Robert Kennedy Jr. Exposes The Reality Behind Climate Change

Unintentionally. Oh, and the hypocrisy, as Michelle Fields interviewed him

(UK Daily Mail) Fields asked: ‘So will you lead by example?’

Kennedy Jr interrupted: ‘No no…I do lead by example.’

‘Are you going to give up your cell phone?’ she said.

‘No,’ he responded.

‘Are you going to give up your car?’

Visibly aggravated, Kennedy Jr pointed his finger in the reporter’s face and barked: ‘Are you going to give up your car?’

 photo barking_moonbat3.jpg

She calmly responds: ‘I’m not the one who’s here talking about the environment’. (Snip)

Pointing in her face, he says: ‘One of the biggest cunards that the press if falling for is blaming individuals for their own choices. That’s not the issue, the issue is what’s happening on Capitol Hill and that’s the thing you guys aren’t paying attention to.

‘You’re letting these people you’re letting the koch brothers run our country, subvert our democracy, corrupt our politicians, capture the -‘

It was totally wacko, he tried grabbing the mike, he was visibly agitated, and you have to see the video available at the link. And, it completely highlights what I’ve been saying for damned near a decade: this is all about left leaning politics,  getting lefty legislation passed, getting left leaning politicians elected, and really has little to nothing to do with actually “saving the planet”.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

9 Responses to “Robert Kennedy Jr. Exposes The Reality Behind Climate Change”

  1. Jeffery says:

    I advise readers to click the link, then click the video embedded in the link.

    Mr. Kennedy kicked the lightweight PJTV reporter’s butt.

    “Will you give up your cell phone?”, she harped. What a dumb, dumb question.

  2. jl says:

    “Kicked the reporter’s butt..” Sure, J, sure. “One of the biggest cunards the press is falling for is blaming individuals for their own choices.” Who else is to blame for an individual’s choices besides the…individual? What a waste of skin.

  3. Jeffery says:

    Also, whomever transcribed this, PJTV or the UK scandal sheet, should learn to spell. ‘Cunard’ is a cruise line and a ‘canard’ is a lie.

    “Are you going to give up your cell phone”, lol. That’s some real journalism.

  4. Jl says:

    Yes, the way to win debates is to whine there isn’t a law to throw people who disagree with you in jail. Actually, treason is punishable by death, but we shouldn’t quible over small things. It might tax Kennedy’s intellect.

  5. Jeffery says:

    It wasn’t a debate, it was a monologue. The reporter asked a couple of ridiculous questions repeatedly, and Mr. Kennedy straightened her out.

    I guess she thinks that since Kennedy has a cell phone she has proven global warming to be a hoax.

  6. Nighthawk says:

    Leave it to Jeffy to completely miss the point of the reporter’s questions.

    She is exactly right. These eviro wackos keep screeching that we need to change. Quit burning fossil fuels, quit using petroleum products and rely on so-called ‘clean energy. But when push comes to shove they refuse to set the example. These rich, high profile warmists have the largest carbon footprints of anyone. When this hypocrisy is pointed out they get very angry.

  7. Jeffery says:


    Rightists smear the man because they can’t refute the argument. They can’t even discuss the issues. You’ve decided global warming is a hoax driven by liberals desire to tell you what to do.

    The implication that rightists will change their behaviors only after liberals change theirs is a canard (or Cunard, as PJTV puts it, lol – now that’s journalism!).

    While it would be great if all Americans used as little energy as this liberal does, but you don’t.

    So all liberals must reduce their carbon footprints to zero before the rightists will lift a finger to help.

  8. Jl says:

    Nice strawman argument, J. But he’s a good little Nazi wannabe for, again, wanting to jail people who disagree with him. Or worse, death.. “Righties smear the man because they can’t refute the argument.” You’re going even further down, if that’s possible, on the debating front, J. How is it possible that our resident low information voter would complain about rightwing smearing” when the original post was about left wing jailing, or death? Very possible.

  9. Jeffery says:


    Left wing jailing or death?? WTF are you talking about?

    The original post was about a typical low information right-wing lightweight asking inane questions and getting pwned.

    Oh, and the Earth is warming from the CO2 we’re adding to the atmosphere.

Pirate's Cove