Weird: DC Judge Orders Proud Boys Leader To Leave And Not Come Back

It’s like something out of an old west movie. Or the Lord Of The Rings

Proud Boys Leader Released From Police Custody And Ordered To Leave D.C.

The leader of the right-wing group Proud Boys was released from police custody on Tuesday and ordered by a judge to leave Washington, D.C. — and stay away.

Henry “Enrique” Tarrio, 36, was arrested Monday shortly after his arrival in the District, where Trump supporters are gathering to rally during Congress’ official certification of the Electoral College ballots on Wednesday.

Tarrio was charged with destruction of property and possession of high-capacity firearm magazines.

In media interviews, Tarrio has claimed responsibility for tearing down and burning a Black Lives Matter banner at a historic Black church last month.

Tarrio appeared in court on Tuesday. A judge ordered him to leave the District and banned him from returning except for very limited conditions, including meeting with his attorney or attending a court date, The Associated Press reports. His next hearing is scheduled for June, according to WAMU.

Again, I’m not defending Tarrio’s destruction of property, he did it, he admits it, and it is wrong. It’s wrong for BLM/Antifa nutters to do it, but, interestingly, have you ever heard of a D.C. judge ordering one of them to leave the capital city of the United States of America and not come back except for court stuff? Can the judge legally do this, order a U.S. citizen to stay out of the People’s capital? Sure, a judge can order someone to stay away from a very specific place, but, a whole city? Especially the nation’s capital? What if Tarrio wants to go to the office of his Representative or Senators? Or witness what happens in Congress?

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

9 Responses to “Weird: DC Judge Orders Proud Boys Leader To Leave And Not Come Back”

  1. Hairy says:

    Judges can put whatever conditions on bail they feel are necessary
    Teach what about the delegate firearms charge how do you feel about that ?

    • gitarcarver says:

      Judges can put whatever conditions on bail they feel are necessary

      No they cannot. This is another case of you spouting what you want and agree with rather than the laws of the land.

      Conditions of bail must serve a legal purpose and must not violate Constitutional rights. While a judge can demand that a person stay away from another or a specific place, the idea that a judge could ban someone from 121 square miles of land – most of which is public – for a simple destruction of property charge is ludicrous on its face.

  2. Professor Hale says:

    Democrat judges have no restrictions on their authority. Restrictions on authority are only for Republicans and their appointed judges.

  3. Hairy says:

    Cdrxrqp
    Teach what about the delegate firearms charge how do you feel about that ?
    In view of his past arrests including a possible hate crime do you think he shoujd be allowed to possibly continue to do these crimes while out in bail when proud boys and MAGA supporters are already saying tgat they will be violent when Biden is proclaimed tge winner?

  4. gitarcarver says:

    Teach what about the delegate firearms charge how do you feel about that ?

    The charge should be dropped. The “firearms charge” was for two magazines, neither of which contained cartridges. The magazines are legal in the state of Florida. Second Amendment rights should be honored across state lines as provided by the 14th amendment.

    In view of his past arrests including a possible hate crime…..

    Virginia v. Buck says that this cannot be a hate crime. The burning of the BLM flag is not a hate crime. Sorry to disappoint you. The fact that you want to bring this up shows that you really do hate the Constitution and the laws of the land.

    proud boys and MAGA supporters are already saying tgat they will be violent when Biden is proclaimed tge winner?

    Most people would be against violence which is why I am surprised that you are bringing it up after the violence protests from the left during the Trump inauguration which you supported here on this blog. Actually, I am not surprised at all.

    As all the left has is hate, and that includes hatred of people’s rights, and hatred of morals.

  5. Hairy says:

    Crimes were committed not in a state but on Federal land
    This was property owned by a black church Vandalism of an important black church could easily be construed to fall into a racially motivated hate crime
    MAGA and proud boys have breached the Capitol buildings
    Pence whisked away
    Reports of gunshots
    Lawmakers told to shelter in their offices
    Some stages allow some felons to own guns shoujd all states respect those laws ?

    • gitarcarver says:

      Crimes were committed not in a state but on Federal land

      Who are you talking about Hairy? As this story was about the leader of the Proud Boys, that who I thought you meant. If you are talking about Representative Lauren Boebert, she was not arrested nor stopped. So who are you talking about?

      This was property owned by a black church Vandalism of an important black church could easily be construed to fall into a racially motivated hate crime

      • gitarcarver says:

        (Sorry – hit the wrong button.)

        This was property owned by a black church Vandalism of an important black church could easily be construed to fall into a racially motivated hate crime

        If it “falls,” it is not a hate crime. Once again,read Virginia v. Buck.

        MAGA and proud boys have breached the Capitol buildings

        First, if that has happened, it is wrong. People on the ground are saying Antifa is behind most of the violence. However, it is the left that said that this type of protest was a good thing and that destruction of property and trespass was “peaceful protest.”

        At least I am being consistent. I am saying it is wrong no matter what. You are saying it is okay when people you support do it.

        Some stages allow some felons to own guns shoujd all states respect those laws ?

        No states allow violent felons to posses fire arms, Hairy. Stick to facts.

        So GC your interpretation of that law is that since the mag was empty it wasn’t illegal?
        Really?

        What I am saying is that the home state of Tarrio allows him to possess the mags. Without cartridges, they pose no threat to the health or welfare of anyone.

        Secondly, a Federal Court threw out the California ban on magazines. That was appealed to the SCOTUS who refused to hear the case, upholding the idea that the ban was unConstitutional.

        Furthermore…..

        “As recognized in District of Columbia v. Heller, the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms. By implication, that right is not limited to guns but extends also to the ammunition and magazines that make guns operable. The Court also held that the Second Amendment protects arms in “common use,” which would cover the 20‐​round magazines that are standard equipment for a significant portion of weapons currently in lawful use.”

        If you remember, the left said that all it would take was one case that said gay marriage was legal and all the states would have to honor it because of the 14th Amendment. Gay marriage (which is not a enumerated right in the Constitution) should be legal (and now is) but states should not step in on Second Amendment rights which are stated in the Constitution.

        There is a principal in the law called “upstream bans,” which basically means you cannot ban a legal activity by banning an “upstream” activity that supports that legal activity. As stated, most weapons come with 20 round mags. Those mags fit into a weapon. By banning the mags, you control the legal activity.

        I suppose that might also be applied to guns?

        A gun without bullets is a club. So you want to ban clubs and baseball bats now? After all, you and your counterpart here have always supported banning weapons.

        You hate freedom, Hairy. That’s all the left has.

        Some stages allow some felons to own guns shoujd all states respect those laws ?

  6. Hairy says:

    So GC your interpretation of that law is that since the mag was empty it wasn’t illegal?
    Really?
    I suppose that might also be applied to guns?

Bad Behavior has blocked 8983 access attempts in the last 7 days.