…is a lake that will disappear and leave ducks homeless, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Maggie’s Farm, with a post saying “don’t do this”
Read: If All You See… »
…is a lake that will disappear and leave ducks homeless, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Maggie’s Farm, with a post saying “don’t do this”
Read: If All You See… »

Happy Sunday! A gorgeous, and rather cool, day in the Once And Future Nation Of America. This pinup is by Bill Randall, with a wee bit of help.
What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets†calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.
Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »
Anyone who has watched or heard Toure knows he is quite the race-baiter and sees almost everything in terms of racism. He continues this at The Washington Post
Black America and the burden of the perfect victim
An information war is being waged in Ferguson, Mo., each salvo meant to shape public perceptions of Michael Brown and Darren Wilson.
Through this war we’ve learned that the 18-year-old Brown had marijuana in his system when he was killed, suggesting he was of poor character, and that police officer Wilson shot Brown six times, a use of force that could seem reckless or excessive. We’ve been told that Brown was a “gentle giant†who would have started attending classes at a technical college this month, but we’ve also seen a grainy convenience-store video in which he does not look gentle. We have seen a video of Wilson receiving an award, looking professional and happy, but we’ve also heard about him cursing at a Ferguson woman who had been maced, weeks before the town began to smolder.
Such snippets and images are efforts to shape public opinion about these men. They could influence St. Louis County Prosecutor Bob McCulloch as he weighs whether to bring charges against Wilson. They could also influence the potential jury pool, showing prejudicial evidence that may not be admissible at trial.
In an information war, the news media is deployed as a weapon, our collective mind becomes a battlefield, and biases are land mines waiting to explode.
Yet, Toure and his network, MSNBC, have been leaders in pushing the memes about racism and Michael Brown being a gentle giant, along with other Liberals. Here’s where it really goes off the rails
I feel confident stating that neither Brown nor Wilson is an angel — because no one is. But that doesn’t matter, because the two men have been reduced to symbols. Information wars suggest that character is destiny and that character is knowable, as if a handful of snapshots or tweets constitute an autopsy of the soul. They are waged in all kinds of legal battles, from civil suits to contract negotiations to public divorces.
But when there’s a black victim involved, the information takes a different and predictable turn: The victim becomes thuggified. This is an easy leap for many minds, given the widespread expectation of black criminality. If you become nervous when you see a young black male approaching on the street, it is not hard to convince you that a kid who was shot was not one of the “good ones,†that he was scary and maybe did something to deserve it. Information wars thrive on America’s empathy gap — the way some people struggle to see any kinship or shared humanity with strangers who don’t look like them.
Reall? Did something to deserve dying because Black? How about if the truth is that Michael Brown attacked a police officer, including punching him in the face? This is all an interesting point of view coming from someone who works at a network which portrays Conservatives and Tea Party members who get in legal trouble as The Worst People Ever (usually right before we learn that the perp was actually someone who has Lefty political leanings and the story silently disappears).
So after 17-year-old Trayvon Martin was killed in Sanford, Fla., on Feb. 26, 2012, people were told that he had been suspended from school, that he had written graffiti, that he had smoked marijuana. As a result, many saw him as a thug — even though many non-thugs have been suspended from school or gotten high, and those are not violent acts. More important, none of that sheds any light on what happened the night George Zimmerman shot him.
Zimmerman was portrayed as a virulent racist, a vigilante, a White guy (despite being Latino), a guy drunk on power. NBC edited the 911 call to paint him as a racist. Toure forgets to say that Martin was suspended three times, once for possibly having marijuana, and makes it seem that the graffiti is separate from the suspensions. He was found to have stolen jewelry, which matched jewelry stolen from a residence a half mile from his school. And, according to the law and the trial, we know Trayvon attacked Zimmerman first. We know from his text messages that he was fighting and thinking about getting a gun. Huh.
With Michael Brown, he had just committed a strong arm robbery. He was walking in the middle of the street (not jaywalking, as some like to portray). The officer asked him and his friend (who also has a criminal record and outstanding warrants) to not walk in the street. Is that “thug” behavior? The first certainly is, and makes no difference whether Black or White or Other.
But it doesn’t matter whether Brown was an angel. He was young and growing and human, and he made mistakes. That’s okay. The real question is not: Was Brown a good kid? The real question is: How are police officers supposed to treat citizens? California Attorney General Kamala Harris, a former prosecutor, has put it well: “Our penal code was not created just to protect Snow White.â€
Yes, he made mistakes. He robbed a convenience store and assaulted and menaced people in the store. He wasn’t a kid. He was a legal adult who had just committed felonies. That’s not “okay”. As far as how are police officers supposed to treat citizens, well, in this case, the officer was apparently asking two idiots to stop walking in the street, for their own safety. According to many witnesses, the officer was attacked. Brown and his partner then ran away, stopped, taunted the officer, then Brown charged the officer.
Toure is correct with the end quote, though. The penal code was also created to protect people, including police officers, who are attacked by citizens.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Read: Toure Has The Real Questions On Ferguson, Black Kids And The Police »
…is super wonderful coffee being wiped out by massive desertification, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Jawa Report, with a post on two deaths, two protests.
Read: If All You See… »
The Hockey Schtick chalks this up as excuse number 38
(UK Guardian) The key to the slowdown in global warming in recent years could lie in the depths of the Atlantic and Southern Oceans where excess heat is being stored – not the Pacific Ocean as has previously been suggested, according to new research.
But the finding suggests that a naturally occurring ocean cycle burying the heat will flip in around 15 years’ time, causing global temperature rises to accelerate again. (snip)
The new study, published in the journal Science on Thursday, concludes that the Pacific alone cannot explain the warming “hiatus†and that much of the heat being trapped by greenhouse gases at record levels in the atmosphere is being sunk hundreds of metres down in the Atlantic and Southern Oceans.
Ka-Kit Tung, author of the paper and University of Washington professor, said: “The finding is a surprise, since the current theories had pointed to the Pacific Ocean as the culprit for hiding heat. But the data are quite convincing and they show otherwise.â€
“We are not downplaying the role of the Pacific. They are both going on [the oceans having an effect on temperatures]; one is short term [the Pacific], one is long term [the Atlantic],†he told the Guardian.
Dr. Judith Curry has a long post on this, and finds the explanations somewhat compelling, but not convincing. She notices something interesting in the press release (first two paragraphs from PR, last from Dr. Curry)
Rapid warming in the last three decades of the 20th century, they found, was roughly half due to global warming and half to the natural Atlantic Ocean cycle that kept more heat near the surface.
The authors dug up historical data to show that the cooling in the three decades between 1945 to 1975 – which caused people to worry about the start of an Ice Age – was during a cooling phase. (It was thought to be caused by air pollution.)
I searched the paper and did not find any discussion/arguments directly related to these. That said, these statements certainly fit in with my own understanding, and seem heretical to the IPCC consensus attribution statement. I am wondering why these statements, and supporting analyses, did not appear in the journal article (I can certainly imagine several reasons).
Here’s another goody from the PR
“Every week there’s a new explanation of the hiatus,†said corresponding author Ka-Kit Tung, a UW professor of applied mathematics and adjunct faculty member in atmospheric sciences. “Many of the earlier papers had necessarily focused on symptoms at the surface of the Earth, where we see many different and related phenomena. We looked at observations in the ocean to try to find the underlying cause.â€
Yup, there pretty much is a new excuse on a constant basis. They’ve been coming quicker and quicker as the Pause continues. Interestingly, most seem to Blame Nature for the Pause, and Blame Mankind for the warming. Back to The Guardian
But the finding suggests that a naturally occurring ocean cycle burying the heat will flip in around 15 years’ time, causing global temperature rises to accelerate again.
So, when it flips, will they Blame Mankind again?
Read: New Pause Excuse: Heat Hiding In Atlantic, Not Pacific »
And if you refuse to stand up for the right of women to go topless in public, you’re probably part of the patriarchy and a misogynist and hate womyn
(The Blaze) It seems some women are planning to let it all hang out in a couple of Texas towns on Sunday.
Their argument: Breasts are less dangerous than guns.
“The 2nd amendment is very popular in TX ‘the right to bear arms’ to protect one’s family is one argument but baring breasts is illegal also ‘to protect the children,’†the group, GoTopless, wrote in a Facebook post. “Texas women, affirm your right to bare your breasts!!! If breasts are more dangerous to children than weapons, then something is truly wrong with our society!â€
One person at the Facebook post link notes “Go topless but with an AR”. Hey, sounds good!
(My San Antonio) GoTopless, a Las Vegas-based organization advocating for “women’s right to go topless in public,” is hosting the event, which is scheduled to take off at 1 p.m. on Sunday at Navarro and St. Mary’s. The group is hosting more than 50 similar rallies around the world on Sunday, including on 6th and Congress in Austin, according to its website.
A San Antonio ordinance that forbids exposure of “female breast(s)” may cause a problem for demonstrators.
So, mostly outside agitators. A few choice comments
Hey, menfolk would love for women to go around topless all the time. Well, mostly. With more proof of Yikes!!!!! at the My San Antonio link.
Read: Go Topless Coming To San Antonio, Compares Itself To Gun Rights »
…is coffee that is under threat from too much dry and wet, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Raised On Hoecakes, with a post noting that laws and rules aren’t for the people who wrote them.
Read: If All You See… »
In These Times’ Ethan Corey and Jessica Corbett are really amped about Naomi Klein’s hyper-alarmist book on “climate change” and offer 5 crucial lessons. Let’s look at two which underscore what I and others have noticed about the Warmist movement (red bold by me)
1. Band-Aid solutions don’t work.
“Only mass social movements can save us now. Because we know where the current system, left unchecked, is headed.â€
Much of the conversation surrounding climate change focuses on what Klein dismisses as “Band-Aid solutionsâ€: profit-friendly fixes like whizz-bang technological innovations, cap-and-trade schemes and supposedly “clean†alternatives like natural gas. To Klein, such strategies are too little, too late. In her drawn-out critique of corporate involvement in climate change prevention, she demonstrates how profitable “solutions†put forward by many think-tanks (and their corporate backers) actually end up making the problem worse. For instance, Klein argues that carbon trading programs create perverse incentives, allowing manufacturers to produce more harmful greenhouse gases, just to be paid to reduce them. In the process, carbon trading schemes have helped corporations make billions—allowing them to directly profit off the degradation of the planet. Instead, Klein argues, we need to break free of market fundamentalism and implement long-term planning, strict regulation of business, more taxation, more government spending and reversals of privatization to return key infrastructure to public control.
5. Confronting climate change is an opportunity to address other social, economic and political issues.
“When climate change deniers claim that global warming is a plot to redistribute wealth, it’s not (only) because they are paranoid. It’s also because they are paying attention.†(WT-note: I have highlighted this passage from Klein’s book)
In The Shock Doctrine, Klein explained how corporations have exploited crises around the world for profit. In This Changes Everything, she argues that the climate change crisis can serve as a wake-up call for widespread democratic action. For instance, when a 2007 tornado destroyed most of Greensburg, Kansas, the town rejected top-down approaches to recovery in favor of community-based rebuilding efforts that increased democratic participation and created new, environmentally-friendly public buildings. Today, Greensburg is one of the greenest towns in the United States. To Klein, this example illustrates how people can use climate change to come together to build a greener society. It also can, and indeed must, spur a radical transformation of our economy: less consumption, less international trade (part of relocalizing our economies) and less private investment, and a lot more government spending to create the infrastructure we need for a green economy. “Implicit in all of this,†Klein writes, “is a great deal more redistribution, so that more of us can live comfortably within the planet’s capacity.â€
This is exactly what we’ve been talking about: “climate change” is being used as a means to push far left Progressive (nice fascist) Big Government policies. Control of economies, control of people, restrictions on business, restrictions on private investment, government doing it all, taxing people out the ying yang, government owning businesses (particularly infrastructure and energy, which gives Government control over your life). Look back at that quote from Klein again
“When climate change deniers claim that global warming is a plot to redistribute wealth, it’s not (only) because they are paranoid. It’s also because they are paying attention.â€
We are paying attention. To bad the average brain dead Liberal isn’t. They might see the reality, and understand that they will not be immune to the fascist tendencies of their Warmist leaders.
Read: Crucial Lessons From Naomi Klein’s “Climate Change” Book For Warmists »