St. Greta Arrested For Hanging With Terror Group In The UK

For being so against fossil fuels St. Greta sure does travel around a lot

Greta Thunberg Arrested in London While Supporting Palestine Action Terror Group

st greta carProfessional protester Greta Thunberg was arrested Tuesday in Central London while part of a mass gathering backing the Palestine Action terrorist group.

The 22-year-old Swede was detained as she expressed support for the proscribed organization.

In a video shared by the Prisoners for Palestine protest group, Thunberg can be seen holding a sign reading “I support the Palestine Action prisoners. I oppose genocide” at the demonstration outside the central London offices of Aspen Insurance.

Two activists sprayed red paint over the front of the building before police arrived and made arrests.

Prisoners for Palestine said its protest had targeted the offices of Aspen Insurance because the company provided services to Israeli-linked defence firm Elbit Systems UK.

The climate cult basically embraced a Jew hater

Thunberg also joined a pro-Palestinian protest in central London last night where she was seen shouting “we support the hunger strikers.”

She said in a video posted on her Instagram: “We are witnessing with pure and utter disgust how the UK government is handling this situation.”

Why is this her business? She’s not a British citizen, yet, she took what had to be a fossil fueled trip to the UK.

Maybe it was a bad idea for the UK to continue to bring jihadis into the UK, particularly after the 7/7 attack, turning the nation into a hotbed of Islamic extremism

Read: St. Greta Arrested For Hanging With Terror Group In The UK »

Bummer: “Immigrants” Have Fewer Legal Options To Not Get Repatriated

America has always been generous. Should we be taking in every 3rd worlder who refuses to assimilate, lives off government programs, and demands America change for them?

Immigrants now have fewer legal options to stay in the U.S. under Trump

More than 1.6 million immigrants have lost their legal status in the first 11 months of President Trump’s presidency. The staggering number includes people who applied for and were accepted to come to the country on a wide variety of immigration parole, visa, asylum and temporary protected status programs. That number exceeds Philadelphia’s entire population.

This is the largest effort to take away deportation protections for migrants who are in the country legally. Immigration advocates say it’s very likely an undercount.

“These were legal pathways. People did the thing the government asked them to do, and this government went and preemptively revoked that status,” said Todd Schulte, president of FWD.us, an immigration advocacy organization that has been tracking the efforts to delegalize immigrants.

Yeah, they falsely claimed asylum. Here on TEMPORARY status. Visa holders calling for the eradication of Israel and Jews.

Many of the immigrants who lost legal status have been in the country for years. Now, they fear what could happen should their immigration cases not process quickly enough. The administration has encouraged immigrants to leave the country as it gets rid of their legal authorization.

Mostly illegals for whom previous admins unlawfully gave them parole, or just ignored them being here illegally.

“The Trump administration has done more to limit migration, both illegal and legal, than any administration in history,” Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said during a press conference this fall. She touted all the ways the administration has cut off these avenues, including by pausing and revoking visas.

“Having a visa in the United States is not a right. It is a privilege and the secretary of state — if you are deemed contrary to our country’s foreign national interests — has the right to revoke that privilege.”

Exactly, so, keep crying, NPR

Read: Bummer: “Immigrants” Have Fewer Legal Options To Not Get Repatriated »

President Of Ireland Calls For Unity For Christmas

There is, of a course, a climate scam component, but, this is really about telling those citizens of Ireland to simply accept the people from 3rd world shitholes and jihadis who are erasing Irish culture

President Connolly calls for kindness in first Christmas message

President of Ireland Catherine Connolly has used her first Christmas message to encourage people to reflect “on the values that truly matter: kindness, tolerance, respect for each other’s differences, and to reflect on how we may nurture our shared humanity”.

In an address delivered in both Irish and English, the President said Christmas was a time of goodwill and hope, as well as an opportunity to look ahead to a new year filled with possibility.

Referring to the winter solstice, she noted that while this period marks the darkest days of the year, it also signals the gradual return of light – a reminder, she said, that better days lie ahead even in difficult times.

“Christmas invites us to reflect on the values that truly matter; kindness, tolerance, respect for each other’s differences, and to reflect on how we may nurture our shared humanity,” she said.

She said her thoughts were with the millions of people around the world affected by climate change, war, conflict and displacement, with particular mention of those suffering in Palestine, Ukraine and Sudan.

How about her thoughts being with the citizens of Ireland who have to deal with the immigrants/refugees/fake asylum seekers, who rape Irish lasses, create no go zones and crime, who fly their own flags and want the Irish flags taken down? Do they count? How about all the money being spent to support the invaders?

Read: President Of Ireland Calls For Unity For Christmas »

If All You See…

…is a horrible gas powered fireplace, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is bluebird of bitterness, with a post on holiday chuckles.

Read: If All You See… »

Bummer: Trump Admin Halts 5 Offshore Wind Turbine Projects

I wonder how much money the Congress critters who are tweeting about this have invested and are making off the projects, like

From the link

The Trump administration on Monday said it would pause leases for five wind farms under construction off the East Coast, essentially gutting the country’s nascent offshore wind industry in a sharp escalation of President Trump’s crusade against the renewable energy source.

The decision injected uncertainty into $25 billion worth of projects that were collectively expected to power more than 2.5 million homes and businesses across the Eastern United States, according to Turn Forward, an offshore wind advocacy group. The five wind farms were projected together to create about 10,000 jobs.

It left intact just two operational wind farms in U.S. coastal waters — one small project off Rhode Island that has been complete since 2016 and a larger project off New York that has been fully operational since 2023.

The five wind farms targeted on Monday had all obtained leases from the Biden administration. But citing unspecified national security concerns, the Trump administration said it would freeze those leases, effectively blocking construction or operations and jeopardizing billions of dollars that have already been invested.

I love the video of the turbines, which were not turning, meaning they provide no power.

Anyhow, every single one of these projects has lots people in those areas who were dead set against the projects, from fisherman to people who live there to people who are going to have to deal with the unreliable, undependable, and more expensive electricity. Turbines which can easily be damaged by enemies of the U.S. They don’t even have to totally destroy them to disable them. Seems like a weak excuse using “national security,”, though, if I’m being honest. Really, they should just let the projects go forward, and without federal money, let the residents in these Dem voting states deal with the fallout.

Read: Bummer: Trump Admin Halts 5 Offshore Wind Turbine Projects »

Your Fault: Christmas Warmth Totally Caused By Climate Doom

I’ve asked, begged you to give up your fossil fueled vehicles, but, no

Climate Matters: Christmas warmth would be “impossible” without climate change

An incoming Christmas heat wave would be “virtually impossible” without the effects of a changing climate, according to meteorologists at the nonprofit Climate Central.

“Yeah, this probably likely would have been a warmer-than-average Christmas regardless. But the level that we’re at, that’s 30 degrees above average for some of us in Missouri, those temperatures would have been almost impossible without climate change,” says Shel Winkley, a meteorologist at Climate Central.

Missouri will be feeling some of the worst impacts from climate change throughout this event, with Climate Central’s Climate Shift Index (CSI) values maxing out at a level 5 in parts of northern Missouri on Christmas Day.

“When you get to a CSI level of four, it means four times more likely. Those temperatures would not be impossible, but rare without climate change.” Winkley explains, “When you get the max number of CSI of five, so five times more likely, that’s where that temperature that you’re experiencing again, not completely impossible, but we know that a temperature like that in Missouri at the end of December, at the holidays would be virtually impossible without an influence of climate change.”

Uh huh

Read: Your Fault: Christmas Warmth Totally Caused By Climate Doom »

Sob: American Immigration Law Costing Illegals Over The Holidays

There’s a very simple for all this

Holidays without my husband: What US immigration policy costs families

On any normal Thanksgiving, I would have made sure Nef had pecan pie after the big meal. It’s his favorite.

I know Nef loves pecan pie, but I also know he would be just as happy with blueberry or apple. It’s not the flavor that matters, it’s the small gesture of giving my thanks to him for his ability to find contentment and joy in the world.

That’s on any normal Thanksgiving. But this year was not normal.

Nef, short for Neftalí, is originally from Puebla, Mexico. After father died when he was a teenager, throwing the family further into poverty, Nef came to the United States to work and send money home to make sure his family had a chance at survival.

I met Nef in 2008 while he was working in Hell’s Kitchen. He was funny, full of bright light I couldn’t believe was real. All the qualities that, until recently, helped me survive difficult holidays and find hope in the midst of life’s challenges.

We married in 2017, mindful that his legal status was uncertain, but I thought I would be able to protect him legally or advocate for him if he was detained. In reality, I knew there may not be a fix at all in the U.S., even if we filed the right paperwork or “got in the right line.” After several exhausting years of spending money on expensive lawyers and filing fees, what I suspected was confirmed the hard way.

Yeah, and he’s illegally present in the U.S. in contradiction of the law. Things caught up with him, no matter what the family tried and which Democrat elected official they talked to.

This forced us to make a choice that no married couple should have to make: live with the everyday fear and danger of Nef getting caught up in this out-of-control system, or he could return to Mexico, where we could be forced to live apart for at least 10 years until he is allowed to apply for a green card again.

I could not live with myself if he were detained. We would have to take our chances living apart. On Oct 2., Nef left the home we built together, in the only country he has known as an adult and returned to Mexico. I went with him, relieved that he would be safer there with his family than here in the United States.

I returned to the U.S. in body, but my heart and mind linger somewhere in between. That’s why I skipped Thanksgiving this year, my first since we’ve been together, unable to face the holiday and all that it entails without Nef’s support.

She could have gone with, right? Oh, wait, Mexico has some seriously strict immigration laws.

It’s easier for people to understand the grief and loss I feel going into the holiday season, but it’s important to explain the anger I feel, as well. I am furious at what my country has done to me by taking away the one person who has been my safety net, who has been there for me over the past decade and a half in a way no one else has.

Not my problem. Not your problem. This is their problem, yet, she directs her anger at the U.S. But, isn’t willing to live in Mexico.

We text and video chat every day. I am flying to Mexico in the spring to see him and will continue to do so as often as I can afford. We hope that if enough Americans understand this problem and demand a solution, one day Nef and I can be reunited in our home here in New Jersey.

We understand that he intentionally broke U.S. law. So, this is on him. The sob stories no longer work.

Read: Sob: American Immigration Law Costing Illegals Over The Holidays »

Global Boiling Is Shrinking The Kiddies Or Something

Yes, this is a new one. I’ve seen the cult yammer about animals and fish and insects and birds shrinking, but, not this one

Climate change is shrinking children’s height – and humidity is making things worse

Researchers have warned of the unexpected consequences of extremely hot, humid conditions during pregnancy.

Millions of children risk experiencing stunted growth if heat-trapping emissions continue to bake the planet.

“If”. What of all the tall people born in hot, humid places? Hawaiians aren’t Hobbits, nor in places like Micronesia, etc.

The new report, published in Science Advances, found that humidity worsens the outcome of extreme heat compared to high temperatures alone. This is mainly because humans cool down by sweating, but evaporation slows when the air is humid.

They do know humidity is nothing new, right? It didn’t start during the Industrial Revolution

Researchers analysed the ratio of a child’s height compared to the average for their age, which is commonly used as a chronic health indicator for children under the age of five.

They found that the majority of children who experienced increases in heat and humidity during every trimester before birth would be 13 per cent shorter for their age than expected. In contrast, increases in extreme heat exposure alone translated to a one per cent reduction in height for age.

The study was conducted on pregnant women living in South Asia, which scientists argue could be hit particularly hard by extreme heat in the coming years.

Oh, so, let’s look at 3rd world nations with poor healthcare to start with. It’s all so silly. But, the point of the story is for people to see the headline, maybe first couple lines of the fable, and freak out, Demanding Government Do Something.

Read: Global Boiling Is Shrinking The Kiddies Or Something »

If All You See…

…is an ocean that will soon rise dozens of feet, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Bearing Arms, with a post on hunting in Canada.

Read: If All You See… »

Far Left Democrats Back To Pimping Single Payer

Though, of course, they’re calling it “Medicare For All”

Democrats are united in bashing GOP on Obamacare. Medicare for All could reopen a rift.

Progressives are pushing Medicare for All in some of the Democratic Party’s most competitive Senate primaries next year, threatening the unity the party has found on attacking Republicans over expiring Obamacare subsidies.

In Maine, Graham Platner said he’s making Medicare for All a “core part” of his platform in his race against Gov. Janet Mills, the establishment pick who’s called for a universal health care program. In Illinois, Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton and Rep. Robin Kelly are both championing the concept — and calling out rival Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi for not fully embracing it.

In Minnesota, Medicare for All has emerged as a key distinction between progressive Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan and moderate Rep. Angie Craig, who supports adding a public option to the Affordable Care Act rather than Medicare for All. Flanagan said she “absolutely” expects the policy to define the primary because “it doesn’t matter if I’m in the urban core, the suburbs or greater Minnesota — when I say I’m a supporter of Medicare for All, the room erupts.”

And it’s become a flashpoint in Michigan, where physician Abdul El-Sayed, who wrote a book called Medicare for All: A Citizen’s Guide, is using his signature issue to draw a contrast with Rep. Haley Stevens and state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, who favor other approaches.

What they all fail to mention are detailed plans for how it will work and be paid for. They have lots of slogans, ideas on sticky notes, but, remember, it already failed in Vermont. And studies in California showed it would cost double the current state budget.

But some more moderate Democrats worry that progressives’ renewed push for Medicare for All would undermine the party’s recent united front in fighting for an extension of the Obamacare subsidies that are set to expire at the end of the year, leading to a significant spike in insurance costs for millions of Americans. Their effort initially failed in the Senate, but with the help of four vulnerable Republicans who crossed party lines this week, Democrats have now secured a House vote on an extension in January.

“We have a singular message, which is: ‘Don’t let these tax credits go.’ We have Republicans on the ropes,” said a national Democratic strategist who works on Senate races and was granted anonymity to speak candidly. “I don’t think introducing ‘we need MFA’ is the right strategy right now. I think it would be unhelpful.”

Also remember, the original idea of Obamacare was that it would be a bridge towards single payer, and most experts thought it would tank insurance companies. But, instead, Democrats gave gobs of taxpayer money directly to those health insurance companies when they started dropping out of the Obamacare exchanges and the cost of premiums was going up an average of 10% per year, and those same companies started giving money to Democrats for elections

Centrists have long dismissed Medicare for All as both a policy pipedream and political albatross for their party — a rallying cry for the left that serves as catnip for Republican admakers looking to broad brush Democrats as socialists. They argue that surveys often fail to present voters with the full picture of how Medicare for All would work, and therefore fail to capture its electoral toxicity.

Ask the question “do you really, truly want the federal government controlling your health care?” and see what the answers are.

Platner has been extolling Medicare for All from the start of his campaign and said it gets the “most raucous” response at his events across Maine, where a recent Pan Atlantic Research poll found 63 percent support for the system (and Platner trailing Mills by 10 points).

Is Politico really using the guy who got a Nazi symbol tattooed on his chest?

And in Michigan, El-Sayed has slammed McMorrow’s call for universal health care with a public option as “incoherent” and ill-informed as the two compete for the same slice of progressive voters. McMorrow has knocked the idea of a single-payer system run by President Donald Trump and his controversial health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. And she’s promoted a public option so people who like their private insurance can keep it. Stevens’ campaign says she supports strengthening Obamacare, including through a public option, without endorsing Medicare for All.

I mean, there’s some TDS in there, but, yeah, what happens when the other party is in charge?

Single payer barely works in countries that have it, ones with a lot fewer citizens, with rich folks bolting to the U.S. for care when the governments give them a walking cane instead of a hip replacement. Where procedures, even things like MRIs, can take a year or more. Sounds great, right? Anyhow, you Dems fight it out.

Read: Far Left Democrats Back To Pimping Single Payer »

Pirate's Cove