Because eventually the reality of economics intrudes
Rachel Marsden: Top climate change salesmen meet budget reality
Remember back in grade school when the kids who were so far ahead of everyone else in their classwork were allowed to indulge in little time-wasters, like blowing blobs of watery paint across paper through a straw until they passed out? That’s exactly what the West has been doing for the past few decades with their climate- change side quests. But now that they’re flunking economics, the fun is over.
I once did so many side quests when playing the Elder Scrolls Of Morrowind that I defeated the main bad guy at the end with no fuss. I was surprised I won so easily. I waste a lot of time at work doing nothing because I’m done with follow ups and waiting for a customer. But, when I have a customer I have no time for Twitter and blogs and reading my book
The floodgates to common sense have busted open, testing political natural selection. Take Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who when faced with a choice between his own political survival or persisting with the same “net zero” policies as the “UN-backed Net-Zero Banking Alliance” that he founded and championed in pre-political life — before all banks ditched it, as the Canadian media reported last year. Guess which path he now favors as he finally rushes to build pipelines so Canada can realize its potential as an energy superpower? Still, he’s stuck explaining to at least one of the true believers, now citing environmental impact in ditching Carney’s Liberal Party, that “things change.”
But not nearly fast enough, apparently. Why do nations need to be in dire straits and faced with the threat of recession before the establishment stops getting high on its own emissions?
Another example is former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who’s now saying that it would be lunacy for the governing Labour Party, which he once headed, to stay on the path to legally binding “net zero” — that is, the notion that a country can somehow emit zero carbon while also not reverting back to the Stone Age. Blair now says that such policies are “doomed to fail,” according to the BBC.
The Mackerel of Reality eventually smacks the leaders of 1st world nations in the face, that they no longer have the luxury of playing with in the cult pool. That they have to get back to their homework.
Mainly because citizens’ enthusiasm for the government blowing their money has limits. And governments can’t afford to bail everyone out to keep these delusions on life support. Particularly when other countries are ignoring it entirely in favor of economic survival.
And the citizens get tired of more and more authoritarian government telling them what to do. It’s worth reading the whole thing, which ends with
Turns out the only things that were reliably hitting net zero were the national treasuries of Western nations and the public’s patience. Some of its chief salesmen are finally exiting the business. Too bad for those who bought their snake oil wholesale.
Even if we agreed that the current warm period is caused 51%+ by the actions of Mankind, why the need to have the government taking more and more of our money, life choices, and freedom? It’s almost like this isn’t about climate.
One of my curent course here at CUNY is Oceanography(we learn things like what a “Theory” is and why scientists do not “rove” things but only gather evidence. The professor sked my class (about 20) who had seen or heard of the movie An Inconvenient Truth. I was the only one who had watched or heard about it.
The other students had all gone to school in NYC Apparently their science courses are not as woke as some might fear.
And Obama’s beachfront house is 25/35 feet above sea level. So quite safe for 100 years. The sea level is expected to not go up more than 7 feet in the next 100 years.
Teach exactly what personal suffering has the government caused you? Is BIG GOVERNMENT really the cause of your suffering? They have taken too much of your money and now you are unable to buy more things to make you happy?