‘Climate Change’ Made Hurricane Season Rainier Or Something

Of course they’re going to say this. When U.S. landfalling tropical systems dried up, the cult switched from saying lots of landfalling systems, like 2005 and 2006, was the new normal to “fewer but wetter.” And, they blame this on you for refusing to give up your money and freedom

Pouring it on: Climate change made 2020 hurricanes rainier

Climate change made the record-smashing deadly 2020 Atlantic hurricane season noticeably wetter, a new study says. And it will likely make this season rainier, too, scientists said.

Human-caused climate change made the entire season — 30 named storms — drop 5% more rain. During the 14 storms that reached hurricane status the rainfall was 8% heavier, according to the study in Tuesday’s Nature Communications.

“It doesn’t sound like a lot, but if you’re near a threshold, a little bit can push you over the top,” said Lawrence Berkeley National Lab climate scientist Michael Wehner, co-author of the paper. “The implication is that that means there was more freshwater flooding and that the damages from freshwater flooding were increased, but by how much would require a more detailed analysis.”

While past studies have predicted climate change would make storms wetter and found individual storms, such as 2017’s Harvey, were in fact wetter because of human-caused climate change, this is the first study to look at an entire season, Wehner said. That’s important because it removes the selection bias of just picking the worst storms, such as Harvey.

It couldn’t possibly be the notion of a typical Holocene warm period being in play, nope. Because it’s a cult. But, without being able to compare the results to previous Holocene warm periods this “revelation” is meaningless.

The researchers used computer simulations — continually updated with real-time observations — to calculate how much water fell during the 30 storms and then compared them to a simulated world with no human caused climate change from the burning of coal, oil and natural gas. The difference is what’s caused by global warming. This scientifically accepted technique came up with the 5% and 8% figures.

When scientists looked at just the three rainiest hours of each storm, climate change amped them up 8% compared to the mythical world without climate change. For the storms that hit hurricane status, 11% more rain fell during the peak rainy time than would have otherwise, the study found.

It’s like saying a Gibson Les Paul sounds and plays better than an Epiphone Les Paul without ever playing or listening to one. Like driving one car is better without driving the comparable ones. Like Bud is better than Coors without trying both. Like saying one brand of allergy medicine is better for you without trying another.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

11 Responses to “‘Climate Change’ Made Hurricane Season Rainier Or Something”

  1. Hairy says:

    Theclimate models are all wrong?????
    Roy Spenser’s current model is within 75% of the other 3 most respected models for temp rise per decade. His have been changing since he announced that in the last 35 years almost all the increase is man made

    • L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

      I can create a model showing all temp increase is due to Trump if I want to. Models are fake. That’s why they use them. You still believe the same people who lied to you about “two weeks to flatten the curve” and “masks stop the Covid” ? You must be a retard.


    • drowningpuppies says:

      Of course Johnnie is lying about Dr. Roy Spencer and the so-called “man made” increase.
      Have another toke and praise Buddha.


      Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  2. L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

    First bus load of illegals from Texas arrives in DC. We need to gather all illegals and when we reach 50 put them on a bus to a lily white leftist blue state town or city. Let’s see how they like it.


    • Two Gun Safes Elwood P. dOwd says:

      By what authority does one round up 50 migrants?

      Anyway, the 2 dozen bussed migrants said, “Gracias por el viaje gratis, me iba de todos modos!”

      They volunteered since they planned to leave TX anyway, LOL. But Gov Abutt will cash his chips come election day, which is his objective anyway.


  3. NOAA Elwood P. dOwd says:

    Here’s what Dr Spencer typed on his blog Mar 3 2022: As a preface, I will admit, given the lack of evidence to the contrary, I still provisionally side with the view that warming has been mostly human-caused.

    Until someone presents to him credible evidence to the contrary, his view is that warming has been mostly human-caused. Spoken like a scientist. He “provisionally” sides with the view that warming is mostly man-made. Contrary data or evidence may shift his position! This makes him your enemy, not unlike Dr Richard Muller at Berkeley.

    If this all sounds familiar it’s because right wing deniers re-repeat their same lies over and over and over again.

    • Facts Matter says:

      While it is true that Spencer believes that warming is MOSTLY human-caused he also wrote:

      As I continue to see all of the crazy proclamations of how human-caused climate change is disrupting lives around the world (e.g., the Feb. 28 release of the IPCC report from Working Group 2, [Pielke Jr. analysis here]), I can’t help but return to the main reason why human causation for recent warming has not been convincingly established. I have discussed this before, but it is worth repeating.

      The above paragraph proceeds the following WHICH YOU CHERRY PICKED TO MAKE A POINT THAT IS HARDLY SALIENT when it comes to what Spencer really believes.

      As a preface, I will admit, given the lack of evidence to the contrary, I still provisionally side with the view that warming has been mostly human-caused (and this says nothing about whether the level of human-caused warming is in any way alarming).

      You are the epitome, DOWD of the man SCREMING FIRE in a movie theatre while standing outside with an army of lawyers taking pictures and handing out cards for the legal suits to follow.

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Anyone can read his article and find that he did not state that warming is man-made.
      As a matter of fact he actually wrote:

      This website describes evidence from my group’s government-funded research that suggests global warming is mostly natural, and that the climate system is quite insensitive to humanity’s greenhouse gas emissions and aerosol pollution.

      As usual Rimjob sees only what he wants to see then purposely misinterprets the meaning out of context. No surprise there. None.

      Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  4. Jl says:

    Good one-“mostly human caused”, which of course could potentially mean only 51%.

  5. L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

    “Mostly human caused”. That’s gotta be one of the best leftist bullshit lines I’ve ever read. No evidence, no proof, just models but “Mostly human caused”. These people need to be given a 75% personal Climate Tax then let’s see what they believe.

Pirate's Cove