…are horrible Bad Weather clouds, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is American Greatness, with a post on Uhaul’s election lesson.
Read: If All You See… »
…are horrible Bad Weather clouds, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is American Greatness, with a post on Uhaul’s election lesson.
Read: If All You See… »
It’s all fun and games when you think you’re Doing Something for the Earth, both because you want to look good (for insane cultists) and because you are kinda forced to do it by politicians. There comes a point when this makes no financial sense, kinda like how the yutes have realized that ordering delivery every day for most meals is a a Bad Idea, and now they’re on to Hamburger Helper
How Wall Street Turned Its Back on Climate Change
In January 2020, Larry Fink, the chief executive of BlackRock, the largest asset manager in the world, stunned the business world by declaring that he intended to use the trillions of dollars managed by his firm to address global warming.
“Every government, company, and shareholder must confront climate change,” Mr. Fink wrote, calling for “a fundamental reshaping of finance.”
A few days later, Mr. Fink arrived in Davos, Switzerland, for the World Economic Forum’s annual gathering, donning a scarf featuring a design of the “warming stripes,” a pattern that depicts 150 years of rising global temperatures.
Mr. Fink’s impassioned call to address climate change was the unofficial start of a movement. Nearly every major financial institution was soon pledging to reduce emissions, joining high-minded alliances designed to phase out fossil fuels and promising to support clean energy. Environmental, social and governance factors, known as E.S.G., became a defining feature of Wall Street investing.
Alas, the money and willpower and caring seems to have ended
But six years later, many of those Wall Street institutions have walked back or abandoned their commitments.
The alliances — like the Net-Zero Banking Alliance and the Net-Zero Asset Managers initiative — that were meant to steer investments toward clean energy and away from fossil fuels have largely fallen apart. Investors have withdrawn tens of billions of dollars each quarter from E.S.G. funds.
While U.S. investment in clean energy has boomed in recent years — reaching $279 billion last year — many large corporations have gone silent on climate change. On company earnings calls, mentions of words like climate and sustainability have plunged by 75 percent over the past year, according to a Bloomberg analysis.
And with President Trump back in office and using the presidency to promote fossil fuels and attack the clean energy industry, Wall Street’s retreat from climate action has coincided with American banks doubling down on coal, oil and gas projects.
The idea of all these companies and such are to make money. Are they making money off “green” energy and all the other stuff? The answer is apparently “no”. Anyhow, the rest of the article is a deep dive into how the climate investment scam rose and then fell. Oh, well, too bad.
Read: Bummer: Wall Street Is Abandoning Climate (scam) Pledges »
The Fish Wrap wasn’t upset that the Biden DOJ was investigating Trump after he left office, raiding his home, searching through his wife’s lingerie, coordinating with state level Democrats to prosecute Trump, and so forth. Nor all the people who worked for Trump who were put in jail. Nor what the Obama admin did when Trump started running in 2015.
Under Patel, F.B.I. Scours Its Records to Discredit Trump Opponents
The F.B.I. has had many missions in the more than half-century since its founding director, J. Edgar Hoover, died. It has chased spies, foiled terrorist attacks, ushered in a modern era of innovation and decreased crime rates.
But under its current chief, Kash Patel, the bureau has added payback to its portfolio. Agents now scour the F.B.I.’s vast holdings to root out negative information about those who once investigated President Trump, according to current and former officials, lawmakers and lawyers representing some of those targeted.
Administration officials say it is an essential task in ending what they denounce as the “weaponization” of law enforcement by Democrats. Critics say it is little more than using federal law enforcement to carry out a partisan opposition research operation.
Almost from the moment Mr. Patel took over the bureau in February, F.B.I. personnel have been poring over case files, internal Justice Department correspondence and other sensitive materials to find documents intended to expose and discredit federal law enforcement officials who investigated Mr. Trump and his allies.
The material appears to be coming from at least three streams. There is the bureau’s production of files in response to longstanding inquiries by Republicans on Capitol Hill; documents Mr. Patel’s team has found through self-generated searches; and self-described whistle-blowers, including at least one from the F.B.I., who have passed on sensitive documents from Trump investigations, including grand jury information that by law is supposed to remain confidential.
In other words, they’re looking at real information on how members of the FBI, DOJ, and others used their power to go after Orange Man Bad, and the Times and Dems do not like this.
Much of it has related to Arctic Frost, the investigation the F.B.I. led into efforts by Mr. Trump and others to overturn the 2020 presidential election. That inquiry ultimately formed the core of the election interference case brought in Washington by Jack Smith, the special counsel who twice indicted Mr. Trump and is a frequent target of the president’s calls for retribution.
“Arctic Frost was a runaway train that swept up information from hundreds of innocent people simply because of their political affiliation,” Mr. Grassley said last month.
The Times didn’t care about those people. They were collateral damage on the way to Get Trump.
Mr. Grassley has requested information about Mr. Smith’s inquiry since 2022, and repeatedly expressed frustration with the Biden administration’s refusal to turn over internal documents. That padlocked door has been kicked open by Mr. Patel.
The Times doesn’t seem to have a problem with the Biden admin hiding info from Congress. Anyhow, Perhaps the Times should have been advising Democrats to not do what they did, because payback is a bitch. The Times actually cheered the partisan investigations of Trump and his people on.
Read: NY Times Super Upset Trump’s DOJ Looking At Negative Info On Those Who Investigated Trump »
…is horrible carbon pollution infused beer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Climate Scepticism, with a post wondering which is more dangerous, ‘climate change’ or AI?
It’s denim week.
Read: If All You See… »

Happy Sunday! Another fine day in returned America. Getting a bit of needed cold rain (that I seriously doubt will turn into snowflakes later), the coyote just wandered through the back yard, and now I have to pay up on my bet with my Hurricanes friends after Devils lost last night. This pinup seems to be by AI, which might be cheating a bit, but, I like it, and added a bit to it.
What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014, so, most are hosted internally). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your Pinups for Vets calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me. I’ve also mostly alphabetized them, makes it easier scrolling the feedreader
Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. And do you have a favorite blog you can recommend be added to the feedreader?
Two great sites for getting news links are Liberty Daily and Whatafinger.
Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »
I mean, seriously
Clyde McGrady actually spent 32 paragraphs on this, which reads more like something that would have been in a hardcore lefty site, like Think Progress or The Daily Kos, but, then, most of the people who used to write for those blogs/sites have moved to the Credentialed Media and the younger crowd just goes to work for outlets like the Times these days. From the link
In the days since a federal agent killed Renee Good in Minneapolis, Republican officials and conservative commentators have called the 37-year-old white woman “very violent,” a “deranged lunatic woman” and a “domestic terrorist.”
Some right-wing influencers have latched onto a different word — or rather an acronym: Ms. Good, they have said, was AWFUL.
“An AWFUL (Affluent White Female Urban Liberal) is dead after running her car into an ICE agent who opened fire on her,” the conservative commentator Erik Erickson posted on social media. “Progressive whites are turning violent. ICE agents have the right to defend themselves.”
From a co-host on an AM radio show in Orlando, Pierce Outlaw, to an army of internet trolls, the acronym has taken off. Mr. Outlaw called AWFULs “the scourge of polite society.” The term popped up on the internet Wiktionary this month as AWFL, without the “U.”
Beyond labels and name-calling, the death of Ms. Good and the protests and anger in its wake have sparked a response from many on the right that is particularly targeted at white women in the streets, even though men have been just as involved. A majority of college-educated women, including white women, have long been skeptical of President Trump’s Make America Great Again movement, and that skepticism has been growing, according to exit polls after the 2024 election. And for months now, such women are attracting the ire of the president’s supporters.
Nah, the Right has been labeling white liberal women as a danger for years. Memes go back to easily the 1st Trump term. Of course, since Clyde is of an age where everything has to be seen in term of social justice
But for the broader core of Mr. Trump’s followers, the description of white, urban women as violent radicals obstructing mass deportations seems to reflect older anxieties around race, gender and immigration among the white, non-college educated men who make up the core of Mr. Trump’s movement and perceive their place in society slipping, said Dr. Shauna Shames, a political scientist at Rutgers and co-editor of the book “The Right Women: Republican Party Activists, Candidates, and Legislators.”
Nah, we just see them as batshit crazy. Women who seem to go for every new Virtue Signal issue even when it is not good for them. Does support biological men with mental illness taking women’s places in sports, business, etc, being in women’s bathrooms, showers, and locker rooms help women? Supporting illegal aliens to the point they put themselves in mortal danger seem like a good idea? How about shilling for anti-women Islam? Shaving their heads because of TDS? The list keeps going on and on.
The term AWFUL is not the first derisive name targeting white women. People across the political spectrum once gleefully targeted so-called Karens, a term meant to denigrate women — usually white and middle-aged — caught using their privilege to bend the world in their direction.
Does Clyde understand that the term Karen was initiated by Liberals, regarding a lady who called the cops on a group of black folks who were illegally cooking in a park? Seriously, the NY Times is more concerned about this than, say, the people protesting in Iran.
Things like tornadoes, wildfires, hurricanes, etc, never happened before you drove a fossil fueled vehicle and jealously held on to your Freedom
‘Climate change is here’: Experts warn environmental crisis is decades ahead of forecasts
Melting glaciers, coastal areas wiped off the map and regular 40C heat in Europe. Climate experts warn the gloomy predictions of long term environmental change are no longer the future – they are already here.
Last year was the third hottest on record, with the World Meteorological Organization this week warning that 2025 continued a run of “extraordinary” global temperatures. The EU has said the Paris climate agreement of 1.5C could be broken before 2030, a decade sooner than expected.
“It is alarming because we are seeing the types of events that scientists didn’t consider would impact us in 2025 or this decade,” Samantha Burgess, deputy director of Europe’s Copernicus Climate Change Service, tells The Independent.
Are these the same people who told us that Manhattan would be underwater right now? That California and Australia were in permadroughts? That the Arctic would be ice free?
“Climate change is here. We are seeing event classes [today] that were forecast in climate models for the 2050s, 2060s, and 2070s.”
They have so many models that fit every scenario they’re wanting to fearmonger about.
The start of 2025 saw the catastrophic devastation caused by the California wildfires, killing up to 440 people and inflicting unprecedented economic losses in excess of $40bn, according to Swiss Re.
It was an above average year for hurricane activity with three category 5 hurricanes in the North Atlantic for the first time in twenty years. That includes the historic Hurricane Melissa, setting records for being one of the strongest storms in the Atlantic this century.
The wildfires were caused by human and government incompetence, and possibly arson, not a slight increase in global temperatures over 175 years. Hurricanes happen. Can we compare this to what happened during the warm and cool periods over the last 8,000 years, because, if you can’t, that’s not science. But, then, this is a cult, not science.
“It was not a peak peril year,” says Balz Grollimund, head of catastrophe perils at Swiss Re. “We haven’t had any big hurricane, flood, or earthquake losses, but 2025 still made it to an average loss year.
Is he adding earthquakes into climate doom, or, just discussing natural disasters?
…is a great place for filming selfies far from the big cities on climate doom while wearing very few clothes, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Cold Fury, with a post on that phrase “law abiding”
Read: If All You See… »
How quick till this order is overturned on appeal?
A U.S. judge on Friday ordered federal law enforcement participating in the Minnesota immigration crackdown to stop pepper spraying, detaining and pulling over peaceful protesters.
The preliminary injunction by Judge Katherine Menendez of the U.S. District Court in Minnesota applies to federal agents and officers participating in Operation Metro Surge, the controversial immigration crackdown launched by the administration of President Donald Trump, who has promised to round up criminal migrants for deportation across the country.
It will remain in effect, Menendez wrote, until the mission concludes or conditions are such that it is no longer needed. The judge stated the federal operation started in Minnesota on Dec. 4 in Minnesota.
The ruling orders federal law enforcement to stop taking action against peaceful protesters, including those demonstrating against federal agents and officers.
The injunction for now prohibits “retaliating against persons who are engaging in peaceful and unobstructive protest activity, including observing the activities of Operation Metro Surge,” according to Friday’s ruling.
Um, OK? Pretty much everyone who gets sprayed is involved in obstructing ICE, for preventing a threat. People aren’t getting detained/pulled over for no reason. We literally see it on video
There are plenty of those out there. These wackos, seemingly mostly affluent, white liberal women (AWFL), have been trained to do this. It ends up making no difference in arresting illegals, it just gets themselves in trouble.
The injunction is a response to a lawsuit, filed Dec. 17 by the ACLU on behalf of six protesters and observers who alleged their constitutional rights, including freedom of speech and right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures, were violated by federal agents. The plaintiffs have been subjected to arrest, detention and pepper spraying, and had firearms pointed at them, during the immigration enforcement operation, according to the ruling.
Law enforcement won’t point a loaded firearm at someone 99.999999% of the time unless they are a threat.
Read: Fed Judge Kathy Orders ICE To Not Pepper Spray Mostly Peaceful Protesters In Minnesota »