Obviously he failed to understand the SCOTUS ruling in Trump v CASA and what they said on nationwide injunctions
Judge blocks Trump administration from arresting immigrants at courts
A federal judge in California issued a nationwide injunction against multiple Trump administration policies, among them one that allowed arrests at immigration courts and another that eliminated the cap on the amount of time an individual arrested for an alleged immigration violation can be detained.
U.S. District Judge P. Casey Pitts in the Northern District of California ruled in a 71-page opinion Tuesday that the policies were arbitrary and violated the Administrative Procedure Act. He said that attorneys for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Executive Office for Immigration Review “failed to provide reasoned explanations for their actions.”
The practice of making arrests at immigration courts began during the Trump administration and enabled federal law enforcement agents to take into custody individuals who were appearing before immigration judges.
There was no argument that Pitts would accept, because he’s an activist. Regardless, the practice has been around a long time, because, get this, illegals tend to be disarmed and in a controlled environment, making it safer to detain them.
Pitts said that “ICE is not arresting individuals who appear for criminal or civil violations ‘unrelated’ to the arrest but instead arresting noncitizens based on the very immigration offenses for which the noncitizens are appearing in immigration court.”
You mean they are in violation of federal immigration laws? Weird. This ruling should be struck down pretty quick, and, the Trump admin can ignore it outside the Northern District of California, based on the CASA ruling. Like this
DC Circuit restores Trump’s expedited deportation policy
A D.C. Circuit panel on Tuesday reversed a federal judge’s order blocking the Trump administration from expanding expedited removal procedures to immigrants who have been in the country under two years.
In a 2-1 decision, the appeals court determined that the Department of Homeland Security’s revival of an identical 2019 policy, which allows the department to exercise its removal power to the “maximum extent allowed by Congress,” does not violate immigrants’ due process.
See, there are these things called Law passed by the Legislative Branch that allow these things to occur.
Oh, and here’s another wacko judge
As a sidebar, MAGA talks about impeaching these rogue judges, because that’s the only way it stops, but, it’s a waste of time because Senate Democrats will never vote for this.
Maybe we should just let the liberal judges and Democrats continue poisoning those people on government food assistance. Shorter life spans may reduce welfare roles. And fat people have a harder time outrunning the police.
The increasingly worried, namecalling Wacko Teach, wants to arrest immigrants in courthouses as they attend court hearings!! How stupid has Wacko Teach become??
He wants immigrants to avoid interacting with the legal system! The irony is that immigrants going to court are WORKING within the system, but ICE have their Steve Miller quotas!
We get it. ICE agents are lazy, overweight cowards who prefer snatching children and women, and shooting American citizens who protest their actions. So, sure, hang out at the courthouses and grab anyone who looks Hispanic. Eazy peazy.
Said Judge Pitts: “For 80 years, Congress has commanded federal agencies to think before they act,” wrote Pitts, referring to the Administrative Procedure Act, a 1946 law that requires federal agencies to justify its actions. That law, he wrote, “does not require an agency to make the choice that a reviewing court might deem preferable. But it demands that an agency at least provide sound reasons for following its chosen course.”