If All You See…

…is a river flooding from too much carbon pollution Bad Weather, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Don Surber, with a post on Trump fighting crime, beating Democrats.

Read: If All You See… »

Good Grief: UK Foreign Minister Could Be Fined For Fishing With JD Vance

I love the CNN headline for this

Britain’s foreign minister went fishing with JD Vance. Now, he could be fined for it

It sorta kinda implies that it was against the law to go fishing with JD Vance. At least, that’s what so many unhinged Democrats will think, as they see the headline but fail to read the article, because, really, they are that unhinged

Last week, British foreign minister David Lammy went fishing with US Vice President JD Vance at his retreat in the English countryside. Now, he could be fined for doing so.

Lammy on Wednesday referred himself to the UK’s environment watchdog for fishing without a rod license – an offense in Britain that could land him with a fine of £2,500 ($3,400).

$3,400? Really? I can’t find any US state that gets close to that. I mean, it’s fishing. On public lakes and rivers. Oh, wait, it gets better

“The foreign secretary has written to the Environment Agency over an administrative oversight that meant the appropriate licenses had not been acquired for fishing on a private lake as part of a diplomatic engagement at Chevening House last week,” a Foreign Office spokesperson said.

“As soon as the foreign secretary was made aware of the administrative error, he successfully purchased the relevant rod fishing licenses,” the spokesperson added.

“He also wrote to the Environment Agency notifying them of the error, demonstrating how it would be rectified, and thanking them for their work protecting Britain’s fisheries.”

He’s getting fined for fishing on a private lake. Private. Not owned by the UK government. I could understand if the lake owner was upset, but, Vance apparently had permission, but, why is this the business of the UK government?

Oh, right, they’re government is nuts.

Read: Good Grief: UK Foreign Minister Could Be Fined For Fishing With JD Vance »

Climate Cult Sues To Stop The EPA From Listening To People Who Are Climate Cultists

We’ve gone from “we need a debate” to “shut these people up”

The Consensus Strikes Back: Climate Empire Launches Legal Assault on EPA

Yesterday, the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) stormed into federal court, clutching their pearls and a 40-page complaint, to demand that the EPA and Department of Energy be stopped from—brace yourself—listening to people who don’t think “climate change” is the meteorological equivalent of Armageddon.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, reads like a mashup of Chicken Little’s autobiography and a high-school debate club’s “Appeal to Consensus” handbook. According to the plaintiffs, the great crime here is that Secretary of Energy Christopher Wright dared to assemble five well-known climate skeptics—John Christy, Judith Curry, Steven Koonin, Ross McKitrick, and Roy Spencer—to review the evidence and produce a report questioning the EPA’s 2009 “Endangerment Finding”. That’s the sacred ruling declaring greenhouse gases an official public health menace, without which the climate policy priesthood fears their altar might crumble.

The complaint is a parade of consensus incantations—“overwhelming scientific consensus,” “ocean of evidence,” “confirmed time and again”—interrupted only by ad hominem swipes at the Working Group’s résumés and reading lists. Curry, they note with horror, has criticized the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for “corruption.” Koonin once worked for BP. Spencer testified on behalf of a coal company. In other words, these people are contaminated by thoughtcrime.

EDF and UCS accuse Wright’s Climate Working Group of operating in secret, holding no public meetings, stacking the deck entirely with “contrarians,” and failing to genuflect before the holy consensus. They demand the court erase the group’s report, bar EPA from using it to justify repealing the Endangerment Finding, and—naturally—extend public comment periods until the paperwork gods are appeased.

This reminds me of Scientology, where friends and relatives are hit with “disconnection”, and just cut from the lives completely of those in Scientology. But, at least Scientologists are not trying to force their cult on other people.

Read: Climate Cult Sues To Stop The EPA From Listening To People Who Are Climate Cultists »

Chuck Schumer Has Meltdown Over Trump “Takeover” Of DC Law Enforcement

Are Democrats really listening to themselves? Is this the hill to die on?

Schumer: ‘No f???ing way’ Dems will back Trump DC takeover extension

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) declared on Wednesday that Democrats will not go along with a potential request by President Trump to extend federal control of the Washington, D.C., police department and deployment of the National Guard in the District.

Trump can unilaterally control the department for up to 30 days, but any extension beyond that period is up to Congress, meaning it would require the support of Senate Democrats. Schumer made clear in an interview on Wednesday that wouldn’t happen.

“No f???ing way,” Schumer told host Aaron Parnas.

“We’ll fight him tooth and nail. … He needs to get Congress to approve it, and not only are we not going to approve it, but there are some Republicans who don’t like either.”

Let’s say there has been a nice little drop in crime in 3 weeks, will Democrats still be fighting this? Do they understand that 90% of DC residents voted for Kamala, and that if they said “we’re going to back Trump within reason. We want to reduce the crime in the District, it looks bad for our nation’s capitol to have the crime. We want our constituents to be safe walking the streets, in their cars, and in their homes” the Democrat voters wouldn’t give Trump the credit, but, Democrats.

Both Maryland senators on Wednesday also told Semafor that they will not support any further plan to federalize the MPD.

“What Donald Trump is doing is, in some ways, a dress rehearsal for going after others around the country. And I think we need to stop this — certainly by the end of the 30 days,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.). “This should never have started, so I definitely want to make sure it doesn’t continue.”

“We want our streets to be lawless” is a hell of a pitch, eh?

How moonbat do you have to be to throw a sandwich at cops?

Read: Chuck Schumer Has Meltdown Over Trump “Takeover” Of DC Law Enforcement »

Dentist Warns Adults Sucking On Pacifiers Is Really Bad For Their Teeth

Wait, what?

from the article

This trend might come back to bite you.

Dentists are gritting their teeth over a bizarre new fad that has adults popping pacifiers like babies, as the self-soothing practice popular in China begins to take hold in the US.

“There is a reason we don’t drink out of baby bottles or suck on pacifiers as adults,” Dr. Ben Winters, an orthodontist and creator of Something Nice oral care brand, told The Post. “It wreaks havoc on swallow and bite patterns.”

But what’s got grown-ups going ga-ga over beefed-up binkies anyway?

The silicone soothers are being pitched as sleep aids and stress relievers — and they’re flying off the shelves.

Some online sellers reportedly move thousands of adult pacifiers every month, with prices ranging from a bargain 10 yuan ($1.40) to a jaw-dropping 500 yuan ($70), according to the South China Morning Post.

The youts really aren’t alright

“When I am under pressure at work, I suck on the dummy. I feel I am indulged in a sense of safety from childhood,” one user told the outlet.

Others swear the pacifiers have helped ease ADHD symptoms, support weight loss and even curb the urge to smoke.

“It gives me psychological comfort and makes me not so fidgety during my smoke cessation periods,” another buyer told the SCMP.

And while it’s super popular in China and South Korea, it is gaining steam in the U.S., because of course it is with TikTok idiotness. Forget the teeth and swallowing problems: these are adults, or, at least supposed to be.

Read: Dentist Warns Adults Sucking On Pacifiers Is Really Bad For Their Teeth »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful low carbon bike, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Bunkerville, with a post on the Muslim Marxist running for mayor in Minneapolis.

Read: If All You See… »

Democrats Still Whining About Blocked ICE Facility Visits

These wackos spend more time attempting to visit detained illegal aliens than (for photo ops) than talking to their own constituents, as well as visiting disaster areas

Democrats say Trump is illegally blocking them from visiting Ice detention: ‘The goal is to bully us’

In May, the Arizona representative Yassamin Ansari toured a detention facility where immigrants rounded up as part of the Trump administration’s campaign of mass deportation were being housed. She described what she saw inside as “sickening” and “worse than prison” – immigrant detainees were held in overcrowded, moldy cells and many reported that they did not have reliable access to food, water or medical care.

Two months later, Ansari returned to the remote desert complex to conduct another congressional oversight visit. This time, she was denied entry.

It wasn’t an isolated incident. From New York to California, Democratic members of Congress have been repeatedly blocked from entering Ice detention facilities where thousands of noncitizens – many with no criminal convictions – are being held.

Democratic officials’ legislative checks – a legal right for members of Congress – have consistently confirmed reports that immigrant detainees are being kept in “filthy” and “inhumane” conditions with little regard for due process. Now, the facilities have become a battleground in the intensifying standoff between the Trump administration and Democratic lawmakers over the president’s supercharged immigration agenda.

“The administration’s goal is to intimidate us and bully us, bully us out of doing our jobs for sure,” Representative LaMonica McIver, a New Jersey Democrat who has been accused of assaulting federal agents during a confrontation at the Delaney Hall detention center, told the Guardian. “If they can get away with doing this to me, they can get away with doing it to anyone. But more importantly, imagine what they’re doing in the dark to others who are not of an elected status, who are not in public eye view.”

ICE has a message back

(Denver7) ICE on Tuesday pushed back on those claims in a statement to Denver7 political reporter Brandon Richard.

“To be honest, we could have written the congressional delegation’s press statements well in advance of the tour, given this tired tactic from the open borders Democrats – tour a facility, make up lies about it after,” ICE Assistant Director of Public Affairs Emily Covington said. “Accusations that ICE is denying access or hiding conditions at our detention centers [are] completely absurd, and we have the receipts to prove it.”

“Further, these members should know that demanding special treatment that breaks long-standing policies, and jeopardizes privacy, security and safety will not be considered.”

ICE’s statement claimed the lawmakers were 10 minutes late for the tour, and that they protested the facility’s cell phone policy the lawmakers were made aware of six days prior. The agency shared with Denver7 a screengrab of what appears to be an email dated Aug. 5 that outlines the rules of the tour, including the cell phone policy.

First, there’s a whole process to visit ICE facilities, and Democrats have been often blowing that off, and just showing up, rather than going through channels to set up the visit, which is what was always done and the rules to visit a detention facility (which they didn’t bother with during Biden’s term). Then they try and play games, like mentioned above, and like the time which ended with Excitable Monica getting charged with “assaulting, resisting, impeding and interfering” with federal officers.

Read: Democrats Still Whining About Blocked ICE Facility Visits »

What Could Go Wrong: Warmists Try Experiment To Change The Oceans

The road to Hell is paved with Warmist intentions

Can we alter the ocean to counter climate change faster? This experiment aims to find out

Later this summer, a fluorescent reddish-pink spiral will bloom across the Wilkinson Basin in the Gulf of Maine, about 40 miles northeast of Cape Cod. Scientists from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution will release the nontoxic water tracer dye behind their research vessel, where it will unfurl into a half-mile wide temporary plume, bright enough to catch the attention of passing boats and even satellites.

As it spreads, the researchers will track its movement to monitor a tightly controlled, federally approved experiment testing whether the ocean can be engineered to absorb more carbon, and in turn, help combat the climate crisis.

As the world struggles to stay below the 1.5-degree Celsius global warming threshold—a goal set out in the Paris Agreement to avoid the most severe impacts of climate change—experts agree that reducing greenhouse gas emissions won’t be enough to avoid overshooting this target. The latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, published in 2023, emphasizes the urgent need to actively remove carbon from the atmosphere, too.

“If we really want to have a shot at mitigating the worst effects of climate change, carbon removal needs to start scaling to the point where it can supplement large-scale emissions reductions,” said Adam Subhas, an associate scientist in marine chemistry and geochemistry at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, who will oversee the week-long experiment.

Well, if every Warmist gave up their own use of fossil fuels we’d be in Shangrila, right? Per their dogma

The test is part of the LOC-NESS project—short for Locking away Ocean Carbon in the Northeast Shelf and Slope—which Subhas has been leading since 2023. The ongoing research initiative is evaluating the effectiveness and environmental impact of a marine carbon dioxide removal approach called ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE).

This method of marine carbon dioxide removal involves adding alkaline substances to the ocean to boost its natural ability to neutralize acids produced by greenhouse gases. It’s promising, Subhas said, because it has the potential to lock away carbon permanently.

See, once they start talking about carbon instead of Carbon Dioxide, they’re into cult land, not science. And this is another bad idea, which will hopefully be shut down.

Read: What Could Go Wrong: Warmists Try Experiment To Change The Oceans »

Will Democrats Fall Into The Crime Trap?

Most of the highest crime cities are run by Democrats. Boston, NYC, Chicago, Baltimore, SF, LA, Seattle, Portland (it wasn’t that long ago that Seattle and Portland were pretty decent. Pre-COVID they were around a 28, meaning safer than 28% of cities, at worst. Now it’s a 1 for both). They’re horrible policies led to the crime explosion. In some cases they’ve tried to get a bit tougher, like, say, San Francisco, but, it’s a little late, so, crime still flourishes. Until there’s a serious crackdown, nothing changes. So

Trump’s DC move forces Democrats to again grapple with crime

President Trump’s use of federal resources to combat crime in the nation’s capital is forcing Democrats to once again address the issue of law and order, something that has been a vulnerability for them in recent elections.

Democrats were quick to note — following Trump’s announcement Monday that he would federalize the city’s police force and deploy the National Guard — that violent crime in Washington, D.C., is down.

However, Republicans see the message as a winning one as signs suggest voters are concerned about crime regardless, leading some Democrats to warn their party against falling into the same political trap some see as having damaged them in the past.

“My advice to Democrats is don’t take the bait,” said Mike Nellis, a Democratic strategist and former senior adviser to former Vice President Kamala Harris.

Nellis noted that voters could still feel strongly about crime even as statistics show improvement in metropolitan areas like D.C., thereby opening Democrats up to easy attacks from the GOP.

Too late! Democrats are already trying to die on the hill of “yeah, crime is still really high, but, it’s down!”

Polls show Republicans have the upper hand on the crime issue. According to a CNN survey released in June, 40 percent of voters said the GOP’s views on crime are closer to their own, while 27 percent said the same about Democrats.

“It’s obviously a winning an argument for Republicans, especially anytime we’re talking about crime in Democrat-run cities,” the national Republican operative said.

OK, this goes on in political calculations for a bit, but, here’s what Democrats do not get: we would rather not let it be a political issue, we just want to reduce crime to acceptable levels, and punish those who commit crimes. I’m sure most Democrats would like crime reduced, as well. They want to feel safe walking down the streets, in their homes, in their cars. But, if Democrats want to be super soft on criminals, then it becomes a political issue, and the GOP will bludgeon them with it.

Read: Will Democrats Fall Into The Crime Trap? »

Bummer: EPA Ends Contract With Unionized Employees

Good. For the most part these white collar federal employees should not have a union. What are they being protected from? Oh, right, it’s about government negotiating with government to give more taxpayer money to government employees

Trump’s environment agency terminates contract with unionized employees

electric vehicleThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency moved to end its contract with unionized employees, according to the union’s president, the latest action in President Donald Trump’s push to weaken collective bargaining across the federal government.

The union, which represents 8,000 EPA employees, is planning a legal response to the decision, said Justin Chen, president of the agency’s chapter of the American Federation of Government Employees, in a statement on Friday.

The decision gets Trump closer to his goal to strip hundreds of thousands of federal workers of the ability to collectively bargain with U.S. agencies. Eliminating union deals would allow agencies to more easily fire or discipline employees, according to attorneys representing federal workers.

“EPA is working to diligently implement President Trump’s Executive Orders with respect to AFGE, including ‘Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs’, in compliance with the law,” an EPA spokesperson said in a statement, referring to the executive order Trump issued in March.

The order involves removing collective bargaining rights at more than 30 federal agencies, including the EPA, and is currently being challenged in court by unions who say it violates free speech and obligations to bargain with workers.

These are public employees. There is no right to bargain. They work at the mercy of the taxpayers. They should earn raises based on performance. If they do not like this, go work in the private sector.

Read: Bummer: EPA Ends Contract With Unionized Employees »

Pirate's Cove