Portugal To Spend $26 Billion To Deal With Blackouts Caused By ‘Climate Change’ (policies)

Government: let’s create a problem. Government: let’s also spend a ton of money to fix the problem we created

Portugal launches $26.5 billion resilience plan after storms and blackout

Portugal’s government on Tuesday announced a 22.6 billion euro ($26.5 billion) investment programme ?to roll out over nine years, aimed at mitigating risks including ?climate change and power outages.

The plan was initiated after severe storms hit central mainland Portugal in January and February, causing damage worth an estimated 5.3 billion euros, and a ?crippling power outage in Spain and Portugal exactly a year ago.

The initiative, ?named Portugal Transformation, Recovery and Resilience, seeks to strengthen infrastructure, ?institutions, homes and businesses against threats linked to climate change, energy security, ?seismic activity and cyberattacks.

It will be 37% funded from the state budget, with ?private financing accounting for 34% of the total and European funds covering 19%.

Presenting the plan, Prime Minister Luis Montenegro said Portugal had been “hit hard in recent years by extreme ?weather events — droughts, heavy rain, floods and fires — occurring year after year ?with increasing destructive force”.

So, will private donors just kick in voluntarily?

(Jo Nova) Engineers were warning the grid was close to crashing due to excess solar

The mass blackouts in Spain and Portugal wrecked havoc on April 28 last year. At the time everyone accountable was feigning confusion, blaming it on a “rare atmospheric phenomenon” which might have set up mysterious oscillations in the line. They were bandying around terms like “ ‘induced atmospheric vibration’ and talking about extreme temperatures (you know, like 23 degrees C). But all along, the head honchos at Red Electrica knew it was due to an excess of solar power and a lack of reliable generation, because the technical staff had told them what was coming:

“Today was really bad, you all saw it”: new audio recordings confirm that Red Eléctrica knew three months before the blackout that the system was failing

Huh

(Not A Lot Of People Know That) Except, of course, it was solar power which was at front and centre of the blackouts, a fact which even the whitewash report could not disguise.

The catalyst for the blackout was a sudden loss of 2.2GW of electricity at Granada substation in southern Spain. The report does not appear to address why this happened, which you might have thought was crucial! But it is believed that one or two solar farms stopped transmitting because of negative prices – these resulted from too much solar generation for too little demand, and this is exactly how the market is supposed to work; negative prices lead to less generation, thus bringing the system into balance.

However solar power now makes up such a large part of Spain’s electricity (about 60% at the time of the blackouts), that the very system of negative pricing is a threat in itself to the grid.

As soon as that 2.2GW disappeared, voltages in the local grid plummeted, leading to a complicated chain reaction of grid disconnections. Within 30 seconds the entire Iberian peninsula was experiencing a complete blackout.

Instead of spending $26.5 billion on “resilience” and crap, how about spending money on making sure the grid won’t collapse, and that there are reliable, dependable power sources?

Read: Portugal To Spend $26 Billion To Deal With Blackouts Caused By ‘Climate Change’ (policies) »

Trump Admin Requiring Enhanced Background Checks For Immigration Benefits

I’m not sure why immigrants, illegal and illegal, are getting any benefits. Those here legally on any sort of visa should be able to pay for their own lives, and those here illegally should be sent packing

Trump administration mandates enhanced security checks for immigration applicants

The Trump administration is subjecting broad categories of immigrants applying for legal immigration benefits to enhanced security checks, and is pausing some cases while the changes are implemented, according to internal government documents obtained by CBS News.

Last week, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services distributed internal guidance instructing its officers to resubmit pending applications for different immigration benefits, including asylum, green cards and U.S. citizenship, to enhanced FBI background checks, the documents show.

Officers were directed to refrain from approving any pending cases that have not undergone the expanded background checks.

USCIS has long used FBI databases to vet immigration applications for potential national security or public safety concerns. But the documents indicate the enhanced security screenings were prompted by the FBI’s decision to grant USCIS greater access to its criminal history database, as part of an executive order by President Trump in February.

All involved will work to investigate to see if any of them have any criminal actions

“Such criminal actors may include foreign nationals with criminal histories who have entered or remained in the United States in violation of the immigration laws of the United States or who otherwise seek to violate the criminal laws of the United States,” the president said in his order.

The enhanced checks will affect pending applications for benefits for which applicants have to submit fingerprints, such as requests for green cards (permanent U.S. residency) and naturalization, according to the internal guidance. It will also apply to sponsorship petitions filed on behalf of relatives or fiancees of U.S. citizens or green card holders.

Obviously, this makes Democrats very upset. They really do not care if any of them have criminal histories. They certainly do not care if they hate America, if they are going to take advantage of America, if they are Islamic terrorists: they just want to create new voters.

Read: Trump Admin Requiring Enhanced Background Checks For Immigration Benefits »

Hotcoldwetdry Is An “Increasing Threat To Democracy” Or Something

I mean, they might be on to something, because the climate cult is certainly looking to enact authoritarianism. But, I doubt that is what this wonkadoodle article means

Climate change an ‘increasing threat to democracy’, study finds

Elections around the world are increasingly affected by natural hazards such as heatwaves and hurricanes, with climate change posing a rising threat to democracy, according to a report.

The Managing Natural Hazards and Climate Risks in Elections report, released by the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) on 22 April, finds that at least 94 elections across 52 countries were disrupted by natural hazards between 2006 and 2025, affecting millions of voters.

It is “a statistical fact that elections will more frequently be affected by natural hazards in future years,” the analysis found, noting that the number of major natural hazards has tripled over the past four decades.

“Election management bodies have always had to cope with natural hazards, but the threat posed by such phenomena has become more apparent in recent years.”

Right, right, because a little weather is such a big problem

During the 2024 “super-cycle year” of elections, 23 primary, local, national, and supranational polls across 18 countries were disrupted by natural hazards, including in Brazil, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nigeria, Senegal, the United States, and Canada.

That’s it? What about the Ukraine elections? Were they called off because of ‘climate change’?

International IDEA is calling on electoral authorities to implement disaster planning into routine election management rather than relying on reactive emergency procedures.

“The aim of the report is to provide an overview and share various strategies that can be used to protect elections from adverse effects,” it said. These include improved contingency planning, coordination with disaster-management agencies, and reassessing the timing of elections to avoid predictable hazards.

Weird, so, more governmental control of elections in the name of climate doom? What could possibly go wrong?

Read: Hotcoldwetdry Is An “Increasing Threat To Democracy” Or Something »

If All You See…

…is a horrible fossil fueled fishing boat, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is A Nod To The Gods, with a post on World War 11.

Read: If All You See… »

Iran War Shows NATO Not Ready To Fight Russia Or Something

First off, it wouldn’t be NATO fighting Russia, the danger is China. Second, it’s strange that Politico didn’t do this after the Ukraine war started

5 ways the Iran war shows NATO is not ready to fight Russia

NATO has stayed out of the U.S.-Israeli war in Iran, but the conflict has nevertheless exposed cracks in the alliance’s defenses that would see it struggle if Russia attacks.

“The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are not separate phenomena; there is much to learn from both in thinking about the wars of tomorrow,” Gen. Dominique Tardif, France’s deputy air force chief, said. “These combined lessons should lead us to a better understanding of how to direct capability development.”

European military officials have warned Moscow could be in a position to attack an alliance member by 2029, highlighting the urgent need for battle readiness and political cohesion across the alliance.

Russia can’t take Ukraine, how are they going to take a NATO nation? Unless Russia goes for obliteration, unlike Ukraine, which they seem to not want to destroy. Kinda worthless taking land that you’ve destroyed

1. Running out of ammo
The Iran war has thrown NATO’s ammunition shortage into sharp relief.

The U.S. burned through around half its total inventory of critical Patriot air defense missiles, while French officials warned that stocks of its Aster and Mica missiles were running low as soon as the the first two weeks of the war. Defense firms like Rheinmetall and MBDA have also pointed to surging demand and looming shortages.

The media wasn’t quite so concerned when the US and NATO were depleting everything for Ukraine

Unless NATO changes tack, Russia “will price us out of a war quickly,” warned Calvin Bailey, a lawmaker from Britain’s ruling Labour Party on the U.K. parliament’s defense committee.

With Moscow producing “6,000 to 7,000” one-way attack drones per month, NATO allies would be left without high-value air defense missiles within “weeks,” said Justin Bronk, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute.

There is that. It might be high time to start producing war drones for overseas deployment.

2. Air inferiority
Iran’s ability to continue pummeling neighboring Gulf states with over 5,000 missile and drone attacks despite the U.S. aerial campaign shows the “clear limits to the expectation that you can bomb a country into submission” with conventional aircraft, said Pieter Wezeman, a senior researcher at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

In response, NATO must rethink air dominance and look for creative solutions to deter Russia, like turbocharging investment in long-range precision strike weapons capable of targeting Moscow’s drone production and military sites deep inside the country, said Bronk.

How long can the attacks last when Iran doesn’t have much of an industrial base, and it’s hard to resupply? Still, Russia is not coming after NATO.

3. Underpowered navies
Europe’s limited deployment to help Gulf allies has also illustrated the gaping underinvestment in NATO navies.

The clearest example is the U.K. After taking three weeks to deploy its HMS Dragon destroyer toward the Mediterranean, the vessel was sent back to port over a technical hitch.

EU navies are rather woeful, but, they’ve mostly depended on the U.S. for force projection, while their navies are for homeland defense. Except the UK, which used to be strong. Now? Not so much.

4. Enduring disunity
The war has also widened the chasm inside NATO — with Europe snubbing U.S. President Donald Trump’s demands for military support, prompting Washington to draw up options for retaliation.

If the EU wants to support Iran, why should we support most of Europe against the aggression from Russia (which isn’t going to happen) all while Europe buys fossil fuels from Russia.

5. Ukraine matters
Within days of the start of the war in Iran, Ukraine sent its drone experts, well-versed in using homegrown interceptors to shoot down Iranian Shahed-type drones used by Russia, to assist countries across the Middle East. Kyiv eventually signed decade-long defense partnerships with Gulf nations.

Does it really matter? They’re still kidnapping men off the streets, still refusing to allow elections, and the rich are still partying hard with EU and US money, all while the war grinds on and the EU dumps more money and arms into the war.

Read: Iran War Shows NATO Not Ready To Fight Russia Or Something »

NY Climate Cultists Rake In Hundreds Of Millions While Trying To Force State To Enact Cult Laws

It’s almost like this is some sort of scam

Green activists trying to force New York to enact climate change laws rake in more than $100M

They’re putting some real green into eco activism.

Environmental activist groups that sued to force Gov. Kathy Hochul to ram through the state’s controversial green laws are rolling in greenbacks — with several reporting revenues of over $100 million.

Earthjustice, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, has $139 million in revenues and $244 million in net assets, according to its most recent 2024 tax filing.

Another plaintiff, the Sierra Club, has $173 million in revenue, according to its 2023 tax filing, the most recent.

Those groups and others accused Hochul of improperly stalling to draft rules on how the state would implement the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act of 2019, which aims to reduce carbon emissions.

The scam sure is enriching, eh?

A state Supreme Court judge sided with the activists last fall and ordered the state to issue the rules to implement the law.

Hochul has since proposed amending the law to stretch out the compliance timetable, saying the lofty were impractical and causing costs to skyrocket.

“We cannot meet the Climate Act’s 2030 targets without imposing new and additional crushing costs on New York businesses and residents,” Hochul said.

If even Governor Kathy can see how bad this is, it must be way, way worse. And NY is already losing tons of businesses, and lots of revenue. They do not need to give even more incentive to leave.

Read: NY Climate Cultists Rake In Hundreds Of Millions While Trying To Force State To Enact Cult Laws »

Who’s Up For Changing ICE’s Name To NICE

This is a freaking wonderful idea

From ICE to NICE? Trump endorses immigration enforcement name change

President Donald Trump endorsed changing the name of Immigration and Customs Enforcement to National Immigration and Customs Enforcement in a Truth Social post on Sunday, April 26.

The name change would convert the agency’s acronym from ICE to NICE. The change was first promoted by conservative influencer Alyssa Marie in March.

“I want Trump to change ICE to NICE (National Immigration and Customs Enforcement) so the media has to say NICE agents all day everyday,” she said in a post on X.

More than a month after Marie proposed the change, Trump weighed in, publicly endorsing it.

“GREAT IDEA!!! DO IT. President DJT,” Trump said on Truth Social.

Of course, it would take Congress passing a bill to change the name, but, there’s no reason Trump and his people can’t constantly refer to them as NICE, which would make the Democrats, well, as unhinged as normal. Just one more thing to be unhinged over

Obviously, Democrats are losing it in the replies.

Read: Who’s Up For Changing ICE’s Name To NICE »

Place Like Detroit Have To Get Ready For Climate Refugees Or Something

Are people really clammoring to move to high tax, high crime Yankee cities?

Cleaning the house before the party: How cities can plan for climate mobility

Across the Great Lakes region, something unexpected is happening. Places long defined by population loss are beginning to see new interest from people seeking safer ground in a changing climate. Cities like Detroit, Cincinnati and Buffalo are discovering that their abundant fresh water, moderate climate risks and rich civic infrastructure could position them as places of real opportunity in the decades ahead.

The question now is whether these cities can harness that opportunity in ways that benefit everyone, including the residents already living there.

Over the past three years, more than 15 million people in the United States have been displaced by climate disasters — more than six times those displaced by the Dust Bowl. Most returned home, but a growing number have not. And tens of millions more people are projected to relocate permanently in the coming decades as rising seas, intensifying storms and extreme heat reshape where Americans can safely live.

How many have been displaced because of the conditions in places like Detroit and Cincinnati?

“This will become one of the biggest equity issues of our time,” said David Lubell, senior climate mobility and cities fellow at ICLEI USA and founder of Welcoming America. “But it’s also one of the biggest opportunities, if we plan for it.”

Oh, so, it’s not really about climate?

Lubell and Beth Gibbons, the first Resiliency Director for Washtenaw County, Michigan, are among a growing network of leaders helping communities get ahead of these shifts by building a field of practice around climate mobility.

Climate mobility refers to how people respond to increasingly hazardous environmental conditions — by staying, moving or relocating. It spans short-term disaster displacement, longer-term migration driven by extreme events such as heat, drought, flooding or sea-level rise and planned community relocation.

Lubell shared a city typology first developed by climate resilience leaders Anna Marandi and Kelly Leilani Main that demonstrates how a variety of places will need to grapple with their own distinct challenges and strengths.

Oh, and there we go, shift taxpayer money to NGOs and climate (scam) companies.

Recipient cities like Atlanta, Memphis and Dallas are already absorbing newcomers while managing their own climate vulnerabilities.

Why are they moving to warm/hot weather cities if the temperatures are getting so bad?

Without proactive planning, Lubell warns, unmanaged growth can lead to climate gentrification, strained services, the displacement of those most vulnerable, and hostility towards newcomers. He points to the Great Migration of Black Americans from the South to the North as both a cautionary tale and a call to action.

There wasn’t an equitable, welcoming infrastructure in place – in fact it was quite the opposite, Lubell said. When you don’t plan for lots of people arriving, it’s the most marginalized who are affected.

It’s about the money.

Read: Place Like Detroit Have To Get Ready For Climate Refugees Or Something »

If All You See…

…are trees that will soon die from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Green Jihad, with a post on California cities having the highest pollution rates in the US.

Read: If All You See… »

DOJ Makes It Easier To Deport DACA Kids

It’s not like 241 of the 261 DACA kids detained last year had criminal histories or something

Justice Department makes it easier to deport those with DACA status

The Trump administration is making it easier to deport immigrants protected by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA.

new precedent decision published Friday by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) says being a DACA recipient is not enough reason to provide relief from deportation.

A three-judge panel of appellate immigration judges sided with Department of Homeland Security lawyers who appealed a decision from immigration judge Michael Pleters terminating removal proceedings for Catalina “Xóchitl” Santiago, citing Santiago’s active DACA status. They sent the case back to a different immigration judge for review.

Although the decision does not mean Santiago will be immediately deported, it potentially weakens DACA protections for hundreds of thousands of others.

Well, they are in the U.S. illegally, DACA was never authorized by Congress, there’s no statute that allowed relief for illegal alien kids, and even Obama said it was un-Constitutional before he went and did it anyway

Santiago’s case gained national attention after she was detained by Customs and Border Protection officers while boarding a domestic flight at the El Paso airport in August. She was placed in immigration detention until a federal judge granted her release last October. She has been fighting the threat of deportation in the immigration court system since.

You know what NPR forgets to mention?

(PBS) We did ask DHS about her case. They gave us a statement in which they called her a criminal illegal alien and they also said this in part — quote — “Her criminal history includes charges for trespassing, possession of narcotics and drug paraphernalia. She will remain in ICE custody pending her removal proceedings.”

Those charges invalidate DACA status. All they were asked was to not be criminals.

Read: DOJ Makes It Easier To Deport DACA Kids »

Pirate's Cove