Surprise: Hillary’s In-secure Server Held US Government’s Most Secretive Programs

If this was you or me, we’d already be in jail under indictment

(Fox News)  Hillary Clinton’s emails on her unsecured, homebrew server contained intelligence from the U.S. government’s most secretive and highly classified programs, according to an unclassified letter from a top inspector general to senior lawmakers.

Fox News exclusively obtained the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified “several dozen” additional classified emails — including specific intelligence known as “special access programs” (SAP).

That indicates a level of classification beyond even “top secret,” the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings even more scrutiny to the presidential candidate’s handling of the government’s closely held secrets.

Hillary may well make it through the nomination process and come out ahead of Sanders and O’Malley, with nary a mention of her issues in any debates, and with the MSM willing to forgo asking her tough questions, but, what happens when she has to deal with the Republican candidate, and all the reset of the GOP, asking questions? It won’t work well with the MSM attempting to ignore the issue, particularly when, not if, it comes up during one or more debates.

That’s all assuming she isn’t indicted prior

Intelligence from a “special access program,” or SAP, is even more sensitive than that designated as “top secret” – as were two emails identified last summer in a random sample pulled from Clinton’s private server she used as secretary of state. Access to a SAP is restricted to those with a “need-to-know” because exposure of the intelligence would likely reveal the source, putting a method of intelligence collection — or a human asset — at risk. Currently, some 1,340 emails designated “classified” have been found on Clinton’s server, though the Democratic presidential candidate insists the information was not classified at the time.

Having SAP information on that server would see the rest of us serving long prison sentences, and, as the article goes on to say in a quote “There is absolutely no way that one could not recognize SAP material.”

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

RSS feed

You can login to comment with:

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

26 Comments

Comment by john
2016-01-19 16:49:28

Teach
She has already answered 11 straight hours of questioning by the House after a multi million dollar investigation
That Special Committee was the longest sitting and most expensive Special in HISTORY
Teach you have already cried Wolf!….. Wolf!…… before on this one

 
Comment by Dana
2016-01-19 17:18:06

Mr Teach, it wouldn’t matter if her server was not only found to have the most secret information on it, and it had been tapped by the Kremlin, and we found the “stand down” from the rescue orders concerning Benghazi, John and the rest of the left would vote for her anyway. They really don’t give a f(ornicate) as to whether Mrs Clinton is good or honest or healthy, simply that she’s a Democrat and has a vagina.

 
Comment by john
2016-01-19 17:37:06

Dana it sounds a bit there like you are anti vagina
but in rebuttal

I believe that Dana and the rest of the right will vote for any candidate that is Republican and has a penis

 
Comment by drowningpuppies
2016-01-19 18:57:42

Why hell, China knows more about the vag hag’s server than the FBI.
I mean the FBI has ONLY 150 agents investigating.

 
Comment by JGlanton
2016-01-19 19:12:27

Also today we learned a Benghazi rescue team was in the air and on the way to the rescue when they were turned back – likely by Obama because he had the authority.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/01/15/report-u-s-rescue-team-was-on-its-way-to-benghazi-but-was-turned-back/

 
Comment by JGlanton
2016-01-19 19:24:39

Insane. Intel community’s IG had to up his clearance just to view info on Clinton server. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hillary-clinton-emails-contained-info-above-top-secret-ig-n499886

 
Comment by david7134
2016-01-19 19:39:22

Just keep repeating to anyone that will listen:
Clinton lied, four men died.

It worked for old LBJ.

Note John’s comment, it is an example of the stupidity of 50% of the US, he truly believes that the witch did not incriminate herself when she clearly stated that she lied and fabricated.

 
Comment by Jeffery
2016-01-19 20:00:25

It’s no wonder the only people left in the Repubican party are white males.

Once again we have the smoking gun that will put HRC in prison!

If this was you or me, we’d already be in jail under indictment

What would the charges be?

 
Comment by drowningpuppies
2016-01-19 20:55:28

According to some who have followed the case closely, Mrs. Clinton could be charged with breaking several laws, including willfully transmitting or retaining Top Secret material using a private server, unauthorized removal of classified information from government control or storing such information in an unauthorized location, lying to Congress, destruction of government property (wiping the server), lying under oath to a judge about having given the government all her emails or obstruction of justice.

 
Comment by Jeffery
2016-01-19 21:06:00

According to some who have followed the case closely

LOL

Is this your own writing or did you copy and paste this second hand “information”? If so, from where?

 
Comment by drowningpuppies
2016-01-19 21:12:07

You asked, little one.
Look it up for yourself.

 
Comment by Jeffery
2016-01-19 21:12:30

Intel community’s IG had to up his clearance just to view info on Clinton server.

Well, she was Secretary of State. Is it surprising that her clearance is higher than some IG?

 
Comment by William Teach
2016-01-19 21:23:55

She has already answered 11 straight hours of questioning by the House after a multi million dollar investigation

Yet, information just keeps coming out, John. Looks like she has more questioning coming her way. And, face it, if she had an R next to her name, you’d be calling for a special prosecutor.

Well, she was Secretary of State. Is it surprising that her clearance is higher than some IG?

No, Jeff, what’s surprising is that Hillary had this material on a private server with crap security in VIOLATION of federal law. Others have been prosecuted for much less.

 
Comment by Jeffery
2016-01-19 21:26:39

Poor little puppysucker,

You plagiarized TARP millionaire Liz Peek’s secondhand opinion. LOL. Now that’s journalism – Some who follow the case… LOL

Go and suck no more.

 
Comment by drowningpuppies
2016-01-19 21:50:23

As usual you’re wrong again, little one.
Keep trying, okay?

 
Comment by Jeffery
2016-01-19 21:55:06

I thought I told you to suck no more, little puppysucker! You just won’t listen.

You’re lying of course. But it’s what conservatives always do.

Now, go. and. suck. no. more.

 
Comment by drowningpuppies
2016-01-19 21:59:05

Keep trying, little one.

 
Comment by Jeffery
2016-01-19 22:37:24

Keep sucking, little one.

 
Comment by drowningpuppies
2016-01-19 22:46:20

Hide the grandkids, Ma, the little one is getting
hot and bothered.

 
Comment by drowningpuppies
2016-01-19 22:53:40

One email they’ll never recover;

-Quick, send reinforcements to Benghazi stat!

-Hill

 
Comment by Jeffery
2016-01-19 23:39:21

I see you still keep your boyfriend’s picture as an avatar. He looks satisfied.

 
Comment by drowningpuppies
2016-01-20 00:04:23

Well aren’t you a precious little thing.
Through with the grandkids yet?

 
Comment by Dana
2016-01-20 07:47:46

John guessed wrong:

Dana it sounds a bit there like you are anti vagina but in rebuttal

I believe that Dana and the rest of the right will vote for any candidate that is Republican and has a penis

If Donald Trump is the nominee and if it is a foregone conclusion that the Democrat will carry Pennsylvania, I will vote third party.

As for being “anti vagina,” not only am I very pro-vagina, having been married to a real woman for 36 years, eight months and one day, but I have also been supporting the candidacy of Carly Fiorina.

One big difference is that while Hillary Clinton is running to become the first woman president, Mrs Fiorina is a candidate running to become President who just happens to be a woman. Of course, that distinction might be a bit to nuanced for the left.

 
Comment by Dana
2016-01-20 07:50:19

Jeffrey wrote:

It’s no wonder the only people left in the Repubican party are white males.

Yet, amazingly enough, the Republicans normally carry the majority of married white women as well.

 
Comment by Jeffery
2016-01-20 08:01:24

Republican wives do as they’re told.

 
Comment by Dana
2016-01-20 08:47:41

Thing is, the ballot box is secret, so if the good Republican wives wanted to do something different from what their husbands told them, their husbands wouldn’t know. Yet, the exit polls have recently seemed to undercount the Republican vote, not overestimate it.

The answer is clear: conservativism favors the economic arrangements common to marriage, while it’s the free-stuff liberalism which appeals to single women. Unmarried adulthood tends to be a poor economic arrangement. Married women can see how liberal policies take more of their families’ hard-earned income to give to people who are less productive, less hard-working.

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Bad Behavior has blocked 7565 access attempts in the last 7 days.