Campbell University Accused Of Discrimination For Removing Charlie Kirk Fliers

By William Teach March 11, 2026 – 10:30 am

Obviously, since it regards Charlie Kirk and a Conservative student, the Raleigh News and Observer fails to editorialize in the article in favor of free speech

From the link, with a story that is going to go exactly how you think

Last semester, a day after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, a Campbell University Law School student hung images of Kirk and his family around Raleigh campus buildings. The flyers displayed the message, “End Political Violence.”

The school promptly took the posters down — and sent the law student a disciplinary warning.

The student, Justin Booker, said taking his flyers down while leaving others up in the same areas amounts to viewpoint discrimination in violation of his rights to free expression.

Originally, the assistant dean of student life, Regina Chavis, told Booker the school didn’t allow the posting of personal messages, he said. But Booker couldn’t find this provision in the school’s student handbook, he said.

“I filed a formal complaint with the administration about this, because not only is this a free speech issue, it actually risks the law school’s accreditation,” Booker, 24, told The N&O. He contends Campbell violated its own free speech policy and that of the American Bar Association, or ABA.

He filed all sorts of appeals with the school, who, being run by liberals, denied them, so, he reached out to Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression

“It’s particularly noteworthy that other political content was allowed to stay posted, as was other commercial content,” said FIRE program officer Dominic Colletti, who wrote the letter to Campbell. “It’s really hard to come up with a policy based explanation for this, other than they did not like the image of Charlie Kirk. That is the most likely explanation here and they haven’t given us another.”

Booker said letters notifying students about Black History Month and celebrating figures from Black and Hispanic civil rights movements are allowed to stay up, while his was taken down. The FIRE letter asks Campbell to consider whether it would’ve sanctioned the removal of flyers about voting rights or vaccination.

“For law schools, part of their job is to teach the First Amendment and the free speech rights that we as a country imbue our citizens,” Colletti continued. “There’s some irony to the university punishing that same kind of free expression.”

Yeah, that’s exactly what I thought would happen. That there would be all sorts of left wing flier up which the school never removed. Here’s the bigger issue

Because Booker was the subject of a disciplinary warning on this issue, he’ll have to disclose that on every bar application he ever submits.

“All I really want from this is for the people who did the wrong thing to admit they did wrong, promise they won’t do it again to me or anyone else, and apologize,” Booker said. “Instead, I have been brushed off, ignored, disrespected, and censored. No due process, no transparency, and no one actually willing to address my concerns.

I suspect if the school doesn’t address this within a week as requested and remove the disciplinary warning there will be a lawsuit filed. And Campbell will have to show that they have give the same type of official warnings for people putting up fliers on a first “offense”. Democrats love Free Speech, as long as the speech complies with Democrat beliefs.

Read: Campbell University Accused Of Discrimination For Removing Charlie Kirk Fliers »

Posted in 1st Amendment, Liberal World | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Who’s Up For A Haircut With A Side Of Climate Cult Sermon?

By William Teach March 11, 2026 – 7:00 am

They can’t just leave us alone, can they

Your Hairdresser Might Save The Planet: Here’s How Salons Are Tackling Climate Change One Cut At A Time

Climate change is a much-needed conversation that a lot of people are now having — not just in school or during a policy meeting, but in the unlikeliest of places, like your barber’s or hairdresser’s chair.

I remember during my teenage years how important the barbershop was to me and how excited I would be to go. Not just because I’d be looking super fresh and clean after my cut, but because of the conversations I would have in there or the people I would meet. (snip)

New research out of the U.K. is now proving this to be true, especially when it comes to climate change. The study, published in Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, reveals that hair salons or barbershops are the perfect hubs where climate conversations and action can take root and spread.

But why? Because your hairdresser or barber has something most people don’t: your trust.

I just go there to get my hair cut and get out. That’s it. But, this is Cult World

Imagine if these hairdressers or barbers started having conversations more consistently about climate change and sustainability. Would their clients listen? Researchers put it to the test and the results were outstanding.

Researchers placed simple eco-tips on salon mirrors across the U.K., and 73% of clients said they would be down to change their hair care habits. Some said they would switch to eco-friendly products, and others said they would follow the tips given, like one about shampooing less.

The conversation around climate change and sustainability doesn’t always need to be protested or forced upon someone. Sometimes it just needs a mirror, a chair and someone you trust enough to listen to.

Yeah, that sounds like it’s being forced on people.

There are over 61,000 hair and beauty businesses in the U.K., and the U.S. has well over 1 million. Imagine the environmental change that could happen if even a small percentage of these shops became safe havens for conversations about sustainability.

How soon till the British government forces this on UK citizens?

Read: Who’s Up For A Haircut With A Side Of Climate Cult Sermon? »

Posted in Climate Cult, Global Warming | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

LOL: San Diego County Sues After Health Inspector Denied Access To ICE Facility

By William Teach March 11, 2026 – 6:45 am

You have to give the illegal alien protectors credit, they keep trying Stupid

San Diego County sues ICE after it blocked health inspection at detention center

San Diego County filed a lawsuit in federal court Tuesday alleging the Trump administration  illegally blocked a public health inspection of the Otay Mesa Detention Center, escalating a dispute over oversight of the privately-run immigration detention facility near the U.S.-Mexico border.

The complaint seeks a court order requiring the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and private prison contractor CoreCivic to allow county health officials inside to conduct a full inspection. According to the lawsuit, ICE initially cleared county officials to enter the facility but reversed that decision when the inspection team arrived.

“The Trump administration cannot hide conditions inside the Otay Mesa detention facility,” said  San Diego County Board of Supervisors Chair Terra Lawson-Remer at a news conference outside the federal courthouse. “If they will not allow a lawful public health inspection, a federal court will.” (snip)

San Diego officials say the inspection is authorized under a 2024 California law that grants local public health officers power to inspect private detention facilities to ensure they meet health and safety standards. CalMatters reported in October that local officials across the state were not utilizing the new authority.

LOL. They actually think they have power over federal facilities. It’s unique, but, very stupid. But, you know some unhinged Democrat federal judge will rule in favor of San Diego County, followed quickly by an appeals court saying “Nope, not happening Comrade.”

Meanwhile

Democrats Sue to Find Out if Trump Will Send Armed Officers to Election Sites

The Democratic National Committee sued the Trump administration Tuesday to try to compel the government to say whether it was planning to put armed federal agents or military personnel at polling places or election offices this year.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., says that 11 separate Freedom of Information Act requests filed in October to the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense have prompted no meaningful response, a violation of the law.

“To ensure that the American people obtain timely knowledge of potential threats to free and fair elections and to enable the DNC to take appropriate action to ensure voting rights are protected, the DNC now seeks this Court’s aid to enforce” Freedom of Information Act requirements, the lawsuit states. (snip)

But fears that the Trump administration might disregard that law have percolated for months among Democrats and voting rights groups, who point to the president’s publicly stated desires to “nationalize” elections and his stated regret over not having seized voting machines in the 2020 election. Other actions taken by the administration, including a raid in late January by the FBI at a local election warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, have only heightened those concerns.

What they’re really worried about is federal immigration officers stopping illegals/fake asylum seekers from showing up to the polls. Even though the Trump admin has really said they won’t be at the polls. But, Dems worry more about illegals than Americans.

Read: LOL: San Diego County Sues After Health Inspector Denied Access To ICE Facility »

Posted in Democrats, Illegal Immigration | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

You Can Now Place Bets On ‘Climate Change’ Events, IE, The Weather

By William Teach March 10, 2026 – 3:00 pm

What kinds of events?

Snow, ice and hurricanes: Prediction markets offer money-making wagers on climate change

See, snow and ice are your fault

The odds were almost evenly split early Monday afternoon: Would Denver’s high temperature reach 71 to 72 degrees? Higher? Lower?

By the end of the day, people wagered over $90,000 on the question, hoping to win money by watching the weather using one of the leading prediction market platforms, Kalshi. These platforms, where people go to make bets on the outcomes of current events, are raking in profits as people try to make a quick buck betting on everything from the next president to whether it will snow in Denver or if “Bridgerton” will be the top show on Netflix.

But the platforms have also drawn criticism about the potential growth of insider trading, gambling addictions in young users, and even “death markets,” which collect wagers on whether deadly events will happen. (snip)

Climate and science topics have their own categories of wagers on two of the largest prediction market sites, Kalshi and Polymarket. People are gambling on whether this March will be the hottest March ever and how many hurricanes will happen this year. They’re placing wagers on measles cases and space exploration.

I think every ‘climate’ cult scientist should be forced to place bets on this, using their own money. Back up their fearporn with proving they know what they’re talking about, that it is actually science, rather than making prognostications for 10, 20, 50, 100 years from now.

Prediction markets have been around for decades but have taken off since 2020 and 2021, when Polymarket and Kalshi launched, respectively.

Under the Biden administration, the industry faced pushback from federal regulators who said their platforms were too close to gaming and restricted their operations in the U.S.

In reality, the article is mostly about these markets, which are kinda nuts, and have some nutty bets, and do include death bets and such. But, the doomsday cult requires that ‘climate change’ be included.

BTW, not sure about you, I do not bet on anything. I think all this betting is ruining sports, for one thing. I know people who bet too often, and, let’s be honest, most are not going to be big winners. Most will lose.

Read: You Can Now Place Bets On ‘Climate Change’ Events, IE, The Weather »

Posted in Global Warming, Web/Tech | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach March 10, 2026 – 1:00 pm

…is a palm tree that will soon grow in the Arctic, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jihad Watch, with a post on Islamist placing prayer mats in front of NYFD’s memorial plaque to those lost on 9/11.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 14 Comments | Trackback URL

Appeals Court Says Federal Judge Sara’s Immigration Order Went Too Far

By William Teach March 10, 2026 – 10:30 am

She was overturned on appeal yet again

Obama appointee’s Chicago immigration order backfires after court says she went too far

An Obama-appointed federal judge’s attempt to rein in immigration enforcement in Chicago backfired after a federal appeals court ruled she overstepped her authority and “effectively established the district court as the supervisor of all Executive Branch activity in the city of Chicago.”

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit tossed out Judge Sara Ellis’ preliminary injunction and dismissed the appeal in a sharply worded 2-1 decision.

The panel, comprising two Trump appointees and a Reagan appointee, said the lower court’s injunction was “overbroad” and “constitutionally suspect.” It faulted the judge for applying the order not just to specific officers but “the entire Departments of Homeland Security and Justice, as well as anyone acting in concert with them.”

Ellis had issued a lengthy 233-page opinion explaining why she granted the class-wide preliminary injunction against Homeland Security and Justice Department authorities carrying out immigration enforcement in Chicago. Her order followed a string of clashes between protesters and agents during Operation Midway Blitz, the effort launched last year by the Trump administration to crack down on illegal immigration and street crime in Chicago. (snip)

The order, the panel said, required federal officers to submit “all current and future internal guidance, policies, and directives” for judicial review, which the appellate court said improperly intruded on the separation of powers.

The panel reiterated that point when vacating Ellis’ injunction, saying that “federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch” and that the district court “likely abused its discretion by issuing such a sweeping injunction.”

She thought she was a king and could order the Executive Department around, essentially creating rules and regulations. Appropriating the powers of the Legislative Branch to essentially pass law. To change existing federal laws. All to protect illegal aliens.

Meanwhile, in the Islamic Caliphate of Britannia

Read: Appeals Court Says Federal Judge Sara’s Immigration Order Went Too Far »

Posted in Illegal Immigration | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

And Here We Go: The Iran War Is Also A Climate War

By William Teach March 10, 2026 – 7:00 am

I’ve been waiting for this. I knew it had to be coming, I’m just surprised it took this long

The Iran War Is Also A Climate War

War makes climate change worse in many ways, and vice versa. The human costs of the United States-Israel attack on Iran—the hundreds of people who have died, including a reported 175 young girls and teachers killed at the Shajareh Tayyibeh primary school—are a tragedy. The mounting economic risks—disrupted supply chains, rising energy prices, shaken stock markets—are ominous. The danger that this war of choice launched by two nuclear-armed states will escalate further, drawing in powers across the region and beyond, is alarming. And threaded through each of these concerns is the fact that modern warfare is inextricably linked with climate change.

The linkages flow in both directions. Wars unleash gargantuan amounts of planet-warming emissions: Russia’s war in Ukraine, for example, has generated emissions equal to the annual emissions of France. Those extra emissions drive deadlier heat, drought, storms, and other impacts that wreck livelihoods, destabilize economies, and spur migration, making armed conflict more likely. The British intelligence agencies MI5 and MI6 warned in January that climate disruption and biodiversity loss, if left unchecked, will cause “crop failures, intensified natural disasters, and infectious disease outbreaks… exacerbating existing conflicts, starting new ones, and threatening global security and prosperity.”

The outbreak of any war is bad news for the climate, just as the election of politicians hostile to climate action is. The climate implications of this new war are not the center of attention at the moment, but they are essential context for understanding what’s at stake. At a time when civilization is hurtling toward irreversible climate breakdown, to overlook the climate consequences of three of the deadliest militaries on Earth going to war would be journalistic malpractice.

As with most wars, so with climate change: The poor and the innocent suffer most. Climate change is not peripheral but structurally embedded in modern warfare. Journalists cannot fully and fairly cover a war this carbon intensive, destabilizing, and consequential if its climate dimensions are treated as optional add-ons rather than core fact.

They want every Journalist to be part of the cult, look at every issue in terms of climate doom.

Read: And Here We Go: The Iran War Is Also A Climate War »

Posted in Climate Cult, Global Warming | 15 Comments | Trackback URL

Trump Says Won’t Sign Any Legislation Till SAVE Act Passed

By William Teach March 10, 2026 – 6:45 am

Good

Trump says he won’t sign any bills into law until SAVE America Act passes

President Trump on Sunday threatened to not sign any bills into law until the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act is approved by the Senate, doubling down on his push to change voting requirements ahead of the midterm elections.

“I, as President, will not sign other Bills until this is passed, AND NOT THE WATERED DOWN VERSION – GO FOR THE GOLD: MUST SHOW VOTER I.D. & PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP: NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS EXCEPT FOR MILITARY – ILLNESS, DISABILITY,” the president wrote in his Sunday morning Truth Social post.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment on whether the president will sign a bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security amid the partial government shutdown.

The leader has pressed Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) to use a talking filibuster to pass the bill, which was approved by the House in February.

The filibuster would force Democrats to speak continuously on the Senate floor to delay a vote on the bill. But, if they cede the floor, Republicans could circumvent the need for a 60-vote majority and pass the measure with just 51 votes.

I mean, that’s what used to be required for a filibuster. Talking. Remember, almost every Democrat in the House, 213 of them, voted against the SAVE Act, an issue that most Americans want. Heck, even this

Two-Thirds Back ‘SAVE Act’ To Require Voter ID — And Support Is Bipartisan: I&I/TIPP Poll

The bitter debate between Democrats and Republicans over the SAVE Act — which would require voters to provide a valid ID to cast a ballot — has roiled political waters as both major parties gird themselves for the 2026 midterms. But do voters care? They sure do, and it’s not good news for the Democrats, the latest I&I/TIPP Poll results indicate.

The online poll, taken from Feb. 24 to Feb. 27 by 1,456 adults nationwide, asked voters: “The SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) is a proposed federal law that would require individuals to present identification and prove U.S. citizenship to vote in federal elections. What comes closer to your view?”

The results weren’t really close. A hefty 64% agreed with the statement that “It is a good idea and would help ensure that only eligible citizens are able to vote.”

Meanwhile, just 24% agreed with “It is a bad idea and could prevent some eligible voters from casting a ballot.” The remaining 12% were “not sure.”

Even among Dems, 47% say it’s “good idea,” versus 42% who say it’s a “bad idea,” a 5-point edge. But the idea is by far strongest among Republicans (85% “good,” 9% “bad”), followed by independents and third-party voters (59% “good,” 26% “bad”).

And, really, this is one of the lower polls I’ve seen. Many call it an 80/20 issue, with 80% wanting, yet, Democrats take the side of the 20%. If the US Congress cannot pass a law that the majority of Americans want then maybe it is time to dissolve the Congress and start over.

Read: Trump Says Won’t Sign Any Legislation Till SAVE Act Passed »

Posted in Constitution, Current Affairs | 7 Comments | Trackback URL

Oh Noes: Trump Forcing Canada To Make ‘Climate Change’ Research Budget Cuts

By William Teach March 9, 2026 – 3:42 pm

Adding Trump’s name in somewhere is the way it’s supposed to be done, right?

Budget cuts at Environment and Climate Change Canada threaten Arctic science

The Arctic has been in the news a lot lately. Between the increased geopolitical interest in Greenland, claims over sovereignty, resource exploitation and the devastating impacts of climate change, the region has become a sentinel for global change.

But away from these headlines, a quieter crisis is unfolding that threatens Canada’s role in global environmental science, law and policy: the dismantling of research teams at the department responsible for Canada’s environmental policies and programs. The federal government’s plan to reduce the public service by 15 per cent over three years means that more than 800 positions at Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) will be cut.

As an environmental scientist who has been involved in the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program (AMAP) since 2016 and an interdisciplinary legal scholar focused on water governance in Canada, we have seen how science can shape policy. For decades, ECCC research scientists have been integral to the work of AMAP, a working group that provides advice and assessments to the Arctic Council.

This intergovernmental group comprised of Indigenous Peoples, Arctic states and non-Arctic states with observer status is the major platform for protecting the environment and co-ordinating sustainable development initiatives in the Arctic.

Sounds like a lot of cult BS trying to force everyone to be a part of the cult

Across Canada, the cuts undermine effective chemical management. Canada’s chemical management plan depends heavily on the expert assessment of government scientists. This expert-based risk assessment has enabled the discovery and monitoring of new chemical risks with comparatively few bureaucratic hurdles. However, it also means that the proposed cuts are particularly devastating to this program.

If we remove the scientists the regulatory system depends on, the system breaks. This means that these proposed cuts could not only cost jobs and reduce scientific excellence in Canada, but also leave the health of Canadians and our environment less protected.

Can they not hire people in the private sector to do the job, rather than government employees looking for a bigger budget?

Read: Oh Noes: Trump Forcing Canada To Make ‘Climate Change’ Research Budget Cuts »

Posted in Collapsing Science, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach March 9, 2026 – 1:00 pm

…is a sea that is totally many feet higher than your eyes are telling you, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on Spain cracking down on free speech.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 6 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove