Unhinged Groomer Florida Teachers React to The Parental Rights Bill

I’m still waiting for any who support teaching all this sexual insanity to kids to explain why

‘Hurtful and insulting’: Florida teachers react to the ‘don’t say gay’ bill

Clinton McCracken, an art teacher in Orange county, Florida, grew up in a small midwest town where he didn’t experience a person out as LGBTQ until he went away to college. He’s concerned Florida’s recent controversial “don’t say gay” bill is dangerous, hateful legislation that poses many risks to LGBTQ youth in the state.

“I wasn’t able to walk to any classroom and see rainbow stickers on the door that says this is a safe place where you can be who you are,” said McCracken. “We have that now. That’s what we’re trying to create for our students. This law, I see as an effort to take away the years that we’ve put in trying to make this a better place for kids so they don’t have to grow up like I grew up, where I thought I was all alone and then I barely made it through high school.”

Why, exactly, is an art teacher getting involved in any of this? Isn’t the job to simply teach art? Why do we need any rainbow stickers? What aboyt for those kids who are straight? Why are they being left out? How about we just leave all that stuff outside of the government funded schools, and just do your job?

The bill, called the Parental Rights Education bill by its Republican authors, prohibits classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity in kindergarten through third grade, as well as any instruction characterized as inappropriate – vague language that has incited concerns the bill will be used to suppress and intimidate mere acknowledgment of the LGBTQ community in public schools.

“Don’t say gay” also grants parents the right to sue for damages and attorney fees if a school district doesn’t resolve their complaint about a child’s education, which essentially forbids discussion of LGBTQ issues or identities. A teacher in St Johns county was reprimanded by their school district after a parent complained about his T-shirt, which said “Protect Trans Kids.”

You know, realistically, it forbids teachers from really talking about anything sexual to kids up to grade 3. Even straight stuff. Because teachers really do not need to discuss anything with young kids. It’s not their job.

“The vagueness of the language in this bill opens an unfortunate door into allowing bigotry to continue,” said Caitlin Pearse, an elementary school music teacher in Hillsborough county, Florida. “What we’re talking about here is the right to be seen and represented in classrooms. We have lots of books in elementary school showing heterosexual couples, they have parent characters that are moms and dads, things like that. We want to be seen the same way that straight couples are seen in media.”

Exactly why does an elementary school music teacher need to be discussing anything sexual with kids of any age?

“This bill, for me, is a sign of pure hatred,” said Javier Gomez, a high school senior at iPrep Academy in Miami, Florida, and president of his school’s Gay-Straight Alliance club. “They’re targeting a demographic that can really benefit from all these teachings about gender identity and sexual orientation, about differences in cultures, and learning about accepting themselves for who they are, because a lot of kids at a very young age know who they are. I knew that I was gay at five years old.”

Bullshit. Kids have zero idea at that age. And, this is stuff for the parents, not unrelated teachers.

“I’m gay too so this hits me doubly hard,” said Jean Eckhoff, a history teacher of middle school and high school students in Live Oak, Florida, for 17 years. “I’m 52 years old, and I’ve never seen anything like this in my lifetime.”

Just teach history. Anything else and that’s outside your bailiwick. And sounds quite a bit look grooming

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

20 Responses to “Unhinged Groomer Florida Teachers React to The Parental Rights Bill”

  1. Elwood P. dOwd says:

    Teach sounds like a groooomer “him”self.

    Teach typed: I’m still waiting for any who support teaching all this sexual insanity to kids to explain why

    I’m still waiting for any who support this attack on Teach-ers to specifically explain what they’re afraid of? Specifically.

    Has anyone actually identified what the Teach-ers suddenly started doing that got Ron duhSantis’ silk panties in a twist? Did the Teach-ers just recently start grooooming the children?

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Well, Rimjob, you should know all about it.
      Grooming that is.

      Bwaha! Lolgfy https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

    • Bill589 says:

      Groomer Elwood: You have supported groomers in the past – which makes your a groomer too.

      • .38 Police Special Elwood P. dOwd says:

        Neither grooomer Bill589 or grooooomerCumBreath are allowed within 1000 ft of a school.

        Why is that you ask? (Hint: Check CaseNet).

  2. Dana says:

    I have said all along that the left’s agenda is about normalizing homosexuality and transgenderism.

    We have lots of books in elementary school showing heterosexual couples, they have parent characters that are moms and dads, things like that. We want to be seen the same way that straight couples are seen in media.”

    That is because heterosexual couples are normal couples! Homosexuals make up a very small percentage of the population — The Centers for Disease Control conducted the National Health Institute Survey in 2013, and found that only 1.6% of the population are homosexual, with another 0.7% bisexual, and another 1.1% either stating that they were ‘something else’ or declining to respond — and an even smaller percentage of parents. Things that far to the end of the spectrum can’t be ‘normalized,’ because they simply are not normal.

    • The catholic but not Catholic Elwood P. dOwd says:

      Mx Dana is confusing the issue. He doesn’t suggest the use of “not normal” in a statistical since, but as a pejorative term. Red hair is not “normal”. Green eyes are not “normal”. Left hand dominance is not “normal”. Albinism is not “normal”. In that context, homosexuality and transgenderism are not “normal”. But what Mx Dana advocates is hatred and discrimination against minorities. Mx Dana is not normal.

      The issue is not acceptance or ‘normalizing’, whatever that is, it’s equal treatment. That’s all. Mx Dana is frightened by gay or trans individuals for some reason, perhaps stemming from his religion. It’s not contagious.

      “The left’s agenda” is equality and freedom. The right’s agenda is hatred and caucasian, christian domination.

  3. MrLiberty says:

    Why are parents willingly handing over their precious children to the unaccountable bureaucrats in the government monopoly day prison system every morning? Government is the greatest evil ever created by man. Why is anyone shocked that this is the kind of thing they would promote? That doesn’t mean anyone has to support its existence, or given them their children to abuse both physically and mentally. HOMESCHOOL, support candidates from the Libertarian and other parties that support an end to ALL government involvement in education, and work to amend your state’s constitution so that government will NEVER again be involved and you can keep your tax dollars. Pretty simple solutions. A 25% loss in kids would collapse the system overnight. Make it happen instead of whining and expecting that the next election or the next law will fix things. The same horrible teachers will be teaching, the same horrible administrators will be administering, and it will all be happening behind closed doors that you are not allowed to open. Show that you love your children and get them OUT!!!!

  4. The catholic but not Catholic Elwood P. dOwd says:

    Should ALL teachers be prohibited of ever talking about their husbands, wives or children?

    Should we ban female teachers having Miss or Mrs before their names?

    If a female teacher talks about her husband is she grooming students to heterosexuality???

    • L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

      More dumbass questions from the groomer QdOwd? How tedious.

      What has their wives, husbands or children have to do with teaching the 3R’s? What you really want is to force people to allow homos fake trans and lezzies to talk about their “wives, husbands and chil’ren” because straight teachers can. Right? So if straights can discuss their families why can’t perverts? Right? How about this answer: Because they’re perverts.

      Why would we ban female teachers from having Miss Or Mrs before their name? We should ban male teachers pretending to be female teachers from doing that because it confuses the chil’ren and because calling a male Miss or Mrs is a big fat fukin lie and the teachers aren’t supposed to be lying to the kids.

      Finally, students aren’t “groomed” toward heterosexuality, it’s natural. You don’t groom a person to eat, drink water, fart or sweat they are as natural as a persons sexuality. If a kid has a dick and balls he’s a boy. Not hard unless you’re a leftist. People have been able to figure that out for tens of thousands of years until radical leftists entered the picture then suddenly one needs to be a biologist to determine a persons sex.

      FJB and his lying perverted minions.

      • Elwood P. dOwd says:

        Mx Lying Grooomer Brandon is sooo full of shit, and just not very smart.

        And now a pervert. He/she wants to check kid’s genitals, saying “If a kid has a dick and balls he’s a boy”. How does this perverted grooomer want to prove that? No doubt, as a current govt official, Lying Grooomer, would love to be in charge of checking kid’s genitals and assigning their “sex”. Should we tattoo an “M” or “F” on their inside forearm once he/she makes his/her determination? Pervert.

        Fascist wingers like Lying Grooomer want to oppress those who don’t think as he/she does.

        F Lying Grooomer and his/her perverted ideas. Pervert.

        No one answered: Is a heterosexual rapist better or worse than a homosexual non-rapist?

        • drowningpuppies says:

          So, Rimjob, is a man who serially assrapes his prepubescent grandson a pedophile or a hebephile or both?

          Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

          • Model 870 P. dOwd says:

            So, Cumbreath, is a 20-something living in his mom’s basement sucking dicks for money a piece of shit? “But, mom, my band is gonna be famous!”

            Bwaha! Lolgf

          • drowningpuppies says:

            But you didn’t answer the question.
            Wonder why.

            Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

    • James Lewis says:

      Dearest Ellwood:

      “If a female teacher talks about her husband is she grooming students to heterosexuality???”

      In all my school days I cannot remember a teacher talking about their spouse.

      Why should they?

      • Elwood P. dOwd says:

        Dearie Jamie:

        We’re not responsible for your memories.

        I did have teachers who talked about their spouses.

        Would you apply the ban widely, even to heterosexuals? Could a teacher be punished for having a picture of their spouse and children on their desk?

        • James Lewis says:

          Dearest Woodie:

          “I did have teachers who talked about their spouses.”

          That your teachers may or may not have used discussions regarding their spouse to groom you is possible.

          That doesn’t mean that they should have.

  5. James Lewis says:

    Dearest Elwood”

    ” Is a heterosexual rapist better or worse than a homosexual non-rapist?

    Like stupid is as stupid does, a rapist is a rapist.

    • Elwood P. dOwd says:

      But is a homosexual non-rapist, a normal, garden variety gay person, as bad as a man who forcibly rapes a teenager?

      We understand you don’t like bringing facts to a meme fight.

      • James Lewis says:

        Dear Woodie:

        You beg the issue.

        ” Is a heterosexual rapist better or worse than a homosexual non-rapist?

        That was the question. And the answer is, “A rapist is a rapist.”

        Just as a gay man is as good as a straight man or a bisexual man given that all else is equal.

        The question is when and if a teacher should discuss sexual/gender issues with children.

        The answer is.


Pirate's Cove