AmericaBlog Pushes “Zero Carbon” Nonsense

How cute

Why Zero Carbon is the only solution to global warming and climate change

Wait, are they now two separate things?

I’ve been writing a lot about the Zero Carbon economy, one of the two methods we have of dealing with the coming economic scarcity, and the only one of those ways that provides us a solution to climate change — “global warming” (though some of that warming may produce extreme cooling, in fact a new Ice Age, in some parts of the globe).

Um, global warming can produce a new ice age? And Warmists complain when we say they’re cultists and wouldn’t know science if it reached up and smacked them?

But that information, about the coming scarcity and the argument for Zero Carbon as the solution, is part of a longer essay, and the second part of it at that. So I want to bring these ideas to the forefront, and not by just linking to them.

Which leads to an article that starts out

I’ll be plain — we can solve the energy crisis with extreme energy rationing now. We need to put the brakes on the carbon car hard and soon. That’s the only way to keep the world below the original +3°C “game over” scenario. That’s the only way to keep the world at or below the newer +2°C “life between the Ice Ages” scenario:

And they are up for forced rationing, despite the human suffering and death toll.

But first things first. If we have any shot at all at fixing this mess, we need to have our eye on the right goal. So-called “carbon neutral” is a climate-caused death sentence. Zero Carbon, on a crash agenda is the only work worth doing. As a great man once said, it doesn’t make any difference how fast you climb the ladder, if it’s the wrong ladder.

Interestingly, Warmists refuse to go carbon neutral, much less zero carbon. And notice that they want Everyone Else to pay the price for their beliefs.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

6 Responses to “AmericaBlog Pushes “Zero Carbon” Nonsense”

  1. jl says:

    “Zero carbon” Just when you think these people can’t say anything dumber…..they do.

  2. david7134 says:

    Actually, this might be the best idea yet. If the liberals would start by not producing any offending CO2, in other words stop breathing, then our problems would be solved.

  3. Jeffery says:

    david,

    Still pushing your “kill all the liberals” meme again, I see. Typical violent, frustrated reactionary.

    Another way to solve problems is to work to solve problems, rather than just wishing death to those with whom you disagree.

  4. gitarcarver says:

    Still pushing your “kill all the liberals” meme again, I see.

    Hmmm… let’s see….. did david advocate killing anyone in his post?

    Well gee golly whilikers! He didn’t!

    So that means that the liberal Jeffery lied again.

    Another way to solve problems is to work to solve problems, rather than just wishing death to those with whom you disagree.

    So why do liberals wish death on people?

    “Rush Limbaugh is beginning to look more and more like Mr. Big, and at some point somebody’s going to jam a CO2 pellet into his head and he’s going to explode like a giant blimp. That day may come. Not yet, but we’ll be there to watch.” — Chris Matthews on MSNBC’s Morning Meeting, Oct. 13, 2009.

    “So, Michele, slit your wrist! Go ahead! I mean, you know, why not? I mean, if you want to — or, you know, do us all a better thing. Move that knife up about two feet. I mean, start right at the collarbone.” – Montel Williams talking about Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) on Air America’s Montel Across America, Sept. 2, 2009.

    “He is an enemy of the country, in my opinion, Dick Cheney is, he is an enemy of the country…. You know, Lord, take him to the Promised Land, will you? See, I don’t even wish the guy goes to Hell, I just want to get him the hell out of here.” — Ed Schultz, The Ed Schultz Show, May 11, 2009.

    “I’m waiting for the day when I pick it up, pick up a newspaper or click on the Internet and find out he’s choked to death on his own throat fat or a great big wad of saliva or something, you know, whatever. Go away, Rush, you make me sick!” — Radio host Mike Malloy on the Jan. 4, 2010 Mike Malloy Show.

    “I’m just saying if he [Dick Cheney] did die, other people, more people would live. That’s a fact.” – Bill Maher on his HBO show Real Time, Mar. 2, 2007,

    After then-Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.) said that the federal government was spending too much money on AIDS, National Public Radio’s Nina Totenberg, on the July 8, 1995 edition of Inside Washington, said, “I think he ought to be worried about what’s going on in the Good Lord’s mind, because if there is retributive justice, he’ll get AIDS from a transfusion, or one of his grandchildren will get it.”

    On the Nov. 4, 1994 edition of PBS’s To the Contrary, then-USA Today columnist and Pacifica Radio talk show host Julianne Malveaux said of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas: “I hope his wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease. … He is an absolutely reprehensible person.”

    Once again, li’l Jeffery projects his feelings and wishes on others.

    Of course now, he may come back with something “witty” like “suck it” because that is the level of his discourse when he is once again shown to be a liar and a hypocrite.

    By the way Jeffery, Al Gore and you are still hypocrites in the AGW debate and your unwillingness of you, Gore and people of your ilk to change your lifestyle shows that your talk about AGW is bluster and that you don’t actually believe what you type.

    Actions speak louder than words Jeffery.

  5. Jeffery says:

    And yet none of those people post here… david did. I disagree with their wishing harm on others the same way I disagree with david wishing death on those with whom he disagrees.

    I assume you must agree with david in wishing death on those with whom you disagree.

    I can only imagine the frustration that reactionaries must feel when debating – but death threats are over the top.

  6. gitarcarver says:

    I disagree with david wishing death on those with whom he disagrees.

    If he had done that, I would agree with you. But he didn’t so all you are doing is either lying (again) or demonstrating a continuing lack of reading comprehension skills. Which on is it?

    I can only imagine the frustration that reactionaries must feel when debating – but death threats are over the top.

    I can only imagine what it is like living your delusional life where you project your desires on others; where you lie; where you cannot read or comprehend what it said.

    I don’t make death threats on anyone Jeffery. On that we can agree. However that was not what was said, so another strawman you created comes back and kicks you in the butt.

    Again.

    And in case you forgot Jeffery, Al Gore and you are still hypocrites in the AGW debate and your unwillingness of you, Gore and people of your ilk to change your lifestyle shows that your talk about AGW is bluster and that you don’t actually believe what you type.

    Actions speak louder than words Jeffery.

Bad Behavior has blocked 5798 access attempts in the last 7 days.