audience of 2 billion via 193 broadcasters.
I wonder if he flew commercial, or was one of those who took a fossil fueled private jet?
As for Gore’s Live Earth, remember when he last tried that, and was blasted, even by some performers, for the hypocrisy of the massive energy sucking performances, which also required vast amounts of fossil fuels to get the performers to the concerts, as well as the attendees? Of course, and as usual, Warmists say we should ignore the hypocrisy and focus on the message. And what is the message? That Everyone Else should should cut down on their fossil fuels usage, their energy usage, and their carbon footprint. Weird, eh?
I know the theme of hypocrisy can get tedious, as is mentioning yet again that the Warmists are still pushing “spreading awareness” after over 25 years, but, these are important issues that can not be stressed enough to understand the idiocy of the “climate change” movement.
Read: Phew: Pharrell Williams Is Super Concerned Over Hotcoldwetdry, Happy About Gore’s Planned Concerts »
Nor should they
(NY Times) Justice Department lawyers will recommend that no civil rights charges be brought against the police officer who fatally shot an unarmed teenager in Ferguson, Mo., after an F.B.I. investigation found no evidence to support charges, law enforcement officials said Wednesday.
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. and his civil rights chief, Vanita Gupta, will have the final say on whether the Justice Department will close the case against the officer, Darren Wilson. But it would be unusual for them to overrule the prosecutors on the case, who are still working on a legal memo explaining their recommendation.
I love the way the Associate Press puts this
(WRAL) Wilson, who shot Brown after a scuffle in the middle of a street, told the St. Louis County grand jury that spent months reviewing the case that he feared for his life during the confrontation and that Brown struck him in the face and reached for his gun. Some witnesses have said Brown had his hands up when Wilson shot him.
A “scuffle”? There was no scuffle. It’s a strange way to term what they go on to write, namely that Michael Brown was a violent criminal, who had just strong arm stolen cigars, attacked a police officer in his car, attempted to take his service weapon, ran away when the weapon was discharged, then turned around, taunted the officer, failed to follow the officer’s directions, then charged him, and was shot dead.
Anyhow, back to the NY Times
But a broader Justice Department civil rights investigation into allegations of discriminatory traffic stops and excessive force by the Ferguson Police Department remains open. That investigation could lead to significant changes at the department, which is overwhelmingly white despite serving a city that is mostly black.
It’s strange that an area that is full of Democrat voters who vote almost solely for Democrats (St. Louis city went almost 83% for Obama in 2012 and voted for Democrat Lacy Clay 73% in 2014) has so many violence and civil rights issues, eh? Of course, this is forgotten by Liberal nuts, such as ultra white Melissa McEwan at Shakesville
Black lives matter. Black lives have to matter to people in positions of power, to people empowered with making decisions about which lives matter under the law.
Of course, there are pesky laws about not stealing, don’t walk in the middle of the street, do not attack police officers in their cars and try and take their weapons, follow commands, and don’t charge them.
The commenters at Daily Kos are going full force barking moonbat. Yet, interestingly, few, if any, of them would willingly live in a place like Ferguson, a rathole of liberal creation. An will all be Very Upset if they are the victim of a crime and a police officer doesn’t appear within seconds of calling.
Read: Justice Dept. Expected To File No Charges Against Police Officer Darren Wilson »
The U.S. Senate voted on three “climate change” amendments to the Keystone XL legislation Wednesday, two of them going down in defeat. But, what of the third?
(Politico) Senate Republicans head-faked Democrats on climate change Wednesday, agreeing in a floor vote that the planet’s climate was changing, but blocking language that would have blamed human activity.
In a complicated maneuver that was the first politically perilous test for Senate Republicans, the new majority party split up the votes that Democrats had hoped would force the GOP into an awkward roll call on whether they believed in the science behind climate change — just hours after President Barack Obama slammed Republicans in his State of the Union address for dodging the issue.
But Republicans made an eleventh-hour change in strategy on two Democratic attempts to divide them — with Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe, their most vocal denier of humans’ effect on the climate, joining a leading liberal in a symbolic vote on whether global warming is “real and not a hoax.â€
“There is archeological evidence of that, there’s Biblical evidence of†the climate changing, Inhofe, the chairman of the Environment and Public Works panel, said on the floor before signing onto a proposal from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) that stopped short of linking climate change to human activities, such as burning of fuels like coal and oil.
I was wondering if that was the reason that S.Amend. 29 to S. 1, the Keystone XL bill, passed 98-1.
I am proud to have stood with @SenWhitehouse as a co-sponsor of amendment #29 to S.1 on the Keystone XL pipeline.
— Sen. Jim Inhofe (@JimInhofe) January 21, 2015
Climate change is real, and it is not a hoax. How arrogant is it for people to say that man can do something about changing the climate?
— Sen. Jim Inhofe (@JimInhofe) January 21, 2015
The Washington Post was less than amused, calling this “a nifty, if insincere, bit of politics.” They didn’t like Democrats getting mugged on the subject after Democrats tried to force the issue, because they think fossil fuels are Bad.
And then all the Senate Democrats jumped in their fossil fueled vehicles to head home after the session.
Greens responded to the stunning turn by challenging Republicans to follow up on their members’ new-found climate conversion with a substantive plan to act on cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
“But what’s their plan to do something about it?†the Natural Resources Defense Council’s associate government affairs director, Franz Matzner, said in a statement. “Republican leaders still are trying to block any and all solutions, and putting our children’s health at risk.â€
Plan? We don’t need no stinkin’ plan. Not to deal with a issue that is primarily caused by natural forces. But, hey, since quite a bit of the perceived warming is due to the Urban Heat Island Effect, I say we tear down all the big cities, which are pretty much Democrat strongholds, and turn them into nature reserves, in which Democrats will be allowed to live and roam free, since Dems seem to want to turn back the clock thousands of years.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Read: Republicans Turn “Climate Change” Votes Around On Democrats »
Two separate Democrat “climate change” amendments will get a vote, most likely some time today, as the Keystone XL pipeline legislation is debated and voted on in the Senate
(Science Magazine)  The U.S. Senate’s simmering debate over climate science has come to a full boil today, with lawmakers trading feisty remarks as they prepare to vote on at least two measures offered by Democrats that affirm that climate change is real—with one also noting that global warming is not “a hoax.†A Republican Senator, meanwhile, is offering another climate amendment that doesn’t address whether global warming is real, but encourages the development of clean energy.
In an effort to highlight their differences with some Republicans on climate policy, several Democrats have filed largely symbolic amendments to a bill that would approve the Keystone XL pipeline. They are designed to put senators on the record on whether climate change is real and human-caused. The backers are now pushing for votes on those measures as soon as today. (snip)
The Senate is likely to take up at least two Democratic amendments. The first, Schatz’s amendment, cites scientific bodies like the National Research Council and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in asking whether it’s the “sense of Congress†that “climate change is real†and that “human activity significantly contributes to climate change.â€
The second amendment, from Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D–RI), asks simply whether it is “the sense of the Senate that climate change is real and not a hoax.” It takes a veiled jab at Senator James Inhofe (R–OK), who has called climate change a hoax.
Neither has any chance of passing. Here’s how The New Republic puts it in their headline
Democrats Are Trolling Republicans So Hard on Climate Change
The Urban Dictionary defines trolling as
Being a prick on the internet because you can. Typically unleashing one or more cynical or sarcastic remarks on an innocent by-stander, because it’s the internet and, hey, you can.
And
The art of deliberately, cleverly, and secretly pissing people off, usually via the internet, using dialogue. Trolling does not mean just making rude remarks: Shouting swear words at someone doesn’t count as trolling; it’s just flaming, and isn’t funny. Spam isn’t trolling either; it pisses people off, but it’s lame.
The Democratic Party in a nutshell: a bunch of trolls.
Read: Democrat Governance In A Nutshell: Trolling GOP On “Climate Change” »
…is coffee that is going to have to be grown on the tops of mountains because of a 2C temperature increase, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is White House Dossier, with an interesting catch from an Obama speech today (yes, satire).
And a double shot below the fold, an evil hairdryer! No face, so I decided not to use it as a primary. And welcome back, Sister Toldjah!

Read: If All You See… »
Via Twitchy
1700 private jets expected to Davos in Switzerland to discuss climate change at World Economic Forum pic.twitter.com/RUbMDYYksT
— Flightradar24 (@flightradar24) January 20, 2015
One of the main points of complaint regarding climate change will, of course, be fossil fuels, as it has been for over a decade. The complaints from Warmists regarding fossil fuels have been growing by leaps and bounds. Strange how Warmists continuously refuse to give up the use of fossil fuels themselves, and, in fact, are the worst offenders.
Heck, even the UK Guardian, a fantastic example of hyper-far left progressivism, noticed, and highlight the hypocrisy in a typical dry, British manner
How many private jets? An estimated 60% of the heads of state and industry invited will be taking about 1,700 private flights in and out of Zurich and other airports to attend.
To attend discussions about climate change, overconsumption, man-made pollution, unsustainable living, that sort of thing? Yes. What’s your point? (snip)
Do you not think that’s a little hypocritical? In what way?
Are you being deliberately obtuse? You don’t get to Davos by taking notice of little people’s complaints.
Those last two lines have to be take together for full impact.
Of course, most Warmists will immediately find exotic excuses to protect the climahypocrites, and will certainly yammer about everyone getting together to move beyond a fossil fueled world.
Read: We’re Saved: Warmists To Take Lots Of Fossil Fueled Flights To Davos To Complain About Fossil Fuels »
There’s nothing better than bringing back ideas that failed before even when Democrats controlled the Senate, and never seemed to get a vote in the Democrat controlled Senate about stopping corporate tax inversions, just a failed vote on slapping on extra taxes
(The Hill) Congressional Democrats said Tuesday they would seek any and all avenues to curb offshore tax deals, kicking off a new effort to punish what they call “corporate deserters.â€
Senior Democrats on both sides of the Capitol brought back legislation to make it more difficult for corporations to merge with a foreign competitor and shift their legal address abroad.
“We believe we need fairness in the tax code,†Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said at a news conference announcing the legislation.
Democrats introduced the legislation last year as well, at the same time President Obama and other senior officials in the party questioned the patriotism of companies like Pfizer Inc. and Walgreen Co. that looked into so-called corporate inversions.
Said legislation languished in the House, obviously, and in the Senate, as well. Democrats have reintroduced that legislation in both (S.198 and H.R.415, searchable at Thomas). They also want to increase taxes on offshore corporations (S.162). Shocking, eh?
This push is going absolutely nowhere, and is just another typical populist anti-business stunt by Democrats, who would rather highlight their hatred of business and big government dominance rather than create an atmosphere where businesses have positive incentives to stay in America, like lowering the corporate tax rate, as well as simplifying it. Heck, even Obama wants to lower the corporate tax rate. Though, really, lowering it to 28% would still not make it competitive with other 1st world nations. Of course, the constant litany of rules and regulations emanating from the Executive Office are a negative incentive for domestic companies, as well.
Read: Democrats Big New Push: Punish “Corporate Deserters” »
In a word, “no”
Why it’s good to laugh at climate change
Did you hear the one about the climate policy analyst? Or the polar bear who walked into a bar?
Climate change is not generally considered a source of amusement: in terms of comedic material, the forecast is an ongoing cultural drought. But perhaps campaigners have missed a trick in overlooking the powerful role that satire and subversion can play in social change. Could humour cut through the malaise that has smothered the public discourse, activating our cultural antennae in a way that graphs, infographics and images of melting ice could never do?
The problem is, when it comes to any politics and stuff, Lefties are not humorous. Or, in British, humourous. Their default mode is to sneer, condescend, insult, and abuse.
But while online ridicule directed towards climate ‘deniers’ (generally portrayed as either too stupid to understand the science, or as conspiracy theorists) may appeal to the usual crowd, its hard to see how this kind of approach will breach the political divide. After all, the feeling of being laughed at by a sneering, left-leaning elite is not appealing. One notorious attempt by the 10:10 campaign and director Richard Curtis at ‘humorously’ marginalising opposition towards environmentalism backfired completely. It turns out that most people don’t find graphic depictions of children’s heads exploding all that hilarious after all…
The hell you say! It says quite a bit about Warmists, a subsection of the Progressive movement, would think that the video had any humor, er, humour, in it at all. They thought so much of their “humor/humour” that they immediately worked to make sure copies of the video uploaded to Youtube and other outlets were wacked. Fortunately, there are still some out there
That’s what Warmists think is “humour”. These are people who think stabbing a “denier” with an icicle is funny.
Many “reasonable” Warmists have highly recommended that Warmists take a chill on the insanity, and are always ignored.