PRC Investigating Whether Local Cops Are Snitching On Illegals

If it turns out cops are telling federal authorities about the really bad ones, will the People’s Republik of California tell us about it?

After immigration arrests, California lawmakers wonder: Are police telling the feds too much?

Citing fear of authoritarianism and invasive surveillance, California lawmakers voted this week to audit the operation of joint intelligence centers where federal, state, and local agencies share information.

The decision was made Tuesday along party lines by the Joint Committee on Legislative Audit, a 14-member body made up of members of the California Senate and Assembly. Nine members voted in favor, one against, and four did not vote. The audit will be conducted by State Auditor Grant Parks.

Advocacy groups like the American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Oakland Privacy urged lawmakers to demand the audit to rein in what they described as abuses at the facilities, known as fusion centers. They cited an incident in which Immigration and Customs Enforcement reportedly asked La Habra police to run searches on its behalf at an Orange County fusion center and several others in which San Francisco police circumvented a local ban on facial recognition by asking for help from a fusion center with access to the technology.

CalMatters investigations last year and last month found instances where local law enforcement agencies shared license plate information with ICE or the Border Patrol, violating state law. California Attorney General Rob Bonta sent letters to more than a dozen local law enforcement agencies since 2024 for potential violations of the state law banning it and sued the City of El Cajon for allegedly violating the ban.

See, they do not care a whit if the cops are sharing information with Los Federales on U.S. citizens who are, say, wanted fugitives, they care if the people are illegal aliens. And it’s somehow “authoritarianism” to alert Los Federales. I don’t remember it being “authoritarianism” when ICE and others were being told when Obama and Biden were in office. They never say why they consider it authoritarianism.

Sen. Sabrina Cervantes, a Democrat from Riverside, requested the audit. She believes that fusion centers have undermined state law that prohibits cooperation with federal law enforcement agencies for immigration purposes. A 2024 Surveillance Technology Oversight Project report cited in her audit petition alleges that a California fusion center routinely shares information with ICE. She also said the centers put at risk the privacy of Californians more broadly, particularly given what she describes as the slide of the federal government into authoritarianism.

Federal law takes presedence over state law on immigration matters, and, the state of California’s, the counties, and local police all receive federal money. Stop taking it and maybe you’ll have a leg to stand on.

Meanwhile

Santa Fe has short time to spend housing funds after immigration fight with feds

Six local nonprofits have a shrinking window of time to spend federal funds meant to help reduce Santa Fe’s severe housing problems.

The funding must be spent by the end of the federal fiscal year in September, but with just six months remaining, the nonprofits are still waiting for the city, which administers the federal program, to allocate the money.

The money was specifically stated to not be used for illegals, but, of course, a judge said that was mean. So, now, Santa Fe has a severe housing problem because there are too many illegals, making it difficult for the Americans who live there, raising the cost of things like rent.

Read: PRC Investigating Whether Local Cops Are Snitching On Illegals »

We’re Saved: Small Group Of Alaskans Take Fossil Fueled Trips To Demand Climate (scam) Action

So, they want to get rid of fossil fuels? Really, without them Alaska would be a back country wilderness. No one would really go there

Small group of Alaskans rally for climate action at Capitol

stop global warmingOrganizers and lawmakers gathered on the steps of the Alaska State Capitol on Thursday morning to rally in support of bills and funding to address climate change in Alaska.

At the gathering of about 25 people, Rep. Donna Mears, an Anchorage Democrat, said climate disasters are expensive for the state.

“The additional cost to government for responding to climate disasters like interior wildfires and the storms in western and northern Alaska,” Mears said. “So we’re getting budget pressures from that, but we also we can’t just spend money on that. We need to work upstream.”

Mears said she supports programs like the Renewable Energy Fund, which was established in 2008. The Alaska Energy Authority requested $41.2 million dollars from the Legislature to help pay for 29 renewable energy projects across the state next year.

Funny how they always want Other Pay to pay for their beliefs. How well will solar panels work in the winter when the sun is scarce, both from storms, fog, and fewer daylight hours? How about wind turbines when it can get way too windy for them to operate and very cold for extended periods of time? Look, in fairness, a lot of Alaskans have solar panels for their personal homes, since laying power lines is not easy in the frozen soil. Many do not have running water, relying on cisterns. Many heavily rely on fossil fuels for transportation, power, and heating.

Felix Rivera is an Anchorage Assembly member who works at The Alaska Center, an environmental advocacy nonprofit. He spoke in support of two bills that haven’t made it out of committees.

Seems rather a conflict of interest.

Read: We’re Saved: Small Group Of Alaskans Take Fossil Fueled Trips To Demand Climate (scam) Action »

House GOP Nixes Senate DHS Bill

The hard part is Thune sent the Senate off on a two week break from D.C. I mean, is he trying to lose the mid-terms?

House GOP rejects Senate-passed DHS bill, proposes stopgap

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Friday rejected a Senate-passed bill to fund much of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), but not immigration enforcement, instead proposing a stopgap to fund the entire department for eight weeks.

The move amounts to a stunning rebuke of the upper chamber by GOP leaders — and extends the length of what is already the longest partial government shutdown in history in its 42nd day.

“This gambit that was done last night is a joke. I’m quite convinced that it can’t be that every Senate Republican read the language of this bill,” Johnson said, going on to read the Senate-passed bill language that provides zero dollars for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and border security operations.

“We’re not doing that,” Johnson said. “And it is unconscionable to me that the Democrats would force some sort of negotiation at three o’clock in the morning.”

Johnson said he intended to hold a vote “as soon as possible” on a continuing resolution (CR) to fund the entirety of DHS through May 22. Such a bill will mark the fourth time that the House has passed funding for the full department.

Of course, it’s hard for that CR to go anywhere even if the Senate was still in D.C.

House GOP leaders were also outraged at the Senate deal. Johnson was visibly frustrated in comments to reporters as he slammed the Senate GOP bill, putting him at odds with his counterpart in the upper chamber, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.).

“I wouldn’t call John Thune the engineer of this,” Johnson said. “Chuck Schumer and the Democrats in the Senate have forced this upon the Senate. I have to protect the House.”

Thune is the majority leader, right? If the situation was reversed do you think that Schumer would have allowed this? Or would he have found a way to get it done? Hell, Schumer crowed about the GOP caving.

The bill funding much of DHS also passed the Senate by unanimous consent, underlining its broad support, even as Johnson on Friday sought to put the blame on Senate Democrats.

So, they didn’t actually vote? Put themselves on the record specifically? Huh.

Read: House GOP Nixes Senate DHS Bill »

Your Fault: The Iran War Is Bad For Hotcoldwetdrya

The Warmists are very upset that Iran is having the shit kicked out of it, and want this to stop

The war on Iran is a war on the climate

Every missile fired, every refinery burned and every pipeline ruptured does more than damage and destroy infrastructure and take human life — it releases vast quantities of greenhouse gases into an already overheated atmosphere. In Tehran, military strikes have turned the sky black and the air caustic, a stark reminder that modern war runs on carbon.

Preliminary modeling and calculations by the Climate and Community Institute estimate that the first 14 days of the current Iran conflict produced more than 5 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, an amount equal to a year’s worth of emissions from 1.1 million gas-powered cars.

Emissions will continue as the war goes on, but they will increase exponentially when it is over. Clearing rubble and then rebuilding are the biggest source of emissions in any war. One study estimates greenhouse gas emissions for rebuilding Gaza and Lebanon after the war to be at least 24 times more than those from the war itself.

Just as concerning as increased greenhouse gas emissions from war and the repercussions are the prospect of feverish production of fossil fuels and a return to a greater reliance on coal to meet current and future demand. Roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil passed through the Strait of Hormuz before the war shut it down. Fatih Birol, executive director of the International Energy Agency, has called this the greatest energy security threat in modern history.

The obvious answer from the cult is to top using fossil fuels. Also, to leave the Islamic extremists in Iran and Gaza alone. Who cares if women are treated like chattel: it’s a small price to pay for the Warmists. Well, a small price to pay for Other People. The Warmists are safely ensconsed in their air conditioned homes with full Internet and food and energy.

Weird how the same people really didn’t complain much about the war in Ukraine. Hell, most of them supported it.

Read: Your Fault: The Iran War Is Bad For Hotcoldwetdrya »

If All You See…

…is a horrible fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Common Cents Blog, with a post on a hero ICE agent saving the life of a baby at JFK.

Read: If All You See… »

Is There A DHS Deal In The Senate?

If there is, will it pass in the House?

DHS shutdown breakthrough comes at cost for Republicans as funding fights nears end

Congress is one step closer to ending the Homeland Security shutdown after the Senate advanced a new, last-minute deal, but it came at the price of Republicans ceding ground, temporarily, to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

The Senate unanimously advanced a deal to reopen most of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in the wee hours of Friday morning, 42 days into the shutdown that was spurred by the Trump administration’s immigration operations in Minnesota.

It was an agreement that largely gave Schumer and Senate Democrats what they wanted — no funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and parts of Customs and Border Protection (CBP). But it lacked the stringent reforms they desired, like requiring judicial warrants or requiring agents to unmask. (snip)

The DHS funding deal now heads to the House, where Republicans aren’t enthusiastic about not funding key components of President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown agenda.

There it is. But, Democrats did not get a block on immigration enforcement protecting their identities from the unhinged Democrat base, nor on requiring warrants. Which is strange, because Democrats didn’t care about warrants when Obama was deporting all those illegals, nor under Biden.

And ICE and CBP are still flush with roughly $75 billion in cash from Trump’s “big, beautiful bill,” giving the agencies a buffer for a time.

“The good news is we anticipated this a year ago. I mean, one of the reasons we front loaded, pre-loaded up the ‘one big, beautiful bill’ with advanced funding for Homeland Security was because we anticipated this was likely going to happen, and it did,” Thune said. “I still think it’s unfortunate. The Dems wanted reforms. We tried to work with them on reforms. They ended up getting no reforms.”

And then Republicans say that they will put funding for ICE and CBP and immigration operations in a reconciliation bill. Will they, though?Never know what you’ll get out of the Squish Squad.

The House is supposed to vote on it today, so, we’ll see what happens. And Thune best not let the Senate leave on a 2 week break before that vote is held.

Democrats want to stop immigration enforcement against people like the above. By extension, they approve of people like that.

Read: Is There A DHS Deal In The Senate? »

WHO Is Now A Green Climate (scam) Fund Entity

I guess this means they will have more of Other People’s confiscated money flowing throw that they can treat as a slush fund

WHO is now a Green Climate Fund accredited entity

The World Health Organization (WHO) has today received accreditation by the Green Climate Fund (GCF), a fund for climate finance that was established within the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The accreditation will unlock new funding to protect communities worldwide from the health impacts of climate change.

“Climate and health action saves lives,” said Dr Ruediger Krech, Director of the department of Environment, Climate Change, One Health and Migration at WHO, “Climate financing will ensure that the health sector is prepared to meet the demands of the climate crisis without contributing further emissions to climate change.”

This landmark decision is the result of extensive preparations including high-level exchanges between the Director General of WHO and the Executive Director of the GCF.

WHO has over 25 years of climate and health policy and technical leadership, and over 15 years of implementing climate and health programmes in over 30 countries. Extensive country presence and partnerships with ministries of health and governmental agencies position WHO as a vital partner in addressing global climate and health challenges. The combined strength of WHO and GCF will lead to direct climate and health programmes and the development of health-promoting interventions at the country level by leveraging a network of health ministries and key partners.

And what percentage of the money will never make it to the recipients/projects? I wonder if they will allow bi-yearly, unannounced audits?

According to estimates, just 2% of adaptation funding and only 0.5% of multilateral climate funding go to health, leaving the health sector with the greatest unmet demand. WHO aims to address these needs for climate finance support and empower national health ministries to develop climate-resilient health systems, reduce emissions and bolster climate-health action across sectors.

In other words, WHO wants its piece of the scam pie. Why should others get rich of siphoning the money, leaving WHO out of it till now?

Read: WHO Is Now A Green Climate (scam) Fund Entity »

Strange: Big Cities Lost Lots Of Population After Immigration Crackdown

Now, why would all these “undocumented immigrants” leave?

Immigration Slowdown Hits Every Metro Area in the U.S., Census Shows

In the Laredo metro area, on the Texas border, immigration screeched to a virtual standstill.

El Centro, a metro that has historically served as a desert gateway into California, lost more people to other countries than it gained.

In Denver and its suburbs, the net immigration rate fell by almost three-quarters. In the Chicago area, it was slashed by nearly two-thirds.

Every metro area in the United States, in fact, experienced lower immigration rates during the year leading up to July 2025 compared with the previous year, according to new estimates released on Thursday by the Census Bureau.

In about 75 percent of all counties, overall population growth — including immigration, domestic migration, births and deaths — either slowed or turned negative. Only 25 percent grew faster.

Where did they all go?

Some of the strongest population gains came in suburban counties, especially in the South, which continued to grow rapidly as they attracted people from other parts of the country.

About 18,000 people moved into Pasco County, Fla., a suburban community about 30 miles outside Tampa, enough to increase its population by nearly 2.8 percent.

Unfortunately, some of this is simply urban liberals leaving the hellholes they voted for.

But for counties along the Mexican border, things looked quite different. In contrast to years when they experienced a surge in immigration, total populations in more than half of these counties dipped in the new estimates.

In Webb County, Texas, which includes Laredo, net international migration dropped by about 95 percent. It gained fewer than 700 people total in the new estimates.

So, the illegals and fake asylum seekers left and stopped coming? I think the reason is related to Orange

Some of those counties lost residents to other parts of the United States, a trend that has been ongoing for years. But immigration was a major driver of the decline. Net international migration across all those urban counties fell to about 932,000 from about two million.

Those new immigrants often required a lot of resources and assistance, said Julia Gelatt, an associate director at the Migration Policy Institute, a research center in Washington. “So some cities,” she added, “might be relieved to have a pause in those people who need initial assistance.”

Well, if they want to come to the U.S. then they need to make sure they can pay for themselves, not have the US taxpayers do it. This upsets Democrats quite a bit since they count on all these foreigners to vote for Democrats.

Read: Strange: Big Cities Lost Lots Of Population After Immigration Crackdown »

Climate Cult Wants Farming To Go Back To 1499

Most Warmists have zero idea how food is grown and raised: they just know it shows up in their supermarkets. And, because they are a doomsday cult, they cannot just mind their own business

Modern agriculture is collapsing under climate change. Indigenous farming has answers.

In the last five years, Indigenous agriculture has received attention in academia as an alternative model, though on a smaller scale, to modern farming systems. Research has shown that some traditional farming systems, such as growing maize, beans and squash together, protect soil health, reduce biodiversity loss and support Indigenous knowledge, known as traditional ecological knowledge.

Yeah, I want to listen to “academia” which offers degrees ending in “Studies” for $50K a year. These mostly uber-white liberals think they know what is best for the poor, poor Indigenous

How many of these elements from traditional farming can successfully translate into larger crop production models, when little research defines their economic value, is a question Kamaljit Sangha, a researcher in ecological economics at Charles Darwin University, wanted to explore in a new study published earlier this month in the journal Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems.

“How do we take it from the perspective where there are holistic and multiple values [of Indigenous farming], which are mostly hidden in the current way of measuring the importance of these food systems?” said Sangha. “The key message we wanted to get out is that if we highlight the non-monetary values of these food systems, we hope that this can attract more attention from policy decision makers and governments to support these indigenous peoples and local communities’ food systems.”

When assessing how many publications include rigorous empirical evidence to measure potential scalability and sustainability for Indigenous farming systems against mainstream agriculture, “there is a gap between advocacy and evidence,” the report read.

Alright, once you start yammering about “advocacy” this is pure on cult

In the study, Sangha and Charles Darwin University researchers found that when reviewing 49 published research articles on Indigenous peoples and local communities, known as IPLCs, most literature highlighted the benefits of communities’ traditional farming practices. This comes at a crucial vantage point, as global industrialized agricultural systems are swept up by climate change risks. The study also found a lack of research examining the quantitative productivity and scalability of IPLC farming, an area Sangha hopes to see more literature on in the near future.

So, their entire study was sitting in their air conditioned office and reading other journals? Huh

As average temperatures climb, climate change is decreasing biodiversity, altering nutritional values and degrading soil health. These effects are disrupting global food production and Indigenous food systems alike. Currently, food systems are responsible for 26 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions.

Obviously, the idea is to grow less food. And, with less food that means there needs to be fewer humans. But, the cultists rarely want to say they want population reduction

The study also argues that merging the two systems, rather than viewing them as opposites, is required to tackle the climate crisis. With government investment and targeted policy, IPLC agriculture can build a resilient wall against threats driven by climate change, while modern farming industries can learn from these traditional ways of growing food. Otherwise, both systems face the loss of ecological, economic and cultural resources.

In other words, with government in charge of the food systems we’ll have a carbon free Modern Socialist utopia! Weird how this almost always ends with “Big Government”, eh?

Read: Climate Cult Wants Farming To Go Back To 1499 »

If All You See…

…are tropical flowers which will soon grow in Finland, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on why the California governor debate was cancelled.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove