Irony: Democrats Wrap Their Impeachment Theater Arguments By Calling Trump A Dictator

Let’s remember what Ted Cruz said: “If you have the facts, you bang the facts. If you have the law, you bang the law. If you don’t have either, you bang the table. Today, we’ve seen a whole lot of table banging.” How’s this for table banging? This is from the NY Times front page with their main bullet points

Democrats PRess Obstruction Case Against Trump
Days of Arguments Wrap Up With a Dire Warning
-House impeachment managers concluded their case against President Trump with an emphatic call for his removal. “He is a dictator,” Representative Jerry Nadler said.
-Republicans appeared unmoved — not just on the question of whether to acquit Mr. Trump, but on whether to compel witnesses and documents, too.

Wait, what was that dictator part?

[Schiff] and the six other managers prosecuting the president spent much of Friday tying up the facts of the second charge, obstruction of Congress, and arguing that Mr. Trump’s attempts to shut down a congressional inquiry into his actions toward Ukraine was unprecedented and undermined the very ability of the government to correct itself.

“He is a dictator,” said Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York. “This must not stand.”

If he was a dictator, there would be no impeachment theater. Schiff, Nadler, Pelosi, and the rest would have been rounded up long ago. Their would be no #NeverTrump movement, at least not an open one. The news would not be speaking out against him. He’d be passing rules with his pen and phone, right, avoiding the duly elected legislative branch, right? Na, even that doesn’t make a president a dictator.

We refer to this as theater. It’s becoming clearer and clearer that that is all it is. The Democrats are playing to their base and the unhinged #NeverTrumpers on the right. They want this stuff on the news, hoping to pick off some Trump voters for the general election. They don’t have to get them to vote Democrat, just to not vote Trump. They knew from the start this was going to fail, because they had no evidence. Hence, the obstruction of Congress and abuse of power, while failing to actually include the quid pro quo/bribery stuff that (supposedly) started this whole thing, based on 3rd and 4th hand hearsay. They knew that getting to 67 votes to boot Trump would be impossible. Now they go completely over the top, making it even more impossible. Here’s Excitable Adam Schiff

Mr. Schiff’s fiery final oration appeared to alienate the very Republicans he was trying to win over. When he referred to an anonymously sourced news report that Republican senators had been warned that their heads would be “on a pike” if they voted against Mr. Trump, several of them vigorously shook their heads and broke their sworn silence: “not true.”

As the Times points out in a separate article, this delighted the left and enraged the right. This almost guarantees that the squishes on the GOP side won’t vote to boot Trump. Democrats will then claim that the whole thing was rigged, that the GOP didn’t want to listen, that they don’t care. Think about Democrats saying that it is a conspiracy if Republicans don’t vote to boot Trump. Now it’s time for Mitch McConnell and Trump to turn this around on Democrats.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

38 Responses to “Irony: Democrats Wrap Their Impeachment Theater Arguments By Calling Trump A Dictator”

  1. ChumpChange says:

    Schiff refers to CBS ‘head on pike’ story, infuriating GOP: ‘Every one of us knows it is not true’

    “I thought he was doing fine with [talking about] moral courage until he got to the ‘head on a pike.’ That’s where he lost me,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who has said she might be open to calling witnesses in the trial, told reporters. “He’s a good orator. … It was just unnecessary.”

    Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, considered another key Republican vote, agreed with Murkowski.
    “Not only have I never heard the ‘head on the pike’ line but also I know of no Republican senator who has been threatened in any way by anyone in the administration,” she told reporters.

    The only thing the house is doing is attacking the Senate. Attacking Americans who dont believe what they believe.

    I have watched some of this and what is overwhelming in their presentation is that NATO and the UKRAINE are OWED BILLIONS of dollars, 80,000 American Boys and Girls on the front line against a nation(RUSSIA) who is a bully.

    IF WE dont spend trillions defending against RUSSIA then the Military Industrial Complex will go into recession and we will all lose millions and millions of dollars in money in our offshore bank accounts.

    I have to agree with the fellah that was here a while back that railed against the MIC. It seems the Democrats are more in bed with them than is the GOP. Trump going back to febuaray during PRIMARY season railed against the MIC, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and called it a huge waste of money. Trillions in fact.

    NOW hes doing the same thing in NATO and the UKRAINE. We sent 5 billion to them. It disappeared in a Russian Oligarchs Bank. Obama sent it I should say. Trump is like. This is bullshit. Im not sending any money till they get this shit cleaned up and he gets impeached for it.

    WHY? Because there are people to be paid off in the Ukraine to keep silent. They should be impeaching half of the house and the Senate, not Trump.

    LOOK at the people in this trial. Most of them were THERE FOR THE CLINTON IMPEACHMENT TWENTY FUKING YEARS AGO.

    America has lost its country. The one thing I do agree with Progressives on is the insane amount of Neoconservativism that has run amuck in DC the last 30 years and exacerbated by BUSH JR. WAR, WAR and more WAR. That is what Schiff spent hours telling Americans.

    VOTE TRUMP OUT BECAUSE HE DOESNT WANT WAR< WAR< WAR and More war. Congress should be impeached. Not Trump!!!!

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    tRump WANTS to be a dictator. He acts more like a Godfather.

    In a conversation he had with Giuliani and his goons, Igor Fruman and Lev Parnas, regarding US Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch:

    The Don: “Get rid of her! Get her out tomorrow. I don’t care. Get her out tomorrow. Take her out. OK? Do it.”

    On the same audio tape Giuliani goon, Lev Parnas (whom tRump denies knowing) says: “The biggest problem there, I think where we need to start is we got to get rid of the ambassador.”

    Ambassador Yovanovitch was anti-corruption and stood in the way of the tRump scheme to force Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.

    Why is The Don ordering non-gov’t goons to eliminate a US Ambassador? Shouldn’t he be telling the Secretary of State?

    Director General of the Foreign Service Carol Perez told Yovanovitch she needed to “come home immediately … on the next plane” because her safety was at risk.

    tRump told Ukrainian President Zelensky that Yovnovitch was going to go “through some things.”

    • Liljeffyatemypuppy says:

      Oooh another whining little sissybitch conspiracy theory.

      Scary, huh?

      Lolgfy Jeffery https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

    • Jl says:

      “Trump wants to be a dictator..”. Stand back, everyone, J is now a mind-reader..

    • formwiz says:

      Funny how we never get a link from a real source on these “conversations”, we never get a source.

      Ambassador Yovanovitch was anti-corruption and stood in the way of the tRump scheme to force Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.

      Sure she was. Her anti-corruption cred comes from an organization called AntAC, created by the Choom Gang, which means she’s mobbed up with Dr Evil, who co-created it, and was was the bearer of a do not prosecute list to the Ukraine President.

      So we can all guess what names were on that list – Biden, Pelosi, Kerry.

      And nobody credible buys what Parnas says; he’s been disavowed by Ukraine. The only people who believe him (because they have to) are Schiff For Brains, Madcow, and our own Schiff For Brains.

      Why is The Don ordering non-gov’t goons to eliminate a US Ambassador?

      Care to link this one, too?

      tRump told Ukrainian President Zelensky that Yovnovitch was going to go “through some things.”

      Wow, that sounds ominous.

    • FunnyThat says:

      Elwood

      I pointed out that this recording took place almost ONE FULL YEAR BEFORE BIDEN DECLARED HIS CANDIDACY.

      I know you don’t like it when people talk mean about other people, but really. The left has no case that trump fired her because he was afraid of Biden. That trump began an investigation because of Biden.

      Also Yovanovich is going around telling everyone not to worry that Trump will be impeached and everything will be just fine. Yovanovich is also the woman who refused to give the UKRAINE officials visas to come to the United States and deliver to congress their corruption findings.

      Why is that Elwood? When Obama and QUID PRO QUO JOE were running their embezzlement scheme in Ukraine did she refuse to let officials come to the USA with their investigation and then BIDEN WAS DISPATCHED TO FIRE THE PROSECUTOR LEADING THIS CHARGE?

      Why is that Elwood? This is the gal he fired. A Clinton Crony and obviously a huge Clinton Supporter doing everything she can to block and obstruct Trump in Ukraine.

      Since this recording took place a year before the candidates even DECLARED. Any of them there is no way they can honestly look Americans in the eyes and claim this was in fear of Biden.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        You’re taking Lev Parnas’ word that Ambassador Yovanovitch was going around Ukraine bad-mouthing trump. She DID block part of Giuliani’s plot to have the corrupt prosecutor Shokin (not “Officials”) come to the US. Ukraine fired Shokin at the strong urging of the EU, IMF and US. Shokin WAS NOT investigating Burisma as claimed by right-wing bloggers.

        https://www.salon.com/2019/12/16/giuliani-admits-he-needed-ambassador-marie-yovanovitch-out-of-the-way-for-ukraine-scheme/

        You’ll need to ask Giuliani and Parnas why they wanted the well-respected ambassador out – trump had no idea who she was. It’s likely trump was just being his “bad boy” mobster self at that time, showing off how “powerful” a man he is.

        Yet… trump didn’t have her removed until a year later in May 2019, a few months before the Giuliani/trump mob started leaning on Ukraine.

        Maybe his “defense” team can use the Reagan defense – that the US President had no idea how his personal attorney was mucking around in US national security. It’s disquieting that the US President was being led around by Giuliani.

        trump, or at least surrogates on his behalf, withheld military aid to Ukraine until Ukraine announced an investigation of Biden. It’s clear that trump knew what was happening, even directing it.

        On the TV this morning Sen Braun (R-IN) said he believes trump is chastised by the impeachment and won’t be bad anymore. LOL.

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    TEACH typed: They knew from the start this was going to fail, because they had no evidence.

    They knew from the start that the Republicans would not vote for tRump’s ouster. TEACH, like most Cons, refuses to pay attention, afraid of what he might see.

    Even with tRump’s absolute obstruction, they have unrefuted evidence that tRump ran a scheme to force Ukraine into attacking tRump’s likely opponent in exchange for military aid.

    There’s no question that tRump did what he is accused to doing. He and his Chief of Staff have publicly admitted to the plot. tRump clearly obstructed Congress. The facts are not in dispute. The question for Senate GOPhers is whether it’s proper for a president to use taxpayer money to force foreigners to support his/her campaign. If this is not impeachable, what is?

    • Liljeffyatemypuppy says:

      Theories don’t have to be proven.
      Just made up.
      Right, little sissybitch?

      Don’t be Jeffery.

      #Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

    • formwiz says:

      OK, let’s get back to reality.

      They knew from the start that the Republicans would not vote for tRump’s ouster.

      Actually, they knew nothing of the sort. They were hoping to sway enough Whigs that the vote to convict would be bi-partisan.

      Even with tRump’s absolute obstruction, they have unrefuted evidence that tRump ran a scheme to force Ukraine into attacking tRump’s likely opponent in exchange for military aid.

      Given that the exact opposite is the truth. They not only have zip on The Donald, we have Gropin’ Joe shooting off his mouth about his little scheme.

      There’s no question that tRump did what he is accused to doing. He and his Chief of Staff have publicly admitted to the plot. tRump clearly obstructed Congress. The facts are not in dispute. The question for Senate GOPhers is whether it’s proper for a president to use taxpayer money to force foreigners to support his/her campaign. If this is not impeachable, what is?

      It’s not impeachable because the Demos listed no crime.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        A crime is not required for impeachment. Only one ignorant of the law would say such a thing.

        Maybe tRump can get his goons to rough up Biden.

        The Dems knew from the start that it would be impossible to find 67 Senators to vote for conviction.

        But just because the entirety of the GOPherists is corrupt doesn’t mean Congress is not obligated to defend the Constitution.

        Don’t be a Dutcher.

        #Lolgfhttps://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

        • formwiz says:

          A crime is not required for impeachment. Only one ignorant of the law would say such a thing.

          I’d hardly call Alan Dershowitz ignorant of the law. You are since you always seem to be breaking it.

          Maybe tRump can get his goons to rough up Biden.

          You mean like Dingy Harry? Sounds more like your side. But we have the goods to rough him up in court.

          The Dems knew from the start that it would be impossible to find 67 Senators to vote for conviction.

          Then why waste the taxpayers’ money?

          But just because the entirety of the GOPherists is corrupt doesn’t mean Congress is not obligated to defend the Constitution.

          Oh, yes, the Demos are sooo devoted to the Constitution.

          That’s why they couldn’t find a real charge, they just made one up.

          Don’t be a Dutcher.

          At least I’ve read the Constitution.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            I’d hardly call Alan Dershowitz ignorant of the law.

            You should do more research…

            Dershowitz is a defense attorney whose obligation is to defend whoever pays him. He defended O.J. Simpson, Claus von Bulow, Jim Bakker, Patty Hearst, Mike Tyson, Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, and now Epstein’s friend, Don Trump. Defendants are entitled to a vigorous defense.

            Who said it?

            “It certainly doesn’t have to be a crime, if you have somebody who completely corrupts the office of president, and who abuses trust and who poses great danger to our liberty, you don’t need a technical crime.” — Alan Dershowitz, 1998

            The other night on the TV, Dershowitz tried to explain to attorney Jeffrey Toobin why he thought a crime wasn’t needed in 1998, but is needed in 2020. Dershowitz explained that 1) he was “less right” in 1998 (LOL) and 2) defense attorneys defend their clients (DUH), so he’s going to argue that a crime is needed to impeach tRump. I guess they don’t cover that stuff on FOX.

            At least I’ve read the Constitution.

            Have you? Really?

        • Kye says:

          Hey, ignorant Elwood, the Constitution states that Congress has the authority to impeach and remove a President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States upon a determination that such officers have engaged in treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. Therefore, Trump has to be accused f an actual crime and by that I mean NOT just beating the living shit out of Hillary? in an election, a real listed, illegal fukin crime.

          If he doesn’t have to commit a crime why is there evidence? Evidence of what if there is no crime? Why is there a “prosecution” and a “defense” unless to prosecute and defend someone accused of a fukin crime? You really gotta stop believing your own propaganda. The act of impeachment is an indictment and therefore a legal action. Man you leftists hate the Constitution so much you abuse, misuse and deliberately misconstrue the entire document, which BTW is a legal document setting up the law in America. Everything in it refers to law including impeachment.

          Trump 2020 Don’t be an Elwood who thinks Jeffery Epstein killed himself

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Kye,

            You are wrong.

            Try this. Can a President be charged with revealing classified information? Nope. A Prez can declassify anything. So a trump could give security secrets to enemies and there would be nothing we could do about it according to you and 2020 Dershowitz. According to Nixon and tRump, if a president does it, it’s legal. And the DOJ OLC states that a sitting Prez can’t be indicted.

            You further conflate the impeachment process with a criminal trial. They are not equivalent. Impeachment is a special procedure for removing officials in high office who commit bribery, treason or high crimes and misdemeanors – that is, misconduct by high officials. Certainly it would make sense to include ordinary crimes, e.g., tRump’s fantasy murder of someone on 5th Avenue, but also misconduct that we ordinary citizens don’t have the access to power to commit. One example could be soliciting electoral assistance from a foreign country.

            If Obama had shared classified information with China you would call it treason, right? If Obama had withheld billions in aid from Kenya unless they build him a 1000 acre compound with a mansion you would call it bribery, wouldn’t you? So you’re upset that the House didn’t label tRump’s misconduct with a specific US Code violation (knowing there was no US Code when the Constitution was signed).

            Your argument would be more persuasive if you tried to refute any of tRump’s questionable actions.

            Do you have any evidence that either tRump or Clinton killed Epstein? Didn’t think so.

  4. formwiz says:

    Any chance the Demos had for winning some Whigs to their cause was blown when Schiff For Brains and Fatty Nadless started shooting off their mouths like Baghdadi Bunny has been doing.

    We already talked about how stung the Weird Sister From ME was and Schiffhead lost Murki. These two are the leaders of the Whigs in the Senate. You lose them, you lose the Whigs.

    You lose.

  5. Kye says:

    “It’s not impeachable because the Demos listed no crime.” He and the rest of the radical communists who are attempting this affront to humanity don’t understand the Constitution which is why they hate it since it stops them from throwing us all in a gulag or murdering us like all socialists end up doing. Elwood and his tribe are constantly projecting their ill will, their moral weaknesses and their tyrannical desires on us. They have no God but political power and they want it NOW!

    That little bitch Elwood stated “Trump WANTS to be a dictator. He acts more like a Godfather.” Did Trump pass laws taking away your 2nd A rights, your right to a trial or your right to keep your property by passing Red Flag Laws? Did Trump stop leftists, communists, socialists or American Republicans from speaking at schools and colleges all across the country? Did he attempt to incarcerate people for “hate crimes” or “hate speech” which is defined as anything some leftist pussy says it is?

    Elwood’s always accusing us Real Americans of wanting a Theocracy of Christianity yet for 244 years America has been a majority Christian and no such laws were ever passed. Gee how’d that happen? I thought we Christians are so oppressive and closed minded? Elwood always accuses us Real Americans of hating blacks, Jews, Hispanics fags and all kinds of other people yet WE FREED THEIR SLAVES and gave them the right to vote while they herded them into inner city ghettos to exploit their votes. We joined with Hispanics to build the Southwest US until the left began talking their hate and their victimhood. We are a Western country so we don’t care if someone is a fag like the Moooslems do, we just don’t think it’s moral to force us to celebrate them and pay for their lewd proclivities.

    We also don’t think impeachment is there to remove a president we don’t like from office. We use elections for that. But now we know how much the left wants POWER we know they will cheat, steal and lie in the next election to obtain it. They are poor losers but if they win we will all be punished. They are very vindictive and they don’t care who they hurt or kill. History proves that over and over. Wherever the left has power the people die by the millions.

    Trump 2020 keep the killer leftists out of power.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Kye,

      We understand why Cons must lie about history. The truth is hardly flattering.

      Conservatives did not free the slaves. Conservatives have never enabled minorities to vote. Following the Civil War and the collapse of the Confederacy it wasn’t liberals that enacted segregationist (Jim Crow) laws that drove millions of Black citizens to northern cities looking for freedom from violence and gainful employment. It wasn’t liberals who crafted Neighborhood Covenants that kept white property owners from selling to Blacks or liberal bankers who created “redlining”.

      Given the opportunity:

      Would you support a law to allow/require teachers to lead prayers in schools?

      Would you support a ban on abortions? Would you allow any exceptions?

      Would you place any legal limits on the practice of Islam? Would you restrict the immigration of Muslims to the US?

      Would you support laws to allow/require city governments to erect religious shrines on government properties?

      Should LBGT individuals be allowed to marry with all the legal advantages that marriage confers?

      We try to understand why the Cons are so very angry these days. Things are going your way, yet you’re increasingly angry and violent. Partly, it’s just that Cons are naturally frustrated, envious and feel victimized. Mostly it’s because you can almost taste that it’s your time – dominance engineered by a great white father who finally recognizes the need of real Cons to dominate (smash) their enemies – libs, Dems, LBGTs, minorities, immigrants, non-Christians. You hate those smug libs, don’t you.

      How many impeachments have there been? 3? Johnson, Clinton and now tRump, and certainly Nixon deserved it but did the right thing and resigned.

      Is impeachment ever justified? Is it time for us to pass an Amendment eliminating impeachment? Did you oppose the Clinton impeachment, instead waiting for the next election? Most Republicans voted against Clinton.

      • formwiz says:

        We understand why Cons must lie about history. The truth is hardly flattering.

        Lessee now, who’s been caught in the most lies?

        Conservatives did not free the slaves. Conservatives have never enabled minorities to vote.

        Not too many Robert Gould Shaws in the Union Army. A lot of Tecumseh Shermans and Armstrong Custers who were in it to restore the Union, but not free the slaves.

        Did you know 50,000 Union soldiers deserted when the Emancipation Proclamation was issued?

        Ever hear of Jefferson C Davis and Ebenezer_Creek?

        Who said, “My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it” .

        Following the Civil War and the collapse of the Confederacy it wasn’t liberals that enacted segregationist (Jim Crow) laws that drove millions of Black citizens to northern cities looking for freedom from violence and gainful employment.

        Because the exodus of blacks out of the South didn’t start until WWI.

        Ignoramus

        It wasn’t liberals who crafted Neighborhood Covenants that kept white property owners from selling to Blacks or liberal bankers who created “redlining”.

        It wasn’t?

        Gropin’ Joe Biden had to give up his first run at the Presidency because he had a restrictive covenant on his house. How many darkies in Hyannisport or Kalorama?

        Would you support a law to allow/require teachers to lead prayers in schools?

        Would you support a ban on abortions? Would you allow any exceptions?

        Would you place any legal limits on the practice of Islam? Would you restrict the immigration of Muslims to the US?

        Would you support laws to allow/require city governments to erect religious shrines on government properties?

        Should LBGT individuals be allowed to marry with all the legal advantages that marriage confers?

        Yes, yes, yes, why not?, don’t be ridiculous.

        We try to understand why the Cons are so very angry these days. Things are going your way, yet you’re increasingly angry and violent. Partly, it’s just that Cons are naturally frustrated, envious and feel victimized. Mostly it’s because you can almost taste that it’s your time – dominance engineered by a great white father who finally recognizes the need of real Cons to dominate (smash) their enemies – libs, Dems, LBGTs, minorities, immigrants, non-Christians. You hate those smug libs, don’t you.

        From all the fulminating you’ve done this week, the only angry guy around is you.

        How many impeachments have there been? 3? Johnson, Clinton and now tRump, and certainly Nixon deserved it but did the right thing and resigned.

        Willie should have, too.

        What’s the point.

        Is impeachment ever justified? Is it time for us to pass an Amendment eliminating impeachment? Did you oppose the Clinton impeachment, instead waiting for the next election? Most Republicans voted against Clinton.

        Thank you, Captain Obvious. Willie was a Demo, so, yes, most Republicans voted against him.

        And that one was justified.

        Trump will walk on firm legal grounds, the country will approve, the Demos will pay for it this Fall, and you will go insane.

        Did I miss anything?

      • Dana says:

        Mr Dowd asked:

        Would you support a ban on abortions? Would you allow any exceptions?

        Yes, I would, and the only exception was an immediate threat to the life of the mother, since if a pregnant woman dies, she will take her unborn child with her. Even in such cases, if it is possible to save the life of the child as well, it should be required.

        Should LBGT individuals be allowed to marry with all the legal advantages that marriage confers?

        No. The problem with homosexual ‘marriage’ is that it hasn’t been just rights for individuals, but the basis of lawfare against normal Americans.

        How many impeachments have there been? 3? Johnson, Clinton and now tRump, and certainly Nixon deserved it but did the right thing and resigned.

        Is impeachment ever justified? Is it time for us to pass an Amendment eliminating impeachment? Did you oppose the Clinton impeachment, instead waiting for the next election? Most Republicans voted against Clinton.

        President Nixon resigned because the impeachment was bipartisan; Republicans as well as Democrats had concluded that the President broke the law. When it comes to President trump, the Democrats never even charged him with a violation of the law.

        But it was a good thing that the Clinton impeachment failed! After all, President Gore would probably have picked up the extra 529 votes he needed in Florida that Vice President Gore couldn’t manage to fabricate. https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_yahoo.gif

  6. Kye says:

    “Do you have any evidence that either tRump or Clinton killed Epstein? Didn’t think so.”

    You are one confused commie. I never stated that either Trump or cLinton killed Epstein, did I?

    Don’t be bitter, just get better. I know being an anti American commie leftists is hard in the era of Trump but some day your guys may take power then you can enjoy murdering us and stealing our property “for the children” of course.

    Trump 2020 Don’t let the Democrats inter us.

  7. Dana says:

    Our esteemed host concluded:

    Democrats will then claim that the whole thing was rigged, that the GOP didn’t want to listen, that they don’t care. Think about Democrats saying that it is a conspiracy if Republicans don’t vote to boot Trump. Now it’s time for Mitch McConnell and Trump to turn this around on Democrats.

    A conspiracy? If it is, it’s a conspiracy to vote the way their constituents would have them vote. The majority of Republican senators come from red states, states in which the President enjoys strong support.

    The Democrats forced through an impeachment without persuading a single Republican congressman to go along with them; they knew, as well as everyone else, that getting twenty Republican senators to go along with removal was a dream so wild that the worst crackhead in the country would never dream that.

    The Democrats claim that the Senate should be an impartial jury, but the House ‘grand jurors’ were Democrats who campaigned on, among other things, impeaching the President.

    Impeachment is wholly political, which is why the Framers set up impeachment such that it required a 2/3 supermajority for conviction; no partisan impeachment could, or ever has, succeeded.

  8. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Lessee now, who’s been caught in the most lies?

    Formwiz

    50,000 Union soldiers deserted when the Emancipation Proclamation was issued?

    Proof?

    Because the exodus of blacks out of the South didn’t start until WWI.

    Do you have a point? Ignoramus.

    Yes, yes, yes, why not?, don’t be ridiculous.

    If you could, you would force prayer in school, ban abortions, restrict Islam, require religious displays on gov’t property, and favor gov’t discrimination against gays. And youse guys say you don’t want a Christian theocracy.

    Did I miss anything?

    The point. But that’s to be expected. If he is still running, tRump will lose bigly next November, and youse guys will crawl back into the crevices but will continue your fight against America and Americans. Eventually, the US right will either have to change their approach, e.g., consider what the American people believe and want, or you’ll have to become a very minor, minority.

    Old racist, christofascists like you and others here will die and the KKK et al are not recruiting youngsters like before. Your only hope for continued power is a police state, which you’re OK with as long as you’re in charge. LOL

    • formwiz says:

      Proof?

      Pretty well-known (do a search), but I’m going by my V Form history teacher.

      Do you have a point? Ignoramus.

      Because you were trying to make a phony point about Jim Crow and I shot a hole in it.

      If you could, you would force prayer in school, ban abortions, restrict Islam, require religious displays on gov’t property, and favor gov’t discrimination against gays. And youse guys say you don’t want a Christian theocracy.

      Theocracy has nothing to do with laws against homosexual conduct or banning abortion; more to do with societal and public health. You said allow, not require, religious display and prayer in school (which, I might add, was a feature of such Administrations as Jefferson, Jackson, Wilson, and Franklin Roosevelt), so you’re lying yet again.

      Restricting Islam when we’re at war with it seems reasonable.

      If he is still running, tRump will lose bigly next November, and youse guys will crawl back into the crevices but will continue your fight against America and Americans.

      What’s with youse guys? I thought Demos all said y’all so they’d appeal to the ignorant and gullible darkies. Youse guys originate with the Irish who won the Mexican and Civil Wars and pushed the frontier west. It’s the rallying cry of the white ethnics Demos still need to win blue states (which will be few and far between this fall).

      Impeachment has so far lost The Weird Sister From ME, Murki, and now Romney. Nobody likes it and Trump’s approval’s been going up all week.

      Pushing nonsense is not going to advance the agenda. The only people crawling back in their holes will be you twerps.

      Embedded video

      Eventually, the US right will either have to change their approach, e.g., consider what the American people believe and want, or you’ll have to become a very minor, minority.

      We did that already.

      We’re WINNING so much we’re still not tired of it.

      Old racist, christofascists like you and others here will die and the KKK et al are not recruiting youngsters like before. Your only hope for continued power is a police state, which you’re OK with as long as you’re in charge. LOL

      LOL when you’re projecting only shows how nervous and frightened you are.

      Kind of like flop sweat.

      • Kye says:

        This is great. Elwood has lost his mind. He’s accusing every true blue American of everything he and his party does with zero self awareness. The dirty slavers and the real conmen as he calls us are the bastards who have been keeping the black people in ghettos feeding them cheese and lies for their votes. Putting abortion clinics on every corner and committing genocide of black babies. I hear they murder at least 300k a year. That’s the Democrat death toll that would make Goebbels envious.

        We troll Elwood and he fukin freaks out. Now he says crazy shit like:
        “Old racist, christofascists like you and others here will die and the KKK et al are not recruiting youngsters like before. Your only hope for continued power is a police state, which you’re OK with as long as you’re in charge. LOL”

        You gotta love stupid invented words from a crazy man like “christofascists”. Say what? So now the Christians are fascists? I’m afraid the word doesn’t mean what you think it means Elwood. Then you start on the KKK which is your go-to racist/white supremacist organization and you know it’s all Democrats but you just can’t help yourself. You are nothing but a pathetic hate monger and a blatant liar.

        You need help Elwood and you should decide where you’re moving after November because if you stay in America when it’s actually being run by Americans you’re gonna be a real unhappy little pup. I suggest N Korea. They have the syatem you want, they hate Christians too, no bad white racists and you’d be one of the tallest people there. Hell, you could become a Commissar in charge of Propaganda, reeducation and hate.

        Trump 2020 Drive Elwood to N Korea—one way.

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          Lost my mind? That means I’m qualified to be a Republican President!

          After The Don is dead and gone, schoolchildren will learn that only three US Presidents were impeached, Johnson, Clinton and Donald J. Trump.

          A young Kushner will ask, “Mom, wasn’t your name Trump? Our history book says a President Trump was a traitor. Are we related?”

          I’ll be happy enough regardless of the elections. But if the American people toss out the GOPhers, you’ll be very, very unhappy.

Bad Behavior has blocked 8787 access attempts in the last 7 days.