A bit of a follow up to the earlier post on the Earth becoming utterly unable to sustain life, we find
(Esquire)Â But for every doomsday scenario, there’s a more measured take. Climatologist Michael Mann, who said he was interviewed but not quoted for the New York story, shared why he disagreed with some of its points:
Not a big fan of the doomist framing of new @NYMag article ("The Uninhabitable Earth"). My take on it: https://t.co/MYt6ijQ8X1 pic.twitter.com/Eo3Qwe1NDY
— Prof Michael E. Mann (@MichaelEMann) July 10, 2017
(Facebook post is here)
In all fairness, Mann has been a charlatan, relied upon shoddy and manufacture evidence, but, he hasn’t usually be a big fear-mongerer. Say, a 4 on a scale of 10. That article in question is a 10.
They’re all still wrong, but, that’s besides the point for the sake of this post.
![Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49](http://www.opmpros.com/host/1800flowers/images/banners/coupons_3_468x60.jpg)
Mann is still a fraud and in contempt of court for not producing his data as ordered by the judge in his lawsuit against Dr. Tim Ball…
TEACH typed:
Prove it, charlatan!![](https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/msn_laugh.gif)
Fool.
Sorry, I missed one of TEACHs errors in the last comment. Is English his first language? Has he SHOWN his long-form birth certificate?
TEACH typed:
Prove it, charlatan!
![](https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/msn_laugh.gif)