…is a lovely lake that will soon boil from too much CO2, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jihad Watch, with a post on Islamists demanding law enforcement retraining
Read: If All You See… »
…is a lovely lake that will soon boil from too much CO2, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jihad Watch, with a post on Islamists demanding law enforcement retraining
Read: If All You See… »
Monday we learned that the Washington Post Editorial Board has become a group of climate activists. Today, they say that America can’t wait
FOR MORE than a century, scientists have understood the basic physics of the greenhouse effect. For decades, they’ve realized humans can affect the climate by burning coal, oil and gas. But the country’s leaders remain divided on the need to curb greenhouse emissions, let alone how to do it.
Among mainstream scientists, this paralysis is mind-boggling.
There is now no doubt that the world is warming.
Not for the last 17 years and 10 months

In fact, many of the same “climate scientists” are now talking about the pause lasting another 10-15 years. One wonders, though, why the WPEB isn’t calling for the Washington Post to stop using fossil fuels to deliver their papers and power their office building.
The most reasonable climate skeptics accept these findings but point to two areas of continuing uncertainty. First, scientists are unsure precisely how much the Earth will heat up in response to a given increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations — the climate’s sensitivity to carbon. The experts have offered a range of possibilities. Second, it is hard to predict exactly what a given increase in global temperature will do to human society.
In fact, there are three knew studies that show that CO2 sensitivity is very low. As far as temperature rise, human society did very well during the previous Holocene warm periods, many of which were much warmer, while doing worse during the cool periods.
Waiting to deal with carbon emissions until the effects are clearer or technology improves is not a wise strategy. The emissions humans put into the atmosphere now will affect the climate in the middle of the century and onward. Technological change, meanwhile, could make a future transition away from fossil fuels cheap — or it might not, leaving the world with a terrible choice between sharply reducing emissions at huge cost or suffering through the effects of unabated warming.
Lead the way, WP: tell us how each of you on the Editorial Board has given up usage of fossil fuels.
Read: Washington Post: American Can’t Wait While World Warms Or Something »
That’s what USA Today is discussing
Burger King is ruling a larger fast-food kingdom — and having to defend its move on social media.
The U.S.-based restaurant chain made it official Tuesday announcing that it agreed to merge with the Canada-based Tim Hortons restaurant chain. The deal, valued at about $11 billion, will create the world’s third-largest fast-food company, with about $23 billion in annual sales and more than 18,000 restaurants in 100 countries. (snip)
By midday several thousand comments had flooded Burger King’s Facebook page. On Twitter, #TimHortons was a trending topic with #BoycottBurgerKing and similar tweets numbering in the hundreds.
Burger King has “to get out in front” of any possible public boycott. “All of a sudden people on my Twitter and Facebook feeds are saying ‘Boycott Burger King,’ but don’t boycott (them) because these are small businesses that need the revenue, and Burger King is going to pay U.S. tax on those. They can’t shift those dollars out of the country.”
Regardless, Burger King may have a public affairs brouhaha cooking. Several members of Congress, including Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., decried Burger King’s Canadian business move. In recent months, as more companies have used inversions, President Obama and Congress have publicly criticized the moves because they cut into U.S. tax revenue.
At the end of the day, will they really pay a price? No. You might get a few hardcore leftist wankers who will refuse to go there for a few months, but, this whole thing will be forgotten within a week. And, really
Tax and business planning attorney Paul Gilman of Chicago-based law firm Aronberg Goldgehn Davis & Garmisa expects that Burger King’s U.S. tax rate won’t change much “because they derive most of their income from franchisees, and (those in the U.S.) are still going to be subject to tax,” he said.
That’s right, most are franchises, so any boycott won’t hurt the company. Furthermore, this is not a full inversion, as BK will still keep a corporate office in the US. The hysteria is overblown, and what this really did was create a bigger company that allows for more growth for both BK and Tim Hortons, in the US, Canada, and internationally.
But, hey, if Lefties do not like it, perhaps they should push to make the US more competitive for the corporate tax rate.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Read: Will Burger King Pay A Price For Corporate Inversion? »
Otherwise known as a sex change operation
(Breitbart) Transgender Americans seeking gender reassignment surgeries are finding relief through Obamacare, The Daily Beast reported on Monday.
Federal laws banning health insurance discrimination against transgender people, combined with Obamacare’s ban on denying coverage for those with pre-existing conditions, have paved a path for transgender patients who wish to make the transition from one gender to another.
Oh, good, Americans will pay more for their health insurance so a tiny fraction of the population can get some parts they were born with snipped and/or added. As The Lonely Conservative notes “In case you’re wondering why health insurance is so expensive, it’s because of all of the coverage mandates dictated by the government.”
Read: Good Grief: Ocare To Pay For “Gender Reassignment” Surgery »
I’m putting this in a separate post, since doing an update to this mornings will mess up the Twitter links
(USA Today) The U.S.-based restaurant chain made it official Tuesday announcing that it agreed to merge with the Canada-based Tim Hortons restaurant chain. The deal, worth about $11 billion, will create the world’s third largest quick service restaurant company with about $23 billion in sales and more than 18,000 restaurants in 100 countries.
So, here’s a question for this who hate this: do you shop around for the best deal? If you can save 20% on something, do you? If that car you’re looking at costs $17k at one dealer and $15k at another, exactly the same, where do you buy it?
I hate it, but it is an economic reality. What do we do? Force the lower price dealer to raise their price? Nope. We get Congress to lower the tax rate, incentivize companies to do business with a USA based address.
Read: Burger King-Tim Horton’s Deal Is Apparently A Done Deal »
…is a wonderful lake that will either flood or dry up from too much CO2, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Adrienne’s Corner, with a post that proves she is not a coward on race, as AG Eric Holder terms it.
Read: If All You See… »
Yet. Here’s Longboat Key News’ Tom Burgum
At least we don’t sacrifice virgins anymore
It was a belief in some ancient cultures temperature could be altered, draughts ended, the rise of oceans halted, merely by throwing a couple luckless virgins into a volcano. Some would think this makes the Incas and Mayans appear misogynistic but, it’s much more likely they didn’t think the gods were much interested in young boys. As I said, it was an ancient culture.
Before you smirk in condescension because these illiterate savages were not conversant with such natural phenomena as the Pacific decadal oscillation, you might look at today’s human folly where we in the United States propose to sacrifice a good bit of our economy in hopes of appeasing the global warming gods. Oh yes, there is not much difference in the religious fervor of the global warming, climate change or weather disruption crowd today and the Inca priests who thought their pathetic and cruel activities could influence the climate.
You have to look no further than the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) new proposed rules which will, according to the United States Chamber of Commerce, cost the American economy $51 billion, as well as 224,000 jobs, every year through 2030. The EPA has much lower estimates but the Government Accountability Office found that the EPA was using a study outdated by 20 years and even when new only took into account four industrial sectors.
According to a study by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), “The United States is already facing the loss of 60 gigawatts of power over the next three years, the result of older coal plants being forced to shut down because they cannot comply with the EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxic Standards enacted in 2012.â€
Make sure to read the rest. And ask Warmists what they themselves are personally sacrificing.
Read: Fortunately, We Aren’t Sacrificing Virgins To The Climate Gods »