Today’s “Global Warming Causes Shark Attacks” Winner Is…

Typically, when certain things happen the Cult Of Climastrology jumps in and blames climate change. Now, this morning, I searched the usual suspects, and Twitter, but found nada, in regards to the terrible attacks that occurred at a North Carolina beach Sunday, which followed another attack a few days ago. I should have searched using global warming instead (via Doug Powers @ThePowersThatBe)

Sigh. I wonder if Dr Shelton realizes that Jaws is based on real attacks at the Jersey shore. In 1916. When CO2 was below the “safe level” of 350ppm.

Read: Today’s “Global Warming Causes Shark Attacks” Winner Is… »

Surprise: Young People Are Really Confused Over Consent Signals

Let’s think about this. Over the years, the far left has worked hard to destroy the mores of society. When it comes to sexual relations, they have been pushing notions that it is A-OK for young people (including teens and pre-teens) to be not just sexy, but be sexual. The Leftists and their Feminist subset have pushed for these young folks to not only show themselves being sexy, but to not worry about having sex. They teach this in schools, on the Internet, in movies and on TV, in person. They have no problem with casual, meaningless sex, consistently pushing the boundaries further and further, including for teens, who generally do not have the emotional makeup to deal with that. They say they like kids to be sexual, especially young women. Show it! Flaunt it! Be it! They push women to be hyper-sexual.

Yet, this has all come back to bite them in the posterior, in terms of the supposed culture of rape, especially on college campuses, which tend to be very liberal. Kids pushing the boundaries of sex, as they’ve been taught, and then liberals get upset that they achieved what they wished for

Deeply divided over consent signals

Many embrace “no means no.” They have grown familiar with another three-word standard, “yes means yes.” But America’s college students are deeply divided on how to read the unspoken language of sex.

What if someone undresses? Or gets a condom? Or nods in agreement?

In each of those scenarios, a Washington Post-Kaiser Family Foundation poll found, at least 40 percent of current and recent college students said the action established consent for more sexual activity. And at least 40 percent said it did not.

Conflict and confusion about consent pose enormous challenges for colleges scrambling to prevent sexual assault. Many have discovered they need a new curriculum just to teach incoming students about the do’s and don’ts of intimate communication.

One of the biggest problems: Men sometimes see a green light when women are signaling yellow or red.

I don’t really find Dave Chapelle that funny, but, he makes a good point.

The rest of the article exposes just how muddled the situation has become. No means no, yes means yes, no means maybe, yes means no, etc. Sexual assault is never OK, but, if you teach kids to be sexual creatures, to think that casual sex anytime is A-OK, if you teach kids without the emotional makeup to always want sex, and tell them there is nothing wrong with it, what, exactly, do you think will happen?

Read: Surprise: Young People Are Really Confused Over Consent Signals »

Doom: Climate Change Causing Plants To Choke On Too Much Carbon

The latest (and very convenient) pronouncement from the Cult of Climastrology

Climate Change: Plants Choke on too Much Carbon

It looks like even for plants, there can be too much of a good thing. Tree and flowers use carbon dioxide (C02) to make energy, absorbing the gas to help fuel the process of photosynthesis. For this reason, some experts have theorized that rising carbon levels will eventually promote plant growth. Now new research claims that this assumption is dead wrong.

That’s at least according to a study recently published in the journal Global Change Biology, which details how the plants in a number of very different ecosystems appear to actually suffer from too much carbon in the atmosphere.

Sample crops, grasslands, and forests all seemed to lose some ability to absorb nutrients when exposed to rising CO2 levels in large-scale field experiment held in eight countries across four continents.

“The findings of the study are unequivocal. The nitrogen content in the crops is reduced in atmospheres with raised carbon dioxide levels in all three ecosystem types,” Johan Uddling, a researcher with the University of Gothenburg, said in a statement.

How very convenient. I wonder how plant life deal with CO2 during the previous 450 million years, when the CO2 level was much higher than today?

The study found that both wheat and rice are already suffering from heightening carbon levels – a phenomenon (both man and nature-driven) that has been frequently described as impossible to stop.

The decline of wheat in particular has already been associated with a climbing global temperature, which can be blamed on climbing greenhouse gas levels.

There’s a little bit of a problem: wheat crops have been at record levels year after year after year. There is no decline in wheat, except in the fevered minds of Warmists. Soy also saw a record 2014, with rice and corn stayed flat (meaning that CO2 was not harming their production)

“We are seeing reduced nitrogen content even when growth has not been affected,” he explained. “Moreover, the effect is there in trials with powerful fertilizer, which indicates that it is not down to limited access to nitrogen in the soil. Future studies should look at what is causing the effect, but it appears to be linked to plants’ capacity to absorb nitrogen rather than to changed levels in the soil.”

So, wait, the explanation of doom from too much CO2 is too simple? It could be something else? There could be other factors in play?

The takeaway? Plants are more complicated than even scientists like to believe, and how climate change and its factors will impact them is still very much a mystery asking to be solved.

But, in order to deal with this mystery, we need to pass how pieces of legislation, international agreements, rules, and regulations, limiting personal freedom, giving Government more and more control of our lives, control of private entities, and control of economies.

Read: Doom: Climate Change Causing Plants To Choke On Too Much Carbon »

NY Times Very Upset Over Legal Immigration Program That Replaces Citizen Workers

The Editorial Board actually makes a good point, which then takes an insane Leftist World turn in the last paragraph

Workers Betrayed by Visa Loopholes

It hardly needs saying that immigration policy should not undermine Americans’ jobs, wages or working conditions. The problem is that what some companies want — cheap, exploitable, disposable labor — is exactly what the system can be twisted into giving them.

Former workers at Walt Disney World in Orlando or at Southern California Edison, the power utility, can tell the story. Those two companies recently laid off hundreds of tech employees, who were replaced by temporary workers recruited by outsourcing firms based in India.

These are only two of many troubling episodes involving the H-1B program, which provides up to 85,000 visas a year to foreigners, mainly highly skilled technical workers. The program was created to allow companies to fill gaps in their work force with specialized employees they cannot find in the United States. But the law has loopholes, and companies here and overseas ruthlessly exploit them. A huge industry has risen to meet labor demand in the information-technology sector, with the imported workers being employees of the outsourcing firms.

The Disney story is all the rage, as it should be. It’s beyond disgraceful what they did, and it will be interesting to see if the park’s attendance suffers. The Magic Kingdom saw attendance surge in 2014, while Orlando’s Sea World say their figures decline by 8 percent, which is blamed on the movie “Blackfish”, about the supposed poor treatment of the Orca’s, which Sea World disputes. Might the reports of Disney forcing employees to train their imported replacements cause a similar decline? Not much people can do about Edison.

And, the NY Times is correct about the problems with the H-1B program and the need for reform. They’re further correct regarding the first paragraph, that immigration policy should not undermine American jobs, wages, nor working conditions. That said, the NY Times, including the Editorial Board, has long fought for not only treating illegal aliens, with supposedly 35-40% being people who overstayed visas, with kid gloves, but legalizing them in some manner, both conditions which negatively affect American jobs, wages, and working conditions.

A mass influx of foreigners doing the jobs of the workers they displace is clearly not what the law intended. Congress surely did not want to give companies a more efficient means of slashing payroll costs while pushing more people to the curb. But despite common perceptions about the H-1B law, it does not require companies to recruit American workers before looking overseas.

Yet, we have a mass influx of illegals who create problematic working conditions for legal American citizens.

The program badly needs reforming, which even members of Congress who are otherwise far apart on immigration issues agree on. Senators Durbin and Charles Grassley of Iowa have proposed tightening the rules to require companies to work harder to find people in this country to fill jobs, to post job openings on the Labor Department website and to pay fairer wages. They would also give the government more authority to investigate fraud, and added protections for H-1B workers, who themselves are vulnerable to exploitation because of their dependency on their employers.

Yes, the program should be overhauled. It would be a simple matter to pass these types of rules. But, of course, illegal immigration

Many of these good ideas were contained in a Senate bill to overhaul the immigration system. That bill died, killed by hard-liners in the House who objected to its provisions for unauthorized immigrants.

That was a tragedy, because worker protection has always been a core ideal of comprehensive immigration reform, which would include allowing 11 million unauthorized immigrants to seek legal status and work without fear. With no immediate possibility of such an immigration overhaul, opportunistic tech companies are pursuing their own narrow agenda, pushing for vast increases in H-1B visas. That might help their recruiting problems, but leave much of the system as dysfunctional as ever. Better to fix immigration with the right goals in mind: a fair deal for all workers and their families.

So, on one hand, the Times’s EB wants a program that brings in people legally (though despicably) to be fixed. On the other, they want mostly low skilled, often illiterate, often unable to speak English, often low or un-educated, to be legalized, who can then be used to replace legal citizen jobs.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: NY Times Very Upset Over Legal Immigration Program That Replaces Citizen Workers »

Slate Knows The Best Way To Force Industry To Care About Hotcoldwetdry

The perfect headline when discussing “climate change”, from hyper-Warmist Eric Holthaus

New Report Finds the Best Way to Make Industry Care About Climate Change: Money

Force industry to care.

A new report out earlier this month by the global consulting firm Mercer is perhaps the most striking argument yet for fossil fuel divestment, written in the cold, calculated prose of international finance. Its very blunt conclusion: “Climate risk is inevitable. Some impacts on investment returns are inevitable.”

The report looks out to 2050, but its focus on the next 18 months to 10 years—and its emphasis on the unique risks to the fossil fuel industry—makes it especially relevant in the near-term. Specifically, the report advocates for “portfolio decarbonization”—aka divestment—and argues that by reducing your investment exposure to sensitive sectors of the economy (the report identifies utilities, real estate, timber, agriculture, but calls the fossil fuel industry the most risky) you can avoid holding “stranded assets” should world governments put caps on carbon emissions or extreme weather produce escalating damage.

In short, by ridding your portfolio of climate sensitive or fossil fuel intensive companies, you can make the world a better place, and make money at the same time. Climate deniers with fat bank accounts, consider this your chance to change your tune—it’s OK to be selfish, to do it for the money, we won’t blame you.

Warmists keeping showing their cards, that what they really want is to force Other People to obey the tenets of the Cult of Climastrology. All while refusing to give up their own use of fossil fuels.

 

Read: Slate Knows The Best Way To Force Industry To Care About Hotcoldwetdry »

If All You See…

…is wasting non-renewable water on an evil fossil fueled machine, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Right Wing News, with a post noting that MSNBC thinks Hillary’s crowd is too white.

It’s car wash week, so, how could we not start off with Sara Jean?

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Patriotic Pinup John Thompson

Happy Sunday! It’s another gorgeous day in America, and today is Flag Day! This pinup is by John Thompson, with no addition necessary.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. The Daley Gator notes a DHS whistleblower stripped of her gun and almost her daughter
  2. The Last Refuge takes a peek behind the real McKinney pool party
  3. Theodore’s World celebrates Flag Day
  4. Weasel Zippers notes something interesting in the CIA pre-9/11 intelligence release
  5. Western Hero covers a sickness that only gold can cure
  6. Wizbang notes what a CNN anchor said about the Dallas gunman
  7. American Power covers “equality” in the People’s Republik Of California
  8. Blazing Cat Fur covers bikini style dhimmitude in the UK
  9. Chicks On The Right note that Hillary will be checking your wardrobe
  10. Fausta’s Blog tells us why removing country-of-origin labels from meat is a Bad Idea
  11. Fire Andrea Mitchell notes Obama releasing more terrorists from Gitmo
  12. Flopping Aces covers the dichotomy of “too big to fail”
  13. Legal Insurrection discusses Obama’s attempt to diversify neighborhoods
  14. Maggie’s Farm wonders why anyone would go to Disney anymore
  15. And last, but not least, Moonbattery notes more phrases that are considered “micro-aggressions”

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Pope Francis To Call For Revolution On Hotcoldwetdry

Pope Francis has been moving the Roman Catholic church into the realm of “climate change” over the past few months, lending his voice to the unhinged Cult of Climastrology. He’s now poised to make it official

(UK Daily Mail) Pope Francis is to call for a stop to climate change and global inequality in a letter due to be sent to the world’s 1.2billion Catholics.

In an unprecedented encyclical on environment, the Argentinian pontiff is expected to call for a ‘fundamental change of course to protect the earth and its people’.

The UN believes the letter, which will be called ‘Laudato Sii’ or ‘Praised Be’ and is due to be published on Thursday, will have a ‘major impact’ and could herald the start of a ‘transformation’.

In the letter, which will be sent to the 5,000 Catholic bishops around the world and published in five languages online, the Pope is expected to argue that the world faces ruin without a revolution in hearts and minds.

When is this ruin coming? Cult of Climastrology members have been predicting doom for decades. What of all their prognostications of an ice free Arctic? None have come to pass. ABC News predicted in 2008 that 2015 would see NYC under water and hundreds of miles of land on fire due to “climate change”. We were told that 2005 would be the “new normal” for hurricanes. Didn’t happen. Superstorm Sandy was also supposed to be the new normal. Nope. We get prediction after prediction, and none come to pass. Though the CoC does work overtime to blame every weather event on Hotcoldwetdry. Including cold and snowy winters.

Cardinal Peter Turkson, of Ghana – who oversaw the drafting of the encyclical – said action to halt climate change was needed. He said the letter would address the root causes of poverty and the threats facing nature.

He told a conference on climate change at the Vatican earlier this year: ‘We clearly need a fundamental change of course, to protect the earth and its people — which in turn will allow us to dignify humanity.’

Just as Warmists link every real world issue, particularly environmental issues, to “climate change”, which damages the impact of the real issue, linking poverty to “climate change” diminishes the importance of that issue, particularly when inexpensive, affordable, reliable, and accessible energy does more to lift people out of poverty than anything else.

The Pope’s letter is likely to have a major impact in spurring UN negotiations on global warming and will add a moral dimension to work on climate change, experts predicted.

I’ve written many times about the intersection of religion with the far left Progressive (nice fascist) movement when it comes to “climate change”, and this brings to mind a few questions: does Pope Francis believe it is moral for citizens to give up their freedoms to Government? Does he think citizens should put control of their lives in the hands of Government? Is it moral to force citizens to be subservient to The Government? Because those are things that are primary tenets of Progressivism. Having government accumulate more power over citizens, private entities, and economies, all for people’s own good. Does he think that this pronouncement will ingratiate the Catholic Church to the far left, which despises religion?

Does he think it’s a good idea to increase the power of the United Nations, a body chock full of tyrants, dictators, and murderers? A body whose peace-keepers have been involved with rape, theft, destruction of property, and host of other bad behavior? A body which ran the Oil For Food program, one full of graft, which saw the food diverted, among other problems? A body which ignored the Rwanda massacre? And other massacres? One which which wants to destroy the nation of Israel? One which had the sex-for-food scandal? How about a body that has nations such as China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and others serving on the Human Rights Commission? The list goes on and on.

Perhaps Pope Francis should take a look at the computer models, and see how wrong they have been. Perhaps he should note that Warmists have to “adjust” their data to match their predictions. Perhaps he should note that the climate has always changed, and will always change. Perhaps he should note that he’s being duped. Like the rest of the Cult of Climastrology.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Pope Francis To Call For Revolution On Hotcoldwetdry »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful tropical jungle which will soon dry up and wither from too much carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is House Of Eratosthenes, with a post on what intelligence is.

Read: If All You See… »

“Your Carbon Emissions May End Up Starving Poor People in Africa” Or Something

The latest big talking point from the Cult of Climastrology is about Hotcoldwetdry causing shorter growing seasons maybe possibly in The Future. Here’s one of the nuttier missives on the subject, which has the exact headline I used

(TakePart) While the grow-your-own ethos has gained popularity in the United States in recent years, for many people around the globe, having a garden is not a matter of choice. Because in many places it’s still your backyard, not the grocery store, that provides the bulk of your food. Globally, 70 percent of the food supply comes from smallholder farms—and if climate change continues unabated, those subsistence growers may be the ones most dramatically affected.

A new study published Wednesday in the journal PLOS One looked at how a changing climate will reshape the growing calendar come 2100. Under “business as usual” climate-change projections, the researchers determined that the number of “suitable growing days” will drop by 11 percent, on average, around the world—and far more in certain regions. The tropics allow for a year-round growing season, but the climate-change impacts on temperature, drought, and solar radiation could cut 200 days from the farming calendar.

If if if if if. More doomsaying from the Cult, based on faulty computer models
and wishful thinking, forgetting that previous warm periods had excellent agricultural production, as has this current warm period. Sure, warmth can cause issues, as we saw during the 1930’s, when it was warmer than today. Prior to data “adjustments”.

Of course, anthropogenic causation hasn’t been proven.

Read: “Your Carbon Emissions May End Up Starving Poor People in Africa” Or Something »

Pirate's Cove